The Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party appears to be in a state of total confusion. This is a party that since at least the days of Woodrow Wilson has tried to change the United States from an individualist nation to a collectivist nation. Said a different way, this is the party that has tried to change the United States from a nation that champions freedom, liberty, and opportunity to a collectivist nation that believes in total conformity and equality or a socialist/communist nation. The Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party has had many nominees for president that were die hard collectivists. Two of the most notable were elected to be president, Franklin Roosevelt and Barack Obama. They never referred to themselves as collectivists openly. In fact, both claimed to champion capitalism while they violated and obliterated the Constitution in their effort to destroy the very thing they claimed to champion.
Today, much to the dismay of the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party, a self-proclaimed Socialist, who has praised the collectivist (Marxist. Communist, socialist, progressive, Democrat – all virtually the same) movement openly and is running on the platform implementing Marxism in much the same way Lenin did in Russia, is the front-runner in their primary. The supposed savior of the party, Joe Biden, is proving once again why he failed miserably every time he was a presidential candidate. It appears the DNC is left with a billionaire who is proving to be even less formidable than Biden. The others, Buttigieg, Warren, and Klobuchar are gone now but will be official the day after super Tuesday.
The DNC and many others are predicting a massive Trump or American, and freedom and liberty victory in November if Sanders is named the nominee. A resounding victory for the President, an extension of support in the Senate, and a return of the house to sanity from the insanity we have had the last two years would be in the best interest of all, including those who identify as Marxist/Progressives (Democrats).
Some reasons the above prediction is very likely:
President Trump is called a liar, a racist, a sexist, and so many other things by the collectivists, and yet the American people see no evidence of these accusations, because they are simply not true.
The collectivists have accused President Trump of colluding with whomever, and just like the constant claims of disaster from climate cooling, warming, change, or whatever that never happened, the claims of collusion are constantly and consistently proven to be false. But, in both instances, the collectivists never stop but instead just become more and more outlandish. This is now viewed as total insanity by the sane American public.
The collectivists have told us consistently that if you do not support the murder of unborn children you can not be a part of their party. Americans are choosing to not support legalized murder and are abandoning the collectivists.
The collectivists are telling Americans that they must abandoned fellow Americans, including veterans, and instead support those who would enter our country illegally. Americans are saying no to this insanity. Reasonable Americans understand that those who enter our country illegally have already shown their disdain for freedom and liberty unlike fellow Americans, including veterans who honor freedom and liberty.
The collectivists are saying they are the party of the working American, yet they are telling us that we must have our taxes raised so that congress and the bureaucracy can waste it and steal it, that we are not smart enough to make our own decisions on how we live our lives and how we think and so government must tell us, and that our health insurance must be provided by government so some bureaucrat has final say in our health care. We Americans still do not trust government, especially with our health and ultimately with our lives.
The collectivists are telling the American people that Americans are not happy. Yet, more Americans are working today than ever before, and much to the dismay of the collectivists Americans do prefer a paycheck to a welfare check. Americans still believe in the American dream and opportunity.
The collectivists have always had at the center or their message pessimism, failure, and problems with the promise that government is the only solution. Americans are still optimists who believe that the individual is the best problem solver and that goverrnment is the best problem creator.
Make no mistake, even if November brings the results the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) and the DNC fear, that result that is truly in the best interest of the American public, the collectivists will not stop with their message of doom and gloom until they have brought about the doom and gloom they so desperately want.
Let that be a warning to all Freedom Loving Americans. We must work diligently to assure that President Trump is re-elected, that the Senate majority is increased, and that the house is returned to sane leadership. Work without ceasing until November 3rd. If we do, we should be able to celebrate November 4th. On November 5th we must become that irate, tireless minority that is keen on setting brushfires of freedom, and never stop so we can bury the evil that is collectivism in the deepest crevices of Hell, where it belongs.
I listened to the debates tonight. There were no flags, no not one. If you listened to the debate you would understand why. These collectivists (Marxist, communists, socialists, progressives, Democrats – all virtually the same) do not believe in the flag, do not honor the flag, and despise everything for which the flag stands.
If you will spend some time reading the Communist Manifesto, you will know everything that was discussed and supported. Just like Marx believed he knew everything there was to know about anything, so did the six on the stage. There was not one Freedom Loving American on the stage.
