DEMOCRATS DEMANDING TYRANNYRead Now
Tyranny is an autocratic form of rule in which power is exercised without any legal restraint. Common usage of the word tyranny connotes the illegitimate possession or use of such power in an evil and pejorative manner. This is why the American Left (this includes the Democrat party and their allies such as ANTIFA, BLM, and RINO’s) is correctly referred to as tyrannical.
Examples of the call for autocratic rule which is exercised without any legal restraint would be:
Eye-opening poll shows 59% of Dem voters want unvaccinated confined at home, 45% want them in 'designated facilities,' 48% demand fines or imprisonment for anyone who questions efficacy of vaccines.
This is absolutely frightening. The fact is that unvaccinated and vaccinated people can contact the virus as well as transmit the virus. The hospitalization rate and death rate, which are extremely low, are virtually the same between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. We know that the virus can be treated with common and inexpensive therapeutics. We know the numbers of hospitalizations and deaths have been greatly inflated. We know the China virus threat is not a pandemic, but it is a serous threat to freedom and liberty.
The demands of the Democrats are not in any logical way related to health, but they are in every way related to revenge and punishment. These demands are in every way a means of eliminating Constitutionally guaranteed individual liberties and rights.
The call by the Democrats demanding confinement and imprisonment is simply demonic. The call by the Democrats to fine or imprison anybody who would even question the efficacy of vaccines, which are proven and documented failures, is UN-American, anti-science, anti-constitutional, and unadulterated censorship. It is reminiscent of their same demands for anybody who would question climate cooling, warming, oh let’s just call it climate change. The American Left, as all tyrants, opposes and wishes to silence any who would question them, despite the illogical and unproven statements they claim to be absolute. Any wise person who believes in seeking truth and believes in freedom encourages discussion and discourse.
Tyrants require total conformity to their demands. Any individual or group that conforms to this standard is somebody who opposes individual liberty and freedom and supports tyrannical rule. What the American left has promised in the United States is that they are committed to transforming the United States from a Constitutional Republic to a Marxist totalitarian state, from an individualist nation to a collectivist nation. This is a proven and documented statement. It is beyond refute.
If you call yourself an American who supports freedom, you can no longer support in any way the Democrat party. To be an American and to be a Democrat is no longer possible; one is the antithesis of the other. To be an American connotes individual liberty and freedom and to be a Democrat connotes total control of the lives and minds of others.
Thank you MLKRead Now
“I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.”― Martin Luther King Jr.
We must all dedicate ourselves to making this dream come true; that is placing character as the only criteria with no attention paid to and no mention of color.
In your face we are being told. If you disagree with Collectivist (Marxist, communist, socialist, progressive, Democrat, - all the same) ideology, you will be declared a Terrorist, and just like the people on January 6th, you will have no Constitutionally guaranteed protections. There are people who have been held in solitary confinement for months5, despite never being charged much less tried and found guilty.
Assistant Attorney General Matthew Olsen revealed the new division during testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee focused on the nation’s domestic terrorism threat in the year after the Jan. 6, 2021, 0storming of the U.S. Capitol.
“I have decided to establish a domestic terrorism unit to augment our existing approach. This group of dedicated attorneys will focus on the domestic terrorism threat helping to ensure these cases are handled properly and effectively coordinated across the Department of Justice and across the country,” Olsen told lawmakers.
The move is spurred by what Olsen described as a “growing threat” of individuals motivated by factors such as “racial animus” and “extremist anti-government and anti-authority ideologies.”
THIS IS SO FAMILIAR!!!
The Cheka, started by Lenin, was the much-feared Bolshevik security agency, formed to identify and eradicate counter-revolutionary activity.
The Cheka was formed in the wake of the October 1917 revolution, as a small agency to investigate and deal with threats to the new regime. It was to be the “sword and shield of the revolution”, defending the new regime against its enemies within.
More significantly, the Cheka operated outside the rule of law. It acted of its own accord, investigated and arrested whoever it chose and answered to no one. The Cheka became a model for 20th century secret police agencies in totalitarian states, including the Gestapo (Nazi Germany), the Stasi (East Germany) and the KGB (Soviet Russia), and now the Department of Justice (United States).
The headlines in a noted conservative news outlet read, “Democrats’ Voting Rules Takeover Is A Threat To Democracy.” The story went on to make all the same standard arguments about whether or not the states should continue to run the elections or should we, like in all despotic governments, have control of elections centralized and controlled by the despot.
