Our government is under siege. We the people can no longer trust our law enforcement agencies, our legislative branch, and our judicial branch. It does appear that other department and agencies of our executive branch have also been infiltrated, but the Trump administration is exposing those who would subvert “rule of law”.
The question is: Did FBI Officials Tamper With Documents, Withhold Information and Fail to Collect Evidence That Might Incriminate Hillary?
DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz concluded in his report that, although many FBI officials involved in the Hillary Clinton email investigation harbored intense anti-Trump bias, he found no “evidence” that it affected their key decisions in the case. The abundant circumstantial evidence cited in the report as well as his testimony before Congress this week, point to the opposite conclusion.
One Senator brought up one incident after another of unethical, improper behavior on the part of FBI officials during Monday’s hearing, he asked the IG, “How did you feel about that?” Horowitz continually responded with, “We were very concerned.” Finally, the Senator said, “Eventually ‘very concerned’ gets to be ‘enough already.’”
We now learn that there was also an exchange of information between a Clinton staff worker and Loretta Lynch that cannot be revealed because it is highly classified. The implication can only be that the information would incriminate individuals that the FBI and DOJ were protecting as well as high officials within the FBI and DOJ.
The pattern that has been formed over the years is that members of a political party in the legislative branch will block any honest investigation that will damage their aspirations to gain or keep political power and will be quietly dropped into the swamp even though it subverts “rule of law” and undermines our constitution. The political party will be helped but the freedoms of the American people will again greatly suffer. The legislative branch, like our law enforcement agencies within the executive branch, will once again place the good of a political agenda over the Constitution of the United States.
If one party feels they might not be able to “cover up” damaging evidence, they go will to some district judge who, for political purposes will issue some order way beyond their constitutional duty to protect a political ideology.
What is now routine within the United States is the practice of “arbitrary law.” This is the practice that is consistent with dictatorial regimes. That would imply the United States is becoming a dictatorial regime and not a free and independent people. Unlike the conclusion drawn by the IG, his conclusion was drawn to protect the subversive actions of individuals, my conclusion is logical and just.
We the people have justifiably lost confidence in our government. The only way that confidence can be restored is if a committee of We the People is appointed to investigate in totality our government. The individuals of the We the People committee could not now or ever have any attachment to what has become a deep and vile swamp that is Washington DC. The sooner this can be accomplished the better are the chances that our Constitution, which was adopted for the sole purpose of protecting the people’s rights, will be restored.
We are in the throes of a revolution. Those who abhor the very principles upon which our nation was founded are waging a full scale and constant attack on the very foundation of our nation. The core principles of individualism, rule of law, limited government, divided government, and sovereignty of the people, essential to a free society, cannot exist under the desired society of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) and their allies the useful idiots so prevalent within the Republican establishment. We constantly and consistently see attacks on individual freedoms essential to freedom, such as attacks on free speech, free assembly, ownership and control of private property, freedom to worship the God of the Bible, and freedom to control your own life by making your own decisions.
This is not some haphazard attack occurring. It is a very orchestrated attack by people who are extremely adept at manipulating public opinion. The very core of our society is being destroyed. Devoted Communists such as Obama, Jarrett, Holder, and many of the Marxist/Progressive Party (Democrats) understand this is a necessity. They are following the directive of Marx by destroying current society, so they can rebuild society as a Communist society or as Marx said a Classless society.
To accomplish their end, they are skillfully employing the principles outlined by Marx as well as the manipulation methods of Alinsky. Marx stated that borders between nations must be abolished and all must be able to cross any boundary if that enables them to find their happiness. Alinsky taught Obama, who was designated by Alinsky’s son as the best pupil the school ever had, how to manipulate public opinion to enable the elimination of national borders.
Marx also said that it is essential to abolish all long-standing principles, morality, and God based religion. The principles of the Declaration of Independence, the United States Constitution, and the Bill of Rights, must be rendered meaningless. The Marxist/Progressive Party (Democrats) are accomplishing this mandate by telling us these documents are living documents and can mean anything we want them to mean. The result is these documents no longer have any meaning. The moral structure of right and wrong that had guided our society is no longer a guide since the Marxist/Progressive Party (Democrats) have us believing there is no right or wrong since all is relative and dependent on what makes one feel good. God and believers are openly under attack by the government, by society, and by churches. We are becoming that atheist society Marx said was essential for his Classless society.