I did learn something however, but it was not from anything said in the so-called debate. During the debate, I multi-tasked and did a segment on the Andrea Kaye show. She asked me what I thought, and I replied I was listening to Lenin, Trotsky, and Luxemburg all agreeing on the attributes of Marxism but disagreeing on how to implement his program. She commented, correctly I believe, that Americans do not know what I just said because of our lack of an education system and our school system becoming an indoctrination system.
If we are to not go down “The Road to Tyranny” we must take it upon ourselves to educate ourselves not only on the differences between collectivism and individualism, but we must learn why for instance the United States was founded as a Republic and not as a democracy and what it means to be a nation founded on natural rights – entitlements are not rights.
If we are to avoid going down “The Road to Tyranny” all Freedom Loving Americans must learn our history and why our founders did what they did, and who the collectivists (Marxist, communist, socialist, progressive, Democrat – all virtually the same) are and what they believe. You must then become a part of the irate and tireless minority keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of others.
The Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party is once again trying to find a way to keep the nomination from Bernie Sanders. They have changed their rules to allow Bloomberg to be on the debate stage. As Biden has fallen through the clouds, as no other current candidate has the appeal the party believes they desire, and as Bernie Sanders continues to dominate, the DNC becomes more and more afraid of a Bernie Sanders led ticket. What we are quickly learning is that the only positive thing Bloomberg has would be his unlimited dollars.
The ironic aspect of this dilemma for the DNC is that there is very little difference between Bernie Sanders and the other candidates. There is very little difference, if any, between who and what Bernie Sanders is and what the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party is. Bernie Sanders, the other candidates, the DNC, and the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party are all hard core and dedicated collectivists (Marxists, communists, socialists, progressives, Democrats – all virtually the same). They all believe that natural rights are under the total control of the state and not our Creator, they all favor democracy over our Republic, they all favor arbitrary law over rule of law, they all favor unlimited government over limited government, they all favor consolidated power over separation of power, and they all favor a sovereign state with the people as slaves to the state over a sovereign people with the government as the servant.
In addition, this same group favors a central committee controlled economy as opposed to a market controlled economy, they all believe that all people should conform in thought, word, and deed, to the government dictated politically correct thought, word, and deed. They all believe that all assets, including income, belong to the government and it is the right of the government to determine what the individual can have. This is referred to as sharing the wealth. They all believe that the right of the individual to pursue their own happiness must always be limited by the dictates of the government in their demand that the perceived good of the community is always placed above the desires and ambitions of the individual.
Following is how a Bernie Sanders surrogate describe what Sanders supports and what the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party and DNC support.
Speaking at a rally for Sen. Bernie Sanders in Tacoma, Washington, a campaign surrogate dispelled any remaining doubts that Sanders and his supporters ardently support socialism and desire to implement it in the United States.
Kshama Sawant, herself a socialist member on the Seattle City Council, delivered an impassioned speech at the rally, which aimed to criticize "corporate elites" and the "billionaire class" in Microsoft founder Bill Gates' and Amazon founder Jeff Bezos' backyard.
"We need a powerful socialist movement to end all capitalist oppression and exploitation!" she exclaimed to thunderous applause during the speech.
Sawant, who helped lead the push to raise the minimum wage in Seattle to $15 an hour and once drew fire from the city's mayor after calling for a "wave of protests and strikes" to shut down highways, airports and other key infrastructure, made sure the crowd knew what kind of campaign Sanders is running.
"Bernie's socialist campaign is poised to win from Massachusetts to California," Sawant said.
Yes, this is exactly who Bernie Sanders is. But then, this is also exactly who the other candidates are, exactly who the DNC is, and exactly who the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party is. Yet every effort is being made to deny Sanders the nomination. It would appear the DNC and the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) do not want the American public to understand that they are now full-fledged collectivists because they fear that will be a losing proposition for them. But then, the very ideology they and Bernie Sanders are proclaiming has been a disastrous proposition for every government that has ever tried it.
There will be fewer people watching this time than last time. All of us watching could fit in my living room. Maybe you eleven want to come over and we could even make some popcorn.
There will not be one American flag in site. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) detest our flag, our history, and our principles of freedom and liberty. Every principle the flag represents they oppose such as individualism, they support collectivism (Marxism, communism, socialism, progressive); rule of law, they support arbitrary law where the law is applied differently to people who support freedom and liberty from those who support a Marxist totalitarian state; limited government, they support a mammoth dictatorial bureaucratic government; divided government, they support tyranny under the judicial branch; sovereignty of the people, they support sovereignty of the government with the people as servants, serfs, and slaves to that sovereign government.
