Karl Marx said all long-standing principles of a nation must be eliminated as the collectivists fundamentally transform a nation to a collectivist Marxist totalitarian state as Obama promised would be done to the United States. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have always despised the Declaration of Independence, The United States Constitution, and the Bill of Rights because they promote individualism, which means freedom and independence.
We are now seeing how the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are once again saying these above documents are living documents and can mean anything you want them to mean to gain your desired ends. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are saying that the idea of burden of proof lying with the state or the prosecution should be turned around, and the accused should have to prove their innocence when that scenario meets the needs of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats). This is called arbitrary law which means the law is flexible and can be changed to meet your needs. Arbitrary law is the system used when the state is presumed to be the sovereign and rule of law is the system when the people are presumed to be the sovereign; totalitarianism vs freedom.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) were committed to opposing any nominee to the Supreme Court the Executive, Donald Trump, would nominate, which is the constitutional duty of the executive. The legislative branch is to advice and consent. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have changed this to mean to oppose and destroy any Supreme Court nominee that believes the Constitution is the law of the land, it means what it says and says what it means, it cannot be changed by court rulings but only by the amendment process, and the role of the court is only to adjudicate and not legislate.
We are now witnessing all the evil inherent in every movement that strives to totally control a society through any means they can, so they can force their wishes and desires on all people within that society. This is always the goal of collectivist movements (Marxist, communist, socialist, and progressive)
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are telling us in their latest attack on the United States Constitution and the Kavanaugh movement that the Constitution really does not mean what it says. The Constitution reads that the burden of proof always lies with the state or the accuser. The defendant has no burden to prove their innocence. The American public knows this concept to mean “assumed innocent until proven guilty.”
The Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) movement today is saying that since Dr. Ford is a women and she believes it was Bret Kavanaugh that attempted to rape her at some party sometime while she was in high school and the people she claims were there are mistaken when they say they were not, and Judge Kavanaugh believes in the judiciary branch of government living within the confines of the Untied States Constitution, it is okay to make the Constitution a living document and place the burden of proof on the defendant, Judge Kavanaugh, because it serves the goal of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) to totally negate the long standing principles of the Untied States and fundamentally transform the United States into a Marxist totalitarian state. In other words, “the ends justify the means.”
Arbitrary law is the system of law in every collectivist nation. Rule of law is an essential element in an individualist society as our founders designed and intended the United States to be.
What we are witnessing today is a rebellion against the United States Constitution and an attempt to totally nullify the long-standing principles upon which we were founded as Marx said must be done. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are conducting a revolution against the foundation of our nation.
These current actions taking place today, the Kavanaugh nomination, the Mueller investigation, the actions of the FBI, DOJ, and NSA, and the recently exposed collectivists undermining movement within other parts of the executive branch, are not only expected but predictable. There is a dedicated and aggressive movement to take the United States on “The Road To Tyranny” and change it from “Individualism To Collectivism.” I would strongly urge all Freedom Loving Americans, along with those Americans who just want to understand what is transpiring currently, to order immediately and then read “The Road To Tyranny, Individualism To Collectivism.” It can be ordered on Amazon or at www.mygrandchildrensamerica.com.
We Freedom Loving Americans are speaking. The so called “elites” of the nation have been telling Freedom Loving Americans for the last many years that we do not understand just how greedy, racist, and stupid we are. These “elites” have been telling us in different ways that the nation we built is and has been destructive to the rest of the world. Obama finally verbalized that sentiment and now other so called “elites” are also verbalizing their hatred for everything that has made the United States the leader of the free world. Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) politicians, academia, Hollywood, the press, and now athletes are voicing their hatred for America’s basic principles.
Freedom Loving Americans are telling these haters of freedom and liberty that we do not need them. Consequently, main stream newspapers are losing subscriptions and advertisers, and football ratings and Hollywood’s self-glorifying programs such as the Emmys and Oscars viewership is plummeting. Much of this is due to the “in your face” attitude of these industries, but some of our disdain is also due to the bad behavior of the actors and athletes.