The very premise that that what the Democrats are doing is a threat to democracy, is in fact incorrect. What the Democrats are doing is implementing democracy. The Democrats have been trying to make the United States a democracy for decades. Democracy is absolute rule as dictated by the majority, or by those in power who control the outcome of elections.
Our founders specifically rejected democracy and formed us as a republic. Democracies DO NOT protect the liberties of people, nor do they adhere to “rule of law.” Democracies believe that those in power have the authority to limit, or even abolish any liberty for a few, for many, or for all, if they determine it is in the best interest of “democracy” to do so. This is what all despots do.
Democracies demand the abolition of “rule of law” and demand “arbitrary law”. “Rule of Law” is blind and implements the written law, in our situation that would be the Constitution of the United States. “Arbitrary law” is used to punish opponents and reward supporters. Under “arbitrary law”, the law is what the despot declares it to be at any point in time. It can be changed or added to as the despot deems necessary. Under “rule of law” the burden of proof is on the state or prosecutor while under “arbitrary law” the burden of proof is on the defendant.
Our founders understood democracy. That is why they rejected democracy. They told us that they reject democracy because it is rule by the mob. They went on to further explain that democracy is a dictatorship of the majority, or those who hold power, over all who are out of power.
The founders also understood the evil of big, centralized government. This is why the powers of the federal government, or central government, are specifically stated in the Constitution. The stated powers are the only powers the federal or central government has. These powers were not suggestions, but defining and limiting. All other powers not stated as those granted to the federal or central government were reserved for the states. The Constitution specifically states that elections are to be controlled by the state legislatures.
In a democracy, the elections would be controlled by the central government. The states would have no control over how elections were to be conducted. This is exactly what the Democrats are demanding. This is exactly how elections were conducted in all collectivist nations including the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany. This is what the proposed Voting Bill does.
What the Democrats have done over the last 100+ years is to transform the United States from a Constitutional Republic to a Democracy. They understand what all collectivists (communists) understand. That is that democracy is absolutely necessary to bring about socialism, and socialism is the gateway to communism.
The headline, “Democrats’ Voting Rules Takeover Is A Threat To Democracy” is false. The Voting Rules Takeover is a threat to our Constitutional Republic, it is a threat to our individual liberties, it is a threat to our freedom, and it is a sure way to transform us into a democracy which is mob rule, which is implementing a dictatorship, which is implementing socialism, which is the gateway to communism.
NOW YOU KNOW WHY THE DEMOCRATS WILL DO ANYTHING THEY MUST TO IMPLEMENT THE “VOTING RULES TAKEOVER.”
DECEIVERS EMPLOY PROPAGANDARead Now
Propaganda is communication that is primarily used to influence an audience and further an agenda, which may not be objective and may be selectively presenting facts to encourage a particular synthesis or perception or using loaded language to produce an emotional rather than a rational response to the information that is being presented.
A key principle of propaganda is the principle of exaggeration and disfigurement.
Also known as the principle of insecurity. It is about using any anecdote, detail and turning it into a threat. By creating terror in people, it is easier to master it.
This principle is very easy to translate to online advertising. It is enough to exaggerate a little to cause fear in the public and thus people are practically forced to acquire your product or service because of a strong emotional need.
After causing fear, surprise, intrigue, or other strong emotions you offer your solution to all the problems they may have in the future if they do not acquire your product.
The American people are victims of a propaganda campaign that has been specifically waged to cause fear in the masses and convince the public to submit to the control of the government, despite the government knowing the actions they are demanding are harmful to the health of people.
Using misleading information
CDC’s report showed 94% of CDC declared COVID-19 deaths were for patients who tested positive but had other primary causes of death. Thus, true COVID-19 fatalities are actually about 6% of those reported.
CDC Admits 40% of Covid Hospitalizations Are ‘Non-Covid Patients’
The issue has to do with what types of hospital admissions actually get counted as Covid-19 patients. Obviously, patients suffering from severe illness due to Covid are included in this count. However, so are patients who visit the hospital for a scheduled procedure or another acute emergency, yet then test positive for Covid-19 while they’re there. They could be asymptomatic, having no Covid issues, but suddenly they become a “Covid hospitalization” and greatly inflate and exaggerate the numbers.