The candidates will refer to the United States Constitution; the very Constitution they despise and wish to obliterate, the very Constitution they do not understand.
The candidates will decry the opportunity the United States capitalist system promises to all except themselves who are millionaires and billionaires.
The candidates will support the mandate of Karl Marx who said it is imperative that all borders be removed so that all become a global nation under the “Dictatorship of the Proletariat.”
The candidates will proclaim that climate cooling, or warming, or change, or whatever, is very real because it is cold someplace, it is hot someplace, it is dry someplace, or it is raining someplace. Anyway, this is a real crisis they will declare so it is mandatory that he United States, who is the most evil imperialist nation anyway they believe, share its wealth with all so freedom and liberty will be destroyed and the Marxist totalitarian state can be established.
The candidates will proclaim that it is the state and not the Creator from whom our natural rights emanate so life of the unborn, and even some of the born, can be eliminated if it is believed that their life will be an inconvenience or will be too expensive.
The candidates will proclaim that we servants, serfs, and slaves, are incapable of taking care of ourselves or making our own decisions. Because of this, the state must provide for us, make our decisions for us, declare that there are no consequences for actions by those who would vote for and support the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) movement.
The dynamics will have changed somewhat in that the only candidate that declares openly he is a collectivist (Marxist, communist, socialist, progressive – they are all basically the same) is the most feared because of his honesty. Biden and Warner will be defending their failed efforts. Bloomberg, who will be a new addition, will have many comments to defend, assuming he is asked questions about his racists, sexists, and elitist comments of the past.
All in all, for those of you who are normal people who have lives, I envy you. We abnormal people who do not have lives, the other eleven and me, will share with you anything of any consequence. I feel very comfortable, however, that you could read this next week even, and you would have read a summary of the event. Oh yes, there will be winners and losers declared, but already I can tell you that the real loser is freedom and liberty, the principles upon which we were founded, and the American people. We would like to say that the winner will be President Trump, and from a political standpoint he will be, but from the standpoint of what is best for freedom and liberty and the American way, all will be losers when the evil of collectivism (Marxism, communism, socialism, progressive – all virtually the same) is openly proclaimed in a United States Presidential debate, even if that debate is one for the nomination of the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party.
Presidential candidate Sen. Amy Klobuchar doubled down on her position that Bernie Sanders, her self-described Democratic socialist rival, would hurt the party if he becomes the nominee.
"I am not a pundit, but what I do know (is this), I am the only one on the debate stage when asked, 'Do you have a problem with a socialist leading the Democratic ticket?' that said yes.
"Here in Nevada, as you were just talking about earlier in the show, we don't want to kick 149 million Americans off their current health insurance in four years, which is what Bernie's bill would do," Klobuchar added. "People are much more pragmatic. They want plans and not pipe dreams. I am the candidate that brings that, and I think that's why we are surging across the country."
Amy is correct about Americas not wanting pipe dreams, but she is wrong about the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party not wanting pipe dreams. Every other Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) candidate has expressed their desire to have a universal health care plan that would eliminate all private insurance. The only difference between the plans is thr length of time in which this would take place.
In addition, everyone of these Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) candidates support the pipe dream of implementing the Green New Deal of the new party leader AOC, that would eliminate air travel and renovate every building in the country while instituting a Marxist totalitarian state. Other policies these Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are supporting is the killing of babies even after they have been born. Would that be called late term murder or early born murder?
These same Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are supporting completely open borders and a program that mandates that any illegal alien that has been deported is brought back to the United States even if that person has committed murder, or rape, or robbery, or any crime. These same Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are advocating the complete obliteration of our Constitution by defining it to be a living document, they want all illegal aliens who have committed any crime to be safely harbored, they want to mandate vasectomy ages, they want our schools to indoctrinate students to believe in collectivism (Marxism, communism, socialism, progressive, Democrat, all virtually the same) ideals, they want anybody including very young children to decide if they are boys or girls before they even have any idea what a boy or a girl is.
Yes, Amy Klobuchar, you are correct, the idea of universal government health care is a horrible idea, but believe it or not, it is simply one of many horrible ideas of the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party. It is only one of many horrible ideas of the candidates and many members of your party that has proven to always fail and destroy the nation that adopts them. Bernie Sanders is not the only Marxist, communist, socialist, presidential candidate running for the nomination of your party. Sanders is the only honest one that has stated “he is a communist and not ashamed of it.” The rest are as much of a communist as he is but they are not as honest.