The great news is that the ratings for Week Two’s Monday Night Football game between the Chicago Bears and the Seattle Seahawks, crashed to the lowest numbers ever recorded for a Week Two Monday night game. It should be noted that the game had competition with the 2018 Emmy’s broadcast, but the 70-year-old award celebration crashed to a never-before-seen low of a 7.4 overnight rating. Indeed, the 2018 Emmy Awards registered as the lowest Emmy’s broadcast ever measured.
This is wonderful news. Freedom Loving Americans have learned that they do have power. Comments I have heard from people who no longer watch the NFL is how freeing it is. They have learned they no longer have to waste, and it was a waste, their time watching rapists, wife-beaters, and thugs who despise the nation that provided the means for them to become rich, but instead can use their time more beneficially.
I saw some clips from the Emmy’s. What a waste of time it would have been to watch these self-indulging talentless individuals try to be funny and profound. The clip I saw was about 90 seconds and it was a pathetic 90 seconds. It is beyond comprehension why anybody would watch these shows, even if they support the politics of the left.
Keep up the great work Freedom Loving Americans.
George Washington said, “There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader, and concerting measures in opposition to each other. This, in my humble apprehension, is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution.”
George Washington again, “All obstructions to the execution of the laws, all combinations and associations, under whatever plausible character, with the real design to direct, control, counteract, or awe the regular deliberation and action of the constituted authorities, are destructive of this fundamental principle, and of fatal tendency. They serve to organize faction, to give it an artificial and extraordinary force; to put, in the place of the delegated will of the nation the will of a party, often a small but artful and enterprising minority of the community; and, according to the alternate triumphs of different parties, to make the public administration the mirror of the ill-concerted and incongruous projects of faction, rather than the organ of consistent and wholesome plans digested by common counsels and modified by mutual interests.”
Fredrick Engels also saw the destructive power of politics in the Untied States when he said, “Nowhere do “politicians” form a more separate and powerful section of the nation than precisely in North America. There, each of the two major parties which alternatively succeed each other in power is itself in turn controlled by people who make a business of politics, who speculate on seats in the legislative assemblies of the Union as well as of the separate states, or who make a living by carrying on agitation for their party and on its victory are rewarded with positions. It is well known how the Americans have been trying for thirty years to shake off this yoke, which has become intolerable, and how in spite of it all they continue to sink ever deeper in this swamp of corruption. It is precisely in America that we see best how there takes place this process of the state power making itself independent in relation to society, whose mere instrument it was originally intended to be. Here there exists no dynasty, no nobility, no standing army, beyond the few men keeping watch on the Indians, no bureaucracy with permanent posts or the right to pensions. And nevertheless, we find here two great gangs of political speculators, who alternately take possession of the state power and exploit it by the most corrupt means and for the most corrupt ends – and the nation is powerless against these two great cartels of politicians, who are ostensibly its servants, but in reality, dominate and plunder it.”
When party leaders place the good of the party over the good of the nation their actions prove they ultimately place party over country. Diane Feinstein did exactly this and proved by her actions that the words of both Washington and Engels were prophetic; political parties will bring about the destruction of a great nation. Great nations can only continue to flourish when those in positions of power place the nation over the political party or their own personal desire for power and riches.
Diane Feinstein was not wrong to make the accusations against Judge Kavanaugh known. She was completely wrong in how she did this. She made these accusations known at the time she did for the purpose of not only destroying a life but also the nomination of Judge Kavanaugh. If Feinstein had placed nation over party, she would have completely disclosed these accusations to the Judicial committee prior to the Kavanaugh hearing so a full and complete investigation could have taken place. If they were proven to be true, Kavanaugh and the administration should have been notified understanding that this accusation would be an issue in the hearing. If the accusation was proven to be false, it would never have been a part of the hearing nor would it be an issue today.
Feinstein did this disservice to the United States for political and personal reasons. The political reason was to insert politics into the court system even more than it is today. The personal reason is because she is facing a tougher race for reelection to the Senate than she anticipated. Feinstein is a hero to her far left base but is a scourge to our Nation that can only remain free when politicians play fair and place nation above party.