Speaking during remarks to a J.P. Morgan healthcare conference, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla openly stated current vaccines the company developed for Wuhan coronavirus offer "limited, if any" protection against contracting current variants of the disease. He then encouraged booster shots.
The statement from Bourla comes as the Biden administration continues to justify vaccine mandates for federal workers, contractors, and private businesses. A number of people who have pointed out the waning efficacy of Pfizer's vaccines, which Bourla touted last year as being "100 percent" effective against contracting or transmitting the virus, have been banned by social media companies.
Meanwhile, the Biden administration is imposing new limits on states’ ability to access proven Covid-19 antibody treatments.
The propaganda campaign being waged by the illegitimate Biden regime is a concerted effort to abolish individual liberty as protected in the United States Constitution, to destroy our republic and replace it with a true democracy which is critical to implement socialism, and to complete the transformation of the United States from an individualist nation to a collectivist nation which would result in making us a Marxist totalitarian state.
The propaganda campaign has been effective as we witness people wearing masks, even outside and while alone, people submitting to numerous vaccines despite the documentation of them killing otherwise healthy people, and parents having their children vaccinated despite the documented reports of the short term and long-term negative effects.
A free people who trusts government and believes their propaganda is a people who are willingly surrendering their freedom. People who do not question, who do not require complete transparency and verification, are sure to have their freedom taken from them. Trust of bureaucrats, technocrats, and experts, bureaucracy, is on “The Road to Tyranny.”
The American left, the Democrats, and their supporters who include but are not limited to BLM, ANTIFA, and RINO’s, no longer even try to hide who they are and what they believe. The American left is a communist movement. The American left believes what Marx taught and falls in lockstep with his teachings. Anybody who has studied Marx and who listens to what the American left proposes and implements can only come to the same conclusion. Yes, it is so; if you vote for, if you support the Democrat party, you are supporting communism.
The United States was founded as an Individualist nation. Individualism supports the rights of the individual to live their own lives and have their own thoughts. Individualism realizes that a society that unleashes the creativity and encourages the diversity of individuals is a society that has the greatest potential to be free from government dictates or tyranny, as well as minimize poverty, crime, and malaise.
The Democrat party, the communists, believe in and profess the ideology of Collectivism. Collectivism places what it refers to as the “greater good” above the creativity and diversity of individuals. Collectivists believe and insist that all conform to the theory that conformity brings harmony. What we have learned is that the insistence upon conformity for the “greater good” stifles the creativity of the individual and eliminates independent thought.
Marx believed individuality was antithetical to the egalitarianism he envisioned. Therefore, the “individual” must “be swept out of the way, and made impossible.”
Individuality was a social construction of a capitalist society and was deeply intertwined with capital itself.
“In bourgeois society capital is independent and has individuality, while the living person is dependent and has no individuality,” Marx wrote. “And the abolition of this state of things is called by the bourgeois, abolition of individuality and freedom! And rightly so. The abolition of bourgeois individuality, bourgeois independence, and bourgeois freedom is undoubtedly aimed at.”
Lenin stated it this way, “The unity of the proletariat in the epoch of social revolution can be achieved only by the extreme revolutionary party of Marxism, and only through a relentless struggle against all other parties.”
This is the very course the Democrat party or the Communist Party of the United States is taking. They are insistent that any who would disagree with them be outlawed, be destroyed.
Again, this is not me talking, this is using the words of Marx, Lenin, and American Communist Andrew McCabe. Remember, McCabe was a part of the FBI team that tried to unseat a legally elected President and then lied under oath. The Democrat party has dropped all charges and has reinstated his pension.
Andrew McCabe recently was invited to speak at the University of Chicago. He echoed Marx, Lenin, and all communists as he said there is no room for any thought that disagrees with the collectivist or communist party line.
Conservatives Are in The Same Category As Islamic Terrorists
McCabe said, ““I can tell you from my perspective of spending a lot of time focused on the radicalization of international terrorists and Islamic extremist and extremists of all stripes… is that this group shares many of the same characteristics of those groups that we’ve seen radicalized along entirely different ideological lines.” By this group, McCabe was referring to Individualists or Conservatives.
