|
Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) 2020 presidential candidates have rejected criticism from Comrade Barack Obama, after he warned the field of White House hopefuls not to veer too far to the left because it would alienate voters.
Though Obama did not mention anyone by name, the message he delivered before a room of Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) donors was a clear word of caution about the candidacies of Comrades Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders, who are seen as two of the top-tier candidates in the crowded field. Sanders and Warren have called for massive structural changes and policies that would dramatically alter the role of government in Americans’ lives. The centrist wing of the party has warned for months that a far-left nominee could alienate moderate Republicans and independent voters needed to oust Donald Trump. “The average American doesn’t think we have to completely tear down the system and remake it. And I think it’s important for us not to lose sight of that,” Obama said. This type of disagreement has been a part of the communist movement for years. The ideologue has argued for immediate revolution with a complete demolition of all current institutions and remaking them in the manner that will advance the communist movement. The practical communist has argued that it is important to maintain the sympathy of the public and to be aware of their support or opposition. Marx was aware of this conflict and he took both sides. Marx indicated that many nations would become communist through revolutions while others (Marx specifically named the United States as a part of this group) would travel the road to communism through revolution. Lenin also recognized that in the United States, the road would have to be traveled through a transformation, the same transformation called for by Comrade Obama when he stated in November of 2008 that he would fundamentally transform the United States. Lenin began that transformation through his efforts to plant his seeds specifically in the areas of education, media, and entertainment within the United States. Premier Khrushchev told us that the transformation to communism within the Untied States would also be a gradual transformation. Comrade Obama has assumed this same transformation stance, warning his comrades that the United States is not a good candidate for a revolution, while Comrades Sanders, Warren, and other dedicated collectivists (Marxists, communists, socialists, progressives, Democrats, - all virtually the same) are advocating for an immediate tear down and rebuilding or a revolution. This difference between the ideologues and the practical factions of the Communist party are being played out once again as Comrade Obama is taking the practical side.
0 Comments
AOC is truly the gift that just keeps on giving. Time after time she reveals who the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) really are and what their intents are. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said impeaching President Trump serves many purposes, such as holding him accountable for violating laws in the Constitution. She added it can also help prevent a "potentially disastrous outcome" in 2020.
Ocasio-Cortez, during a recent speech, invoked Franklin Roosevelt, several times during her 20-minute talk, which was interrupted numerous times by applause from the roughly 1,000 attendees at the 44th annual fundraising Truman dinner for the Boulder County Democratic Party. If Democrats want to “live up to our values,” AOC said, “we are going to have to become a stronger party, a braver party and a more innovative party. We need to earn the right to represent people in this country. The way that we do that as a party is to come home to our FDR roots as a party. We need to come home and make sure that the Democratic Party is the progressive party once more.” We need to become the party of FDR once again they were told. We must explore exactly what the FDR administration was. Cited in an article that Roosevelt was called a socialist and a communist, is an insightful quote. It indicates the true attitude and sympathies of FDR towards the Soviet regime. "The Russian newspapers during the last election [1932] published the photograph of Franklin D. Roosevelt over the caption, 'The first communistic President of the United States,'" said Sen. Thomas Schall, a Republican from Minnesota. "Evidently the Russian newspapers had knowledge concerning the ultimate intent of the President, which had been carefully withheld from the voters in this country. In fact, the voters of the United States were meticulously misled as to such intentions." We found Schall's comments in the book, “All But the People: Franklin D. Roosevelt and his Critics, 1933-1939.” In the brilliant essay, The Friends of Uncle Joe, Joseph Sobran strikes to the core with his analysis. Roosevelt’s eulogists likewise avoid the subject of Stalin, for whom FDR had the highest regard, calling him “a Christian gentleman” during the Yalta conference. He had befriended Stalin from the first year of his administration, when he extended diplomatic recognition to the murderous pariah state. Time and again he chose to help “Uncle Joe” when he didn’t have to, appeasing him from a position of strength. Even Neville Chamberlain never idealized Hitler as “Uncle Adolf.” When FDR asked Pope Pius XII to condemn Hitler, Pius sent back word that if he did so he would also have to condemn Stalin; Roosevelt withdrew the request. Stalin had shown his true colors long before Roosevelt and Churchill took on as their ally the brave, bluff “Uncle Joe.” Had they never heard of the forced famine of Ukraine, the NKVD mass arrests, the