|
What is happening in the United States has been forecast. Nobody should be surprised that the United States of America is now on the cusp of becoming a collectivist nation. The move for this to happen was put into motion years ago. It would not have happened if the American public had remained as dedicated to individualism as were those who paid such a huge price for freedom and independence.
I received a call from my Cousin this morning on a personal matter. During the course of our conversation, which had turned to current events, she made the comment that she and her husband were talking about the situation and she said my name came up as it had in many of their previous conversations. She said that they recall many of the things I had written and that so much of what I had written is happening. I had a conversation with my Sister the other day, again on a personal matter. As so often happens the conversation had turned to current events and my Sister mentioned that during the course of many conversations in which she has been engaged recently, my name will be mentioned in reference to the books I have written and the comment of how what I had said is now happening. I mention these happenings for a specific purpose and that purpose is not to brag that I am not clairvoyant. The fact is I am not. What I have done is to study history which is the study of people. I have also studied the differences between the individualist movement and the collectivist (Marxist, communist, socialist, progressive, Democrat, - all virtually the same) movement. The current happenings are the results of individualists glorying in the inevitable achievements of individualism and the destruction and evil championed by the collectivist. The change is because the American people refused to pay any attention to the inevitable signs of what was to come. Complacency is always dangerous. Two areas of critical attack by the collectivist movement was taking place right before us and we Freedom Loving Americans paid no attention to what was happening, in fact, in many ways we assisted the collectivist as we relished the rewards of the efforts of those before us. The two critical areas that the collectivists were attacking are the two areas they always attack. The collectivist always indoctrinates the youth of a nation through the school system and they also concentrate on the breakdown of the core family unit. If they can succeed in these two areas they are well on their way to destroying the freedom, liberty, and prosperity that is created by individualism. We who claim to champion freedom, liberty, and prosperity must learn in what manner individualism is being challenged, who is challenging it, and how they are challenging what we hold so dear. It is this that was referenced by my cousin and my sister. They better understood the what, the who, and the how. If you are determined to fight to retain the individualism that was given to us, you must also understand the what, the who, and the how. How do you go about doing this. You must commit to being a dedicated student and keen observer. Set aside some time each day dedicated to this cause. Be less concerned about repeating and posting the now trite clichés and understand the reasoning behind these bumper stickers. Read, read, read, and ask questions. The resources are at your fingertips. One great way to get a better understanding is to read the books I have spent a great deal of time researching and publishing. You can find them on my website or on Amazon. The Road to Tyranny, Two Visions of America, and Setting Brushfires of Freedom will give you a much better understanding of the what, who, and how. These books are available on my website, Amazon, or Barnes and Nobel. http://www.mygrandchildrensamerica.com/
0 Comments
This year of 2020 has been a year that has brought much change. The China Virus alone has caused a realignment of priorities in the life of many. The Marxist movement of Black Lives Matter has also revealed aspects of racism that in the past have been discussed but have now been exposed.
