I do believe we have had Democrats in the White House and in Congress that did believe in honesty and truthfulness. I believe John Kennedy was a good person who dealt with people honestly. I believe Tip O’Neil was a Democrat whose word you could trust. The Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party is now dominated by collectivists (Marxists, communists, socialists, progressives, Democrats – all virtually the same) who absolutely believe that “the ends always justify the means.” In the short run that false axiom is applied to destroying Donald Trump so anything can be said and done and is justified if it accomplishes that goal. In the long run the end is to destroy the Republic we call the United States of America and bring about within the United States a Marxist totalitarian state under the tyrannical rule of the “Dictatorship of the Proletariat.” If you only understand what I said based on bumper stickers and 30 second sound bites, you owe it to yourself to thoroughly understand the goals of the current Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party to destroy our Republic. They are following the roadmap drawn by Karl Marx and used by people like Lenin, Hitler, Mao, Castro, and Chavez.
Some of the more infamous lies we have heard recently to bring about the Marxist totalitarian state desired were, “You can keep your plan if you like it,” “You can keep your doctor if you like them,” “Impeachment is a very solemn occurrence,” “I pray for him every day,” “I do not know who the whistle blower is,” and of course the infamous false characterization of the phone call of President Trump by Adam Schiff.
Now we have another lie of omission being used by the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) in their illegal and unconstitutional coup attempt to oust a duly elected President of the United States. Schiff, who can absolutely not help himself from deceit and outright lies is trying to put forth the idea that President Trump stated he had complete power under Article II of the Constitution. President Trump did make that statement and President Trump was absolutely correct. Donald Trump, as President of the United States had the full and complete power to fire Special Prosecutor Mueller. Nobody questioned that authority. The clip that Schiff and his fellow deceivers are showing was President Trump stating that fact. The context of the clip was not explained. Nevertheless, Schiff and his fellow Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are using that clip to imply that President Trump stated he had full authority to do anything he wants.
If you vote for Marxist/Progressives (Democrats), if you vote for Republican establishment members, if you vote, and if you in anyway condone this type of deceit, you are conforming to the deceitful methods of all collectivists including Marx, Lenin, Hitler, Mao, Castro, and Chavez. You are approving of the anti-American and anti-constitutional methods now being used by the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats), the same methods that have been used by all collectivists (Marxists, communists, socialists, progressives, Democrats, all virtually the same) for centuries. That method is that anything that moves us down the road to a Marxist totalitarian state under the tyrannical rule of the Dictatorship of the Proletariat is not only acceptable but encouraged including deceit and outright lies.
We are hearing all kinds of nonsensical cries by those who desire to destroy our Republic and replace it with a Marxist totalitarian state under the tyrannical rule of the “Dictatorship of the Proletariat.” This is exactly what Islamic Jihad sympathizer Comrade Obama meant when he called for the fundamental transformation of the Untied States, the exact same transformation Marx said would take place in the United States.
A fact-based book “Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America's Progressive Elite” is to be released on January 21. Here is the Amazon description
Washington insiders operate by a proven credo: when a Peter Schweizer book drops, duck and brace for impact.
For over a decade, the work of five-time New York Times bestselling investigative reporter Peter Schweizer has sent shockwaves through the political universe.
Clinton Cash revealed the Clintons international money flow, exposed global corruption, and sparked an FBI investigation. Secret Empires exposed bipartisan corruption and launched congressional investigations. And Throw Them All Out and Extortion prompted passage of the STOCK Act. Indeed, Schweizer s follow the money bombshell revelations have been featured on the front pages of the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal, and regularly appear on national news programs, including 60 Minutes.
Now Schweizer and his team of seasoned investigators turn their focus to the nation’s top progressives’ politicians who strive to acquire more government power to achieve their political ends.
Can they be trusted with more power?
In Profiles in Corruption, Schweizer offers a deep-dive investigation into the private finances, and secrets deals of some of America s top political leaders. And, as usual, he doesn’t t disappoint, with never-before-reported revelations that uncover corruption and abuse of power all backed up by a mountain of corporate documents and legal filings from around the globe. Learn about how they are making sweetheart deals, generating side income, bending the law to their own benefits, using legislation to advance their own interests, and much more.
