|
Transparency and honest investigations are critical in a free society. It is in a totalitarian state that we are told to shut up and not question the happenings and accept the answer it did not happen. This is why our founders were so adamant that the government is the servant, and the people are the sovereign. A sovereign must know everything, good, bad, and indifferent. The servant must be totally transparent or in a totalitarian state, that servant is eliminated.
We can know that the roles in our society are no longer as designed but today the government is the sovereign and we the people are the servants. We are no longer a free society but in a totalitarian state. Today the government says to the people, you will do this, or you will be punished. When we the people ask for transparency and an honest investigation we are told we do not have a right to know and if we insist on transparency or an investigation we will be punished or eliminated. There are two issues in the United States today that are totally off limits for we the people. I want complete transparency and an honest investigation into the murder of Seth Rich. That he was murdered by a random robber has no basis in fact. The sovereign government has told us that we are to believe them and ignore the evidence that is contrary to what we are told. The second issue is the 2020 election. The evidence is overwhelming that fraud took place. We know that dead people, non-citizens, and non-residents voted. We know that ballots were created, that observers were prevented from observing, that coordinated dumps of Biden votes took place in at least 6 states, that the Dominion machines were programed to change votes and to create votes, and that all of this took place in Democrat controlled large cities already known for voter fraud and corruption. Yet we are told that there was no voter fraud. And then when this explanation is so obviously absurd, we are told that the fraud was not sufficient to change the election. This is as absurd as the first argument. You admit voter fraud took place. How can you possibly know if it was enough to change or not change the election. In many states the difference was exceedingly small, and it would not have taken much fraud to change the election. Nevertheless, the sovereign government is telling we the servants that they the sovereign do not have to be transparent and they do not have to conduct any kind of an investigation, much less an open and honest investigation. This explanation is not only coming from the Democrats, but it is also coming from the RHINOS. These people obviously are willing to do anything to remove President Trump from office. It would appear both the Democrats and the RHINOS have a good reason to remove President Trump. President Trump is a true outsider to Washington. President Trump promised to drain the swamp that is Washington. President Trump did much to expose how deep that swamp is. President Trump revealed that the swamp includes members of both political parties. The swamp members, regardless of whether they have a R or a D behind their name have much to keep concealed. Consequently, we the servants are told that honest elections will no longer be held and that there will never to be investigations into overt or covert voter fraud. President Trump and fellow Freedom Loving Americans, this is not the time to bend the knee to our sovereign government, but it is the time to do exactly what our Declaration of Independence demands when it states that, “But when a long train of abuses and usurpation's, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.-“ We go about accomplishing this by becoming soldiers of freedom committed to “Setting Brushfires of Freedom” and supporting only candidates to office that are known to support that the proper role of government is to be the servant, that would be committed to a totally transparent government, and that would insist on a full and open investigation into the murder of Seth Rich and the fraudulent election of not only 2020 but previous voter fraud as well. Will you join the forces for freedom, or will you accept your role as servant?
0 Comments
To understand the beliefs of Martin Luther King, Jr. a person needs to listen to his niece, Alveda King and not to those who use Martin Luther King, Jr. to promote and enrich themselves, namely Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson. MLK was a crusader for equal rights, not for special treatment. MLK was not a racist as are the political left, perhaps none more so than Joe Biden and Kamal Harris.