We are in the throes of a revolution through the very transformation outlined by Marx and promised by Comrade Obama. Those who would proclaim their adamant opposition to Marxism and Communism are helping and enabling this transformation to a Marxist society. Those who would proclaim their adamant opposition to this transformation are willingly enabling this movement by succumbing to the Alinsky tactic of demonizing and shaming any that would support and demand the continued adherence to the principles that made the United States the envy of the world; individualism, rule of law, limited government, divided government, and sovereignty by the people.
Do not be used as a “useful idiot” by this clever and dangerous movement that wishes to destroy our society, so they can rebuild it in the failed ways of those others who have tried to bring about Marx’s Classless society in the recent past. My experience is that those who claim to oppose this transformation called for by Obama, only understand this devastating movement based on a “bumper sticker” mentality. This understanding is wholly inadequate. Every day we witness further erosion of our fundamental freedoms given to us by our Creator but being usurped by man and our government. Those in opposition to the Marxist philosophy do not recognize this erosion and in many situations voice support of that erosion.
History would show that only one of two things can happen; the erosion will continue until we are completely transformed to that Marxist totalitarian state as prophesied and desired by Comrade Obama, or those who proclaim to be lovers of freedom will educate themselves to understand the constant erosion of their freedoms and take the same stand as did our founders; “give me liberty or give me death.” We must understand when that awakening occurs that the odds are also against our success just as the odds were against the American Rebels. Those odds did not deter the American Rebel in their quest for freedom. Let us also be American Rebels and demand that America returns to the Freedoms for which those Rebels paid such a high price.
In his farewell address, President Washington cautioned against three interrelated dangers that threatened to destroy the Union: regionalism, partisanship, and foreign entanglements. He warned his countrymen not to let regional loyalties overwhelm national attachments: “The name of American…must always exalt the just pride of patriotism more than any appellation derived from local discriminations.” At this time, many Americans primarily identified with their state or region, but Washington reminded the citizenry not to allow such attachments to divide them, lest “designing men” convince them that differing local interests made the Union unworkable or unnecessary.
In particular, Washington feared that geographic identities would serve as the foundation for the development of political parties. Indeed, this process had already begun with the emergence of the New England Federalists and Southern Democratic-Republicans. While we currently view partisanship as inseparable from the American political process, in the early republic, most condemned parties as divisive, disruptive, and the tools of demagogues seeking power. “Factionalism,” as contemporaries called it, encouraged the electorate to vote based on party loyalty rather than the common good. Washington feared that partisanship would lead to a “spirit of revenge” in which party men would not govern for the good of the people, but only to obtain and maintain their grip on power. As a result, he warned Americans to guard against would-be despots who would use parties as “potent engines…to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government.”
This statement, while we currently view partisanship as inseparable from the American political process, in the early republic, most condemned parties as divisive, disruptive, and the tools of demagogues seeking power, is once again happening on Capitol Hill. I have had some time to listen to the IG Report hearings taking place. It is so apparent these hearings, as have others in the past, have nothing to do with the topic at hand but are used to push partisanship and political agendas. The topic of the IG Report is about the bias of the hierarchy in the FBI, not whether it existed or not, but did it have an influence on the conduct during the investigation of Clinton and the conclusions drawn.
In the House hearing, Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Cummings gave his opening remarks and did not mention the report or the conduct of the FBI officials who conducted the Clinton investigation, but instead condemned the Trump administration for alleged wrong doing in what appears to be a manufactured crisis on the Southern border. Cummings had no interest in learning why the IG found what he found. Cummings only interest was in scoring political points and castigating the current administration which is of the opposite political party.
In today’s environment, there is nothing we American citizens can do that does not have political overtones, politics stretches into every facet of our lives. The conversation is never centered on whether or not the action or lack thereof is in the best interest of the United States, but is instead centered on whether this is good for the political party. Cummings is and always been an advocate for the advancement of his political agenda as opposed to learning facts and drawing reasonable conclusions. He is the extreme. His extremism would be mitigated if he was not placed in powerful positions and if others would not follow his lead but instead insist on placing the interests of the United States above the advancement of political ideology.