Hillary Clinton rips 'career politician' Bernie Sanders with brutal honesty: 'Nobody likes him'. Can you imagine somebody who is as detested and disliked as Hillary Clinton makes this revelation?
Hillary Clinton nearly lost the 2016 Democratic nomination to Sen. Bernie Sanders — and now we know she personally does not like the Vermont socialist, either.
Ahead of a new documentary about her failed 2016 campaign, Clinton confirmed in an interview with the Hollywood Reporter that she is not a "Bernie Bro," a phrase used to refer to Sanders supporters.
In the documentary, Clinton says of Sanders, "He was in Congress for years. He had one senator support him. Nobody likes him, nobody wants to work with him, he got nothing done. He was a career politician. It's all just baloney and I feel so bad that people got sucked into it."
When asked if her assessment still holds today, Clinton told the Hollywood Reporter, "Yes, it does."
AOC says the Democratic Party is not leftist, calls it 'center or center-conservative
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, true leader of the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party said that the Democratic Party is not on the left of the political spectrum, but rather a majority of its members are centrist or right-of-center in their beliefs.
To support her position, she pointed to Democrats' inability to even get votes on major progressive issues like single-payer health care.
"We don't have a left party in the United States," Ocasio-Cortez said during a Martin Luther King Jr. Day event. "The Democratic Party is not a left party. The Democratic Party is a center or center-conservative party. We can't even get a floor vote on Medicare for All, not even a floor vote that gets voted down. So, this is not a left party. There are left members inside the Democratic Party that are working to try to make that shift happen."
Ocasio-Cortez is a collectivist (Marxist, communist, socialist, progressive, Democrat, all virtually the same) who has endorsed fellow collectivist Bernie Sanders in the Democratic presidential primary. She recently said America is the only country in which she and former Vice President Joe Biden would be in the same political party.
The Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party is covering their corruption, their division, and their desire to bring about the fundamental transformation called for by Islamic Jihad sympathizer Comrade Obama when he said he would bring about a fundamental transformation of the United States from a Republic to a Marxist totalitarian state under the tyrannical rule of the “Dictatorship of the Proletariat.”
Once again, we are in a crisis because the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) hate the United States Constitution, do not understand the United States Constitution, and have no idea upon which values our nation was founded. The definition of oxymoron is when a Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) says we adhere to the Constitution or we must do what our founders wanted. The fact is, the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have no idea about either.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have for years told us that the Constitution is a living document and can mean anything they want it to mean. Collectivist Franklin Roosevelt said, “The United States Constitution has proved itself the most marvelously elastic compilation of rules of government ever written.”
"The words of the Constitution … are so unrestricted by their intrinsic meaning or by their history or by tradition or by prior decisions that they leave the individual Justice free, if indeed they do not compel him, to gather meaning not from reading the Constitution but from reading life." —Felix Frankfurter, Supreme Court Justice
Roosevelt, Frankfurter, and so many other collectivists (Marxists, communists, socialists, progressives, Democrats – all virtually the same) were so wrong and are so wrong. Nevertheless, the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) led House is once again destroying our Constitution for political purposes. They have completely ignored the words of the Constitution and the intent of the framers in their coup attempt, and have incorrectly referred to their actions as an impeachment. Their actions in no way adhere to the Constitution or the intent of the framers.
Regarding our Constitution being a living document, this was never the intent of the framers.
The basis of our political systems is the right of the people to make and to alter their constitutions of government. But the Constitution, which at any time exists, ‘till changed by an explicit and authentic act of the whole people, is sacredly obligatory upon all. … If in the opinion of the people the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates. But let there be no change by usurpation; for though this in one instance may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed. — George Washington
On every question of construction carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text or invented against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed. —Thomas Jefferson
Can it be of less consequence that the meaning of a Constitution should be fixed and known, than a meaning of a law should be so? — James Madison
So far as this coup attempt (impeachment) is concerned:
Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz said the Democrats’ impeachment of President Trump is the Founding Fathers’ “greatest nightmare.”