Parents at School Board Meetings Pose A ‘Threat To National Security’
McCabe said moms and dads who stand up for their children’s health and education at school board meetings in ways Democrats disagree with are very dangerous. So dangerous that it is actually “essential” we have a “rapid and complete response by law enforcement at the state, local and federal level to this sort of political violence…”
McCabe Wants More Surveillance of ‘Mainstream’ Conservatives
McCabe wants to get around constitutional obstacles that restrict the abuses of federal agencies. He explained that the path to granting the feds more power to spy on and punish “extremists,” a.k.a. conservatives, is by implementing federal penalties against “domestic terrorism.”
A measure like this would grant domestic agencies the intelligence capabilities of the international terrorism-focused National Counterterrorism Center. It would, McCabe says, “give investigators the ability to begin investigating when folks are plotting or planning or organizing to use violence for the purpose of coercing the population or influencing government…”
There is a concerted effort on the part of the American left to outlaw and punish any who would disagree with them. This is true of all Marxist totalitarian regimes. Tyranny, despotism, collectivism, communism, what the American left wants for the United States can only exist when all conform to the same belief system, when all conform to the demands of the bureaucrats, technocrats, and experts of the supreme power, the bureaucracy.
A free nation can only remain free if it protects the unalienable liberties and rights endowed to people by the Creator. A free nation can only remain free when it protects the right of all people to have their own thoughts and be able to express those thoughts, yes even extreme thoughts from both sides of the political spectrum. A free nation must always put the rights of the individual and denounce the insistence that all conform to one way of thinking. A free nation must remain an Individualist nation and reject the efforts of the left, of the collectivists, of the communists, of the Democrats to transform us into a “classless society” as envisioned by Marx and his Comrades, then and now.
Thomas Jefferson said, "When the people fear the government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty."
I call on every American, regardless of your political affiliation, to learn and understand why our nation was founded on the principles that the government that governs least governs best, that the government can have no power to limit the liberties of the people, and that we would be a republic and not a democracy. Sadly, many who would call themselves lovers of liberty, are willing to succumb to the popular mindset that government is the answer to problems, when in reality government rules and regulations create problems, create crisis, that we are then told can only be solved with more government control through laws and regulations, through the loss of even more liberty.
Never has a people been enslaved to government when the government is limited in its power. Always, the more government usurps power, the people lose more and more liberty and more and more, people have dictated to them how they must live their lives, how they must think. That is called tyranny, despotism, collectivism, communism, and yes democracy.
Our founders understood this. This is why they formed us as a Constitutional Republic, this is why they specifically limited the power of government, this is why they stated time after time that it is only a virtuous people, who elect virtuous representatives, that can remain a free people.
Today we have a part of our nation that opposes virtue, views as its number one enemy the Bible, and views as its number two enemy the United States Constitution. We have many bureaucrats, technocrats, experts, and elected representatives who tell us that we as a people must accept their standards, their requirement of indoctrination, their propaganda, and succumb to their intimidation.
Here is a list of requirements to which our founders knew we must adhere if liberty would remain as the hallmark of our society. When we study this list, we find that the Democrat Party platform is the antithesis of this list. We find the RINO faction supports many aspects of the left’s opposition to these requirements. History proves the founders to be correct about these requirements, and the American left to be wrong. The question is, do you support liberty or tyranny?
This is the list to which I referred. Please read it carefully. Ponder these requirements. Research these requirements and learn what the result was when people supported them and what the result was when people refuted them. You must determine for yourself if you support liberty or tyranny. If you determine you believe liberty is supreme to tyranny, you must be about “Setting Brushfires of Freedom”. Certainly, you can use these points as questions when you are conversing with those who believe they are supporting liberty, but are in fact assisting the despots who are determined to transform the United States to a Marxist totalitarian state.
“Principles of Liberty
1. The only reliable basis for sound government and just human relations is Natural Law.
2. A free people cannot survive under a republican constitution unless they remain virtuous and morally strong.
3. The most promising method of securing a virtuous and morally strong people is to elect virtuous leaders.
4. Without religion the government of a free people cannot be maintained.
5. All things were created by God, therefore upon him all mankind are equally dependent, and to Him they are equally responsible.
6. All men are created equal.
7. The proper role of government is to protect equal rights, not provide equal things.
8. Men are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights.
9. To protect man's rights, God has revealed certain principles of divine law.
10. The God-given right to govern is vested in the sovereign authority of the whole people.
11. The majority of the people may alter or abolish a government which has become tyrannical.
12. The United States of America shall be a republic.
13. A constitution should be structured to permanently protect the people from the human frailties of their rulers.
14. Life and Liberty are secure only so long as the Igor of property is secure.
15. The highest level of security occurs when there is a free market economy and a minimum of government regulations.
16. The government should be separated into three branches: legislative, executive, and judicial.
17. A system of checks and balances should be adopted to prevent the abuse of power.
18. The unalienable rights of the people are most likely to be preserved if the principles of government are set forth in a written constitution.