Gulag camps, the purges and show trials, the murder of Trotsky, the invasions of Poland (with the Katyn Forest massacre of 15,000 Polish officers), Finland, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania? All these things, and more, revealed not only the brutality of Stalin but the logic of Communism itself, which had begun its reign in Russia with the mass murder of Orthodox priests under Lenin. Communism was in essence a reversion to the principles of primitive warfare, directed not only against external enemies but against its own subjects if they resisted (or were even suspected of a disposition to resist) its tyranny.” Doubting Roosevelt’s involvement, 'The sordid History, lies, FDR, and Stalin" makes a powerful statement: “FDR praised Stalin’s constitution for guaranteeing religious freedom while ignoring the purges, show trials, aggression against countries adjacent to Russia, and the persecution of the Russian Christians. It may sound incredibly today but FDR called Stalin, the Communist butcher, a Christian gentleman. Ever read that in high school? FDR was Stalin’s best friend among world leaders and that is in spite of Stalin killing more people before WWII started than Hitler would kill during the war. Amazing is it not?” When we take the time to understand FDR and his communist sympathies and communist infiltrated administration, including his key aid Harry Hopkins, and we understand the ultimate goal of the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party led by AOC, we can clearly understand why she and her party would want to “come home” to the party of FDR. The ultimate goal of AOC’s party and FDR’s party is and was to fundamentally transform the United States to a Marxist totalitarian state as was the Soviet Union. When trying to understand a situation and make some prediction as to what will happen, it is always good to state what we know. What we know is that the United States Constitution was written and intended to be the final authority. Since we would not have an individual as our final authority the founders said that the Constitution is that final authority.
Our nation was also founded on the principles inherent to the philosophies of Natural Rights and Individualism which greatly diminished the role of government in the lives of the citizens as was common in the late 18th century. To emphatically state these intents the founders specifically listed the powers we the people would grant to the federal government and then reinforced this concept in the 10th amendment. To reinforce our beliefs in Natural Rights coming from the Creator and not government, we added to the Constitution the Bill of Rights including the 9th amendment. The concept of Individualism was embedded in our society by our framers as they endorsed the free enterprise system, adopting our Constitution with no direct taxes on the citizens or their assets or incomes, and establishing that the individual citizen was not, could not become a ward of the state owing to the state. In fact, Madison specifically stated the government was not to provide welfare. We also know that Woodrow Wilson stated his discontent with the Constitution and the framer’s concept of government when he tried to convince the American public to adopt the parliamentary system of government where the legislative branch and the executive branch would be of the same party. Remember, nowhere in the United States Constitution are political parties referenced or implied. George Washington warned us of the dangers of political parties when he warned us against the dangers of political parties and people placing the good of the party above the good of the nation. FDR and Obama furthered challenged the legitimacy of the Constitution. They opposed Natural Rights being under the full purview of the Creator, and the concept of individualism or self-responsibly. They supported and advanced government reliance and the state becoming a welfare state with individuals becoming more and more reliant on government for their subsistence based on the declaration of Karl Marx, “From each according to their ability to each according to their need.” Today we are witnessing a direct attack on our Constitution once again where a political party that was dissatisfied with a presidential election, the only nationwide election provided for in our Constitution, is challenging the right of the people to elect the President of their choice. This political party is doing exactly what George Washington predicted and that is to place the needs and wants of a party above the good of the country. What is being learned during this inquisition are some startling realities that when fully realized will shake the very core of our nation. Another nationwide election will be held in less than a year. The outcome of this election will determine much. If President Trump is not elected, our government will go back to the normality it had achieved. What we have learned that normality is, is to continue to limit our Natural Rights, to enlarge our government until the government is the final arbiter it all areas as to how the individual lives their lives and what their thoughts are to be. That normality includes canceling all parts of the United Sates Constitution and truly declaring it a living document so discarding it completely will be justified. If President Trump is re-elected, our nation will through a very dramatic crisis, but one that is probably unavoidable and necessary. It will be a time when the self-righteousness of the left will ring like the noise of sharp strikes on evil symbols. It will be necessary and mandatory that the Trump administration continue the investigation and uncovering of the unlawful actions