It would seem Amy, that perhaps, if you are somebody who thinks freedom and liberty are good things, that you might want to at the very least switch your registration from Democrat to anything else. You might also seriously consider, if you think freedom and liberty are good things, of not supporting any Marxist/Progressive candidate and voting for President Trump. If, Amy, you are somebody who thinks freedom and liberty are good things, you might want to publicly announce this and declare how your current party despises freedom and liberty while it believes that people are in fact slaves to the state. This brave and wise action could swing many of your followers away from the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party and assure that the Marxist, communists, and socialists running for any office, including president, would be defeated.
I had the privilege to share with the Porterville, Californian Republican Women on Wednesday. I will be sharing with the Republican Women of Paso Robles, California on Monday. I share with many Republican Women groups and consider it a privilege and honor always. I am available to share with any group that is interested in hearing about the state of our union from somebody who refuses to be politically correct and will speak the truth about the wonders of individualism and the evils of collectivism.
What a wonderful time we had in Porterville. During the introductions of guests, one Freedom Loving American introduced her guest and informed the group that she had taken her friend to register to vote for the first time ever and her guest will be voting for the first time ever. This is absolutely a very necessary part of what it means to “set brushfires of freedom in the minds of Americans.”
If we are to remain a free and independent people, free from the dictates of the “Dictatorship of the Proletariat” as proposed by the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party of today, we must begin to do exactly what this patriot in Porterville did. We must love freedom enough to be willing to face ridicule and rejection of those who wish to destroy our freedom, our Constitution, and our Republic. We must be willing to discuss, not argue or debate, about the necessity of us passing our Republic on to our posterity as opposed to allowing the collectivists (Marxists, communists, socialists, progressives, Democrats, - all virtually the same) to transform us into a collectivist state.
I do not know the name of this example setting patriot, but all should hold her up as an example to which we should all aspire. Thank you Freedom Loving American!!
Dictatorship definition: a country, government, or the form of government in which absolute power is exercised by a dictator. A dictator can be a single person or an autocrat, a small group of people or an oligarchy, or a large group of people or a democracy. In a dictatorship those who do not have power do not have any rights unless granted to them by the ruler. The law is that as stated by the ruler and can change as the ruler dictates.
Our founders discussed forming a democracy or a republic. They chose republic because they wanted the law to be the dictator and not people. A republic must have a constitution. That constitution can be written or understood. Our founders chose a written constitution despite the additional, and at time contentious, efforts. A republic is also defined by the principle that all individuals have the same rights. Those in power do not have greater rights than do the others. If a ruler has freedom of speech, so does everybody else. If a ruler is to receive due process of law, so does everybody else.
Our Bill of Rights came about because it was determined that the rights of all must be specified. The Ninth Amendment was added because our founders knew that not all of the rights of the people could not be listed, so they stated that the rights of the people were not limited just to those stated.
A democracy, being a form of a dictatorship, does not recognize rights of the minority nor does it recognize equality under the law. In a democracy, the majority believes it is their right to limit for instance speech, right to assemble, right to worship God, right to life, right to property, and other rights they believe violate the principles of the majority.
Dictatorships insist on conformity of thought. This is why you will witness censorship, restrictions on speech, and indoctrination by the state, especially indoctrination of the children. Dictatorships insist on control of groups assembling. Unless the purpose of the assembly is to promote the dictatorship, it becomes the goal of the dictatorship to use whatever means necessary to stop the assembly.
Karl Marx said that the ruler during his transition period, or that period where the society is transforming from a capitalist society to a communist society, the society must be ruled by a dictatorship or what Marx called the “Dictatorship of the Proletariat.” This would, Marx and Engels believed, be a democracy.
The transition period that Marx said must take place to transform capitalism into communism is the same transition referred to by Michelle Obama when on May 14, 2008 she said, “We are going to change our conversation, we’re going to change our traditions, our history, we’re going to have to move into a different place as a nation.”
It is the same transformation Barack Obama stated would happen when on October 30, 2008 he said, “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.”
Today, in the United States, we have calls to continue the transformation of Marx, the Obama’s, Sanders, Warren, Buttigieg, and in general the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats). What all Freedom Loving Americans must ask is if we are willing to accept the transition under the “Dictatorship of the Proletariat,” or do wish to keep the Republic our founders gave us. If your choice is the latter, you must learn about this transformation and what it means. You must then begin to set brushfires of freedom in the minds of Americans.