MLK would never have stated that anybody must vote a certain way because their skin was a certain color such as Joe Biden said. MLK would have opposed people of any race receiving special treatment or special privileges. MLK did demand that all people be treated equally, and that people should not be relegated to accept inferior positions because of the color of their skin, but he never proposed special treatment either, only equality. "I look to a day when people will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character,” was his statement from his famous “I have a Dream” speech. The day to which MLK looked is a day to which every Freedom Loving American should look, that day when skin color does not designate you as inferior or superior, when skin color does not designate you as supremacist or victim, when skin color does not stipulate you are incapable of competing and thus must be singled out for special treatment, a day when you are free to vote for whomever you wish without being demonized or ostracized, yes, a day when all are color blind, that means blacks are color blind, browns are color blind, and whites are color blind. Yet in today’s world, those who believe power and wealth can be accumulated because they tell people to ignore the content of the individual character but focus on the color of skin, hatred and division will abound as power and wealth are accumulated. Sorry MLK, but so many who claim to be your disciples are using you for purely selfish reasons. However, those of us who believe in your message will continue to do what we can do to hopefully help bring your dream of equality based on individual character. He said there is a deep state and revealed that high level members of the FBI, DOJ, CIA, NSA, and State Department openly worked against a duly elected president of the United States by eavesdropping, falsifying documents, disregarding constitutionally guaranteed due process of law, committing perjury, and lying to a congressional committee. He said there was no Russian collusion and a two-year investigation proved him to be correct. He said the election would be rife with fraud and thousands of affidavits, video recordings, expert testimonies, forensic studies proved him to be correct. He is claimed to be an enemy of the people by the members of the deep state, by those who claimed Russian collusion, and by those who committed massive voter fraud to rid the American people of the individual for whom they overwhelmingly voted to be their president. His brother said they get away with corruption because they are experts at plausible denial. He said he and his party never allow facts to get in the way of their truth. He said his party has put together the greatest voter fraud machine ever. This was irrevocably proven to an accurate statement He refused to open the records he claimed would prove he did not sexually molest his staffer in the halls of the capitol. He said his druggie and sexually perverted son was the most intelligent and moral person he knew. He openly sexually molests females by sniffing them and fondling them regardless of their age. He denies he runs an international crime family despite sworn statements and texts and emails to the contrary. He has consistently lied about his academic record and has been proven to be a serial plagiarist. He will be inaugurated as perhaps the first overtly fraudulently elected president. He is acclaimed by the members of the deep state, the supporters of the deep state, the advocates for a corrupt and immoral government, and the advocates for transforming the United States into a Marxist totalitarian state as an honest and upstanding individual who will unify the country as he promotes censorship, confiscation, demonization and ostracisation of opponents, and the final obliteration of the United States Constitution and our republic. Confusion reigns supreme. We are told now is a time for healing and unity, yet government condoned censorship is imposed on any who would disagree with those calling for unity. We are told now is a time for healing and unity, and yet demands for demonetization and ostracisation are imposed and demanded on any who do not conform.
We are told that President Trump has committed an impeachable offense, and yet the impeachable offense is not defined nor is any specific corroboration given, only generalities and inflammatory rhetoric. We are told that the happening at the capitol was an insurrection while the burning of American cities, the destruction of private property, the looting and stealing of the property of others was simply an outcry for justice and must be celebrated as an American right. We are told that we all must accept the outcome of what has been proven to be a fraudulent election. That the terms of the United States Constitution were ignored by governors, secretary of states, judges, and local officials is beyond dispute. These people made election law where the United States Constitution explicitly states that is the sole domain of state legislatures. We are told that we must accept the outcome of what has been proven to be a fraudulent election. Yet we know that millions of illegal votes were cast, ballots were printed and fraudulently competed, and voting machines were manipulated. The evidence is overwhelming. Yet we are told that the fraud was not enough to change the election results and because those telling us such do not want the election results overturned, no audit, no review, or no investigation will take place. The reason we are given is, “because I say so”. We are told that freedom and liberty is to be cherished, yet calls for cleansing the group that has asked for compete transparency is made a motion, seconded, and supported by those who say they champion freedom and liberty. We are told that we champion free and open thought, yet those who would voice an opinion that is opposed to the party in power are prevented form speaking or communicating. We are told that we must allow our democracy to work, yet we were never intended to be a democracy for the very reason we are told to allow it to work. We have become a democracy and subsequently the rights of the minority have been taken from them, conformity is demanded and enforced, indoctrination has replaced education, corruption is protected and enabled, and he who would expose the ubiquitous deep state must be chastised, and then destroyed. We are told that we must honor the new American way, the new American way that has rewritten our history. The new American way to bring about an American way that opposes all upon which our great nation was founded, the protection of the people from the tyranny of government, the protection of the rights of the minority from the dictatorial rule of the majority, the rule of law over arbitrary law, and the protection of due process. All of these great principles now gone because we are told the United States Constitution is an antiquated document, a document that no longer has any applicability to our new modern and woke ways, and that our heritage that shaped who we are, Judeo/Christian principles, also have no applicability to our new modern and woke ways. We are told that we must honor the new American way, the one where all must conform to the collectivist ideology. We must accept that it is for the good of the collective that they who refuse to conform, be separated or eliminated. WE ARE TOLD THIS IS THE NEW AMERICA. The United States has been in one stage or another of being transformed from the individualist principles upon which it was founded to the collectivist principles that have been the driving force behind the transformation movement. Those of you who have read my writings over the years know that I have discussed individualism and collectivism frequently. I have written a book on the topic which is “The Road to Tyranny, Individualism to Collectivism”. I have defined these concepts many times in many different ways. A simple explanation is that individualism celebrates the individual understanding that as individuals we have the freedom and liberty to seek our dreams. The role of government is to protect the rights for all and is to have no ability to limit these rights. Collectivism states that the good of the collective should be paramount, and the collective must have total control over the actions of all so that the aspirations of individuals to not violate what is called the good of the community. The role of government is to control rights and liberties and maintain a totally conforming and totally equal society.
