Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are always outraged that there are so many "old white men" in positions of power and they don't even spare our feelings.
"Well! He's just another old white man running a corporation, or there are too many old white men in Congress," and "We need someone as president besides an old white man!"
In the jubilation of the Obama election victories of 2008 and 2012, the Left warned Republicans that the party of McCain and Romney was now “too old, too white, too male — and too few.” (and to think that McCain and Romney were mentioned, because both had values more consistent with the liberals than with the conservatives)
Beginning with, by my count, two dozen candidates for president, the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) had a diverse field. Two were black men; one was a black and Asian American woman; four white women; one Latino man, an Asian American man, a Pacific Islander woman and a white gay man. What is left are three white males, all closer to 80 than to 70.
One of these old white men is an open communist who praised the bread lines in the Soviet Union, championed the indoctrination system in Cuba, and said the system that has brought the once prosperous nation of Venezuela to a third world country whose people are starving, as more American than America is.
One of these old white men is a failed Senator who rode the coattails of another communist to the vice presidency of the United States. He is trying to ride those coattails to the presidency but his fondling hands, his bumbling tongue, and his failing mind are making it very difficult.
One of these old white men is a multi-billionaire who has not learned yet that to be popular in the party requires that you sing the praises of all that is collectivist, claiming that government is far more capable of making all choices for individuals and determining what these individuals can think. It has cost him some of his wealth, but he seems to be learning his lesson. It appears that the only positive thing that will come from his campaign is that he will have helped contribute to the GDP by spending a huge sum in the advertising field.
Confusion reigns supreme in this party however as they claim nobody should be above the law except in a few instances; if you are a member of their party you are above the law, if you enter the United States illegally you are above the law, if you commit a crime that the party can use to advance their agenda you are above the law.
There is confusion on how evil an inert object is, but the person that brings action to the object bears no responsibility for the harm done if that person meets the criteria that would have made them a victim of society.
There is confusion on what is and is not weather. If it is hot, cold, dry, wet, windy, calm, or great weather, the condition was created by climate change and the only way to save the world is to take the wealth of the United States and redistribute that wealth to the nations determined by that party. Thus, the terms climate cooling or climate warming have been placed in the all-encompassing term of climate change. To truly understand this phenomenon, we must turn to a 16-year-old girl whose claim to fame is the ability to exhibit anger and outrage.
There is confusion on who is the leader of this party. An old lady who has been in congress for it seems centuries would have us believe she is the leader, however, a young communist female who is a self-appointed expert on any subject you mention, has become the leader of this party.
We have been told time and time again that choice and murder are not synonymous. This party has finally cleared their ambiguities on this subject as they now concede that choice is truly murder as they unanimously support the murder of a child, even a child that has survived choice.
Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.