Once again, the discussion is about which band-aide should be used to stop the leak in the dam. The fact is none of the band-aides will work. We can use the one with super duper adhesive, we can use the extra large one, or we can use the most absorbent one and nothing will change. The dam that is threatening to collapse must be restored, or it will break.
Pundit, politician, and citizen say the AR-15 cannot be sold, the age to buy guns must be raised, better back ground checks must be used, and on and on they go. Meanwhile, the morality, ethics, and respect within our society continues to deteriorate, and that deterioration goes on not only unheeded, but encouraged.
Karl Marx said that in order to transform a society to a classless society that is totally socially just, totally conforming, and totally equal, the transformers must obliterate all morality, all long-standing principles, and all religion from that society. This obliteration has been active and ongoing within the United States and most all Western Society for at least the last 100 year.
When morality, long standing principles, and religion are obliterated, something must fill the void. What has always filled the void are the forces of evil, those who would long to take what is not theirs, legally or illegally, those who would long to kill, legally or illegally, those who would seek to shirk their responsibility, and those who would seek to claim victim hood as opposed to self-responsibility.
A welfare system, be it called a safety net system or compassion will always breed and cause evil. A welfare system creates a segment of the population that becomes government reliant which brings about a lack of self-respect and destroys the family. A society with a strong family unit will always be a society with far fewer people who deem it necessary to kill others. And yes, welfare is nothing more than a system of legal robbery.
We have a system that says it is not only a choice to kill others for any reason including convenience, but this murder is encouraged by a large segment of the population and in many cases funded by the government. This murder is referred to “as a women’s right to choose,” but is in fact telling our population that human life has no value. This widely accepted and encouraged manner of murder is telling our society that if the life of another is an inconvenience to you, you have every right to have that life extinguished. Abortion is telling society that murder is right, and it is legal.
We have a system that tells parents they do not have to, and in many instances the state prohibits them from disciplining or giving their children correction, especially if that discipline or correction is based on the teachings of the Bible. We have a system that says children cannot be disciplined in school because of bad behavior, rudeness, or class disruption because that could harm the self-image of the child. This system is supported by parents who sue the schools when their child is disciplined, and it is supported by school administrators and courts. The Obama regime said that discipline could not be applied based on an individual basis, but discipline must be applied based on race ratios.
We have a system that more and more is requiring that the state be responsible for all aspects of child development including but not limited to morality, religion, and academics. A large number of parents encourage and support the state appropriating this responsibility because the parent can now be friend or just absent, but under any circumstances these parents believe they are freed from this tremendous responsibility.
So, to satisfy our need for believing we are doing something to correct a problem, we argue about the band-aide and allow the dam to continue to crumble. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) once again continues their onslaught against our Constitution and all it represents, and of course they believe they are mitigating the Bible, which can never be accomplished, even by the academic, political elite, or self- adjudicated important individual. The useful idiot joins in this meaningless argument believing they are the defender of freedom. The useful idiot then wins acclaim as opposed to the ridicule they would suffer if they instead insisted on restoring the dam.
Veteran award-winning Radio Host and author Chuck Morse broadcasts live Mon - Fri Noon ET on YouTube and Facebook.
Named as one of the “heavy 100” talk show hosts by Talkers Magazine and awarded “Communicator of the Year” by the National Right to Work Committee in 2003, Chuck's column is published weekly by Newsmax.com and his books are available on Amazon.com and elsewhere.
Chuck, who wrote the forward to my book “Goodbye Constitution, Freedom, America” and I discussed my new book, “The Road To Tyranny, Individualism to Collectivism.” Chuck is very knowledgeable about many topics including a unique and deep understanding of Collectivism. Our discussion will give everybody a better idea as to what is happening in the United States today. You can listen to this penetrating and informative discussion here: https://youtu.be/TcgRs0jMKrc
I would recommend that any American who wants to have a better understanding of the current discussion taking place in the Untied States today go to my website and order “The Road To Tyranny, Individualism to Collectivism.”
A reader called me yesterday and thanked me for writing what they called “a great book.” They said they appreciated the straight forward explanation of Individualism and Collectivism without the typical and expected bombastic rhetoric. They also thanked me for relating these concepts to current events, so they had real life meaning. They went on to say they now understood what is meant by the slippery slope so often discussed today without any clear explanation of what the term really meant. They then ordered ten additional books, explaining there were many people they knew they wanted to give a copy and strongly encourage them to read the book.