The United States Constitution was written for the purpose of protecting the citizen from the tyranny of government or the collective. The transformation movement believes the purpose of government is to be the sovereign and people are to serve the wishes or demands of the government because that is what is best for all. The goal of the transformation movement is to place the people as the servants of the government as opposed to the intent of our Constitution which is to have the government serve the wishes and needs of the people. Our founding principles were based on the concept that less government is better government, while the transformation movement believes more government is always better. The proper role of government has been debated form perhaps the beginning of time, is the citizen the sovereign or the servant. Throughout most of history, it was widely accepted that people were incapable of governing themselves and some form of controlling government or sovereign government prevailed. In the 18th century a group of people living in what was referred to as the New World conceived of an idea that government should be the servant and the people should be the sovereign. The United States of America was born based on that premise or the premise of individualism. Those who opposed and oppose this ideal of individualism, have been seeking to change the American society. These people generally refer to this movement as a transformation. The purpose of the transformation is to place the government as the sovereign with the people as the servant, adhering to the demands of the government. Any government is comprised of people, and the collectivist says that these people in government, the bureaucrats who are schooled in maintaining control, technocrats who are technical experts in the different functions of government, and experts who have been schooled in different facets of functions performed by government will control how all the others will live their lives and how all the others will think. The collectivist has understood that the proposed transformation could take a long time with many ups and downs. The dedicated collectivist did study how others who strove to gain government power for the good of the people, accomplished their goal. What they learned is that control of the education system must be absolute. This is critical because the education system must become a system of indoctrination assuring that the beliefs and values of the people become the values mandated by the state and not be the values of parents or the church. The collectivist also quickly understood that the owners of all arms must be known by the state so that when the time came, any and all arms could be confiscated. An honored collectivist, Vladimir Lenin told his comrades that one person with a gun could control a hundred without a gun. The collectivist also understood that liberties and rights must be limited and controlled. Rights and liberties included those rights and liberties specifically named in the 1st Amendment of the Untied States Constitution, religion, speech, and assembly. These liberties could be controlled over time through the indoctrination of the youth in the school system and they could be controlled by implementing the necessary tool of political correctness where huge numbers of people will adjust to the demanded censorship so they would be considered a part of the accepted class. The collectivist also understood the necessity of a great propaganda system where telling lies often enough would become the truth, where using plausible denial would be considered proof of no wrongdoing, and where manufacturing lies about individualists who oppose the collectivist movement would be accepted as irrefutable truth. A critical element to bring about this transformation would be to manipulate any incident that could be twisted to bring about the desired ends of total government control must be promoted and manipulated to bring about the desired effect. Perhaps the most critical strategy to complete the transformation is to centralize all economic and social aspects of the society in a central government where the proper bureaucrats, technocrats, and experts are already in place to complete the transformation. Even though the United States Constitution extends no lawmaking power or judicial power to any bureaucrat, technocrat, or expert, the collectivist understands that legal authority is inconsequential, and that assumed power becomes the prevailing power. In today’s America, the bureaucrats, the technocrats, the experts, those in power in the three branches of government, and the media support having a sovereign government. They support a full and complete transformation of our individualist nation to a collectivist nation. They support people accepting what they consider to be the proper role of the people, servants to a sovereign government. In order to reverse this transformation, all individualists in our nation will have to become as dedicated to that movement as were the Americans in the 18th century. These people, these Americans, were willing to sacrifice life and fortune to live as individuals free from the tyranny of government. Are the Americans of the 21st century as committed to individual freedom and liberty, or are these modern day Americans willing to accept the role of servant for the good of the collective? I know about what I speak, and that is that the movement of collectivism (Marxism, communism, socialism, progressives, Democrats, - all virtually the same) are out to destroy the society known as the United States of America. The collectivist hates the United States because it was built on individualism, which is the opposite of collectivism. Political correctness has permeated our society, and is a great danger to our society based on individual liberty and freedom. When others can explain this danger so clearly and so concisely, I believe it is best to use their explanations and give them the credit and hope all will learn from their insight. Here it is and I encourage all to read and to digest this accurate information.