But then, we must remember that there is a political party in the United States who wants to see the principles stated in the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution of the United States, and the Bill of Rights rendered meaningless. A logical conclusion can be reached from their actions that they wish to see the fundamental transformation called for by Comrade Obama, that is a transformation from a free and independent nation to a Marxist totalitarian state, completed.
Here is an excerpt of a panel discussion recently. Jason Chavetz and Ann Coulter were on the panel. This is what they had to say:
“You see that with the left and the elite conservatives in the Republican Party that don’t want an honest dialogue about the successes of this president,” said Chaffetz. “Instead of joining together and moving forward with specific goals to restore getting wins in the midterms, they are being disruptive in a haphazard way.”
Coulter took her disdain to a deeper level.
“I completely agree with you that we need to disband the official Republican Party. That was the point you were making, and I completely agree. I’m sorry Representative,” Coulter said, turning to Chaffetz.
I was stunned the other day when I heard Kevin McCarthy call himself a conservative. But then, I should not have been since people like Ryan, McConnell, and McCain have also referred to themselves as conservative.
The media and most of America would have us believe that the Republican Party is a party for the conservative and the Democrat party is a party for the liberal. Both assertions are incorrect. The Democrat Party has become a party that supports the doctrines of Karl Marx and the implementations of said doctrines. The Republican Party has become a party of useful idiots that would profess they oppose Marxist doctrine but will willing compromise what they claim to believe so they are not viewed derogatorily be the politically correct forces. That defines the Republican establishment members like McCarthy, Ryan, McConnell, and McCain as “useful idiots” by the left and liars by conservatives.
An Individualist (Conservative) and Collectivist (Democrat, Marxist, Socialist, Progressive, and Liberal) can be differentiated by how they view the rights and responsibilities of the individual and how they view the powers and limitations of government.
The Conservative views the development of the individual as not being something that can be directed by outside forces. Every individual, for their own good and for the good of society, is responsible for their own development. The choices that govern their life are choices they must make; they cannot be made by any other human being, or by a collective of human beings such as government. The Conservative looks upon politics as the art of achieving the maximum amount of freedom for individuals within the confines of a social order.
The Collectivist views the federal government as the whole people organized to do what must be done. The useful idiot says that if a job must be done to meet the need of the whole people, then it is the proper function of the federal government to meet that need. As you can see, there is not much difference between the two. As you can also see, neither of these falls under the definition of limited government nor do they adhere to the limitations of government in the United States Constitution.
The Constitution was drafted for the sole purpose of limiting the role of government and protecting the freedom of the individual. Government, throughout history has always been the single biggest threat to the freedom. The Conservative will always place the freedom of the individual above the mandates of government. He who supports the growth of government, both financially and in scope, is not an Individualist or a Conservative.
The Republican Establishment now advocates for the growth of government financially and in scope. We Conservatives, if we are to adhere to our belief in the principles set forth in the Declaration of Independence, The Constitution of the United States, and the Bill of Rights, we must denounce the Republican Establishment and promote a Republican Party that adheres to that overwhelming principle that our freedoms are from our Creator and not from man; the role of government is to protect those freedoms and not to infringe upon them or to totally nullify them.
This is what I believe both Chavetz and Coulter were advocating.
Rule of Law is as essential to a free society as is freedom of speech and assembly. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have openly stated their opposition to freedom of speech with their support for organizations like BLM and Antifa. Both organizations use despotic tactics to enforce the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) and tyrannical doctrine of total conformity. Marx explained that in the fundamental transformation called for by Comrade Obama, despotic means would have to be used to bring about the Marxist totalitarian state which mandates total conformity. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are being good soldiers.
Freedom of speech, thought, assembly, and the legal right to investigate and arrive at your own conclusions is essential to a free society. Those on the right have learned it is essential to protect the freedoms of all, including those who disagree with them. Freedom Loving Americans understand that to maintain freedom means the protection of our God given rights for all.