Washington was correct and that is understandable. Engels was also correct and that is remarkable that the co-author of "The Communist Manifesto" would understand his followers in the United States (the Democrats) would use every available method to destroy our freedom and independence and bring about the tyrannical classless society of Marx and Engels.
The modern left has taught people that the way to evade difficult situations is to simply call them something else. We are then told by using a euphemism the problem has been solved and all will be good. We are told that if we use the word choice the act of taking the life of a baby is simply a medical procedure. We are told if we use the word undocumented, the fact that a crime of illegal entry has been committed has never happened and the repercussions are simply an over dramatized account by racists and xenophobes. We are also told that if we view the Muslim religion as the religion of hate as opposed to the religion of peace we are Islamophobic and demonizing some manufactured per cent of those who would follow the teachings of the profit Muhammad.
We are told that it is only the misguided Islamic Radical Jihadist Terrorists that want to harm anybody who does not claim allegiance to their religion. Yet, Muslims follow the teachings of the Quran or the book of Allah. The book of Allah, purportedly the eternal never-changing charter of conduct for the individual and the society at large, is singularly wanting. It emphatically and repeatedly vilifies and condemns the kefirs — all non-Muslims. A total of about three percent of the verses of the Quran seem to say something positive about non-Muslims. Yet even these few verses are immediately followed by verses that discard them.
First, there was the Islam of Mecca, or the Islam of weakness. For thirteen years, Muhammad’s teachings, as recorded in the early suras of the Quran, were about hellfire and damnation, but not about punishment of the unbelievers in this world. Very few people were attracted to what he preached. In fact, the people scorned the man, harassed him, and eventually made him flee his hometown of Mecca for Medina. Then a major mutation took place: the Islam of Medina, or the “Islam of Tyranny,” arrived on the scene. The Quran’s suras of Medina are replete with exhortations of intolerance, exclusivity, and sanctioning of violence against non-Muslims. This mutation deeply appealed to the temperament of the Arab Bedouins, and they flocked to Muhammad’s beliefs.
The People of the Book, Jews and Christians are subject of the Quranic approval only if they recognize that their holy books are corrupt while the Quran is the one true book.
Ironically, Allah, who is claimed by Muhammad to be the creator of all, does not even bother addressing people of other faiths, such as Zoroastrians, Hindus, Buddhists, or those of no faith. Why are all these folks left out? Could it be because Muhammad did not know about them, that Muhammad had contacts only with Jews and Christians?
Muslims and their apologists selectively cite the positive verses of the Quran to impress upon others its goodness and convince them that the book is indeed about peace, tolerance and the brotherhood of all people. It is in this spirit of misrepresentation that Islamic organizations in the West spend huge sums in spreading their propaganda through the media by claiming that Muslims are indeed kin of Jews and Christians; that the only three faiths Islam recognizes are members of the Abrahamic family.
Acceding to Muslims, Islam was made for men. Women are playthings of men. Islam is 100% misogynist. Men are superior to women. Women are to obey men and are to be beaten when they disobey or misbehave. Islam is racist. The Quran stipulates that Arabs are superior to all others and it clearly condones slavery. It explicitly stipulates discriminatory laws for slaves. Islam denounces other belief systems and marginally recognizes the validity of only two religions, Judaism and Christianity. The nature of Islam is based on violence. It not only condones jihad, it recommends it and promises great reward for the jihadist.
Here is the truth, as bitter as it may be. Islam is the culprit. Islam is anything but a religion of peace. Violence is at the very core of Islam. Violence is institutionalized in the Muslim’s holy book, the Quran, in many suras.
The Quran as a Charter of Hate
It is impossible to accept the Quran as a book of the loving creator of the universe, as Muslims claim. Why would the creator Allah, an all-merciful and compassionate, as the Quran calls him, vilify, despise and consider all non-Muslims as worthy of torment? Studying the Quran shows it to be a charter of hate, more than anything else. A few examples will suffice:
Non-Muslims are the worse beasts (sura 8:55);
Jews are despicable apes (suras 2:65) and says the Jews are like donkeys (sura 62:5);
In the daily prayers that involves seventeen recitations of Al-Fatehe (sura 1), the Jews are demonized and the Christians are castigated;
The Quran condones terrorism (surahs 8:12, 8:59);
Killing a Jew earns the Muslim admission in Allah’s paradise (sura 9:11).