of the CIA under Brenan, the NSC under Clapper, and the FBI under Comey. This should expose not only the unlawful actions of these individuals but also uncover what is known as the swamp or the deep state within these bureaus. The Trump administration must also uproot the bureaucratic deep state in the State Department and the Defense Department who have come to believe that the President serves at their pleasure and it is them that determines the foreign policy of the United States. We have witnessed the arrogance and self-righteous attitude of this danger this past week. What will have to be investigated, and it must be investigated with no hesitation or any limitations, is how long-time government employees, elected, appointed, or hired have used their positions to enrich themselves through corruption. The Clinton’s use of pay for play during Hillary’s time as Secretary of State must be totally revealed including her selling uranium to the Russians for millions of dollars given to the Clinton foundation and her husband. The full story on how she and Obama sold arms to terrorists through Libya and then allowed our ambassador to be murdered to cover up their wrongdoing must be fully investigated. Hunter Biden being paid and used by the Chinese to acquire access to technology must be exposed. The use of Ukraine to enrich the Biden’s, Kerry’s, Pelosi’s, and associates of Romney must be totally investigated and exposed. There can be no political limits on these investigations. As more is exposed it must be investigated as well. Yes, this type of exposure will bring about a crisis for sure. Yet it must be done. Those have been promoting communism for our country will resist with anything and everything they can. Never forget that they live by the rule, “the ends always justify the means.” This exposure will deliver a detour as they take us down “The Road to Tyranny” like they have never experienced before. But, never forget that collectivists do not give up; they just keep coming and keep coming. The more they are exposed during the next four years of President Trump, the longer it will take them to regain the control they had. Let us hope that takes hundreds and hundreds of years. We can hope but I doubt it. President Trump made many promises to the American people. Because of these promises President Trump was elected. We could list all of these promises, but they have been listed so often and the results are so abundantly clear I will dispense. The most important promise President Trump made was that he would drain the swamp. What we are witnessing at this time is the result of President Trump attempting to fulfill that promise and that promise was that HE WOULD DRAIN THE SWAMP. This is the reason President Trump was threatened with being removed through a coup, commonly referred to as an impeachment, even before he ever took office.
The swamp includes but is not limited to career bureaucrats, the permanent congressional staffs, long time politicians, members of the entrenched media, and long-time lobbyists. It is these mostly non elected and even non appointed, but hired people that have come to believe the government has been established for them to influence, control, and manipulate for their own power and enrichment. It is this very government to which Thomas Jefferson referred when he stated: "Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established, should not be changed for light and transient causes; and, accordingly, all experience [has] shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But, when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce [the people] under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security." Thomas Jefferson It is this very entrenched government long established that President Trump promised to throw off and to provide new guards for future security. What Thomas Jefferson did not tell us was that those who had become used to continuing their train of abuses and usurpations would be adamant about retaining their evil and self-serving practices. Thomas Jefferson did not warn us, perhaps because he never envisioned that a political party would in fact have as its goal the overthrow of the Constitution, the freedom, and the liberty his generation gave to future Americans. That this determination of the swamp, and this commitment of this political party to replace our freedom and liberty with tyrannical rule enforced by the “dictatorship of the proletariat” was not predicted or perhaps even predictable. Although George Washington did warn us that it was very probable that a political party would in fact place power of the party over the welfare of the country. What is now on display for all to see is that the swamp who hates the Constitution, freedom, and liberty, and the political party that places party above country, will do anything to bring about what was referred to as a “fundamental transformation of the United States.” Freedom Loving Americans must understand that we our freedom and liberty is being reduced, per design, as Jefferson stated it would. When President Trump promised to drain the swamp, he told us he would throw off the despotism that had become so prevalent, and provide the new guards for our future security. The result of the attempted coup will determine if we in the Untied States live with freedom and liberty, or will we live under the tyranny of the “dictatorship of the proletariat.” “You Americans are so gullible. No, you won't accept communism outright, but we'll keep feeding you small doses of socialism until you'll finally wake up and find you already have communism. We won't have to fight you. We'll so weaken your economy until you'll fall like overripe fruit into our hands.”