Now we find the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) supporting the total and complete breakdown of another essential principle to freedom, rule of law. The recently released IG report clearly shows that members of both the DOJ and the FBI ignored the law and showed bias that “greatly influenced” their findings and subsequent proceedings for the sole purpose of protecting an individual who they believed would continue the transformation of the United States to a Marxist totalitarian state that was so greatly enhanced by Comrade Obama. This is the exact opposite of what the law enforcement agencies of a free nation should do.
If these law enforcement agencies were protectors of and advocates for rule of law, they would have ignored the name and position of the person connected with the crime they were investigating. The political prejudices of the hierarchy of these law enforcement agencies are contributing to the destruction of freedom as much as are BLM and Antifa.
The members of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are openly advocating for the elimination of rule of law and implementing the totalitarian mandated principle of arbitrary law. Arbitrary law is the principle of using law in an arbitrary manner to gain the results you desire and not the results as mandated by impartially applying the law.
The IG’s report uses hard evidence to show the bias and partiality applied by members of both the DOJ and the FBI. An individual who loves freedom would draw a conclusion from the hard evidence. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have instead chosen to ignore the hard evidence, as did the OJ jury, as did Comey, and arrived at a conclusion, ignoring evidence and facts, that protects their transformation movement.
The IG said that he found no documentary evidence that stated imperially the DOJ or FBI stated they were arriving at their decision because, even though the evidence clearly points to guilt, they do not want the person to be found guilty because of their position and influence. This is the same as the OJ jury saying that OJ could not be guilty because he did not specifically say, “I killed those two people," even though the evidence clearly pointed to his guilt.
The IG came to a conclusion based on his imperial evidence. He did not have a recording or a written document that stated the DOJ or FBI would ignore the facts and arrive at a conclusion that promoted their personal prejudices, even though they openly stated their political prejudices.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) by twisting the stated conclusion of the IG, are openly advocating for the breakdown of rule of law just as they are openly advocating for the elimination of freedom of speech. A reasonable conclusion from these facts would be that the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are openly advocating for the elimination of freedom and the implementation of a Marxist totalitarian state where all conform to their way of thinking.
Political parties are independent organizations and can establish their own rules for who they allow to compete in their primaries so long as those rules are not discriminatory per the amendments to the Constitution and the laws of the land. When the DNC says that a candidate must be a member of the Marxist/Progressive Party (Democrat), that is not an unreasonable restriction. The parties can also establish the rules for how their candidates are selected. They are not obligated to hold primary elections but can and have nominated candidates in “smoke filled rooms”. There is no Constitutional requirement nor law that declares how a party is to choose who will run in a general election.
If people do not agree with the new rules of the DNC, they have a choice. Yes, this is still the United States and we still can make some choices. These disgruntled people can establish their own political party. There is nothing in the Constitution nor in our laws that limits the number of political parties to two. So, Sanders and all “Democrat Socialists” start your own party and establish your own rules. Wipe your tears and get to work, that is the American way; it is also the way of those of us who proclaim the principles of Individualism.
The Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) National Committee recently adopted a new rule that could keep Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) from earning the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) 2020 presidential nomination or any other non-proclaimed Marxist/Progressive (Democrat). The rule, which was adopted on Friday, would prevent non-declared Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) from seeking the nomination.
The new rules state that when a Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) presidential candidate announces their candidacy publicly, they must publicly affirm that they are a Marxist/Progressive (Democrat). Each candidate must also affirm “in writing, to the National Chairperson of the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) National Committee” that they are “a member of the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party; will accept the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Nomination and will run and serve as a member of the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party.”
The 76-year-old senator is seeking re-election in 2018 as a Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) in Vermont. Once he has enough votes to secure the state party’s nomination, he will decline the nomination and declare he’s running as an independent. His strategy, which he has used in the past, ensures that he ends up on the ballot while also eliminating other liberal candidates from appearing on the ballot as the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) nominee.
Many consider this practice to be unethical. It is. But, remember that Collectivists, which Sanders is, never allowed ethics to get in the way of promoting themselves or advancing their cause of fundamental transformation to a Marxist totalitarian state.