POLITICAL CORRECTNESS – A Marxist Strategy To Destroy Capitalism… by Elissa Meininger It may not be obvious to you, yet, but WE, the American people, WERE being manipulated by a powerful, committed, and longstanding movement that, until Trump was elected, was about to transform our country into a socialist state – health care included. If that concept still alludes you, ask yourself why anybody cared if Ann Coulter was to speak at Berkeley last week. The plain truth is, if some people didn’t want to hear her, then they didn’t need to go to the auditorium. Duh! Are these vaccine damaged young people? Instead, the Political Correctness speech censors showed up in force and had a field day intimidating people to make sure nobody would be able to hear what she had to say. We see this behavior on just about every college campus in America these days and, sad to say, it is a reflection of the mindless activities college students are doing all day long. All that seems to be going on is ranting about victim feminism, the gay rights movement, Black Lives Matter, demands for special privileges, and safe places. In the middle of all this craziness the rest of us have learned to be fearful of what we say, what we write and what we think. After all, we might use the wrong word that somebody might find offensive, insensitive, racist, sexist, homophobic or God knows what else. In fact, for years, I’ve not felt free to say “Merry Christmas” at Christmas time as it was no longer politically correct. We certainly see this in US health care. How dare we question vaccines, the CDC, FDA, doctors? All of this was planned… Believe it or not, all this aggressive political correctness is the invention of a Marxist think tank set up in 1923 affiliated with Frankfort University, they called the Institute of Social Research. The idea was to create a cultural parallel to economic Marxism. Economic Marxism had a simple idea. Nobody should own stuff. Cultural Marxism?… Cultural Marxism (aka Political Correctness) was created to rewrite history, create divisions among people and no matter what the topic, to reverse truth. By the 1930s, with the addition of the ideas of Freud, politically correct thought took on a more powerful agenda called “Critical Theory”. The theory was to just constantly criticize Western culture, repressive capitalistic economic order, and everything else and finally break down the system until it collapsed. What would be put in its place, nobody cared. The breakdown of society was and is the only goal. How it is being used now in America… On college campuses we now see women’s studies departments to appeal to radical feminism, gay studies departments, black studies departments, all to recreate history and reality so people believe they are being repressed by the oppressor, whoever that may be that day – usually white people, rich people, men, etc. Almost 20 years ago, Bill Lind provided a detailed account of the “Origins of Political Correctness” which bears consideration today as we see major events almost daily on TV to illustrate what he was observing way back then. Cultural Marxism Is Destroying America Below are some highlights of Lind’s observations that cover both Economic Marxism and Cultural Marxism. First of all, both are totalitarian ideologies. The totalitarian nature of Political Correctness is revealed nowhere more clearly than on college campuses, many of which at this point are small ivy covered North Koreas, where the student or faculty member who dares to cross any of the lines set up by the gender feminist or the homosexual-rights activists, or the local black or Hispanic group, or any of the other sainted “victims” groups that PC revolves around, quickly find themselves in judicial trouble. Within the small legal system of the college, they face formal charges – some star-chamber proceeding – and punishment. That is a little look into the future that Political Correctness intends for the nation as a whole. Second, the cultural Marxism of Political Correctness, like economic Marxism, has a single factor explanation of history. Economic Marxism says that all of history is determined by ownership of means of