What we suspected in the past but now know, is that the independent spirit that has always been a part of the American mystic has left a large part of the American public. Much of the American public no longer questions government but instead has become an extremely compliant people. Independence and freedom can only survive when people are highly suspect of government. Our founders and early Americans understood that when people viewed government as their friend, as Obama told Americans they should, that the people already had at least one foot in the trap of becoming enslaved. What we have come to realize as well is that the so-called leaders in the Black community, the Reverends, are racists. These Reverends have shown how they have used those they are claiming to help for power and self-enrichment. The Black Lives Matter slogan is the epitome of racism, and is spoken by racists and hypocrites. The racist element is exposed just on the face of the statement. Any modifier used to change the meaning of lives matter reveals racism. The hypocrisy is revealed when it becomes irrefutable that the only life that matters, black or otherwise, is the one that can bring more power and riches to the Reverends and others who are in the power and rich domain. It is becoming more and more evident that the monolithic voting block is becoming more diverse and it is doing so quickly. As importantly is that many of the American people are realigning priorities. Parts of their lives that they thought were critical, they have learned have been a waste of time and money. Many people now understand how intellectually challenged are so many of the celebrities and athletes from whom they used to gather their ideas. People have learned that the cost and time of going to the movie theater is now on a much lower priority level. The cost and time of attending pro sports events to watch morally corrupt, intellectually challenged, and American hating people perform is way down the priority list if not completely removed. If colleges and universities continue on their course, they will learn that they have also done damage that will take years to rebuild if ever. Perhaps the most critical event that has been revealed is just how harmful the public-school system has become because of Marxist Teachers Unions and Marxist bureaucrats. Parents are learning that the education, reading, writing, math, science, accurate history, of their children is low on the rung of priorities of Teachers Unions, School Boards, and others who have any control over public-schools. Responsible parents, which most are, will be looking to alternative options for educating their children. This will become even more apparent as parents hear how their children have been and are being indoctrinated in the Marxist movement which includes the desire to destroy the core family unit in the United States. This has become the primary purpose of Teachers Unions and public schools. So many choices we face. The choices we make impact our lives. Where will we go to school? Will we marry and if so who will it be? Where will we live? How will we spend our money? If we live in a free society, we make all the choices that affect our lives. If we live in a collectivist (Marxist, communist, socialist, progressive, Democrat, - all virtually the same) society, the government makes most of our decisions. The people have little to no responsibility because they have given their right to make choices to the government in exchange for the right of the government to control their lives.
Sadly, most people do not understand that in fact there are two decisions that are critical and even when the individuals choose to ignore these decisions, by not specifically declaring, they are choosing in the negative. The first of these choices is of a temporary nature. That choice is what type of government will you choose. Some form of government always exists. Samuel Adams told the colonists they must also make a choice. Adams said, “It has high time the people of this land explicitly declared whether they will be free men or slaves.” This is always the choice. Do we choose to live as individuals in an individualist society where we make our own choices and then must be responsible for the consequences of those choices. The other alternative is to choose to live under a collectivist society where we agree to subjugate our wishes, our desires, and our ability to make choices to the collective in exchange for the collective telling us how to live our lives, how we are to think, and providing us with what the collective determines we need. We make no choices, we are not responsible for consequences, and we agree to be satisfied with what the collective gives us. The choice as to whether we will be free men or slaves is temporary and ends with our last breath. The other choice is eternal. That choice has far greater consequences and literally determines where we will spend eternity. Many would have people believe that the choices are many and varied and choosing or not choosing is meaningless because we all spend eternity together. Others would have us believe that if we are good, or at least intended to be good, (good is very flexible), we are rewarded for our intents and we will spend eternity in some blissful and wonderful place while the others will simply cease to exist. As wonderful as that may sound, it is a false and misleading belief. The hard truth is that we all should spend eternity in Hell because none of us is good. The reality is that we are given an opportunity to choose to spend eternity with Holy God. The choice is available to all, but it is only attainable through the person that we know as the Son of God or Jesus Christ. What you do with Jesus Christ has eternal consequences. Do not avoid or evade this decision. Making no choice is the same as choosing to reject the offer of Salvation through the Grace of Christ. Remember the consequences are eternal. You will either spend eternity in the presence of God or you will spend eternity separated from God. Understand you choose what type of government you support on earth; a government based on individualism or a government based on collectivism. Most importantly, know where you will spend eternity. We were given a wonderful promise when we were promised that those of us who seek Christ will find him. The place to search is the Bible. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.