What is ironic is that the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) practice the same standards or ethics the ends justify the means. This time it is being used by one of their own but against them.
Several things have become clear recently about the DOJ and the FBI. What is obvious is that the DOJ and FBI have become political agencies and not defenders of justice for the American people. As opposed to defending the Constitution and our freedoms, the DOJ and FBI became political instruments to promote the Marxist agenda of the Democrat party and sabotage any movement that advocates for the principles of liberty and freedom.
What has also become clear is that President Trump made a huge mistake when he appointed Jeff Sessions to be the Attorney General. It also appears that nothing would be any different if Jeff Sessions had not recused himself from the so called “Russian Probe.” In all likely hood Mueller would have been appointed as a Special Council and the witch hunt would have progressed just like it has.
Sessions has come out and defended Assistant Attorney General Rosenstein when collaborated reports show that Rosenstein threatened individuals that are performing their jobs of oversight. Rosenstein said that if these individuals continued in their pursuit of information in the DOJ and FBI handling of the Clinton investigation and Russian investigation that he would vigorously investigate them and their families. We know that Rosenstein was a part of the Mueller, Comey, and McCabe ring that seems to be at the center of all the illegal activities and undermining of the Constitution that was a part of the Obama DOJ.
We also know that only a few in congress seem to be really interested in learning what really happened. The members of the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party are as intent on covering up this fiasco as they were in covering up the Benghazi fiasco. These Marxist proponents like Schiff and Pelosi will do everything in their power to keep the American people from learning the truth. Republican establishment members, for some reason, do not seem very interested in learning the facts either and that includes Jeff Sessions.
The DOJ and FBI were never intended to be an arm of any political party. In a free society, those protecting the people must be free and independent of political persuasion. If they are not, the result is a police state with the justice department prosecuting people for political activities and not for criminal activity. This is a real threat the people of the United States are facing today. This is the reason it is so critical that no stone be left on turned and all activities are exposed with those responsible being held accountable for their undermining of a key concept to freedom, “rule of law”.
No congressional committee can be trusted to investigate this threat thoroughly. No Special Prosecutor can be trusted to investigate this threat thoroughly. To maintain freedom and liberty is in the best interest of the American people. To maintain freedom and liberty is ultimately the responsibility of the American people. Let those who have the most to gain and the most to lose investigate this real and serious threat. Because of what can now be viewed as a crisis and a very serious threat to our freedom and liberty, I wrote a letter to President Trump several weeks ago advocating for a special committee of American citizens to investigate the corruption within the DOJ and the FBI. It would then be in the best interest of freedom and liberty that all of Washington be investigated by this or other American citizen committees.
Here is a copy of the letter sent to President Trump. If this type of investigation is to happen, it will only happen because of a volcanic like eruption by the American people demanding a truly open and transparent government. Never forget, freedom can only be maintained if we the people exercise our rightful place as sovereign and those in government once again become servants to us. Please respond if you agree and will support.
Don Jans, Freedom Loving and concerned American Citizen
March 5, 2018
President Donald Trump The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Ave
Washington, DC 20500
Dear President Trump,
During your campaign to become President of The United States, you promised the American people you would “drain the swamp” that is Washington DC. You have proven this was not some idle campaign promise, but that you meant what you said and said what you meant.
Over the last several months we have come to learn just how deep and wide the swamp really is. We have learned it permeates every facet of our government, even to the point that the swamp has thwarted the efforts of the people’s representatives in congress. We also have strong reason to believe that the swamp transcends political parties. Very importantly, we now realize had you not become President, “drain the swamp” would have remained a rally cry for what the swamp refers to as the “far right-wing extreme radicals.”
As you know, our nation was founded on the radical premise that the “people would be sovereign” and the government would be the servant. President Lincoln declared that our nation is a nation “of the people, by the people, and for the people.”
With this in mind, if WE THE PEOPLE are to ever regain our rightful place as sovereign, then WE THE PEOPLE must do the necessary and hard work to accomplish that end. I would strongly urge you to take the lead in this endeavor. My proposal is that you appoint a special commission of representatives from WE THE PEOPLE. The commission would be comprised of ordinary but concerned citizens like myself. Yes, I would propose that I would be a member of this commission comprised of no more than perhaps 39 concerned citizens.