19. Only limited and carefully defined powers should be delegated to the government, all others being retained by the people.
20. Efficiency and dispatch require government to operate according to the will of the majority, but constitutional provisions must be made to protect the rights of the minority.
21. Strong human government is the keystone to preserving human freedom.
22. A free people should be governed by law and not by the whims of men.
23. A free society cannot survive a republic without a broad program of general education.
24. A free people will not survive unless they stay strong.
25. "Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations; entangling alliances with none."
26. The core unit which determines the strength of any society is the family; therefore, the government should foster and protect its integrity.
27. The burden of debt is as destructive to freedom as subjugation by conquest.
28. The United States has a manifest destiny to be an example and a blessing to the entire human race.”
― Founding Fathers
Throughout the history of the United States, the battle has raged between the Individualists and the Collectivists; that is those who believe the government that governs least governs bets as opposed to those who believe government must control the lives and the thoughts of its people. This is a battle between the Individuals who believes that it is best for people to question any and all authority, to learn to research and reason and make independent decisions, that non-conformity, different ideas, to accentuate the differences in people, versus those who stress indoctrination, adherence to ideas demanded by government through propaganda and intimidation, total conformity and obedience to the dictates of those controlling the government, and total conformity and obedience to the dictates of a tyrant.
The Freedom Loving American colonist told the tyrants governing them that they would not accept the role of being an obedient conformist but insisted that government be the servant with the people being self-reliant making their own decisions and having their own thoughts; being free from tyrannical dictates by government bureaucrats, technocrats, and experts. The Freedom Loving American colonist was determined to free themselves from tyranny.
Freedom Loving Americans face the same situation today. The question is, “do we have the same resolve to throw off the chains of government and demand we once again live in the freedom that was won for us by the Freedom Loving colonist.
Here are the last two paragraphs of the “Give me liberty Speech” by Patrick Henry. I would suggest you go and read the entire speech. It is not a long speech but can be read in 15 minutes or so. If we are to remain free, we must be proceeding with the same dedication to and belief in the virtue of freedom versus the evil of tyranny, that did these brave and determined Freedom Loving colonists.
“They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather strength by irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance by lying supinely on our backs and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot? Sir, we are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power. The millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battles alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations, and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from the contest. There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable—and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come.
It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace-- but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!”
Can we Freedom Loving Americans make such a commitment to freedom. If we cannot, if we hesitate, if we loose focus, we will come under the evil of despotism once again. Yes, the choice is ours, the same as it was for our founders, the great price of freedom has not changed. It still is, “give me liberty or give me death.”
Because we are called the United State of America does not mean that we do not have aspiring tyrants within our midst. They are more and more prevalent, and less and less concerned with concealing their ambitions through any means possible. The American left, an aspiring tyrant, demonizes other tyrants while using the very tactic the others are using. The American left has demonized Russian President Putin for being a tyrant.
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi rejected the possibility that Russian President Vladimir Putin might address the U.S. Congress, describing the Russian leader as a “tyrant”.
This is what the tyrant of Russia has done to his opponents:
A Russian court has outlawed the organizations of the opposition leader Alexey Navalny by labelling them "extremist" as the Kremlin moves to crush Navalny's movement following his jailing.
The ruling by Moscow's City Court puts Navalny's Anti-Corruption Foundation, the FBK, and its regional political offices alongside terror groups like the Islamic State and means that anyone publicly supporting Navalny could now face lengthy prison sentences, as well as being barred from running in elections.
This is what the American Left in the United States is proposing:
Democrats are using the anniversary of last year’s Capitol riot on January 6 to launch an effort to win the 2022 midterm elections by disqualifying Republicans who supported the effort to challenge the 2020 elections results as “insurrectionists.”
The effort, spearheaded by Russia hoaxer Marc Elias, aims to use a provision of the post-Civil War 14th Amendment that was crafted to disqualify former Confederates or anyone who “shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof” from holding federal office.
Tyrants are tyrants. They penalize and attempt to eliminate any who would oppose them. The borders within which the tyrant resides in no way reduces the evil of their actions. The actions of a tyrant in Russia restricts freedom the same way the actions of a tyrant in the United States restricts freedom.