Nikita Khrushchev This is the message of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats). This is the platform of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats). This is what is being taught in our schools as they have become indoctrination centers just as Lenin intended. This is what is being printed in our media, just as Lenin intended. This is what is being shown in our entertainment outlets, just as Lenin intended. Those who vote for Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) and who contribute to them are enemies of all the principles upon which our nation was founded; the principles of individualism. This question must be asked of all Marxist/Progressives (Democrats): Why do you hate freedom, why do you hate the Untied States Constitution, why do you hate liberty, why do you support the enslavement of the people to the dictates of government which is the result of the policies you support???? Not just Khrushchev, but so many others have warned the United States that it will be from within that we will be destroyed, and yet, you Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) continue to promote all the policies that have destroyed nations. And yet, you Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) continue to be “useful idiots” for all those who place power and control above freedom and liberty. Please, please, put aside your destructive pleas for conformity and equality and understand that it is these demands that destroy the fiber of liberty and freedom. Please, Please, Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) read history with an open mind and understand that it is you who are fulfilling the prophecies of the United States being destroyed from within, Yes, Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) it is you are the enemy of the United States, the enemy of freedom and liberty, the enemy of the very nation that protects your right to advocate for its destruction. Please Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) let this be a match that would ignite a brush fire of freedom in your indoctrinated mind. We are witnessing a coup. This is a communist coup to overthrow the Republic our founders established. This Republic was based on a sovereign people with a government that served this sovereign. In order to accomplish and maintain this ideal, our founders understood it was critical that we always maintain a limited government and maintained a society that adhered to rule of law.
Principles of the Rule of Law Supremacy of the Law: For the laws made to govern the actions of government. The Principles of Equality before the Law: This implies that everybody is equal in the eyes of the law. The Principle of individual Rights: Laws are made in a country to protect the interest of the citizens. It is so critical we understand that our founders understood the biggest threat to freedom was government, or what Marx called the “dictatorship of the proletariat.” Our Constitution was written with this understanding, but the founders stated that it was not enough to just have the limitations placed on our government defined within the Constitution, but we must specifically state that natural rights granted to us by our Creator could not be infringed upon by government, so they added the Bill of Rights as a part of the Constitution. What we must understand is that the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) oppose the idea that support the concepts of limited government and rule of law and instead embrace the belief of Marx and Lenin that the people should be under the tyranny of the “dictatorship of the proletariat.” The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are stating this belief, are practicing this belief, and are adhering to this belief in their coup attempt to overthrow a duly elected president, an action which they understand will overthrow, our Constitution, our principle of peaceful transfer of power, and place government as sovereign of the people. I do not state these facts lightly. However, when I study the beliefs and practices of Lenin, and compare them to the beliefs espoused by Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) candidates for president and when I compare the practices of Lenin to the practices of Pelosi and Schiff in their now stated coup attempt (that is right, this is a coup and not impeachment), a reasonable person can come to no other conclusion. A special logic governs the Leninist (and Marxist/Progressive or Democrat) approach to morality, legality, and rights. In his famous address to the Youth Leagues, Lenin complains that bourgeois thinkers have slanderously denied that Bolsheviks have any