It is a Natural Right given to us by God to pursue our happiness. That would mean that, just like our right to life and liberty, the only role government can play in our right to pursue happiness is to protect that right. Since the right to pursue happiness is given by God to us, government does not have the right to limit or abolish that right. The collectivists (Marxists, communists, socialists, progressives, Democrats, - all virtually the same) disagree with all of our founding documents including the Declaration of Independence. The collectivist would have us believe that everything, including what we individualists refer to as Natural Rights, in fact come from government. Many collectivists would have us believe that God does not even exist, while those that say perhaps there is a God, but the laws of God are inferior to the laws of the state. When it became known that a virus was moving throughout the world’s population, many of the collectivists saw this as an opportunity to wield even more power and control over those subject to the jurisdiction of these collectivists. In the United States, many governors, mayors, elected county officials, and bureaucrats used this virus to assert their power and control and pronounced that it is government and not God who has all control over the right to happiness of the individual. These collectivists used the long-used excuse of safety to implement draconian requirements drawn from the air to “lockdown the population.” In declaring these lockdowns, the collectivists even took it upon themselves to declare who is and who is not essential, which functions are and which functions are not essential, and under what conditions each individual can operate within a totally closed society. The collectivists were totally wrong in so many aspects. The lockdowns, depriving the individual of their God given Natural Right to pursue happiness, were conducted based on political motives and applying no science to the decisions. Even as reality revealed that this virus was at most just another flu virus, the collectivists high on power, imposed even more draconian restrictions that caused serious health dangers to the public along with the serious financial damage being caused. It is now becoming more and more apparent everyday that in fact the collectivists motives and demands of the collectivists had no concern for our founding documents and no concern for the well being of the people. The only concern was power and control. The most recent proof that the collectivists are only interested in power and control is the refusal to open schools. There is no logical or scientific argument to keep schools closed. The only reason for this action is to appease the Teachers Unions in their desire to move the fundamental transformation of the United States even closer to the Marxist totalitarian state to which they aspire. That these lockdowns were absolutely wrong is the experience of one of the few nations that did not adhere to the desire to assume the role of God and restrict the Natural Right of pursuing happiness by imposing the lockdowns of the collectivists. That nation is Sweden. The results are now known. In life, we encounter things which may work in theory, but not in practice. Communism is famously one of those things. Time travel is another. With any luck, Americans will soon come to realize that strict social distancing, economic lockdowns, and mask-wearing all belong in that category of supposedly sound ideas that simply don’t work in reality. For evidence, let’s look to Sweden. As Dr. Malcolm Kendrick, an ER doctor at a hospital in Stockholm, writes on his blog, “COVID is over in Sweden. People have gone back to their normal lives and barely anyone is getting infected anymore.” Unlike so many other countries, “Sweden never went into complete lockdown,” Dr. Kendrick writes. Non-essential businesses remained open, people continued frequenting restaurants, the kids stayed in school, and “very few people have bothered with face masks.” Basically, Sweden did the exact opposite of what most Americans tragically still believe are the necessary requirements to reach the outcome that Sweden has achieved. Kendrick argues what should now be obvious to any rational, thinking person, which is that “the size of the response in most of the world (not including Sweden) has been totally disproportionate to the threat.” Naysayers may point to Sweden’s mortality rate to discount its success. But the virus has taken nearly 6,000 people in a country of 10 million, and one which tallies about 100,000 annual deaths each year. Given that 70 percent of those who died with COVID were over the age of 80 and very unhealthy, Kendrick argues, “quite a few of those 6,000 would have died this year anyway,” making COVID a “mere blip in terms of its effect on mortality.” And, while Sweden will likely continue to see deaths from COVID, it will likely never see anything close to those numbers again. The large number of deaths can be clearly attributed to a “complete lack of any immunity” to this novel coronavirus. A few months ago, Dr. Kendrick says that “practically everyone who was tested had COVID,” even if the presenting symptom was a “nosebleed” or “stomach pain.” Today, he reports that he hasn’t seen a COVID patient in over a month, and even when he tests patients with fever or cough, the “tests invariably come back as negative.” To be clear, Sweden’s economy is wide open. No one is social distancing or wearing a ridiculous mask. Life is back to normal, and the infection rate is still falling. It’s pretty safe to say the population in Sweden has now built some level of immunity to the virus, and all signs indeed point to the pandemic being over in Sweden. What is the obvious takeaway from this? Perhaps Dr. Kendrick sums it up best, saying that he is “willing to bet that the countries that have shut down completely will see rates spike when they open up. If that is the case, then there won’t have been any point in shutting down in the first place.” In other words, all of the lockdowns will have been meaningless. The China virus has long ago left the gate of being fought based on science as are other health related issues and has become a political bell weather. Yes, one could say incredible, but nevertheless very revealing. Just that I chose to use the name China Virus and not COVID 19 would be deemed to be inflammatory by many, even though it has absolutely nothing to do with the scientific elements of the virus. This is what is so revealing.