Forbids asking questions about it, because one may lose his faith (sura 5:101-102);
Allah is the one who leads people astray and will punish them for it (suras 5:41, 7:155, 16:53, 6:49);
Satan, or the devil, can harm people only by Allah’s permission (sura 58:10). Would not this make Allah responsible for harming people?
Not long ago, a rapist was acquitted by an Islamic court in the Islamic Republic of Iran for his crime by pleading that Satan made him do it. The judge ruled that he cannot punish the real culprit, Satan. The man, therefore, was found not guilty of the crime. A truly Islamic form of justice, squarely based on the Quran.
Unfortunately, Islam cannot be reformed, since Islam claims it is the perfect eternal faith for mankind. Splits have occurred and will continue to occur in Islam. Yet reformation has not happened in nearly 1400 years and is not going to happen. Allah’s book is sealed.
More and more Western countries are appeasing the Muslim and adhering to the hatred taught within its covers. Political correctness is saying this is the way to peace and understanding. According to the Muslim, peace can only exist when all adhere to the terms of the Quran. Understand what the politically correct term or phrase really means, or more appropriately what the term is really concealing.
The progressive movement is not a progressive movement, but a regressive movement. Progressive has been defined as making use of or interested in new ideas, findings, or opportunities. Regressive is defined as returning to a former or less developed state; characterized by regression. Regression is what the Marxist/Progressive movement is advocating for the United States today.
Sovereign is used to describe the person or institution that is the highest power. The sovereign has the final say in all decisions. When the United States became a nation, our founders took a dramatic turn from history. Government had always been the ultimate power over people. What the head of government said or declared was the law of the land and the individual had no recourse. The sovereign rulers said in fact they were sovereign because they were the agent of God here on earth, thus legitimizing their sovereignty. Our founders acknowledged the sovereignty of God but differed from the rest of the world in that they did not place an individual or institution in the middle between God and the people. Our founders said that the role of government was not to rule the people but to serve the people and to insure the rights given by God directly to man were not infringed upon by government. The role of government was not to act as ruler on earth because the people would have the role of sovereign on earth.
The founders were incredibly forward-looking people, in fact they were liberal or progressive because they changed the way government was to be viewed from the way it had been viewed for centuries prior. Americans are not taught this in history classes. The fact is that history has been rewritten so many Americans view the founders as being regressive thinkers so the modern “progressive” will have their views regarded as progressive and not seen as the regressive views they really are.
What we are witnessing in the United States today is the movement to establish government’s role as sovereign once again. The modern progressive movement has taken the position that what are considered to be inalienable rights granted by our Creator to us as individuals; freedom of speech and thought, freedom to peaceably assemble to voice our disagreements, freedom to worship God as we choose, freedom to object to government when government views it’s role as sovereign, and so many more rights that are not mentioned as stated by the Ninth Amendment, are really rights to be granted by government as they wish.
What we are witnessing in the United States today is a movement orchestrated and controlled by “elites” who believe the happiness of individuals is best determined by them as opposed to the individual. These movements are extremely regressive movements and take us back to the darkest days of history when the Sovereign literally ran the lives of the individual and dictated all actions of the individual. Karl Marx described this as a classless society. In the classless society all people would conform to the same thoughts and ideas. All people would be equal in all aspects of society including social, political, and economics. Individuals differences were not to be recognized, especially when those individual differences would be detrimental to the group as determined by the group.
Freedom can only exist when the individual is not only allowed but encouraged to exercise those inalienable rights given to us by our Creator. Perhaps the most important of these rights is that right to thoughts and ideas and the freedom to express these thoughts and ideas. The Marxist/Progressive movement in the United States today is telling us that if we do not conform to their collectivist ideal than we are not only reactionary, but regressive. The exact opposite is what history would tell us to be the truth.