As I have explained to others, I wrote this book because in Q and A sessions, both on radio and in live settings, it became very clear to me that people did not understand the differences, nor did they relate Individualism and Collectivism to current happenings. The above reader believed they understood these differences but said for the first time they were able to relate these differences to current events. My mission was accomplished with this reader. For the sake of liberty and freedom in the Untied States, I hope you are the next.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) understand the real fight to bring about their desired fundamental transformation of the United States from a free and independent nation to a Marxist totalitarian state that is a classless society that is totally conforming and equal, lies in the courts. The role of the courts today is totally different from what the founders intended. The founders intended that the courts only give rulings. The Constitution does not give the courts the authority to make law.
However, this has become the role of the courts. Yes, the Marshall court, the courts during the FDR reign of terror, and the Warren court determined the role of the court was to make law, engineer social justice, and advance the fundamental transformation so this has become the purpose of the third branch of our government. Consequently, the battle between Senate Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) over the “blue-slip rule” escalated this week, after another one of President Trump’s judicial nominees advanced without the approval of both of their home-state senators
The blue-slip rule — which Democrats describe as a long-running Senate tradition Grassley has taken to ignore — has become a flashpoint for members on the Judiciary Committee. The committee has been tasked with considering the slew of nominees from the Trump administration, many of which have been controversial. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the committee’s top Marxist/Progressive (Democrat), said that Grassley’s decision to hold nomination hearings and approve two nominees who lacked a blue slip from a home-state senator marked a landmark change in committee tradition. Home-state senators have historically been able to block nominees by refusing to return a blue paper of approval to the committee. It’s a courtesy, rather than a formal Senate rule, and whether it’s followed is entirely up to whoever helms the Judiciary Committee — in this case, Grassley.
This is critical because the courts have become the predominant way the Marxist/Progressives are enforcing and advancing their programs. A Marxist/Progressive Judge in Pennsylvania has just taken it upon himself to flaunt the Pennsylvania legislature and redraw the congressional district map that will probably swing four house seats to the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) side. Nothing in the United States Constitution gives any member of the court the right, power, or duty to determine congressional districts. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have never allowed the United States Constitution to prevent them from moving forward their agenda of transforming the United States from a free and independent country into a Marxist totalitarian classes state that is totally conforming and totally equal.
Former Obama regime EPA administrator Gina McCarthy says that regulations struck down by the Trump administration won't carry weight in court. McCarthy, who was the Environmental Protection Agency chief from 2013 to 2017, called the recent political targeting of regulations at the agency a "real problem."
"I think the important thing is none of them should be touched unless the administration has a real reason to touch them, other than it was done under the Obama administration, and that is the real problem that we see," McCarthy said.
The former administrator who has been an outspoken opponent of changes made under current EPA head Scott Pruitt, specifically mentioned the administration's desire to change the Clean Water Rule, also known as the Waters of the United States (WOTUS) rule.
"We see the Clean Water rule being proposed to be repealed, all that rule really did was do what the Supreme Court and what science told us to do to make sure we are protecting the rivers and streams that are necessary to ensure safe drinking water and fishable and swimmable waters," McCarthy said.
"That is being challenged just because the president told them to do that in an executive order. That’s legally not going to hold up."
McCarthy is probably correct. The courts have taken it upon themselves while overstepping their Constitutional authority, that they can rule, not on the content of the regulation or law, but what they determine to be the motive and thinking of the law. The Supreme Court has done this, as have appellate courts, and now district courts. One court said he ruled against a lawfully written administrative order because of things Trump said during the campaign. Another court recently ruled that the current administration’s position on DCAC is unconstitutional because the administration said DACA is unconstitutional.
No wonder the Senate Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are so adamant that the so called blue-slip rule be treated like a law or even like a part of the Untied States Constitution. That is how much the Marxist movement depends on the courts. Thank you Senator Grassley for acting in the best interest of freedom and independence and actually adhering to “rule of law” to restore the Constitutionally mandated role of the Judicial Branch of government.