We have the political element of the China Virus controversy that is telling us the right and purpose of government is to protect the health of the individual by placing regulations on their public and private behaviors. This same element is telling us that it is the right of government to control the life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness in the name of safety as government deems necessary with total disregard for the liberties of the individual. What we are witnessing is a clear definition of the differences between a society based on the precepts of individualism and a society based on the precepts of collectivism. Individualism is associated with a free and independent people because the rights of the individual are superior to the demands of the collective. A collectivist society is associated with a state that controls the aspirations of the individual, so they do not challenge what is determined to be the good of the collective. Any form of a dictatorial society including but not limited to Marxist, communist, socialist, and democracy, demand collectivism. An individualist society demands the individual to be responsible for their own actions, to be involved, interested, informed, and to adhere to Natural Law, which means the individual has the right to life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness or property, but is prohibited from infringing on another persons rights to the same. This is not based on laws and demands set forth by government, but by the individual living under Natural Law. In a collectivist society, the individual is required to adhere to the laws of the state even if those laws infringe on the rights of the individual to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness or property. I remember when I was in Albania a few years ago and was conversing with an individual who told me what it was like living under the collectivist regime, that same type of collectivism advocated by the transformation movement in the United States today. This person was telling me how shocked the Albanians were as to what had happened in the world outside Albania during the time their government controlled every aspect of news and information the people received. He said it was shocking to learn of the political, social, and cultural changes. He also told me that many people were unable to adjust to freedom, such as his grandparents, and to a certain extent his own parents. These people were now required to make their own choices; choices such as what job they would have, where and when they would vacation, where they would live, what food they would buy, what clothes they would buy, what books they would read, what television program they would watch, and on and on. All choices were previously made by the state in the name of the safety and good of the people. This is what we are learning under the orders of certain mayors, governors, and certain county health officials. Based an inflated or completely false precept of safety, these elected officials and bureaucrats are telling us what our choices will be. They are telling us if we can use the phrase China Virus, if we can go outside, if we can go to church, school, work, if we are or are not essential, and even what we must do in our own home. The above are decisions that we as a responsible, informed, involved, and an interested public should be making for ourselves such as, if I want to open my place of business and other people want to frequent my place of business, if I choose to follow the suggestions of the elected officials and bureaucrats, that is also my choice. If I determine I should wear a mask and gloves in my home or car when alone or with others, so be it. But if I do not, it is not the right of the state to deny my right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness and property even in the name of my safety or the safety of others. This is telling me that the state has the right to force me to subjugate my Natural Rights to the demands of the collective and this is the definition of tyranny. Karen Bass said, ““I’m not a socialist. I’m not a communist. I’ve belonged to one party my entire life and that’s the Democratic Party, and I’m a Christian.”