The regressive would demonize any who disagreed with their idea that the women’s right to choose was a right of liberation as opposed to an action that denies the right to be born by another individual, that weather, even climate, has changed throughout history, that individuals, regardless of race or gender are to be treated equally based on their individuality, that all individuals should not be limited in their desire to achieve in whatever field they chose, and that we as individuals have the freedom to make choices and we as individuals reap or suffer the consequences.
What the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are telling us today is that we as individuals must accept the role of government as our sovereign. What many of that movement further advocate is that no Creator exists, therefore their role of sovereign is supreme. This is the same position assumed by many of the ancient dictators as well as many of the modern actual or aspiring dictators including Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Castro, and Obama and his fellow comrades.
With unemployment steadily declining and more people working in full time year-round jobs, household incomes in the United States rose last year, and the nation’s poverty rate declined to its lowest level in more than a decade according to new federal government data. The decline in poverty rates naturally declines as people work. People go to work when taxes are lowered, and government regulations are reduced. History has proven this rule to be as consistent as is the rule of gravity.
While all people know this to be true, why does the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) contingent always call for higher taxes and more regulation while at the same time claiming it is their goal to help the poor and lower the poverty rate. Their stated goal is inconsistent with their stated actions. They know it.
We must understand that it has never been the goal of any collectivist movement to help the people they claim they want to help. The Marxist, communist, socialist, and progressive movements have always known that to make the claims they make is the ticket to them gaining power. As they raise taxes, increase regulations, and place more people on government welfare programs, they are purposefully enslaving more people to the master the sate and increasing their power base.
It is not the goal of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) to help anybody but themselves. As they purposefully limit economic growth, the perception the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are creating is that they have the answer to solve the very problem they knowingly created. During the Obama regime, the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) were proud of the record numbers of people that were on food stamps and receiving welfare checks. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) praised the goodness of government and tried to make the argument that this is why government should collect even more taxes and place even more regulation on business.
If Trump had not won, we would have seen a tax increase instead of a tax decrease, we would have seen even more regulation and not a massive roll back in regulation, we would have seen an increase in the poverty rate, and we would have heard why government is so good and not witnessing how capitalism reduces poverty and socialism increases poverty once again.
The Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) agenda is the same agenda as that put forth by Marx and followed by Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Castro, and Chavez. That agenda is to control the population and force upon all people the concept of total conformity to the Marxist ideology while bringing about equality, or poverty, for all except the elite in government.
The pattern is clear. The pattern was not created by Marx. The pattern has failed every time it has been implemented. The pattern always ends in total societal and financial failure. The pattern cannot succeed. The pattern is always brought about by the collectivist movement through deceit and violence. The Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) movement in the United States is employing, encouraging, and enabling deceit and violence. If successful in bringing about the fundamental transformation promised by Comrade Obama, the result for the United States will be a total failure of society and a failure of our financial system. This result is as sure as is the result that gravity will always pull objects back to earth.
House Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.) said Wednesday that Democrats need to denounce violence done in the name of politics, after a man allegedly attempted to stab a GOP congressional candidate in California.
“There’s no place for it. If somebody on the right was doing it, we’d be vocally denouncing it. They need to be denouncing it on the left,” Scalise said on "Fox and Friends."
The assailant in the Tuesday attack allegedly shouted profanities about President Trump before attempting to stab Republican Rudy Peters, who is running in the state's 15th District.
Fox News host Ed Henry also brought up recent confrontations between Trump administration critics and officials that have happened in restaurants and other public places. Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) drew criticism in June for encouraging Americans to continue the confrontations, which the critics call harassment.
“They need to be denouncing that kind of activity,” Scalise said.
“You should not incite violence, or any kind of assaulting people based on their political views and especially if it’s somebody who’s working in the administration and you’re attacking them because of what they do and what they believe in," he said. "That’s not what American ideals are about.”
Scalise was critically wounded by gunfire when a man who authorities say was “fueled by rage against Republican legislators” opened fire on him and three others last June.