No member of the commission could now or nor ever have held an elected or appointed government position. No member of the commission could have held a rank of Lieutenant or above in the military. No member of the commission could be an attorney or a school teacher or a college professor. No member of the commission could hold a management position including serving as a board member on any of the top 1000 companies in the United States. All commission members would have to be a certifiable citizen of the United States. All commission members would have to show a consistent record of voting in statewide and national elections. All members of the commission would have to be able to receive the same security clearance any member of the White House Staff would have. Every member of the commission would have to sign a pledge that they would not seek an elective office nor accept an appointed position in the federal government for no less than 10 years.
The purpose of the commission would be only fact finding. The commission would have no prosecutorial power and would not make any prosecutorial recommendations. The commission would have subpoena powers but more importantly would have open access to all aspects of federal records of every department with the only exception being any information that would endanger the Untied States from a foreign power or endanger the life of any individual preforming security related functions for the United States.
The commission would be charged with the duty of investigating the activities related to any and all organizations and individuals involved with all federally related elections beginning in 2008. The commission would be charged with the duty of investigating the activities related to any and all departments and agencies of the United States government since 2008 to determine if the role of servanthood was maintained; that no individual or agency promoted or tried to promote any outside political activity, that no individual or agency attempted to subvert any lawful actions with which they or others were charged to perform as a part of their duties in the role of servant to the people, and that no agency or individual enabled a foreign power to gain an advantage to the detriment of the United States.
Commission members would report to a designated congressional committee of no more than 9 members and to an individual or committee of the executive branch as designated by the President. Any commission member or designated committee member that was found to leak sensitive information to the press would be subject to a prison term of no less than 10 years. Every commission member would agree that they would in no way use the information they gained for personal gain of any kind. They could, however, carry on their normal activities of writing and or discussing any topics with the exception of unique information and knowledge they would have gained from being a member of the commission.
It would be expected that the legislative branch of government and the executive branch of government would use this information to truly “drain the swamp” that has become Washington DC with no exceptions or restrictions based on political affiliation, race, sex, creed, or citizenship. Prosecutions, dismissals, or any other form of corrective measures imposed would be initiated as designated by the United States Constitution and the laws of the United States.
Thank you for your indulgence Mr. President. WE THE PEOPLE wish to drain the swamp so future generation of Americans can live in the freedom and independence that is America.
Let freedom reign. President Trump has made the goal of his administration to restore the principles upon which our nation was founded; Individualism, rule of law, limited government, divided government, and sovereignty of the people. The President has been attacked bitterly and constantly by the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) and the Republican Establishment for believing that our freedom and prosperity is directly tied to our adherence to the doctrine within the Declaration of Independence, the United States Constitution, and the Bill of Rights.
The followers of Karl Marx have declared their desire for the Untied States to fail so that they can again begin the fundamental transformation, that was so greatly advanced under Obama. A transformation of the United States that would transform us from a free and independent nation to a Marxist totalitarian state that is totally conforming and totally equal. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) understand that to enable their desired end to freedom and liberty, unfair elections with massive voter fraud must become the norm. They have enabled non-citizens, the dead, one person casting multiple votes, and even pets voting by their refusal to establish a fair voting system.
The Supreme Court took a major step in stating that voter roles can be purged. This is critical to our freedom and independence because it lessens the chances of illegal votes being cast. The more inflated the voting roles are the greater the chance of voter fraud. Remember in Los Angeles there are nearly one and a half voters registered for every possible legal voter in Los Angeles.
The Supreme Court said the law that Oho is using to maintain accurate voter registration roles is legal. Ohio law allows the state to send address confirmation notices to voters who have not engaged in voter activity for two years. If a voter returns the notice through prepaid mail, or responds online, the information is updated. If the notice is ignored and the voter fails to update a registration over the next four years, the registration is canceled.
The Marxist/Progressive would have us believe this is somehow discriminatory and will suppress voter turnout. If it is your intent to have illegal votes cast, which is the intent of the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) than yes, the law is discriminatory against the illegal voters. If it is your intent to have fair elections, then no, this is just and reasonable method of maintaining accurate voter rolls.