Speaking with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos on Sunday, Dershowitz, a Democrat who is on Trump’s legal defense team, made clear that the impeachment articles contain no crimes.
“Is it your position that President Trump should not be impeached even if all the evidence and arguments laid out by the House are accepted as fact?” Stephanopoulos asked.
“That’s right,” Dershowitz replied. “When you have somebody who, for example, is indicted for a crime -- let's assume you have a lot of evidence -- but the grand jury simply indicts for something that's not a crime, and that's what happened here, you have a lot of evidence, disputed evidence, that could go both ways, but the vote was to impeach on abuse of power, which is not within the constitutional criteria for impeachment, and obstruction of Congress.
“Those are both the kinds of things that led Hamilton and Madison -- talk about nightmare -- to regard that as the greatest nightmare, number one, giving Congress too much power to allow the president to serve at the will of Congress,” he continued. “And number two, as Hamilton put it, the greatest danger is turning impeachment into a question of who has the most votes in which House, and rather than having a consensus and a broad view of impeachable conduct.”
Dershowitz said his role in the case is to "determine what is a constitutionally authorized criteria for impeachment" and despite Stephanopoulos's pressing, refused to give his personal opinion about whether he believed the president acted improperly.
"I'm a liberal Democrat who's been critical of many of the policies of the president. I'm here as a constitutional lawyer, a lawyer who's taught for 50 years constitutional criminal procedure at Harvard, taught a course on impeachment, taught a course on constitutional litigation," he said. "I'm here to lend my expertise on that issue and that issue alone, because that's the primary issue."
Again, I repeat, we are in a crisis because the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) hate the United States Constitution, do not understand the United States Constitution, and have no idea upon which values our nation was founded.
Anyone who would support this coup attempt (impeachment) is equally as guilty as are the House members who advanced and supported this anti-Constitutional and anti-American coup.
That this so-called impeachment is in fact a coup is not disputable. An impeachment proceeding as outlined in the Constitution and discussed in the Federalist Papers is not a procedure that begins prior to a President being nominated, much less inaugurated. This coup did. This coup declared impeachment and then begin looking for a crime. A crime was never found so some nebulous statements were concocted to fulfill the real purpose of the coup, and that was to damage a duly elected president of the United States in an effort to overturn the will of the people.
The chances of the Senate to uphold the actions of a truly rogue and anti American group of people in the House of Representatives is negligible. The reason the odds are so minimal is because more members of the Senate are willing to put party politics aside and in so doing will become statesmen placing the Constitution and the country before party than there are in the House. Our founders understood this would probably be the situation and that is why they placed the final outcome in the hands of the Senate. Do your research and you will know what I just stated is fact. If you do the research, you will become far more equipped to become a freedom loving American who is not only keen but equipped to set brushfires of freedom.
We should bring good from evil by exposing the deep state or swamp and how they manipulate to bring about their desired results, illegally or legally. When the Russian Hoax went up in flames with the Mueller report and then the disastrous testimony of Mueller, the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) were desperate to find another means to continue the coup they had begun perhaps as early as 2015. Out of nowhere we learned from Schiff that a “whistle blower” had accused the duly elected President of wrongdoing. Even though the wrongdoing has been proven to be incorrect, the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) still used it as a springboard to bring about the Articles. During the Senate trial, those involved with the accusations by the “whistle blower” should be called before the Senate and the nation. This would include the “whistle blower”, Schiff, and the members of Schiff’s staff that assisted the “whistle blower” in concocting his accusations and drafting the complaint. The Senate should place no limits as to the scope of the questioning. The exposure of this small part of the “deep state” and “swamp” could and should lead to many different parts, including the parts within the FBI and DOJ.