A case is to be argued Feb. 26 that could affect the financial viability of unions that are major supporters of Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) candidates and causes. The unions represent more than 5 million government workers in 24 states and the District of Columbia who could be affected by the outcome.
The court is being asked to overturn a 41-year-old ruling that allows states to require government employees who don't want to be union members to pay for activities the union undertakes supposedly on behalf of all workers, not just its members. These so-called fair share fees are purported to cover the costs of collective bargaining and grievance procedures to deal with workplace complaints.
Pro freedom interests are backing an Illinois government employee who says that being forced to pay anything at all violates his First Amendment speech rights.
"I'm not against unions," said the employee, 65-year-old Mark Janus, who is represented by American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Council 31. "I don't oppose the right of workers to organize. But the right to say no to unions is just as important as the right to say yes." He said he opposes his union's fight for wage and benefit increases when the state is "in pretty terrible financial condition right now."
William Messenger, the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation lawyer who is representing Janus at the Supreme Court, said everything the union does, including its bargaining with the state, is political and employees should not be forced to pay for it.
Will the Supreme Court rule in favor of the First Amendment which says that no law should be made that would abridge freedom of speech, which includes the right to say yes as well as to say no.
The result of this ruling could have a major impact on the power the Marxist supporting unions have amassed in many states including Illinois, California, New York, and New Jersey; yes, the states who are locks for the Marxist/Progressive Party in statewide and national elections. A ruling in favor of the First Amendment will be good for freedom and liberty.
Those who hate freedom, those who despise independence, and those who hate the Bible and the Constitution; that would be the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) and most of the Republican Establishment, say more and more government (laws) are needed to prevent any future school shootings in particular, and violence in general. Once again, their band-aide solutions will do nothing to solve these problems.
These collectivists, who promote big and powerful government and conformity to their ideas that always promote evil and result in devastation, are taking the easy road and saying if only we had more laws, if only the government had more power, if only the people had less freedom, if only the rights of the individual and their power were reduced and the power of the collective was greatly enhanced, all future violence, including shootings at schools would be eliminated.
Meanwhile these foolish people promote the vary policies and ideas that cause the violence, including school shootings, they claim they wish to stop. These foolish and blind people desire to eliminate God from our society including our schools. When the righteousness of God is eliminated, the void this creates is filled with evil. When the Ten Commandments, the only laws any society needs to live in peace and harmony, are ostracized and demonized, the void is filled with meaningless, complicated, and enslaving man-made law that has never brought about a society that lives in peace and harmony.
These same foolish people promote the murder of the unborn child. In so doing, these foolish people are telling the youth of our nation that life has no value. The very foolish would allow the murder of these children even when the child had survived the murderous act of abortion. Yes, the message is that life has no value so if you kill somebody for your own convenience, our society supports you.
These same foolish people promote the protection of those who would break our laws. In the United States, we have laws against violence and the harming of or destruction of or absconding with others property. Yet, these foolish promoters of collectivism protect those very people who have broken our current laws, just because those people are in our country unlawfully or illegally. The ideas of sanctuary principalities to protect these people who have broken laws, is telling people that adherence to law is conditional.
These same foolish people protect those who flaunt our law because they are of the same political persuasion are once again telling our youth that so long as the ends justify the means, your unlawful actions are justified so long as your ends conform to the collectivist movement. The collectivist supports the unlawful activities of Antifa and Black Lives Matter because their unlawful activities, including the killing of law enforcement personnel, supports the collectivist movement. The foolish collectivist does not understand that the example they are setting transcends politics.
These same foolish people promote the very policies that have destroyed the family unit and promoted hate between classes of people. The so called “compassionate” safety net and welfare systems are the very systems that have brought about the destruction of the family unit and destroyed self-reliance, replacing it with government reliance. Programs like “The War on Poverty” and “quota” systems and requirements, are the same programs that have helped bring about hate between different classes of people. These programs have promoted a society of classes and not a society of individuals.
The foolish collectivist wants to eliminate and nullify that which can reduce crime and violence. The foolish collectivist wants to remove from our society any influence of the Bible and the United States Constitution. The foolish collectivist cannot live with the righteousness of God and his teachings in the Bible, such as sin and evil are not relative to what is our wish or convenient to us.