I cringe when I hear people who claim to be Americans say that we must protect our democracy. They either do not understand what they are saying, or they are not Americans, they are part of the American Left, and truly do want to not only protect our democracy but to enhance democracy by further eroding our Republic.
There are critical differences between democracies and republics. Voting for representatives is not one of them. Our founders understood the differences and overwhelmingly chose to become a republic, rejecting and denouncing democracy. Some in the American Left, those who are committed to transforming the United States to a Marxist totalitarian state, understand the differences and are committed to transforming the United States to a true democracy.
Our founding fathers explained that they did not want a democracy because a democracy is mob rule. They went on to explain that they reject democracy because democracy is dictatorship, it is dictatorship of the majority over the minority that quickly becomes dictatorship of the few over the many. Lenin understood democracy as he explained that democracy is essential to socialism and socialism is the gateway to communism. Yes, the American Left understands the differences between republic and democracy, and this is why they are so committed to transforming the United States to a democracy with their end goal being communism.
In a republic there is an understood or written law that cannot be changed by a simple dictate or vote. Our founders chose that we would be a Constitutional Republic with our law wrtitten. This means that the Constitution is the Supreme law of the land. The only way the Supreme law can be altered is through a time consuming and arduous process. This was intentional. The founders understood that the Constitution should not be amended based on emotion but only after long and careful thought.
Our founders also acknowledge and stated that our liberties come from God and not from government. They so stated in the Declaration of Independence. The people felt so strongly that they insisted that some of these liberties must be explicitly stated and protected, liberties such as speech, religion, assembly, the press, petitioning the government, due process, equal treatment under the law, are some of the stated liberties. The founders also understood that all of the intended liberties could not be enumerated, so they added the 9th amendment to the Constitution.
In a democracy, the majority, those in power, or the dictator is the ultimate law. The dictator has the power to change the law, to ignore the law, or to make new law at anytime and with no limitations or restrictions. In addition, it is the dictator who is the final arbiter as to what is a liberty and to whom the liberty is extended. The dictator has no limitation or restrictions in these declarations.
In a republic, all citizens must be treated equally under the law. In a republic, lady liberty is blind and does not see wealth, political position, societal position, race, creed, or any other differences. This is commonly referred to a “rule of law.”
In a democracy, the majority, those in power, or the dictator can not only declare what the law is, but they can also declare to whom the law applies. They can state for instance, that people violating stated laws can be declared innocent of breaking any law because of their reasons or intentions when breaking the law. The majority, those in power, or the dictator can also state that an action that did not break the law at the time of the action, can at a later time be declared to be in violation of the law because the majority, those in power, or the dictator decreed it is.
In a republic, in a free nation, the burden of proof always falls on the government or the prosecutor. When a charge is made, the defendant does not have to provide any defense, and must be declared innocent unless the government or prosecutor proves guilt. In a democracy the burden of proof falls on the defendant. The government or prosecutor brings the charge, and the defendant must prove their innocence to the satisfaction of the government or prosecutor.
In a republic, it is the government that is established to serve the people. The people have given to the government certain powers and duties. The powers and duties the American people gave to our government are enumerated in the Constitution of the United States in Article 1 and Section 8. The government, under a republic, has no authority to assume any additional power or duty.
In a democracy, the people are servants to the government. The majority, those in power, the dictator, declare what powers, duties, and privileges it will bestow on the people. The majority, those in power, the dictator can bestow different powers, duties, and privileges based on classes of people or even certain individuals, based on nothing more than because I want to. We commonly see those who conform to the dictates of the majority, those in power, the dictator receives special privileges, while the opposite is true for the non-conformist.
The more and more we understand the differences between republic and democracy, the more and more we understand why our founders were so adamant that we be formed as a republic and that we adhere to the principles of a republic. Our Founders were a people who had sacrificed much to be free from the tyranny of the majority, those in power, a dictator.
The more and more we understand the differences between republic and democracy, the more and more we understand why the American left is calling us a democracy, is transforming us into a democracy, is rejecting any principle of republic. We understand that the American left understands, as did Lenin, that democracy brings socialism and socialism is the gateway to communism. The American left has sworn it will transform the United States to a Marxist totalitarian state. The first step is to transform the United Sates from a republic to a democracy.
Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.