production. Cultural Marxism, or Political Correctness, says that all history is determined by power, by which groups defined in terms of race, sex, etc., have power over which other groups. Nothing else matters. All literature, indeed, is about that. Everything in the past is about that one thing. Third, just as in classical economic Marxism certain groups, i.e. workers and peasants, are a priori good, and other groups, i.e., the bourgeoisie and capital owners, are evil. In the cultural Marxism of Political Correctness certain groups are good – feminist women, (only feminist women, non-feminist women are deemed not to exist) blacks, Hispanics, homosexuals. These groups are determined to be “victims,” and therefore automatically good regardless of what any of them do. Similarly, white males are determined automatically to be evil, thereby becoming the equivalent of the bourgeoisie in economic Marxism. Fourth, both economic and cultural Marxism rely on expropriation. When the classical Marxists, the communists, took over a country like Russia, they expropriated the bourgeoisie, they took away their property. Similarly, when the cultural Marxists take over a university campus, they expropriate through things like quotas for admissions. When a white student with superior qualifications is denied admittance to a college in favor of a black or Hispanic who isn’t as well qualified, the white student is expropriated. And indeed, affirmative action, in our whole society today, is a system of expropriation. White owned companies don’t get a contract because the contract is reserved for a company owned by, say, Hispanics or women. So, expropriation is a principal tool for both forms of Marxism. And finally, both have a method of analysis that automatically gives the answers they want. For the classical Marxist, it’s Marxist economics. For the cultural Marxist, it’s deconstruction. Deconstruction essentially takes any text, removes all meaning from it and re-inserts any meaning desired. So we find, for example, that all of Shakespeare is about the suppression of women, or the Bible is really about race and gender. All of these texts simply become grist for the mill, which proves that “all history is about which groups have power over which other groups.” So the parallels are very evident between the classical Marxism that we’re familiar with in the old Soviet Union and the cultural Marxism that we see today as Political Correctness. Lind leaves us with a final (before Trump) warning we must take seriously. ………America today is in the throes of the greatest and direst transformation in its history. We are becoming an ideological state, a country with an official state ideology enforced by the power of the state. In “hate crimes” we now have people serving jail sentences for political thoughts. And the Congress is now moving to expand that category ever further. Affirmative action is part of it. The terror against anyone who dissents from Political Correctness on campus is part of it. It’s exactly what we have seen happen in Russia, in Germany, in Italy, in China, and now it’s coming here. And we don’t recognize it because we call it Political Correctness and laugh it off. My message today is that it’s not funny, it’s here, it’s growing, and it will eventually destroy, as it seeks to destroy, everything that we have ever defined as our freedom and our culture. These two terms are antonyms. You can no longer be an American and a Democrat. America was founded on the principles of individualism or where the rights and liberties of the individual are sacred. Individualism is a strong adherent to the principles of self-responsibility and self-dependency. The Democrats have become collectivists or the belief that the individual is only a part of the collective and must subjugate all individual wants and desires for the good of the collective. Collectivism denounces self-responsibility and declares that all must be responsible to and dependent upon the collective for the good of all. Collectivism is the core belief behind Marxism, communism, socialism, and the core of the progressive doctrine. Democrats have become dedicated collectivists.