ethics. We reject any morality based on extra-human and extra-class concepts. We say that this is a deception. We say that morality is entirely subordinated to the interests of the proletariat’s class struggle. That is why we say that to us there is no such thing as a morality that stands outside human society; that is a fraud. To us morality is subordinated to the interests of the proletariat’s class struggle. When people tell us about morality, we say: to a Communist all morality lies in this united discipline and conscious mass struggle against the exploiters. In short, Bolshevik morality holds that whatever contributes to Bolshevik success is moral, whatever hinders it is immoral. Imagine someone saying: “my detractors claim I have no morals, but that is sheer slander. On the contrary, I have a very strict moral code, from which I never deviate look out for number 1.” We might reply: the whole point of a moral code is to restrain you from acting only out of self-interest. Morality begins with number 2. A moral code that says you must do what you regard as your self-interest is no moral code at all. The same is true for a code that says the Communist Party is morally bound to do whatever it regards as in its interest. Regarding law: If by law one means a code that binds the state as well as the individual, specifies what is and is not permitted, and eliminates arbitrariness, then Lenin entirely rejected law as “bourgeois.” He expressed utter contempt for the principles “no crime without law” and “no punishment without a crime.” Recall that he defined the dictatorship of the proletariat as rule based entirely on force absolutely unrestrained by any law. His more naïve followers imagined that rule by sheer terror would cease when Bolshevik hold on power was secure, or when the New Economic Policy relaxed restrictions on trade, but Lenin made a point of disillusioning them. “It is the biggest mistake to think that nep will put an end to the terror. We shall return to the terror, and to economic terror,” he wrote. When D. I. Kursky, People’s Commissariat of Justice, was formulating the first Soviet legal code, Lenin demanded that terror and arbitrary use of power be written into the code itself! “The law should not abolish terror,” he insisted. “It should be substantiated and legalized in principle, without evasion or embellishment.” So far as I know, never before had the law prescribed lawlessness. Do as you wish, or else. Lenin had ascribed the fall of the Paris Commune to the failure to eliminate all law, and so the Soviet state was absolutely forbidden from exercising any restraint on arbitrary use of power. Indeed, officials were punished for such restraint, which Lenin called impermissible slackness and Stalin would deem lack of vigilance. The same logic applied to rights. On paper, the Soviet Constitution of 1936 guaranteed more rights than any other state in the world. I recall a Soviet citizen telling me that people in the USSR had absolute freedom of speech—so long as they did not lie. I recalled this curious concept of freedom when a student defended complete freedom of speech except for hate speech—and hate speech included anything he disagreed with. Whatever did not seem hateful was actually a “dog-whistle.” Lenin’s language, no less than his ethics, served as a model, taught in Soviet schools and recommended in books with titles like Lenin’s Language and On Lenin’s Polemical Art. In Lenin’s view, a true revolutionary did not establish the correctness of his beliefs by appealing to evidence or logic, as if there were some standards of truthfulness above social classes. Rather, one engaged in “blackening an opponent’s mug so well it takes him ages to get it clean again.” Nikolay Valentinov, a Bolshevik who knew Lenin well before becoming disillusioned, reports him saying: “There is only one answer to revisionism: smash its face in!” And so here we are today, the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) embracing all that Lenin embraced. Lenin brought about a tyrannical government of terror under the rule of the “dictatorship of the proletariat.” The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) under the leadership of Pelosi and Schiff are attempting a coup to bring about this same tyranny under the leadership of the “dictatorship of the proletariat.” The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are telling us that in the interest of compassion and better and more fair health care, we must have a nationalized health care system. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are telling us that any who do not agree with this system are all the typical isms or we are evil people.
