Obama promised in the fall of 2008, after it was certain that McCain had blown the election, that the Untied States was about to be fundamentally transformed. What we now know is that Obama intended to follow the same script his fellow Comrades such as Lenin, Mao, Castro, and Chavez used when they fundamentally transformed the countries they represented into the Marxist totalitarian state Obama desired. Yes, it is correct to say that based on Obama’s policies he is exactly what he was taught to be by his Grandfather and Frank Marshall Davis, a devoted Communist.
A Communist desire is what they call a fair and just classless society. Marx told them that to arrive at this utopia, they would have to tear down their current society and then build the new society. Class warfare, be it race, sex, or religion would have to be instigated. A hate and distrust for law enforcement would have to be created. A total disregard for morality, long standing principles, and religion would have to be brought about. A society would have to be disarmed and despotic means would have to be used to bring about the transformation.
Obama, Holder, Lynch, and Jarrett were successful in all these endeavors. We have more class unrest in the Untied States than we have had in decades. Obama and Holder instigated a hate for anybody not brown or black by anybody who is brown or black. Obama and Holder encouraged illegal immigration into the Untied States to help with the hate and to bring known and dangerous gang members into the United States to help with the unrest.
The Obama regime promoted the welfare state knowing the welfare state is and always has been the premier for the breakdown of the family. The Obama regime advanced the indoctrination of the children of America by teaching Communist doctrine in our schools and minimizing the influence of parents. The Communists like Obama, Holder, Lynch, and Jarrett belief that children are the property of the state and should be under the influence of the state and not the parent.
The Communist, like Obama, Holder, Lynch, and Jarrett, understand that respect for law enforcement must be minimized. Obama and Holder legitimized the anti-cop group called Black Lives Matter and encouraged them in their open attacks against police. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) endorse and encourage the lawlessness and thuggery of the group called Antifa. All of this is not by accident, but it is a well-coordinated effort by the Communist, Obama, Holder, Lynch, and Jarrett, to bring about the fundamental transformation of the Untied States they promised and desired.
The Republican establishment refuses to acknowledge how successful Obama was in his efforts because the Republican establishment is more concerned with pretending that co-existence is preferable; coexistence also helps them maintain their power and grow their wealth. If Americans are not willing to understand who the people like Obama, Holder, Lynch, and Jarrett and the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) truly are, truly understand their goals, and understand the ways they have been indoctrinated to achieve their goals, nothing will stop the fundamental transformation.
Trump is hated and despised by these Communists. Trump is throwing some roadblocks in their way. Trump can only slow the movement, he cannot reverse it. Only the American people, assisted by Trump, can reverse this fundamental transformation that otherwise will lead the Untied States to the catastrophe that is the Communist movement.
The Obama regime was very successful in entrenching the bureaucracy with devoted Communists. This is reminiscent of FDR. Obama was very successful in accomplishing what he wanted to accomplish. Obama’s biggest mistake was believing that Hillary could win and carry on the work he had started.
We have been given a reprieve. We can not miss this opportunity, we might never have another. I would strongly urge those who are truly concerned and want to understand what this fundamental transformation is, to order “The Road To Tyranny, Individualism to Collectivism” by Don Jans. You can get the book on the website www.mygrandchilsrensamerica.com or on Amazon. After you have read the book, get involved and play your part in keeping the Untied States a free and an independent nation that was and should remain a nation built on Individualism.
"The public cannot be too curious concerning the characters of public men." Samuel Adams
Sam Adams was skeptical about the character of public men in 1775 and he would be skeptical today. One thing is certain, the people we have been electing to represent us in congress, be they Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) or members of the Republican establishment are people with no character. The people in this group have one thing in common and that is to not do anything that might cause them to take a stand that could slow the movement toward a Marxist totalitarian state or that might cause them the loss of potential power and financial gain. These Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) and Republican establishment members are no different than the Broward County Sherriff and his deputies who hid behind automobiles while unarmed people were being shot.
The plight of so called “dreamers” has been front and center as an issue for months. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have used this issue as a rallying cry. At the center of their rallying cry is that these illegals should be able to eventually vote. Of course, in many cases, namely Pennsylvania, Illinois, and California no restrictions as to whom can vote exists. If you can walk to the polling place or get your name on the mailing list you can vote.