We should bring good from evil by exposing the corruption that runs throughout the government as it manipulates foreign aid to different countries and then corrupt officials have some of the foreign aid returned to them much as then Vice President Biden had foreign aid given to Ukraine returned to him through his son. By the way, where is Hinter? It would appear that Senator Mitt Romney would object to this line of questioning as would Pelosi and Schiff who all apparently have money in their hands from Ukraine just as does Biden. There are solid reasons to belief that this foreign aid game has been played from many years and through many different countries. The depth to which it runs is anybody’s guess, but we the people should know and those who have played this game like the Biden’s should be discovered and punished accordingly. It would be interesting to see who else would object, along with Romney, Pelosi, and Schiff.
Good can come from evil. People with good intent must be seeking the good and must be willing to expose the evil completely, even if it exposes people they have called friends.
“A republic if you can keep it,” is a quote attributed to Benjamin Franklin when he was asked by a lady what type of government we had. It is critical that we note that Franklin did not say, a democracy if you can keep it. The founders understood the difference between a republic and a democracy. They chose a republic because they envisioned that what they had created would last for a long time. Our republic is under attack today like never before and it is being attacked by a political party, the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party, for the very reasons the founders rejected a democracy and favored a republic.
A democracy is rule by the majority. Our founders, who were students of history, governments, and philosophy, understood that democracies quickly become tyrannies. The reason this is so is because rule by the majority is always used to eliminate the rights of the minority. As rights of the minority are eliminated, those members of the minority are no longer considered a part of the political group eligible to vote. As the number considered to be a party of the political group eligible to vote becomes smaller and smaller. A tyranny is created because the demands of a very few, perhaps even one, become the rules of all.
A republic is established with the intent to always protect the liberty of the individual and to always protect the rights of the minority. This is why we have the Bill of Rights. The opposition to adopte the Bill of Rights was not because those people opposed the liberties protected, but because they said the Bill of Rights would be redundant since the rights of the individual and the minority were already protected in the Constitution. Those who favored adopting the Bill of Rights stated that any redundancy to protect the liberty of the individual and the rights of the minority could not be overdone. Nancy Pelosi, her understanding of the founding and the Constitution are terribly perverted so as to ask if she has any concept as to why we revolted, what the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution of the United States, or the Bill of Rights really mean and why we have them, stated in her incorrect interpretation, that the founders were against having a king. This is true in the most rudimentary form. The founders feared more than anything, the tyranny of the majority and big government that would, as Patrick Henry stated, “dominate the lives and thoughts of the people.”
Today we have the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party advocating for everything the founders feared; they are advocating for a democracy and a big government that “dominates the lives and thoughts of the people.” We have seen the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party dismantle our Republic during the coup attempt against a Constitutionally elected president by totally dismissing and abolishing the rights of the minority. We have consistently heard the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party advocate for a democracy by dismantling our Republic and the rights of the minority through the obliteration of the electoral college. We are seeing the Republic being dismantled through the court system championed by the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party as they campaign for the obliteration of individual liberties by restricting the right to life of the unborn, restricting the right to worship God without state sponsored religion as they establish secularism as the state sponsored religion, we witness the curtailment of freedom of speech by the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) enforcing a limitation on what they call hate speech or phrases and words they consider to be politically incorrect, and we are witnessing the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) eliminating the right of citizens to peaceably assemble by their encouragement of such hate groups as ANTIFA and BLM to disrupt assembly of groups with whom they disagree.
In the next coming days or weeks, we will witness the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) attack our Constitution by their perversion of the concept of impeachment. The impeachment clause was not just some clause carelessly thrown into the Constitution, but was carefully considered and discussed. The founders feared the very thing that has just happened and that is that a rogue and irresponsible group would impeach a duly elected President because they disliked the individual and/or disagreed with the political agenda of the individual. The standard for impeachment was set very high. The current rogue and irresponsible House has just lowered that standard to dislike and disagreement, just as the founders feared.
When our founders formed our nation, they understood they would also have to form a government. Make no mistake, the founders understood that any government they would form, it would be that government that would be the single biggest threat to the freedoms they had just won. To try to protect those freedoms, the founder created a republic. The Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party is proving the founders to be correct; the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are destroying the republic for a democracy, so they can bring about the tyranny of government from which we originally revolted.
If you are a Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) and disagree with anything I have stated, please, not with emotion with such inane comments as Trump is a liar and racist, but with facts and rational arguments, show me where you believe me to be wrong.