I am a believer that we can learn from the observations of wise people who have come before us. If history teaches us anything it is that although methods and speeds of communication and transportation change, the basic nature of man does not. Individualists existed from the beginning; however, the United States was the first nation to be founded on the explicit principles of individualism. I would strongly recommend that if you do not know who Alexis de Tocqueville was, you do some research. It will give you a better perspective of his observations. Here he is defining what it is to be an American. Tocqueville was the man who discovered American individualism—he described it somewhat negatively as “a mature and calm feeling which disposes each member of the community to sever himself from the mass of his fellow-creatures, and to draw apart with his family and friends.” Yet he talked approvingly about self-help, a hallmark of American individualism. For example: “The citizen of the United States is taught from infancy to rely upon his own exertions in order to resist the evils and the difficulties of life; he looks upon the social authority with an eye of mistrust and anxiety, and he claims its assistance only when he is unable to do without it.” Tocqueville explained what people everywhere came to recognize as the American dream: “There is no man who cannot reasonably expect to attain the amenities of life, for each knows that, given love of work, his future is certain. . .. No one is fully contented with his present fortune, all are perpetually striving, in a thousand ways, to improve it. Consider one of them at any period of his life and he will be found engaged with some new project for the purpose of increasing what he has.” Tocqueville commended the peaceful influence of free enterprise. “I know of nothing more opposite to revolutionary attitudes than commercial ones. Commerce is naturally adverse to all the violent passions; it loves to temporize, takes delight in compromise, and studiously avoids irritation. It is patient, insinuating, flexible, and never has recourse to extreme measures until obliged by the most absolute necessity. Commerce renders men independent of one another, gives them a lofty notion of their personal importance, leads them to seek to conduct their own affairs, and teaches how to conduct them well; it therefore prepares men for freedom, but preserves them from revolutions.” Tocqueville observed how liberty and the need for social cooperation give people incentives to be virtuous. “I have often seen Americans make great and real sacrifices to the public welfare; and I have noticed a hundred instances in which they hardly ever failed to lend faithful support to one another. The free institutions which the inhabitants of the United States possess, and the political rights of which they make so much use, remind every citizen, and in a thousand ways, that he lives in society. They every instant impress upon his mind the notion that it is the duty as well as the interest of men to make themselves useful to their fellow creatures; and as he sees no particular ground of animosity to them, since he is never either their master or their slave, his heart readily leans to the side of kindness.” Tocqueville defines Democrat. With phenomenal foresight, Tocqueville predicted that the welfare state would become a curse. For example: “Above this race of men stands an immense and tutelary power, which takes upon itself alone to secure their gratifications and to watch over their fate. That power is absolute, minute, regular, provident, and mild. It would be like the authority of a parent if, like that authority, its object was to prepare men for manhood; but it seeks, on the contrary, to keep them in perpetual childhood; it is well content that the people should rejoice, provided they think of nothing but rejoicing. For their happiness such a government willingly labors, but it chooses to be the sole agent and the only arbiter of that happiness; it provides for their security, foresees, and supplies their necessities, facilitates their pleasures, manages their principal concerns, directs their industry, regulates the descent of property, and subdivides their inheritances; what remains, but to spare them all the care of thinking and all the trouble of living?” “Our contemporaries,” he continued, “combine the principle of centralization and that of popular sovereignty; this gives them a respite: they console themselves for being in tutelage by the reflection that they have chosen their own guardians.” Do be an American is to be an individualist. To be a Democrat is to be a collectivist. You can not be both. Each person must choose and our nation must choose. Here is a list of a few questions that will help you determine if you are truly a Freedom Loving American or a collectivist (Marxist, communist, socialist, progressive, Democrat, - all virtually the same).