Nationalized health care is 0% about compassion and 100% about power. The collectivist (Marxists, communists, socialists, progressives, and Democrats, - all virtually the same) have always been about power and 0% about the good of the people. Collectivists such as Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Castro, Chavez, Wilson, FDR, Obama, Jarrett, Holder and on and on, never considered the people first, but always did what was necessary to put power in the hands of the government, which was power in their hands. Lenin told us that nationalized health care is the archway to socialism. We have seen this same scenario play out in many European nations, Canada, and the United States. Health care under the control of the government always results in higher cost and less and poorer health care for the people. Always, check out anywhere in the world today where you have nationalized health care including Canada, the UK, Cuba, Venezuela, and the United States. The VA is government control of health care. The VA has shown us that government health care is not concerned with the patient but is more concerned with bureaucratic procedures and control. It is these controls and procedures that manipulate the system while the patients die. The collectivists have attempted to bring nationalized health care to the United States for years. In 1965, Johnson was successful, under lies and false pretenses of bringing Medicare. The result of Medicare is much higher health costs, more and more bureaucratic red tape, providers of health care being forced to participate in practices they do not support, and it has been the stepping stone for nationalized health care in the United States, which is serving as an archway to socialism. Nationalized health care always increases costs, lowers the quality of care, places a large segment of any economy under government control, and gives the government the tool to control the people, just as Lenin said it would. A National Health Service (NHS) trust in the UK has announced that it will deny treatment to patients it deems are ‘racists’ or ‘sexists’. The North Bristol NHS Trust said that “threatening and offensive language,” as well as “racist or sexist language, gestures or behavior” and “malicious allegations” would all be punishable offenses. Patients who commit such an infraction will be subject to a “sports-style disciplinary yellow card and then final red card in which treatment would be withdrawn as soon as is safe.” “We have staff from many different backgrounds, from all over the world, and we pride ourselves on our commitment to equality which is a fundamental value of the NHS,” said Andrea Young, Chief Executive for North Bristol NHS Trust. “We’re sending a strong signal that any racism or discrimination is completely unacceptable – we want staff to challenge and report it and we want everyone to know that it will have consequences,” she added. This is the goal of anybody arguing for nationalized health care. This is the ultimate goal of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats). This is why the $ cost is of no concern to them. The reason they want nationalized health care has nothing to do with the well being of people, but is 100% about power and control. Yes, what is happening in the UK will happen in the US if we foolishly accept the lies of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) that they have any concern for the well being of the people. The collectivists (Marxists, communists, socialists, progressives, Democrats, all virtually the same) are purposefully destroying our Constitution and thus our nation. The collectivists have always hated liberty and freedom. The collectivist believes that all should worship the state and totally conform to the dictates of the state. The collectivists believe that all should be equally poor and dependent on the state and beholding to those who occupy the seats of power who should live in splendor and opulence because of the sacrifice they are making for the good of the state.
The collectivists advocate for big dominating, dictatorial, bureaucratic government. This is critical to the collectivist movement because through big government the lives of the people can be controlled. It is the belief of the collectivist that all rights come from government including our natural rights and all those rights specifically protected in the Bill of Rights. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are calling for government controls on our liberty to practice our chosen method for worshiping God, what we can and cannot say, and when we can and cannot assemble. These freedoms are critical to a free and independent nation. They are a threat to an aspiring tyrant. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are calling for open borders with unfettered access to any and all who would wish to cross those borders. Once those borders have been illegally crossed, the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are advocating that these illegal aliens have full rights of any citizen. They are also advocating for these illegal immigrants to be free from the consequences of crimes they would commit while in our country. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are in the process of changing our election process for president by demanding that they have the final authority over the results of the election. They are trying to establish this principle by putting forth the proposition that if they disagree with the election results, they can remove the duly elected president by the process of a coup. This will also set aside the idea that power be peacefully transferred. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are stipulating that all facets of our lives be under the purview of government. This includes our health care and the raising of our children. Every tyrant has understood that it is critical the children be indoctrinated by the state so they will understand that it is the state to whom any and all allegiance is given. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have rewritten history, they have determined that children as young as five start to be introduced to the sexual perversions and mores so critical to the breakdown of the family as the core unit of our society. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) understand that in order to bring about their desired collectivist state, they must negate the family unit as the core unit of society and replace the family with a total allegiance to the state. The welfare state, legalized murder of the unborn, demeaning of faith, promiscuity, acceptance of perverted sexual practices, indoctrination of youth, and the destruction of the nations culture are all a part of this effort. It was implemented successfully by Lenin, Mao, and Hitler and is now well on its way to being implemented successfully by the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats). They are very skilled in their method of implementation. They will always turn the discussion or debate to the details of their target, such as nationalized health care, which turns the discussion to how much is too much, as opposed to the evil and destruction of the implementation of nationalized health care in any form. If you will listen to them, they will always tell you they have been successful if they are able to implement another part of their destructive agenda, even if it was not the total of what they wanted. Freedom Loving Americans must understand this method and not participate in the discussion of how much, but instead demand not at all. We revolted from the Brits because they were acting as tyrants, telling the American Colonists how they were to live their lives and how they were to think. Today, we have a major political party in the freed colonies advocating that we return to tyranny again and have the government tell we the people how we must live our lives and how we are to think. The last presidential election we held in the freed colonies was in November of 2016. According to the Constitution of the United States, yes Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) we still adhere to parts of that document despite your efforts to totally obliterate it, our next presidential election is scheduled for November of 2020.