The foolish collectivist wants to eliminate and nullify the principles of the United States Constitution. The Constitution teaches rule of law and not arbitrary law, The Constitution teaches that freedom and independence are dependent upon having a limited government, a divided government, and that sovereignty must reside with the people. The collectivist believes that government and conformity is the answer. Once again, they are wrong.
Karl Marx said that society must be torn down before it can be rebuilt into the fair and just classless society that is totally conforming and totally equal he desired. The policies of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) and the Republican Establishment are those very policies Marx said were necessary to bring about his transformation. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) understand exactly what they are doing. It is the useful idiot we hear clamoring for more gun laws to solve this problem whose heart and mind must be changed. It is this useful idiot that must understand his support for the nullification and elimination of the Bible and The United States Constitution, as advocated by the collectivist, is the real reason for the violence we have in our society. The Bible and the United States Constitution are our only hope.
Our country is doing exactly what we were told not to do by those who understood what it means to be free and how to remain free. The current mentality of our country is exactly the opposite what is needed for freedom. A free nation cannot rely on government or laws to maintain their freedom. in fact, exactly the opposite is needed. A free people cannot rely on government enforcement to maintain civility within a society. This is what our founders told us time after time.
Patrick Henry was very succinct in verbalizing this doctrine when he said, “The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government — lest it come to dominate our lives and interests.”
Henry understood the evil of government. Henry and the founders understood that the more control the government has the less free and civilized society becomes. Government is the instrument of Collectivists to control and enslave people. Collectivists believe it is laws enforced by government that create the utopia they desire; their classless society that is totally conforming, socially just, and totally equal. This is the definition of a totally enslaved and lawless population.
Henry and the founders understood that it is an Individualist society that brings about freedom and civility. Henry and the founders understood that freedom and civility depend on individual responsibility; individuals who are self-reliant, individuals who understood they are personally responsible for their behavior, individuals who will not assume the mantra of victim hood, and individuals who will assume role of responsible parenthood and not pass that responsibility to the all-consuming government as is desired by the Collectivist.
Today the Collectivist chooses to pursue the course of indoctrination with the emphasis on victim hood and class hatred one for the other. The outcome has always been and can only be an enslaved and lawless society. Passing more laws has never solved the problems of immorality, hatred, and revenge. History has proven the only solution to these problems is individualism; self-respect, self-responsibility, and acceptance of all individuals as just that, individuals.
The more the Untied States passes laws which contradict the Bible and the founding documents and principles, the more enslaved and uncivilized will our society become. The more the Untied States embraces the Bible and the founding documents and principles, the more free and civilized will our society become. This is not conjecture or philosophy. This is fact based on the prophecy of history.
Yes, that is right. The Left is now saying kids can no longer have best friends. It is discriminatory. Perhaps this is a step in the progression of the Left saying monogamous relationships, within marriage or outside of marriage are also discriminatory. I guess there is no end to political correctness and the desire of the elite on the Left to dictate every facet of our lives.
Here is the story.
Some American and European educators believe the time has come to eliminate the concept of “best friends” from schools in an effort to encourage kids to be more “inclusive.”
The movement gained international attention when Prince William and Kate Middleton enrolled their son Prince George in Thomas’ Battersea prep school in South London last year. News reports on the school indicated that the school encouraged students to “be kind” to all their peers, which included discouraging students from having a “best friend” in favor of being equal friends with everyone at the school.
Although Prince George’s school only “discourages” students from having best friends, WCBS-TV in New York reports that some schools are considering banning “best friends,” with the enthusiastic support of education experts.
Clinical psychologist Dr. Barbara Greenberg told WCBS that the idea is catching on in schools. According to Greenberg, “There has been a movement in some American schools and European schools to ban the phrase ‘best friend,’ … The idea of banning the phrase ‘best friends’ is a very intriguing social experiment.”
Greenberg acknowledged that simply banning the phrase “best friend” won’t stop children from having “close relationships,” but might encourage kids to be more inclusive in their friendships: “I see kids come in all week long who are feeling dreadful because they are excluded and because they are either nobody’s best friend or their best friend has moved on… Let’s face it, you can’t ban somebody from having a close relationship, and you can’t really ban somebody from having a best friend but what the schools are trying to do is foster the idea of kids having more than a single friend.”