One of the requirements for a nation to remain free and independent is that the voters act like the sovereigns they must be. A sovereign is the one that is ultimately responsible for a kingdom. It is the sovereign that must be informed, involved, and knowledgeable about the kingdom. If the sovereign neglects their responsibility, they will be replaced, not necessarily because the new sovereign will usurp the sovereignty but because the current sovereign has abdicated their right to sovereignty. This is what we are witnessing today.
A prime example of the people abdicating our right to sovereignty was the election of Mitt Romney to the Senate by the voters of Utah. In Utah, the Republicans are putting forth a resolution calling on Mitt Romney to either support President Trump or vacate his Senate seat. Remember, it was the same Republican party who made a choice between Mitt Romney and Mike Kennedy. The Republican party of Utah chose Romney.
Romney has always leaned more to the liberal side than the conservative side. He won the governorship of Massachusetts. At that time, he supported big government, abortion, and brought about health care controlled by the state. When he ran for the nomination for president, he changed his positions on all three and tried to tell people he was a conservative.
When Donald Trump ran for president in 2016, Romney spoke often about his disdain for Trump. Then when President Trump gave an indication, he might name Romney as Secretary of State, Romney kissed the feet of President Trump. Romney begged President Trump for his endorsement for the Senate in 2018. If Romney has been consistent about anything in his political career it is that he will say or do whatever he needs to at the time, but he always goes back to his liberal ways. That Romney double crossed the voters of Utah is very consistent with who Romney is and always has been.
The Utah Republicans have nobody to blame but themselves. They nominated a liberal who believes as all liberals do that the “ends always justify the means.” Romney never has been a conservative. Romney has always placed what is good for Romney above all else. That is what he did.
The lesson we must take from this episode is that unless we the people remain informed, involved and knowledgeable about our kingdom and who we choose to represent us, we will abdicate our right to sovereignty. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are very open about their desire to have the government become sovereign or supreme ruler dictating to the people how we are to live our lives, even what our thoughts are to be. When we, who advocate for the people to remain as sovereign but choose a person like Romney to represent us, we are only assisting the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) to reach their goal of total government control over the people.
We were told by our founders that they gave us a government that was established to perform the role of servant to a sovereign people, but it was our responsibility to keep it that way. We are not fulfilling our responsibility. To do so we must be more informed, involved, and knowledgeable so we will reject those like Romney who have as their goal what is good only for them and not for the people. People of Utah, you must rid the nation of unscrupulous representatives by removing Romney.
The two primary arguments within the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party today is how clearly do we state our desire for a collectivist (Marxist, communist, socialist, progressive, Democrat – all virtually the same) state and how clearly do we state our disdain for and desire to obliterate the United States Constitution and the Republic for a tyrannical Marxist state under the control of the majority of the “Dictatorship of the Proletariat.”
Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) presidential candidate Bernie Sanders had to deny that he was a communist, although every thing he says and has said would state otherwise. Apparently, Bernie believes that because his party claims you are anything you say you are, Warren said she was Indian, he, being a communist, can not be one because that is what he said.
Bernie has said he is a Democratic Socialist. You can try to modify socialist anyway you want, but, as Lenin said, all socialism leads to communism. Elizabeth Warren sings from the same song book as Bernie. The only difference between them seems to be gender and age, but then they can change that, according to Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) by just saying they are something else, apparently even younger or older. What a marvelous world in which the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) live. And that takes us to Mayor Pete, who the media and others claim is a moderate. In the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) world, moderate is apparently what a Menshevik was in the Russian Communist Party compared to a Bolshevik. Both were absolute Communists, they just differed in how the revolution should take place in the rest of the world. Mayor Pete is well versed in these differences as he learned at the feet of his father who not only taught the Communist Manifesto, but defended it while singing its praises.
This strong and open collectivism within the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party has many within the party concerned. We have heard from James Carville, Van Jones, Bill Maher, and now Chris Mathews. They also hear and understand that regardless of how Bernie Sanders tries to modify socialism, it is a losing proposition for their party and ultimately the country.
Several weeks ago, even Islamic Jihad Sympathizer and devoted Communist, Comrade Obama said that the rhetoric was to explicit and that the outright arguments for socialism must be camouflaged better. Remember how well Comrade Obama camouflaged his call for his movement for nationalized healthcare when he knowingly lied to the American people by telling us we could keep our doctor or our healthcare plan if we liked them even though he knew it was a total lie. But telling lies was not an unusual strategy of Comrade Obama. Comrade Obama, John Kerry, and Ben Rhodes told lie after lie about the Iran Nuclear deal as they helped Iran secure the road to nuclear weapons while at the same time making it possible for Iran to promote Islamic terrorism by lifting sanctions that made huge amounts of cash available to the Iranians.