Do you believe that biology classes should be sex education classes concentrating not on human reproduction but teach all aspects of sex including perversions and then encourage all youth to experiment. Do you believe that the news media should be an opinion outlet concentrating on rumor, suspected activity, and use anonymous sources with questionable stories, but stories that still report on what evil the conservatives might have done. Do you believe that a political persuasion should be required for news reporters or do you believe it is best if the political persuasion of the reporter cannot be detected. Do you believe that benefits and special privileges should be extended to one citizen over another especially if the citizen receiving is from a group considered a minority group and the citizen being denied is from a group considered to be in a privileged group. Do you believe that all students must be taught how evil our founders were because some of them were slave holders and all were recipients of the benefit known as white privilege. Do you believe those who speak or write against equality, love, fairness, and opportunity should be prohibited from speaking on campuses and other forums where particularly the young might be perverted. Do you believe there are times when the freedoms and liberties protected in the constitution, must be limited when it is deemed to be in the best interest of the community. Do you believe in a progressive income tax, even one perhaps that places minimum and maximum limits on income. Do you believe that actions that are deemed to be in the best interest of the community, such as vaccines, should be mandatory and enforceable by the government. Do you believe that record to all holders of firearms is necessary. These are taken from Lenin’s Decalogue, which is a part of his document entitled Manuel to Seize Control of a society. Communists know they must convince people that Natural Rights are simply a part of people’s imaginations. The Communist believes it is only the state that can declare what is or is not a right or a liberty. Communists also believe that rights and liberties that are extended to be done so only as rewards for what they deem to be good behavior and that they can be withdrawn when the state determines it is best to do so. The communist also believes that allegiance to the community must always come before allegiance to family, and that only the state can teach values to the children. A communist believes all children must be educated in public schools where the state has total control over the curriculum as well as control over the influence of any teacher on any student. Communism is collective over individual, conformity, equality, limited liberty such as gun ownership for the good of the community, or restricted speech when it is deemed that it will harm the community. Are you a Freedom Lover or are you a collectivist? In 2nd Chronicles Chapter 7 we find God speaking to Solomon for the second time when God tells Solomon, “17As for you, if you walk before Me as your father David walked, and do according to all that I have commanded you, and if you keep My statutes and My judgments, 18then I will establish the throne of your kingdom, as I covenanted with David your father, saying, ‘You shall not fail to have a man as ruler in Israel.’ 19“But if you turn away and forsake My statutes and My commandments which I have set before you, and go and serve other gods, and worship them, 20then I will uproot them from My land which I have given them; and this house which I have [g]sanctified for My name I will cast out of My sight, and will make it a proverb and a byword among all peoples.”
Similar statements were made by God to his people where he told them he would bless them, but they must keep his commands, follow in his ways, and not worship other gods or idols. The people would see the miracles of God and in spite of that, they would turn to other gods. Within weeks after God had parted the Red Sea and revealed himself to the people by speaking to them at the mountain, they built a golden calf and worshiped it. It is so easy to look at those people and say how foolish they were. Our condemnation would have far more meaning if we did not do exactly the same thing. Despite what the left would have us believe, history proves that the United States was founded on Judeo Christian beliefs, on the teachings of the Bible. The Bible was used as a primary text in schools and it was to the God of the Bible that our institutions recognized in prayer when they opened their meetings including the 1st and 2nd Continental Congresses and the Constitutional Convention. We have been told by Obama that Islam was instrumental in our founding, which to a certain extent it was. It was because of Islamic Terrorists in the form of pirates that President Jefferson insisted on building a navy to combat this enemy of freedom and liberty. The United States was greatly blessed. But just as the Israelites did not listen to God by purging the evil from within, and instead made a treaty with those God had told them to purge, the American people did not purge the evil from us but accepted the evil of collectivism to reside within our nation in the name of tolerance and diversity. It is this evil of collectivism that has been our Thorne and has in fact brought an end to our Constitutional Republic. The Untied States is no longer a republic. A republic honors the rights of the minority and protects those rights from the dictates of the majority. A republic protects the people from the enslaving dictates of government. A republic places rule of law as the only means of adjudication denouncing the dictatorial demands of the state. The Constitutional aspect of our Republic placed our written constitution as the ultimate law of the land demanding all must adhere to its written law. The United States no longer adheres to the written law of the Constitution. Not one branch of government applies the Constitution as the ultimate law of the land, and we are now a democracy quickly becoming a dictatorship ruled by the mob as our founders told us would happen. We, as a