The British school movement to ban best friends has been gaining momentum for years, and now it appears to be catching on in the United States, according to Greenberg.
We have witnessed the support of demagogue’s time after time by the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) in the United States. FDR favored Stalin over Churchill and aided the Russians, so they could conqueror Eastern Europe after the war through his Second Front fallacy and his Lend-Lease program. Not only did the Lend-Lease program assist the Russians in their industrial endeavors but over gave them the plans and the materials to build their atomic bomb arsenal.
Joseph Kennedy, the American ambassador to the Court of St. James liked to take a short walk from his residence into the most gracious of London’s open spaces, Hyde Park. On Saturdays he took his oldest son, Joe Jr., and his youngest, Teddy, to a large pond in the park where Teddy sailed a toy sailboat, along with other children of the privileged families who lived nearby in the elegant streets of Knightsbridge. In its tranquility the park and its many little rituals of leisure in the fall of 1938 was a refuge from a bigger, ugly reality.
At the same time in Germany thousands of shop windows were being shattered, hundreds of synagogues were burning, and Nazi mobs were targeting Jewish communities in the outrage that became known as Kristallnacht. Thirty thousand German Jews were rounded up and shipped to concentration camps in Buchenwald, Dachau, and Sachsenhausen.
The isolation of Saturdays in the park from this horror reflected the isolationism pursued by Ambassador Kennedy. Adolf Hitler’s territorial aggression and persecution of the Jews was a European problem, he argued, and the United States should not be involved. Sensible diplomacy, he said, would prove that you could “get along” with dictatorships like those in Germany and Italy and imminent in Spain.
Kennedy had supported the “peace” pact made with Hitler in Munich early that fall by the British prime minister, Neville Chamberlain. Even though Hitler was soon ignoring the terms of the deal Britain would be wise to keep humoring him – and not to listen to a “drunk and warmonger” named Winston Churchill.
Now we seem this same faction that has this strange propensity to support dictators, evil, and persecutors fawn over the evil that has ruled Korea for three generations. This same faction that supported Lenin, Stalin, and Hitler, would now have us believe that the Kim dynasty is good because a lady has a charming smile with an evil mind. Kim Yo Jung, as director of the Propaganda and Agitation Department of the Workers’ Party of Korea, has been personally sanctioned by the U.S. government for being a leader in the North Korean government responsible for horrid human rights abuses.
These are the words of somebody who lived under the hardships caused by the Kim family. “Yo Jong’s grandfather, Kim Il Sung, is a war criminal, and her father, Kim Jong Il, killed three million people by starvation. Kim Jong Un is responsible for human rights violations and assassination of his own half-brother,” Ji, an individual who escaped the Kim evil, said.
“The Kim family is taking hostage of the North Korean people and threatening the world with its nuclear weapons,” he added. “South Korean people hate Kim Yo Jong and her visit.”
Ji knows all too well the reality of who Kim is when she’s not on the world stage. He was personally the victim of the Kim regime — losing limbs and being imprisoned.
And yet, the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) dominated media and press fawn over this member of the Kim family just as Kennedy fawned over Hitler and Roosevelt fawned over Stalin. Marx told his followers that even evil is good if it moves the “social justice” cause forward.
So, once again we are witnessing the Marxist love for evil over good, for domination over freedom, for hell over heaven. Kennedy, Roosevelt, Obama, and all Marxists have always been able to justify their egregious actions because “the ends always justify the means.”
These are the results of our grade school and high schools becoming indoctrination centers as opposed to systems of education. The Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) doctrine, that doctrine that advocates the teachings of Karl Marx, is very evident. We see the basic concept of conformity front and center. Marx said their must be one class, that will be a classless society, and all will think the same. Those who would oppose the Marxist doctrine will be ostracized and eliminated.
Young Walker understands that if you tell a lie often enough it will become truth. Walker claimed it is the first responsibility of universities to ensure the safety and well being of students to mean protecting students from hearing anything but the Marxist doctrine. That is the definition and purpose of indoctrination, not education.
And then we see the age old axiom of the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) movement; “the ends always justify the means,” when we are told that violence against speech that exposes the fallacies of the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) movement is justified.
Colleges should limit “hateful rhetoric” on campus, according to Richard Walker, a University of Central Florida sophomore and member of the Knights for Socialism.