Comrade Obama would also like the Americans to believe that he is not a devoted Communist. However, far too often his deep-seated love of communism and hatred for the United States seeps out. Documentary filmmaker Julia Reichert quoted the "Communist Manifesto" during her acceptance speech at the 92nd Academy Awards after she, Jeff Reichert, and Steven Bognar won Best Documentary Feature that sang the praises of communism. Reichert quoted the Communist Manifesto when she encouraged the workers of the world to unite, which is a rally cry popularized by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels' infamous book. The full phrase is, "Workers of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose but your chains!"
Comrades Julia and Steven Reicher won the praise and adulation of their more famous Comrade, Comrade Obama as he tweeted, “Congrats to Julia and Steven, the filmmakers behind American Factory, for telling such a complex, moving story about the very human consequences of wrenching economic change. Glad to see two talented and downright good people take home the Oscar for Higher Ground’s first release.”
These Comrades, along with the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have as their goal, the total obliteration of the United States Constitution, which was established to protect the people from the tyranny of government, the destruction of the United States as a world economic and military power because they believe the United States to be the worst of the worst imperialist states that oppresses the people of the world, and the rebuilding of society as the Classless society called for by Karl Marx that will be totally equal and totally conforming to the collectivist ideology. Carville, Jones, and Obama were not saying to the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party should not move ahead with their agenda, but just to be more covert.
No, God is not politically correct. God tells us not to be politically correct. The collectivists (Marxists, communists, socialists, progressives, Democrats - all virtually the same) attack people when people call evil as evil and good as good. They tell us that the Bible teaches us that we are to love all. To call evil as evil and good as good does not mean we do not love all. The Bible does not instruct us to kill, rape, or even hate those who do not believe the Bible is the Word of God. They who tell us the Bible teaches us to love are right, Our God is a God of love. Why else would he send Jesus to earth for the sole purpose of being a sacrifice and promise us that those who will believe on the word of God will be welcomed into the Kingdom of God and not be in our rightful place of Hell for eternity.
However, God is also a Holy and Righteous God. God tells us very clearly; he is a God of black and white. And yet, we allow ourselves to adhere to the politically correct and misleading demands of the collectivists today, and that is to play along with the collectivist (Karl Marx said his classless society must be a Godless society because in his words, “God does not exist”) mantra that all must go along with the politically correct idea that to call evil as evil is not only UN-American but also anti Biblical.
The advantage of calling, for instance, the murder of unborn children a choice, constitutional, and those who oppose as being judgmental and not loving, is to deny the laws of God. Because of the social pressures of being politically correct, we will often evade direct statements and justify our actions by saying that not being direct is in fact being loving and kind. Jesus followed the commands of God, or his commands, with his dealings with the religious of leaders of his day when he told them, directly, that they were hypocrites and led people astray.
The question you then ask, I would imagine, is Don what is it we should do. The premise of that question is of course wrong. It should be “God, what are we supposed to do” and the answer is where all of God’s answers are, in the Bible. So, I would say get your Bible and search. I can help you with that a little bit. I would suggest you go to Malachi chapter 2 and verse 17. We are told “You have wearied the Lord with your words. But you say, “How have we wearied him?” By saying, “Everyone who does evil is good in the sight of the Lord, and he delights in them.” Or by asking, “Where is the God of justice?””
What I hear God saying is that to be politically correct is wrong. When we are politically correct, we are wearing the Lord. Being politically correct is justifying the evil people do by saying that it is somehow good in the sight of the Lord and he delights in them. God does not delight in evil. If we excuse evil, we are not doing what God has commanded us to do, and that is to love others. Instead, we have assumed the role of being an enabler. I cannot find any place in the Bible where we are commanded to be enablers, or in political terms, I cannot find any place in the Bible where I am told to be politically correct. Until somebody can show me, it would seem that a loving God, but a God of judgement, would say, “Don, (insert your name) do not weary God by excusing and justifying evil by misleading people and telling them that evil actions and the people who commit or support the evil actions, pleases God.” We are told in Malachi chapter 2 and verse 17 that it in fact will weary God.
Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.