“Leadership on the Democrats’ side needs to stand up and say this is wrong, no matter what your differences with the president or anybody else, you go and you solve them,” Scalise separately told Fox Business Wednesday. “We’re going to have an election in a few weeks, that’s how you resolve it. You don’t resort to violence.”
Scalise added that Democrats “need to be called out” by the mainstream media.
“If you saw this happen on the right, you know where the mainstream media would be,” Scalise said. “The mainstream media needs to be in the same place, calling this out too, and calling on leaders on the Republican and Democrat side to denounce it.”
The Marxist movement, which is the left in the United States today, will not denounce violence. Marx encouraged revolution. Marx explained that the current society must be destroyed so the Marxist Classless society called for by the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) movement in the United States, can completely rebuild their desired totally conforming and totally equal society.
Collectivist movements, such as we see taking place in the United States today spearheaded by the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) movement, have followed the dictates of Marx and through violence destroyed the existing society. We saw it in Russia, later the Soviet Union, headed by Lenin and then Stalin. We saw it in the Soviet Satellite countries, Hitler’s Germany, Mao’s China, Castro’s Cuba, and now Chavez’s Venezuela. The fundamental transformation of the Untied States called for by Comrade Obama is the same fundamental transformation that took place in the above; the same transformation Marx said must take place to bring about his communist society.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) understand that if their desired fundamental transformation is to occur, they must use every means possible, including but not limited to propaganda, deceit, lying, and any and all types of violence. After all they understand that, “the ends always justify the means.”
We Freedom Loving Americans must understand the DNA of the Marxist. We must understand their only standard is a double standard. We must be aware of history and understand how much they despise the American electorate for derailing their plans in 2016. We must work ten times as hard in 2018 to be sure that the Marxist movement does not capture either house of congress. We must enable the building of the wall, the return to the Declaration of Independence, The Constitution of the United States, and the Bill of Rights. We must once again return our schools to systems of education and not systems of indoctrination.
It is a big job, but it is no bigger than the job our founders had before them in the 1770’s and 17780’s. Never forget the rallying cry of Sam Adams, “It does not take a majority to prevail, but a tireless minority committed to setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men.”
We must be tireless and never stop setting those brush fires of freedom. We will then remain a free and independent people; yes free from the tyranny of government.
OBAMA EXPLAINS HIS HATRED FOR THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE, THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, AND THE BILL OF RIGHTSRead Now
Obama is once again in the public eye exposing his collectivist (communist, Marxist, socialist, progressive) views and skillfully twisting them as if they were the goals of the founding fathers. The principles upon which the United States was founded are in direct contrast with the goals of Communist Obama and his fellow comrades. Obama’s promise to fundamentally transform the United States has been revealed to mean he wants to fundamentally transform the United States into a nation that would emulate all government control that prompted the colonists to revolt.
Our nation was founded as an Individualist nation where the individual is encouraged to pursue their own happiness, even when that happiness does not conform to the dictates of “common standards.” Americans were taught to pursue their dreams, even when those dreams did not conform to the prevailing norms of the day. Our founders understood that government is one of the major obstacles to a nation being great, because the individuals who comprise government have the natural propensity to dictate to the citizen their thoughts and their ideas; such as Jimmy Carter stating that the United States would have to limit their ambitions because of the “energy shortage.”
This is from a recent speech given by Comrade Obama:
“It did not start with Donald Trump. He is a symptom, not the cause. He’s just capitalizing on resentments that politicians have been fanning for years, a fear and anger that’s rooted in our past, but it’s also born out of the enormous upheavals that have taken place in your brief lifetimes.”
During his Illinois speech, Obama explained, “Of course, there’s always been another, darker aspect to America’s story.
“Progress doesn’t just move in a straight line. There’s a reason why progress hasn’t been easy and why throughout our history every two steps forward seems to sometimes produce one step back.
“Each time we painstakingly pull ourselves closer to our founding ideals, that all of us are created equal, endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights, the ideals that say every child should have opportunity and every man and woman in this country who’s willing to work hard should be able to find a job and support a family and pursue their small piece of the American dream, ideals that say we have a collective responsibility to care for the sick and the infirm and that and we have a responsibility to conserve the amazing bounty, the natural resources of this country and of this planet for future generations — each time we’ve gotten closer to those ideals, somebody, somewhere has pushed back.