What a great couple of days we have had for freedom and independence. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are enraged as the principles that are at the heart of our founding are strengthened and their promise to transform the United States from a free and independent nation to Marxist totalitarian state is weakened.
The Collectivists have no idea how to act when the United States elects a president who acts like and believes that he was elected to be the President of the United States and not the world. When President Trump said that he will put the United States first, many believed this was just another bumper sticker statement that was also made by Daddy Bush, Clinton, George W, and Obama and never meant nor did they adhere to it. The difference is that Trump meant it and understood what he was saying.
The world, the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats), and the Republican establishment had become very comfortable with the fundamental transformation that was taking place within the United States; that fundamental transformation being the continuing demise of the United States as a free market nation and eliminating the Individualist beliefs upon which we were founded. The United States had not elected a president who believed in the principles of the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution of the United States, and the Bill of Rights since Ronald Reagan and before that Calvin Coolidge. Most recently we had elected three dedicated collectivists, Daddy Bush, Clinton, and George W. and a dedicated Marxist who is also a Muslim Jihadist sympathizer, Obama.
Now along comes Donald Trump who has placed the good of the United States even above himself. The world, the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats), and the Republican establishment have come unhinged. Trump said he would adhere to the Constitution. The Constitution says it is the duty of the President to enforce the laws of the land. Congress has passed immigration laws that provided a means of legal entrance into the United States. Trump has stated he will follow those laws and he is demonized for doing his Constitutional duty. When Trump explains that Obama acted unlawfully with his DACA executive order and that only Congress can make law, the Collectivist group calls Trump a dictator and not Obama who clearly used dictatorial means in his unconstitutional executive order.
It is the duty of the United States Government to protect the interests of the Untied States Citizens. The most recent Collectivist presidents placed the needs of the world first when it came to negotiating trade agreements. The world came to believe that the United States would always place their needs ahead of the needs of the United States citizens and consequently the United States trade deficit grew and grew. Trump has come along and said that the United States is seeking only that the United States citizen have a fair position in the world markets. The Collectivist leaders of the other countries had become so accustomed to our presidents doing whatever the rest of the world demanded that they have no idea how to react to an American President who says and enforces his belief that Americans insist on fair treatment.
The rest of the world, the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) and the Republican establishment had grown accustomed to the Untied States agreeing to deplete its resources to protect the rest of the world from aggressors, that it was the duty of the United States to fund the freedom and Individualist hating United Nations, and that it was the obligation of the Untied States to join world agreements where the United States would be unfairly treated such as the TPP and the Paris Climate agreement. Comrade Obama understood that a means of destroying what he viewed as the worst imperialist nation of all time, the United States, could be greatly enhanced through these world agreements. We are witnessing the outrage against Trump because he has said the United States will no longer participate in, yes even enhance, its destruction through one sided and unfair agreements to the United States.
The threat of Iran to the peace and stability in the Middle East, yes even to the world, is a very real threat. They have openly stated that it is their goal to eliminate Israel and the United States. Iran had serious financial sanctions placed on them and their economy was at the point of collapsing. The Iranian people were calling for the end of the Jihadist government, but along comes Comrade and Jihadist sympathizer Obama. Obama saw the danger of the collapse of the current Iranian government in that there would be less terrorism in the world and Israel would be much safer. In order to insure ongoing terrorism and to make the annihilation of Israel a great possibility, Obama negotiated an agreement with Iran that said go ahead and produce a nuclear weapon, to strengthen your economy we will lift all sanctions, and to enable you to increase your terrorist aid, we will give you a plane load of money.
Donald Trump saw the danger to the United States and to the rest of the world in this one-sided agreement. Trump did what he promised and pulled out of the agreement. Now Trump has done what the previous Collectivist and Marxist Presidents would not do and that is to not practice the destructive policy of appeasement; the policy that had been used with North Korea. Today, President Trump is sitting at a table with the Dictator of North Korea explaining to him that appeasement is no longer being practiced. Those who had so miserably failed over the years are explaining to Trump that he must not negotiate a weak deal with North Korea. These same people had praised Comrade Obama when Obama agreed to give Iran everything they demanded, everything they requested, and then everything Obama wanted them to have so they could greatly enhance their efforts to increase terrorism and unrest in the Middle East and around the world.