Others argue with Bass and say she is a communist because she went to Cuba to work with the Cuban government when she was younger, she praised Castro, and she eulogized a known communist and called that person her friend. Karen Bass said that because she has been a member or the Democrat party she is not a communist. As we know, being a member of the Democrat party in no way means you are not a Communist. Elanor Roosevelt, Barack Obama, Michele Obama, Valarie Jarrett, Eric Holder, and so many others have been members of the Democrat party and are still communists. That she is a Christian is a more valid argument since communists denounce the very existence of God and claim the state is their God. However, God also says though shalt not kill and the Democrat party and the Communist Party are both strong advocates of murder. The Democrats have stated one cannot be a member of their party if you do not support “choice” or the murder of an unborn child for any reason. Christianity also teaches that God deals with each of us on an individual basis and the Democrats and Communists advocate collectivism or we are all to be viewed as a part of a group and not individuals. Bass cannot be declared she is a communist simply because she went to Cuba, praised Cuba, or eulogized a communist she called a friend. Other people have gone to Cuba to try to do good work, have said kind things about Castro, and even Ronald Reagan said nice things about Gorbachev. I would suggest that we use to determine if Bass or anybody else is a communist is to understand if they advocate for communist ideals per Marx and Lenin. Marx and Lenin had as their main criteria t socialist ideas such as central planning, state ownership or control of property, steeply progressive income taxes as a means of sharing wealth, and welfare programs until the ideal of “from each according to their abilities to each according to their needs” was achieved. The communist ideals were a classless society where all people conformed to the same ideology, the communist ideology. This would be achieved through a state-run indoctrination system where all children were taught the same values and not the values of the parents or the church. In order to achieve the classless society, the family unit would also have to be destroyed. This would be done by adopting and normalizing sexual immorality and perversions, making divorce amazingly simple, and promoting abortion or the murder of unborn children. The communist society is by definition a society that denounces individuality or individualism and subjugates all to the dictates of the collective or a collectivist society. People are not treated as individuals but are grouped together based on attributes such as sex, race, nationality, sexual perversions, and other groupings that might be useful. When you study what Karen Bass has supported throughout her lifetime, you can then come to the conclusion as to whether or not she is a communist. Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said in an interview that the “problem of the left” is that it assumes how black people should think.
What Condoleezza Rice said is certainly true. We heard Joe Biden say that if a person with black skin did not vote for him than he was not a black person. This thinking is not applied just to human beings who happen to have darker skin than others. The collectivists (Marxist, communist, socialist, progressive, Democrat, - all virtually the same) have held this belief since the beginning of time. The collectivist movement holds as its core value that people are a part of the collective and must subjugate all ambitions, thoughts, and desires to the ambitions, thoughts, and desires of the collective. Karl Marx stated that society must be a classless society. It was the goal of Karl Marx and is now the goal of collectivist proponents that we have only one class of society. The very core of this belief is that all people must conform to one philosophy; that the right of the individual to have their own thoughts must be eliminated and all must hold the same philosophy as the collective mandates. Freedom and liberty as envisioned by our founders demands the opposite of what the collectivist movement requires. Freedom and liberty require that individuals have the freedom to think and act independently from the demands of a collective, be that the state, a political party, or some other group. A society that aspires to be a free society with liberty for all must be comprised of a group of individuals who not only do, but are encouraged to thing beyond the bounds of what would be considered to be normal thought. Required conformity can and should be defined as tyranny. When an individual is required to think and act based on the defined group to which they are designated by others, their freedom and liberty is denied and those imposing the requirement would be imposing tyranny. When Joe Biden declared one is not black if they do not support him, Biden is imposing tyranny. When a group requires the thoughts, speech and actions of others must be politically correct, they are imposing tyranny. When a group prohibits the use of what they would term as hate speech, they are imposing tyranny. When a group does not allow those with different ideas from freely expressing their ideas, the group is imposing tyranny. When we who are proponents of freedom and liberty advocate for the rights of all individuals to freely express themselves without imposing restrictions, we are denouncing tyranny. A question before the American people today, a question that is the difference between freedom and liberty and tyranny, is do you champion all people to freely express their thoughts and ideas, or do you believe thoughts and ideas should be limited and controlled if they differ from yours? If you answered in favor of the former, you would favor freedom and liberty. If you answered in favor of the latter, you would favor of tyranny. The former can only exist in an individualist society. The latter can only exist in a collectivist society. Let the people decide is the cry of many. That is always a good idea if the people are informed and open to learning and adjusting accordingly. Most people do not change their minds because another tells them they must unless some form of threat is also applied. This is what we who are Freedom Loving Americans must realize. People will change their minds when they conclude that a new way is better based on new information and their own processing mechanism.