If you agree with what I said, I challenge you to thoroughly understand what I said. Please no bumper sticker phrases or 30 second sound bites but cogent reasons. Once you understand, you can become a freedom fighter by beginning to be an irate tireless minority that is keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of others. If you have not already done so, I would strongly suggest you get “The Road to Tyranny” and “Two Visions of America” that will clearly outline why it is critical that you join this cause and how you can effectively set brushfires of freedom.
Some quick observations:
Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Castro, and Chavez are alive and well, just different bodies but the same minds and philosophies. They were on the stage alive and well.
On a lighter side:
Bernie’s hair was combed.
Steyer needs a better whitener
Biden said he and Islamic Jihad sympathizer, Comrade Obama defeated ISIS. That must have been in the same world where Hunter is.
Buttigieg is the best; he is the best talker without saying anything. Give him a high mark for his attempt to be compassionate and emotional.
Warner evaded the question of whether she stated that Sanders told her a woman could not win. She is becoming adept at deflecting her lies but then she has had a lot of practice.
More serious if we can find any truly serious parts:
When you read this, you better say something to yourself, pinch yourself, jump once or twice to make sure you still exist. Climate cooling, warming, change or whatever will kill you more likely today as opposed to in a week unless we immediately redistribute American wealth, which we gained, you understand, because we are the worst of the imperialist nations, to any deemed to be oppressed. Are you still there? If you are, do you know where Hunter is?
The conclusion on health care is to adopt the health care systems of Cuba and Venezuela. Everybody has a “right” to government funded health care in those countries.
Not one of the people on the stage, but then very few people who identify with the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party, would have supported the American Revolution, the Declaration of Independence, The Constitution of the United States, and certainly not the Bill of Rights. The Revolution and our Documents came about because of the American dream of individual liberty or individualism which includes capitalism, rule of law, limited government, divided government, and sovereignty of the people. The solution for every single solution was government. The solution for a collectivist is always government.
Our founders feared government and that is why they drafted and ratified a Constitution, and then insisted on the Bill of Rights, that protected the people from the government. This is how the founders viewed government, which they knew and has proven to be correct.
The very definition of tyranny is when all powers are gathered under one place. James Madison
Experience hath shown that even under the best forms of government, those entrusted with power have in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny. Thomas Jefferson
What the differences we heard on the stage were that all wanted to gather all power in the government to pervert power into tyranny, just at a different pace.
This is the song and dance of the climate warming, cooling, change, oh who knows what claimers. Australia is burning because some of you decided they would start fires and then claim “the world is ending" unless we immediately take everything from the imperialists, mostly the United States, and give to the oppressed. Just like Elizabeth Warren’s claim about Bernie Sanders saying a woman could not win will gain no traction because Warren is infamous for her tall tales, so claims about the disaster caused by climate whatever gain less and less traction.
Here is a history of claims made by the climate whatever people, who really are collectivists following the direction of Marx to take from the imperialists and give to the oppressed. Remember the criteria for imperialist and oppressor is flexible and can mean whoever or whatever you want.
Written by Sam Dorman on Sep 18, 2019. Posted in Latest news
Doomsdays That Didn’t Happen: 50 Years Of Failed Climate Predictions
The Competitive Enterprise Institute has put together a lengthy compilation of apocalyptic predictions dating back decades that did not come to pass, timed as Democratic presidential candidates and climate activists refocus attention on the issue. The dire predictions, often repeated in the media, warned of a variety of impending disasters – famine, drought, an ice age, and even disappearing nations – if the world failed to act on climate change. An Associated Press headline from 1989 read “Rising seas could obliterate nations: U.N. officials.” The article detailed a U.N. environmental official warning that entire nations would be eliminated if the world failed to reverse warming by 2000.