Now we are learning that the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) and Republican establishment will punt on DACA and even pull a trick play by using the hidden punt play. Yes, DACA could end up in next month's massive government funding bill, Republican establishment senators predict.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, a leader of the Republican establishment, said that including a short-term deal on the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals in the funding legislation was one of three potential paths — and the most likely one
"That's probably the most likely thing, when we write the funding of the government bill we'll extend DACA legislatively, making it legal for a year or two and kind of punting it," Graham said.
Other options would be, doing nothing, or finding the "sweet spot" that would pair a permanent fix for DACA with border wall funding, he said. We all know that will not happen since these “Broward County like Sheriffs” (members of congress) would have to come out from behind the cars and actually do their jobs.
Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.Va., said Monday she would prefer a permanent fix, but also predicts an agreement will become part of the March funding bill.
"I have a feeling what we may see on this is . . . a DACA fix and some border security, a much smaller package, that will be attached to the March 22 spending bill. If I was guessing what was going to happen, I think that's what may happen."
SOME REAL, MEANINGFUL, AND IMPACTFUL NEWS OF WHICH ALL FREEDOM LOVING AMERICANS SHOULD BE AWARERead Now
We are inundated with meaningless and bombastic rhetoric that is called news. These constant accusations seem to drive social media interaction and maybe even drive Americans to at least pretend to be interested. Who really cares what an uneducated gifted athlete who cannot even construct a sentence says? Who really cares what some homosexual figure skater does to try to get endorsements? Who really cares that some washed up quarterback who is a self-declared Marxist is not on an NFL team? Who cares what some failed talk show host says? Who cares what some Hollywood character says? We all know that Adam Schiff is a liar and protector of the Marxist movement. That he would fill the airwaves with meaningless and untruthful information should be a footnote at best. That the Marxist/Progressives would fawn over a young lady who is an integral part of the North Korean killing machine is predictable. It would have been noteworthy had not the Marxist/Progressive press elevated her to sainthood status. After all in the Marxist/Progressive world she is a saint.
What we know is that those who advocate the Marxist/Progressive doctrine (mostly Democrats and some Republican establishment like McCain and Flake) belief they are justified in telling any lie, in using any method, and in breaking any law that will eventually accomplish their goal of fundamentally transforming the United States into a Marxist totalitarian state.
This following story is a very real happening that could have an affect of not only slowing the Marxist movement, but also doing some reversal. This story could have a major impact on the reversal of our schools, so they once again educate and not indoctrinate. This following story should be front and center in social media because it will have a meaningful impact on our nation.
This was written by Chris Rochester for Townhall.
The Supreme Court heard arguments Monday in the case of Mark Janus, a child support specialist from Illinois, who is suing AFSCME because he has no interest in financially supporting the union’s political activities.
Since Janus is not a member of the union, he doesn’t pay the same amount in dues as union members. But thanks to a Supreme Court decision in 1977, he is forced to pay the union “agency fees,” feeding the coffers of an organization he wants nothing to do with.
The high court will determine whether these agency fees are unconstitutional. Since freedom of association is a basic tenet of the American idea, it would be stunning if the Supreme Court rules to uphold the 1977 precedent. Considering a similar case deadlocked 4-4 after the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, the presence of Justice Neil Gorsuch gives advocates of worker freedom great hope that agency fees will soon be a relic of the past.
To say this is a big case would be an understatement. More than 5 million government workers in 22 states are currently forced to pay these unholy tithes to big government unions just to keep their jobs. That enormous spigot of cash gives unions like AFSCME tremendous political power. But what would happen if public employees are actually given a choice?
According to the unions, if Janus wins, government functions will be completely crippled and public unions will be destroyed. “The politicians who want to slash public services and crush unions are busting budgets with extravagant tax breaks,” wrote AFSCME President Lee Saunders in a recent op-ed.
Observers of the Janus case can look to Wisconsin to find out what really happens when government employees have a choice. To put it mildly, Saunders is wrong.
In 2011, Gov. Scott Walker and Republicans in the Legislature pushed through a bold reform called Act 10. Among other taxpayer-friendly reforms, the landmark law allowed public employees to opt out of their unions without risking their job, prohibited government from withholding union dues from paychecks, and required annual re-certification of all government unions.
Union bosses and agitators threw a massive temper tantrum, and Saunders told a union mob that he had a “score to settle” with Walker. Unions predicted the sky would fall as a result of Walker’s reforms. Government operations would grind to a halt, schools would close their doors, and chaos would seize the state, they breathlessly exclaimed.
Seven years later, none of those predictions has come to pass. In fact, Wisconsin is stronger than ever.