Samuel Adams said, “All might be free if they valued freedom and valued it as they should.” This is our challenge, to help those who believe the Democrat party is the best course to see that today's Democrat party does not value freedom. Over the last century or so we have seen the Democrat party identify more and more closely with the teachings of Marx and the implementation of those teachings based on how Lenin implemented them in Russia, later to be the Soviet Union. This gravitation toward communism was evident during the regime of Franklin Roosevelt who had filled his administration with members of the Communist Party. This was revealed after the fall of the Soviet Union and the records were opened. This movement toward the teachings of Marx again made a gigantic step forward under the regime of Comrade Obama, a student of known communist agitator Frank Marshall Davis. Obama’s college days and early young adult days continued in his quest to bring about communism as he learned community organizing as a student of the Saul Alinsky School. The Democrat party is today continuing along the same path to fundamentally transform the United States to a Marxist totalitarian state per many of those in the leadership of the party including but not limited to Sanders, Perez, Holder, Jarrett, Cortez, Ellison, and on and on. Even today Bob Avakian, the leader of the Revolutionary Communist Party USA endorsed Biden, as he warned followers against a 'protest vote'. The Democrat party has been planning for this particular period for a long time. Not only have they endorsed the outline by Marx in the Communist Manifesto, but they have also been following the ten points called “Lenin’s Decalogue” when Lenin wrote the “Manuel to Seize Control of a Society” that he used as his guideline to bring communism to Russia. Here are the ten points of Lenin’s Decalogue. There is no reason to debate or argue with your friends about how the Democrat party is now the Communist Party of the United States. Just simply ask them if they would review the points and note if they see any similarities to what the Democrat party is promoting today. Lenin’s Decalogue “Manual to Seize Control of a Society” Lenin’s Decalogue “Manual to Seize Control of a Society” which he used in the 1917 Russian Re-Revolution (The October Surprise) usurping control from the original Russian Revolution which occurred earlier in the spring of that year. 1. Corrupt the youth and give them absolute sexual freedom. 2. Infiltrate and take control of the mass communication media. 3. Divide the population into antagonist groups; encourage arguments between them over social issues. 4. Destroy the people’s confidence in their leaders. 5. Talk all the time bout democracy and republic, but when the opportunity arises, seize power as a dictator. 6. Cooperate with the drainage of public funds; discrediting the image of the country, especially overseas, and create panics within the population through the launching of an inflationary process. 7. Encourage strikes, even if they are illegal, in the country’s key industries. 8. Promote riots while conspire to prevent intervention by law enforcement. 9. Cooperate actively in destroying the moral foundations of society and honesty and trust in the government’s promises. Infiltrate other parties with your own people, forcing them to vote for what is useful to your own party’s interest. 10. Register everyone who has firearms, in order to confiscate them when the time comes, preventing them from opposing your revolution. When we are “Setting Brushfires of Freedom” we must remember we can only lead. Do not argue, simply answer questions, and provide information. The evidence is overwhelming that the Democrat party of today is the party of Marx and Lenin. We can only provide the evidence. The other person must conclude if they want to live in a free nation or a communist nation. If they determine they prefer communism, they will vote for candidates with a (D) behind their name for local and for national positions. If they determine they prefer freedom, they probably will not tell you, but they will vote for candidates with a (R) behind their names for local and national positions. The Democrat party, BLM, ANTIFA, and the media are proponents of collectivism (Marxism, communism, socialism, and progressive). Yes, if you vote for people with a D behind their name you are voting to support collectivism (Marxism, communism, socialism, progressive). These are all a part of the Marxist movement or that same evil system Lenin installed in Russia and the Soviet Union, Mao installed in China, Castro installed in Cuba, Chavez installed in Venezuela, and Comrades Obama, Holder, Jarrett, Sanders, and the others want installed in the United States.