Then there were the fears that the world would experience a never-ending “cooling trend in the Northern Hemisphere.” That claim came from an “international team of specialists” cited by The New York Times in 1978. Just years prior, Time magazine echoed other media outlets in suggesting that “another ice age” was imminent. “Telltale signs are everywhere — from the unexpected persistence and thickness of pack ice in the waters around Iceland to the southward migration of a warmth-loving creature like the armadillo from the Midwest,” the magazine warned in 1974. The Guardian similarly warned in 1974 that “Space satellites show new Ice Age coming fast.” In 1970, The Boston Globe ran the headline, “Scientist predicts a new ice age by 21st century.” The Washington Post, for its part, published a Columbia University scientist’s claim that the world could be “as little as 50 or 60 years away from a disastrous new ice age.”
Some of the more dire predictions came from Paul Ehrlich, a biologist who famously urged population control to mitigate the impacts of humans on the environment. Ehrlich, in 1969, warned that “everybody” would “disappear in a cloud of blue steam in 20 years,” The New York Times reported. According to The Salt Lake Tribune, Ehrlich, warning of a “disastrous” famine,” urged placing “sterilizing agents into staple foods and drinking water.” Those predictions were made around the time former President Richard Nixon created the Environmental Protection Agency. Since then, the U.S. has adopted a series of environmental reforms aimed at limiting emissions.
Years after those initial predictions, media outlets and politicians continue to teem with claims of apocalyptic scenarios resulting from climate change. Earlier this month, leading Democratic presidential candidates held a town hall on the issue and warned about the “existential” threat posed by a changing climate. Before the end of the month, 2020 candidates are expected to have another climate forum at Georgetown University. CEI’s report came just before the U.N. Climate Action Summit on Sept. 23, an event that promises to “spark the transformation that is urgently needed and propel action that will benefit everyone.”
It also came a week after Rep. Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., warned that Miami would be gone in a “few years” because of climate change. She was responding to critics of her ambitious “Green New Deal,” which seeks to reach net-zero emissions within just decades. Ocasio-Cortez, whose plan has been endorsed by leading presidential candidates, previously joked that the world would end in 12 years if it didn’t address climate change.
But short-term predictions weren’t a laughing matter in the years following “An Inconvenient Truth,” a documentary produced by former Vice President Al Gore. In 2008, ABC released an ominous video about what the world would look like in 2015. As the video warned about rising sea levels, a graphic showed significant portions of New York City engulfed by water. Gore himself famously predicted in the early 2000s that Arctic ice could be gone within seven years. At the end of seven years, Arctic ice had undergone a period of expansion.
So, on and on we go, “the sky is falling, you must redistribute immediately.” And yet those who cry the loudest continue to get rich like Gore, and fly on private jets to conferences to decry climate whatever. Come on, give me a break. We have real problems like Islamic Terrorism that you climate hoaxers protect and champion, like creating poverty, homelessness, and horrible conditions that dominate collectivist nations and U. S. states that you collectivists control. Any rationale person can only conclude that the real problem is you the collectivist.
The Democrat party is the Marxist/Progressive party. This is true because the Democrat party of today advocates for the very policies Karl Marx said where necessary to bring about what he called a classless society. Marx’s classless society would be a society where all the people thought the same thing, totally conforming, and all the people were equal financially and socially. It would be the order of business for the Dictatorship of the Proletariat to make this happen in any and every way necessary, including force.
If you listen to the so called Democrat debate this evening, and I would encourage you to suffer through it with me, you will hear every single person on the stage advocate the very policies Marx said would be necessary to transform the United States to a Marxist totalitarian state, the very state Islamic Jihad sympathizer, Comrade Obama said would happen when he proclaimed in November of 2008 that he would fundamentally transform the United States.
Donald Trump will be painted as a demagogue and evil every time his name is mentioned this evening. President Trump is an enemy of the collectivist (Marxist, communist, socialist, progressive, Democrat – all virtually the same) movement. President Trump believes in and has taken actions to restore the principles upon which our nation was founded so we could remain free and retain our liberty. These American values include individualism of which capitalism is a part, rule of law, limited government, divided government, and sovereignty of the people with the government being the servant. Collectivists believe in exactly the opposite.
You will hear every person who is campaigning to become the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) nominee advocate for:
More control by the government over business and all private property through more government regulations.
Higher tax rates (confiscation rates) on the personal property of the individual, their income.