November of 2020 is one year or 12 months from now. The campaign for the election began in November of 2016. That is right, we in the United States now have continuous political campaigns. We have been having so called debates since June of 2019. The first caucuses and primaries will begin in about three months with the party nominees to be officially named by Labor Day 2020. In the meantime, we have been having meaningless polls dominating the news cycle. As we learned in 2016, polls are no longer predictors but are used to try to sway public opinion with the only meaningful poll taken where and when it should; on election day. The United Kingdom has been going through some rocky political times much like we have in the United States. The people of the United Kingdom voted to exit the European Union about three years ago. The deep state in the United Kingdom believes that the United Kingdom should remain a part of the European Union, a globalist organization that believes they supersede the sovereignty of the individual nations, and has thrown every possible roadblock in the way of the public demanded exit. To try to overcome these roadblocks, Prime Minister Boris Johnson declared that a national election would be held. In many ways this national election is a repeat of the vote taken three years ago on whether or not the United Kingdom should remain a part of the European Union. The outcome of this election will make the final determination, supposedly. Johnson called for this election the end of October. The election will take place on December 12th of 2020. That is correct, approximately seven weeks from the time the election was called, it will be held. Of course, there are many polls being conducted, perhaps far more meaningful than those in the United States which were first taken four years from the presidential election. But, only seven weeks of campaigning. Only seven weeks of pontificates. Only seven weeks of listening to meaningless promises and rhetoric. How refreshing is that. The above number is the current National Debt. It is actually higher because this was the number as of the other day. It is on its way to $24 trillion. Gross National Product for 2018 rose to a level of $20.50 trillion. As of the end of 2018, Greece had a national debt that was 181% of its GNP, Italy was 132%, and Cyprus was 102%. The United States is 117%.
Today we hear cries from the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) to provide universal health care, eliminate all student debt, provide free college tuition for all, and on and on. The congress is in the middle of passing budget bills so the government can keep operating. In the discussion, nobody is mentioning that we are in a bankrupt state. During the current presidential campaign, we will be hearing from the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) how much the government should give away. They will be telling us that we can pay for their give away programs by taxing the rich. What history proves is that the higher the tax rates the lower are the government receipts and the lower the tax rates the higher are the government receipts. As has so often been said, the United States, along with Greece, Italy, Cyprus, and so many others, does not have a receipt problem, we have a spending problem. President Trump proposed a zero-based budgeting program with a 5% decrease spending cut as its goal. Rand Paul recently called for an across the board cut of 2%. In both situations, they who called for the make sense and responsible budgeting proposals were roundly demonized by the Marxist/Progressives and Republican establishment. In the plan to make America great again, President Trump, along with Rand Paul and other Freedom Loving Americans, must make the greatest threat to our national security, our debt, a target and right the ship. This means we will need a large majority in both the house and the senate. Remember, the swamp runs deep and deficit spending is a major part of the swamps ideology. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
November 2019
Categories |
RSS Feed