nation, have also turned form our founding principles based on Judeo Christian heritage. Today we denounce the God of our Fathers and include him with false gods and anti-gods such as Allah, mother nature, and self despite us being told not to do so. Today we follow the god of self and adhere to the evil of child sacrifice because self says the child will be an inconvenience or nuisance. Child sacrifice is recognized and supported as a key aspect of a major political party and supported with taxes. Today we worship the god of political correctness. Political correctness teaches us that tolerance and even endorsement of what God has called an abomination is now and must be placed above the law of God and the principles of our founding. Political correctness teaches that any deviation from our Constitution and the established precepts of right or wrong, or good and evil must be euphemized so tolerance and acceptance is deemed to be honorable and opposition to such is now demonized and ostracized. Today we worship the false god of state, practicing the belief that total and complete dependence on the goodness, fairness, and the demands of government (which is people) must replace any and all adherence to the God of the Bible. So much have we accepted this false god of state that we now accept that it can tell us when, where, and if we can pray, where, when, and if we can read the Bible, where, when, and if we can even utter the reverent name of God, and soon where, when, and if we can even have thoughts of our God. We are getting close to the time when not only will the Bible be banned from all secular institutions including schools, but they will also be banned from churches, from homes, and from being available for purchase. Today the United States has, “19“But if you turn away and forsake My statutes and My commandments which I have set before you, and go and serve other gods, and worship them.” Subsequently, God has cast the United States from his sight. But what we learn is that as people cried to God, learned to depend on him, and cast aside the false gods, God was faithful and blessed them again. When rejoicing in this fact, always remember that yes our God is faithful and just, but he calls upon us to stand for him. These stands were in the form of civil disobedience. Servants of God who obeyed him and stood for him were cast into dens of lions, were thrown into furnaces, were ostracized, demonized, and ridiculed. Many suffered and died in many ways, but they placed God first and the nation was healed. In establishing our nation, our Constitutional Republic, our unique nation the United States of America, many who took the stand for freedom and liberty suffered hardship and even death. One young man was hanged, Nathan Hale, and his reply was that he regretted he had but one life to give for his God fearing and individual freedom and liberty champion nation. Others, whose names we will never know paid the same price. Yes, we have lost our Constitutional Republic. Again Dr. Franklin, we did not keep it. Yes God, we did turn form your commands, and we are worshiping false gods and idols. “The Road to Tyranny” was simple. The road to restoration will be difficult and will require sacrifice. Is today’s Christian, today’s Freedom Loving American, completely sold out to God and to individual liberty and freedom so we will listen when God speaks and then obey??? A tactic that has been used by the left forever is also used today; accuse your opponent of the very evil you are perpetuating.
“In my opinion, we don’t need white people leading the Democratic Party right now,” Communist Democrat operative Symone Sanders. Symone D. Sanders is an American political strategist and commentator. She served as national press secretary for Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders during his 2016 presidential campaign. “White folks was in caves while we was building empires… We taught philosophy and astrology and mathematics before Socrates and them Greek homos ever got around to it.” ~ Professional racial grievance industry profiteer and fake “Reverend,” ~ Al Sharpton “The Jews don’t like Farrakhan, so they call me Hitler. Well, that’s a good name. Hitler was a very great man. He rose Germany up from the ashes.” ~ Leftist anti-Semite and racist America-hater Louis Farrakhan "To avoid being mistaken for a sellout, I chose my friends carefully. The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists and punk-rock performance poets. We smoked cigarettes and wore leather jackets. At night, in the dorms, we discussed neocolonialism, Franz Fanon, Eurocentrism, and patriarchy. When we ground out our cigarettes in the hallway carpet or set our stereos so loud that the walls began to shake, we were resisting bourgeois society's stifling conventions. We weren't indifferent or careless or insecure. We were alienated. But this strategy alone couldn't provide the distance I wanted, from Joyce or my past. After all, there were thousands of so-called campus radicals, most of them white and tenured and happily tolerant. No, it remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names." -- Barack Obama “America is just downright mean.” Michelle Obama We hear the racism, the hatred, and the prejudice from these people claiming to only want equality for all. Despite their claim that they want equality, everything they do, everything they say, and everything they tell others to do is exactly the opposite of what will bring about equality. What has become clear is that despite these people claiming to be admires and followers of Martin Luther King, Jr., they are exactly the opposite. If they were truly warriors for equality and justice per Martin Luther King Jr., would they not adhere to his sentiments on how to bring about equality and justice when he proclaimed, “I look to a day when people will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character. If indeed, equality and justice is to be a part of our society, those demanding that all be measured on color of skin, must be purged from our midst. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
January 2021
Categories |
RSS Feed