Higher tax rates (confiscation rates) on any accumulated wealth while the person is alive and at their death.
Government control of lending, beginning with the students, by having the government chose who should have their debt relieved.
Centralizing more control on means of communication and transportation with the government.
Free education for all. This will not be stated as the reason but what Lenin, Mao, Hitler, and every collectivist leader has done has used education as a primary tool for indoctrination, the same thing we see happening in the United States today.
Redistribution of wealth with those who achieve being demonized as greedy and selfish and their income redistributed based on some government mandated means to bring about “income equality.”
A call for “social justice” which is a call for the government to have full and total control over the lives of its citizens, including their thoughts so as to properly conform, and providing a basis on which to punish and eliminate those who would act contrary to the demands of the party. The American Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party is calling for total conformity in things such as adherence to many convoluted and nature defying beliefs on biology, adherence to genocide through the murder of unborn children, government or party control of all through the surrendering of arms, adherence to our nations surrendering of our wealth and our sovereignty based on a manufactured crisis called climate change, our surrendering of a critical liberty for any free nation, freedom of speech, under the guise of political correctness, and government control over health coverage and health care which Lenin declared to be essential for a Marxist totalitarian state.
Everything for which the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) candidates will be advocating comes from the writings and teachings of Marx and the policies implemented by all collectivist tyrants including Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Hitler, Castro, Pol Pot, and Chavez. If you believe in freedom and liberty and the American way as determined by our founders, it is critical that you understand what I have stated and then become a warrior for freedom and liberty by setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of others. We can not prevail by winning arguments, but can only prevail by helping to bring change in the minds of those who would vote for a Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) because they believe it is compassionate.
A great place for you to start to understand the drastic contrast between what these Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) candidates are claiming will bring about freedom and prosperity and the actual results and how drastically what they are advocating differs from the very principles that built our country, order today “The Road to Tyranny” and “Two Visions of America.” Read them and understand what liberty and freedom are and how and why the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) want to take it from you. Then begin immediately to set brushfires of freedom in the minds of others.
This is Joe’s fourth try to be president. It would appear this time will end the same way as the other times; that is Joe will tell us he is a team player and will support the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) candidate. He might even claim a small victory this time because he could gain more delegates than in the past. In 1984, Joe won ONE delegate. In 1988, Joe doubled that and won TWO delegates. Then in 2008, the floor broke below Joe as he won ZERO delegates, but his good friend, or so Joe says, Comrade Obama thought Joe could balance the ticket and Comrade Obama asked Joe to be his second. Today Comrade Obama won’t even wave to Joe when they pass each other on the street.
The news for Joe now is that, after having a huge lead in Iowa with polling showing he had support over 35%, now the former vice president sits in fourth place in the latest Des Moines Register/CNN/Mediacom Iowa Poll. U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders tops the poll with 20% support. Then comes a tight pack: U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren is next with 17%; former South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg, with 16%; and Biden with 15%. And even worse news for Biden, is another so called debate will take place on Tuesday evening.
Remember, Biden is claimed to be the only moderate in the above list of people. The leader, Bernie Sanders says he is a Democratic Socialist. All Socialists claim they are Democratic. Democracies quickly become Tyrannical Collectivist (Marxist, communist, socialist, progressive, Democrat – all virtually the same) countries. The other two ahead of Joe are also collectivists. Study who they are and what they propose, and you will also come to the same conclusion.
Why would Joe be having such a problem. Of course, his biggest problem is that he is Joe, and just can never get anything correct. In an interview with the Des Moines Register, Joe Biden lamented the ongoing crisis in Venezuela. The 77-year-old former vice president described President Donald Trump's foreign policy toward the region as "irresponsible" to the newspaper's editorial board.
"Look what's going on in Venezuela right now...millions of people are crossing the border destabilizing Bolivia," he said. Bolivia has no common border with Venezuela, and Trump’s policy toward Venezuela is the opposite of the Democrats in that many within the Obama regime plus Sanders praised Venezuela as the American dream as the government took over all private property and totally socialized Venezuela. Today the people are starving, health care is non-existent, and the country is in the typical state of any socialized country, that is despair, desperation, and without any hope.