“The status quo pushes back. Sometimes the backlash comes from people who are genuinely, if wrongly, fearful of change.
“More often, it’s manufactured by the powerful and the privileged who want to keep us divided and keep us angry and keep us cynical because it helps them maintain the status quo and keep their power and keep their privilege. And you happen to be coming of age during one of those moments.
The record of Obama reelects very clearly what Obama meant when he stated he will fundamentally transform the United States.
The United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights limit the rights and powers of government while establishing that our Creator gave us what are called Natural Rights or those rights that protect individuals to be the person God created and not the person the government believes we should be. It is the understanding that we are individuals limited only by our individual abilities and desires and that allowed the United States to become the exceptional nation it became. Obama condemned the United States for rising above the conforming standards to which he adheres and denounced the United States for its economic and military leadership continually.
Obama, through executive order and regulation violated the words of the United States Constitution and the spirit of the Declaration of Independence, The United States Constitution, and the Bill of Rights, by placing government limitations on our Natural Rights, by changing and nullifying constitutional law, and by legislating through the executive branch. His actions always increased the power of government and limited the rights of the individual.
Obama served the purpose of enemies of the United States who had declared war against us. This is defined as treason by the Constitution. Obama lifted sanctions on Iran at a crucial point and enabled the Iranians to continue their pursuit of nuclear weapons, so they could destroy our allies and ourselves. Obama gave the Iranians access to billions of dollars, so they could continue funding terrorist organizations who had stated it is their goal to destroy the United States and our allies. Obama also assisted these same enemies by maintaining an open border and allowing other terrorists to enter our country through his refugee program.
Obama limited economic growth by increasing taxes and using stifling regulations on business. He now claims it is his policies that are responsible for the economic growth he declared to be a thing of the past. It is the reversal of his policies, taxes and regulations, that has ignited the economic growth he said could never be achieved again.
Obama and Holder are directly responsible for the racial hatred in the United States today. They gave legitimacy to such anti-social groups as Black Lives Matter. Obama and Holder, mostly through deceit, fostered the hatred toward law enforcement. It was Obama and Holder that insinuated that Americans, especially patriotic Americans, are racist.
Obama is a very dangerous person. Many of his supporters refuse to research his Marxist and Islamic Jihadist ties and leanings. Many of his supporters have the same Marxist and Islamic Jihadist leanings. Obama is anti-American. He advocates for the exact opposite of what was the basis for the American Revolution and our American principles, principles based on the teachings of John Locke. Obama advocates for the principles of the French Revolution, or those principles put forth by Rosseau and Hobbs.
I challenge you to research and understand my above paragraph or you can wait a few months and read my next book that will explain that paragraph.
I was in a hotel in Gainesville, Florida the morning of September 11, 2001 watching the morning news. The story was that a plane had flown into one of the towers of the World Trade Center and nobody was sure if this was intentional or some form of an accident. While the discussion was taking place, you could see flames coming from the tower. While watching the flames and listening to the discussion, we who were watching, saw another plane fly into the other tower. No longer was the discussion questioning the accident idea, but the discussion was now who orchestrated the attack.
Within a short period we were informed that all planes had been ordered to land. We also learned that there were at least two other planes that were presumably hijacked and now the speculation was what were their targets. We learned that one of the targets was the Pentagon. The other plane crashed in Pennsylvania. The United States had been attacked and all planes were grounded.
I remember finally getting on a plane several days later. My route home took me through Atlanta and then into Los Angeles. I had been through Atlanta many times before. Never had I seen the airport so empty. Our plane seemed to be the only plane landing at the time. When we landed in Los Angeles it was the same situation, empty runways and empty airports.
As events unfolded we learned that the United States had been attacked by a known enemy. That same enemy had try to take down the World Trade Center about eight years earlier. When the people were caught who had attempted the bombing, America considered these war criminals to be civilian criminals and the individuals were tried in our courts and they were granted all the constitutional protections an American citizen would be given.