For his efforts of protecting the interests of the Untied States, Donald Trump has been called many things including Hitler. What the bumper sticker declaring Collectivist fails to understand is that Trump opposes everything for which Hitler stood while the Collectivist in fact agrees with Hitler. Hitler said the citizen can not own a gun. Hitler said only speech that agreed with him could be uttered. Hitler said that all school children would be taught what to think and not how to think. Hitler said the ends always justify the means. Hitler said all people should conform in deed and thought. Hitler said the government should be in total control of the economy. Hitler said the government should dictate how each person was to live their lives and what their interests were to be. Hitler was a Collectivist. Hitler was a Socialist. Everything Hitler believed, Trump opposes. Everything Hitler believed, the Collectivist believes.
The United States elected a President who believes, supports, and practices the principles upon which the United States was founded; individualism, rule of law, limited government, divided government, and sovereignty by the people. The rest of the world, the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats), and the Republican Establishment do not know how to react to or deal with a President who is a true Freedom Loving American who believes in and advocates the basic principles upon which our nation was founded..
For those of you who do not understand what I said above or have only an inkling or a bumper sticker idea, (experience would indicate this is at least 95% of those who call themselves conservative) I would strongly suggest you get the book “The Road To Tyranny, Individualism to Collectivism.” You can get the book on Amazon or at www.mygrandchildrensamerica.com. If you love freedom and value your liberty, act today.
The Globalists, leaders of the European Union, and George Soros have been trying to destroy National identities and borders throughout the world but have been concentrating in Europe. Many of the leaders of the independent nations in Europe have adhered to this Globalist movement including Merkle of Germany. There has been a grassroots movement against the forced immigration of Islamic Jihadists into Europe. We have seen the grass roots movement take hold predominantly in Hungary and Poland, but it is now spreading into Austria and Italy. Meanwhile citizens of Germany, France, Belgium, England, Sweden, and Norway are facing prosecution and persecution from there governments when they attempt to protect themselves, their families, and their nations from the onslaught of the Muslim whose goal is to kill the infidel and take over the different countries.
Austria is currently at the forefront by leading the way in protecting their citizens from this onslaught of Muslim slaughter of their citizens and the attempt to implement the barbarism of Sharia law. The Story:
Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz announced that the government is planning to shutter seven mosques and expel dozens of imams from the country. At a press conference, Kurz declared, “Parallel societies, political Islam and radicalization have no place in our country.” Vice Chancellor Heinz-Christian Strache echoed: “This is just the beginning.”
What brought this on?
Following years of build-up during Europe’s ongoing migration crisis, Austrian voters have elected conservative leaders who have vowed to “crack down” on government benefits for immigrants and “political Islam.” In 2015, the Austrian government passed a so-called “law on Islam,” which prohibited the funding of religious groups by outside entities and required Muslims to have “a positive fundamental view towards (Austria’s) state and society.”
The imams being considered for deportation — as many as 60 — are being funded by the Turkish-Islamic Union for Cultural and Social Cooperation in Austria (ATIB), a group aligned with the Turkish government. A spokesman for ATIB, Yasar Ersoy, confirmed that the imams were indeed paid by Turkey‘s state religious authority, but said, “We are currently working on having imams be paid from funds within the country.”
How’s it going over?
Predictably, Turkey’s presidential spokesman Ibrahim Kalin took to Twitter to denounce the move, saying: “Austria’s decision to close down seven mosques and deport imams with a lame excuse is a reflection of the anti-Islam, racist and discriminatory populist wave in this country.” Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan said last week of Kurz, “This immoral chancellor has a problem with us.”
Conversely, leader of the French Front National, Marine Le Pen, said, “Austria is taking things in hand and showing that ‘when you want to, you can!” The head of Italy’s League and interior minister, Matteo Savlini, also weighed in with support of the actions, saying, “Those who exploit their faith to endanger a country’s security should be expelled!”