Joe has bigger problems than not knowing policy or geography, and that is that he does not remember that he is living in the age of taping and recording. Joe has always been one to say what he thought was required of him and not what he truly believed, of course perhaps that is because he has no real beliefs. Time after time the Joe on the recording is saying exactly what the current Joe said he never said. Normally the press would describe this as lying or at least being in consistent, but in the days when the press believe they are not investigative reporters but promoters of all that is collectivist, they say this is just Joe being Joe. The public seems to disagree.
More and more we are learning that Joe being Joe is not acceptable to Americans. Joe seeming to have 9 hands and not being able to control any of them anytime he is around a woman or a girl is no longer popular in the days of Epstein and Weinstein. People seem not to care that Joe believes he can win push up contests.
Where is Hunter???? Joe, using Hunter to enrich his family is becoming more and more a problem as Hunter finds more and more ways to draw attention to him. Joe was able to get his brother, who had never built anything, a $1.5B contract building homes in Iraq. Joe was able to get Hunter on the criminal company Burisma, and was able to have at least $2.5B dollars moved to Hunter’s investment company of three weeks from China, but Joe was not able to control his chip of the old block when it came to controlling his hands.
When Joe determines he wants to spend more time with his family and thus has to drop from the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) race for president, there will be much speculation. For sure Hunter will enter that discussion. But that Joe could not win over three die hard committed collectivists, Sanders, Warren, and Buttigieg, can only be because there is just too much Joe in Joe.
It was not by chance that political parties were not mentioned in any of our founding documents. The founders were very familiar with political parties. They had existed in Britain and existed in the American Colonies. Interestingly they did not play a part in the Continental Congress nor in the Constitutional Convention. That is not to say that there were not differences, but the end goal of the members of both the Continental Congress and the Constitutional Convention were the same and that was to provide freedom and liberty for all.
What George Washington knew must be avoided was the growing of political parties, understanding that the differences and animosity inherent with political parties would become damaging to the country. Washington understood that unless the end goal of the citizens was to maintain and even promote greater liberty for citizens, which meant less government intrusion and control, the end result would be the loss of the freedom and liberty for which he and the other colonists paid such a high price.
George Washington told his fellow Americans, both current and future in his farewell address:
“However [political parties] may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion.”
This has happened. Today we have a political party that under the guise of impeachment, believes it can conduct a coup attempt against a duly elected president because it both hates and disagrees with that duly elected president. This political party has determined the United States Constitution is an outdated document and as such can be interpreted any way it deems necessary to bring power and glory to itself. This political party has determined that equality should now be placed above individual liberty, that conformity to the dictates of this political party is of greater importance than are the liberties of the individual, and that adherence to the philosophy of the party dictates that the United States is the most evil imperialist nation and must as such surrender its sovereignty and adherence to the principle of individualism, the very principle that propelled the nation for which George Washington paid such a tremendous price, must be abandoned.
This political party, for reasons unknown other than hatred and jealousy of a duly elected president, is praising and defending an individual and people who declared war against the United States years ago and has continued that war. This same individual and people have declared time after time their wish to bring death to our country and us as individuals. This individual and people have conducted activities to do exactly that. This individual had been designated a terrorist and enemy of the United States years prior to the current duly elected president taking office. Yet, when the terrorist is eliminated, the political party pours heaps of praise upon him and condemns the duly elected president in the harshest terms possible.
The only plausible explanation of the actions of this political party is because they, as George Washington stated would happen, are cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled people who have as their goal to subvert the power of the people and usurp for themselves the reins of government and destroying the principles of freedom and liberty. This should come as no surprise as the previous president, a member of said political party, stated that it was his purpose to transform the United States from a nation of freedom and liberty to a Marxist totalitarian state.
Mr. President, (George Washington) I wish you had been wrong, but just as you knew you had to cross the Delaware that Christmas and surprise the enemy, you foresaw the evil of political parties and how eventually one political party would place their desire for power and control over freedom and liberty and the good of the people.
Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.