Listen to what Marx said and then determine if what I say above is or is not accurate. “Democracy is the road to socialism.” “Keep people from their history, and they are easily controlled.” “My object in life is to dethrone God and destroy capitalism.” “But Communism abolishes eternal truths, it abolishes all religion, and all morality, instead of constituting them on a new basis; it therefore acts in contradiction to all past historical experience.” “the Communists everywhere support every revolutionary movement against the existing social and political order of things... They openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions.” “We have no compassion and we ask no compassion from you. When our turn comes, we shall not make excuses for the terror.” “Communism begins where atheism begins.” “If you can cut the people off from their history, then they can be easily persuaded.” “The education of all children, from the moment that they can get along without a mother's care, shall be in state institutions.” “From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs.” “A heavy or progressive or graduated income tax is necessary for the proper development of Communism.” “We know that violent measures against religion are nonsense; but this is an opinion: as socialism grows, religion will disappear. Its disappearance must be done by social development, in which education must play a part.” The Democrats, BLM, ANTIFA, the media, and the total left is doing all the above. They are demanding we abolish our Republic and become a democracy. They are changing our history, not only by destroying statues, but also through programs such as the 1619 project. They are trying to eliminate God from our society as we saw with the burning of the Bibles. They are promoting violent revolution in the streets under the false pretense of peaceful protests. They advocate that all children must be educated in the public-school system, so it is easier to indoctrinate these children. They strongly support massive taxes. It is critical Americans understand that the transformation movement supported by these communist groups has as its goal the same systems implemented by Lenin, Mao, Castro, and Chavez. There is a transformation movement in the United States. This transformation movement was once again proclaimed on October 30, 2008, when then still a candidate for president, Comrade and Islamic Jihadist sympathizer Obama stated that the United States was five days away from being fundamentally transformed. He did not finish the statement but actions show that the rest of the statement would have been transformed from a Republic that protects the liberties of all to a Marxist totalitarian state that declares the government can and will determine what, if any, liberties are extended and to whom they will be extended.
This movement to transform the United States has been active since at least the days of Woodrow Wilson and had its biggest advances under the Regimes of Franklin Roosevelt and Comrade Obama. The two enemies of this transformation movement that must be destroyed are the Bible and the Constitution of the United States. In Portland over the last two months, we have seen violence and revolution to bring about this transformation. The political party that calls themselves Democrats have encouraged, supported, and defended the violence and the revolution. The other evening, we saw this transformation movement directly attack both the Bible and the Constitution. A reporter said, “Rioters in Portland were caught on camera putting bibles and an American flag into a fire outside of the federal courthouse, which has been a focal point in the protests that have been ongoing for more than a month and a half, numerous sources reported.” I want you to notice that in this story the writer did not capitalize Bible. That violates the rules of proper writing and makes a direct statement on how the media, the democrats, (I purposefully did not capitalize) and the left denounce the God of the Bible as does the actual act of burning the Bible. Burning the flag represents burning the Constitution. Both the Bible and the Constitution stand for exactly the opposite of what the democrats and the left desire. The Bible and the Constitution represent belief in the Creator, belief in the individual over the collective, respect for all regardless of race or national origin, a strong family unit, and a set of rules by which we should all observe that honors life, liberty, and property. This is from Noah Webster: “All the miseries and evils which men suffer from vice, crime, ambition, injustice, oppression, slavery, and war, proceed from their despising or neglecting the precepts contained in the Bible.” What the transformation movement, comprised of much of the media, the Democrat party, and the left, is advocating are those very miseries and evils stated by Noah Webster. This is the choice before the American people; vice, crime, ambition, injustice, oppression, and war per the fundamental transformation, or the liberty and freedom proclaimed in the Bible and the Constitution. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
August 2020
Categories |
RSS Feed