“The university’s first responsibility is ensuring the safety and well-being of their students,” Walker, 19, told the Orlando Sentinel. “It might be just words now, but if you let that sort of thing come into the public discourse and become widely accepted, it doesn’t stay words.”
Walker said he believes colleges should ban speech viewed as racist or defamatory, a concept that concerns First Amendment advocates, the report said. The problem lies in getting everyone to agree on what is truly “hate speech,” advocates said.
Generally, the First Amendment protects free speech except for statements that are slurs or epithets likely to cause a violent reaction, the report noted.
“I’m very disconcerted about how very uninformed — frankly dangerously uninformed — many college students are about the First Amendment,” Lawrence Walters, a Longwood, Florida,-based attorney who focuses on First Amendment issues, told the paper.
What have other students said?
A recent study by the Brookings Institute, a nonprofit that is sometimes referred to as “the think tank for the establishment,” surveyed 1,500 students about free speech and found some troubling results.
Almost 20 percent of students said, “using violence is an acceptable means to stop such speech,” the survey found. Additionally, 53 percent of students (they were 61 percent Democrat and 47 percent Republican) said colleges and universities should “prohibit offensive speech.”
Some students point out, however, that limiting free speech can be abused or enforced unfairly.
“If you’re going to insulate people in college from offensive speech, how are they going to survive the real world?” UCF junior Alexander Zimmerman, 21, of Miami, told the Orlando Sentinel. Zimmerman added that people have spit at him and threatened him simply because he supports President Donald Trump.
“Under the leadership of a spurious individualist, recently a budget was finally passed. This budget was passed by a group of collectivists, spurious individualists, and weak individualists with no support from true individualists because the budget completely met all the demands of the collectivists. In typical fashion, the head of the spurious individualists explained that it was in the nation’s best interest to cave to the collectivists, but that they had set the stage to bring about true individualist policies in the future. Once again, the spurious individualists and weak individualists promoted the collectivists agenda of fundamentally transforming the United States from a free and independent nation to a fair and just classless society that is totally conforming and totally equal by making our massive government even more massive.”
This is taken directly from my recently released book, “The Road to Tyranny, Individualism to Collectivism.” This passage was written about times from the past. History does predict the future. This exact scenario just took place last week. The Republican Establishment led by McConnell and Ryan could not jump on the ideal collectivist budget fast enough. Once again, the collectivists were able to secure everything they wanted in the “budget” deal. The “budget” adds more and more deficit and debt. Rand Paul said the additional debt will be over $1 trillion. History would prove that it will be much greater.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have never misled anybody about spending. They say it is critical to spend more and more on welfare or redistribution plans of any kind. This is their agenda and McConnell apparently told Schumer to give him a wish list and McConnell would see that it was accommodated.
This is what Ryan said in 2011. Paul Ryan, chairman of the House Budget Committee, gave a talk and took questions this morning at an event organized by the American Council on Capital Formation. His solution to economic problems; First, get government spending and deficits under control, to restore fiscal certainty and allay fears of higher taxes down the road.
As our national debt passed $15 trillion, that is almost $6 trillion ago, Ryan tweeted this; $15 trillion in national debt marks an infamous day in U.S. history. You deserve leaders willing to tackle this problem.
McConnell has a well-documented history of fretting about the debt. “We’d like to do something about the nation’s biggest problem, spending and debt, which of course is the reason for this economic malaise,” he said in 2011. He added that Republicans could not address the problem because they did not control the White House or Senate.
Ryan and McConnell, you do control the House and the Senate. Yet, you caved to the demands of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) once again. Once again you showed you cannot be trusted or believed. You could care less about the debt or the deficits. Your only concern is you keeping power and accumulating more and more wealth. Freedom Loving Americans have fallen for your lies and deceit time after time because we say well at least they are not the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats). You might have a R behind your names, but that certainly does mean that you are honest and have the long-term health of the United States as your primary goal.
Freedom Loving Americans, we have some real soul searching to do.
If you have a desire to understand what “The Road To Tyranny” is, what individualism and collectivism are, and what we must do immediately to have any chance of remaining the free people our founders wanted for us, go to Amazon or www.mygrandchildrensamerica.com and get “The Road To Tyranny.”