These same people have declared war on the United States and all peoples living in nations that do not adhere to their Islamic dictates. These same people have perpetrated attacks through out the United States and other non-Islamic nations. Still today, Islamic Jihadists are welcomed into non-Islamic countries, given benefits as if they were citizens, and continue to attack our western civilization while refusing to assimilate. We have been told that these terrorists are not happy because we do not love them enough.
These Islamic Jihadists are not necessarily unhappy. They hate anything and everything that is non-Islamic. It is there sworn duty to destroy us and put all people under Islamic control. Any individual who refuses will be killed. This is what they believe and what their children are taught.
That morning 17 years ago proved to me the Islamic Jihadist is serious about their threats and their claims. We are seeing the results through out the world, most predominantly in Western Europe. Yet, foolish people defend these people and still believe we must love them more, so they will denounce their evil ways and their hate. The more we defend them the more they will destroy us.
This is reality. We know attacks are being planned on a continuous basis. War has been declared. Those of us who understand the danger of Islamic Jihadists are being called the enemy. Those who bury their heads in the sand are guilty of aiding the enemy. History shows those who advocate the policies being advocated by the left today; that is to defend and encourage the enemy in hope that the enemy will recognize the love and change their declared intentions and goals, have always been proven to be wrong. We must learn from history and fight this war with determination, otherwise we will be fighting to escape from Sharia Law as the Law of the land.
The left has always gone by their number one criterion of “The ends always justify the means.” Remember the way they treated Justice Bork and Justice Thomas. Remember when Harry Reid knowingly went onto the Senate floor saying that he had it from good sources that Mitt Romney had not filed income taxes for ten years. A few years later when it was common knowledge that Reid had knowingly lied, he defended his lie by saying, “he wasn’t elected was he.” Now we are learning that the left wants a perjury case brought against Judge Kavanaugh.
Three prominent liberal groups pushing to defeat Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court nomination on Friday urged their fellow Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) to seek a formal perjury investigation of him based on his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee this week. Demand Justice, MoveOn, and NARAL Pro-Choice America outlined their case in a letter sent as Kavanaugh’s marathon four-day hearing came to a close, with the Republican Senate still expected to confirm him by month’s end.
The trio of advocacy groups claim that five topics Kavanaugh addressed with Judiciary panel senators this week reveal inconsistencies with statements he made during confirmation hearings for his current appellate court position that “appear to rise to the level of perjury,” they wrote. The five topics are: Kavanaugh’s involvement in the judicial nominations of William Pryor and Charles Pickering during his time in the George W. Bush administration; his involvement in the Bush administration’s warrantless wiretapping program; his role in handling Bush-era detainee policy; and his awareness of the use of Democratic documents reportedly stolen by another GOP aide.
Kavanaugh was pressed to explain his past statements to the Senate during this week’s confirmation hearing and sought to clarify his past portrayals. When asked about the conservative Pryor, for instance, the 53-year-old appellate judge said during his previous confirmation hearing that he was not involved in handling the nomination during his service in Bush’s White House.
It is clear there is no perjury what so ever, but as we have learned facts do not matter to the left.
The double standard comes in because there was absolutely no urging by anybody on the left to investigate clear perjury with Holder, Brennan, Clapper, Lois Lerner, Koskinen, or John Kerry and the other representatives from the Obama regime when testifying on the Iran agreement. In every one of these situations, the facts show that what these people said during testimony was not only contrary to the facts, but there is good reason to believe the misinformation given was intentionally given to mislead.
In order for our Republic to survive as a free and independent nation, it is critical that honorable people serve in government positions. What has become all to obvious is that the left does not want our Republic to survive. The left does not want our nation to remain a free and independent people who make decisions for themselves in how they will live their lives, how they will think. The left wants the government to dictate to all us how we are to live our lives, how we are to think. The left wants a society that totally conforms to their ideas and thoughts. This is not the American way, despite the left claiming it is. The left fulfills totally their mode of operation, “the ends always justify the means.” Nothing is to outrageous for them including distorting of facts, double standards, manufacturing of facts, and outright deceit and lying.