Contrary to frantic claims that education in Wisconsin would be devastated, Wisconsin now boasts the second-highest high school graduation rate in the country, and the number of advanced placement exams taken by high school students has increased 47 percent since 2010. Students’ test scores have held steady, and all Wisconsin students are now taking the ACT.
Once-bloated government unions have shrunk now that people can elect not to join, aren’t forced to pay, and have an opportunity to vote on whether to have a union in the first place. The biggest example is the Wisconsin Education Association Council (WEAC). Before the passage of Act 10, the state’s largest teachers union had almost 100,000 members. As of 2015, the union stood at just 36,074 active members.
WEAC also suffered the largest revenue decline among all state teachers’ unions in 2014-15. During just that time, the union’s revenue dropped more than $3 million.
Symbolizing its sharp decline as a political powerhouse propped up by coercive dues money, the union even put its lavish 51,000-square-foot headquarters up for sale in 2016.
The most recent data show overall union membership in Wisconsin has declined from 354,882 members in 2010 to 218,233 in 2016, a drop of 38.5 percent, according to a MacIver report. As it turns out, giving workers the freedom to leave a union results in steep declines in union membership as unwilling members vote with their feet.
While union membership is now confined to those workers who actually want to be in a union, the number of state and local government workers in Wisconsin has increased by 10,000 between 2013 and 2016, according to the Census Bureau. So claims by people like Saunders that letting workers opt out of a union will decimate public services simply aren’t true.
Not only were the sky-is-falling claims wrong, but Wisconsin is in impressive fiscal health. The state’s budget surplus now stands at $385 million, $137 million more than projected. Walker and the conservative Legislature have been able to cut taxes by $8 billion over the last seven years. This is all possible while maintaining good public services and giving public employees the freedom to not join a union.
The Wisconsin experience shows us that worker freedom means smaller, less powerful unions. It also shows us that government will continue to function, and students will continue to learn and thrive.
No one wants to have their paychecks plundered to fund a union they want nothing to do with. Everyone should be given the basic freedom of association guaranteed by the Constitution. Everyone should be free to choose the political activity their money goes to. If Mark Janus slays the AFSCME giant in the Supreme Court, the big government union bubble will deflate just as it did in Wisconsin.
Most important, millions of public workers will have their basic human rights restored.
BETSEY DEVOS UNDERSTANDS THE CONSTITUTION – AND THAT IS WHY THE MARXIST/PROGRESSIVES (DEMOCRATS) DESPISE HERRead Now
Betsey DeVos was and is a brilliant choice for Secretary of Education. The Department of Education, like so many bureaucratic lawmaking and unconstitutional departments and agencies of the federal government had determined it was their function to dictate to the states how our children were to be educated. The Department of Education, like so many bureaucratic lawmaking and unconstitutional departments and agencies of the federal government had determined that it was their function to usurp the constitutionally mandated function of the Legislative Branch of government and make law. Under the Constitution per the 10th Amendment, not even congress has the authority to tell the States how to educate the children within that state.
The Department of Education had quickly become the primary tool the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) were using to transform the education system in the Untied States into a system of indoctrination. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) were installing the same indoctrination system in our schools that Lenin and Stalin installed in Russia and other Soviet States to indoctrinate kids and for the same goal which was to have the children become communists and slaves of the state.
Betsey DeVos has always stood for choice in education. She has always advocated that parents should have the only and final say as to whether or not they wanted their children educated or indoctrinated. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) were vehemently opposed to her nomination and demonized her in their typical way. They despise Betsey DeVos today for the same reason they despise Trump; these people believe that the constitution should be honored, and we should adhere to its dictates because it was and is the protector of freedom and liberty. This was the intent of the founders and they accomplished their goal.
It is for this reason the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have fought for and advocated for a living constitution, which means the constitution can mean anything they want it to mean; the constitution can mean anything that will further the transformation of the Untied States to a Marxist totalitarian state where all are indoctrinated, and all conform to the Marxist dictates.
Most recently the deregulatory step of DeVos was that the Department of Education said it will not investigate or take action on complaints from transgender students regarding the open use of restrooms in public schools. The Obama regime had unconstitutionally adopted a broad understanding of Title IX, the federal law that protects citizens from discrimination on the basis of sex. Under Obama, the Department of Education ruled that “sex” also includes “gender identity.” Now that bureaucratic decision is being reversed.
“Title IX prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex, not gender identity. Therefore, the question is whether a student (regardless of gender identity) has been discriminated against on the basis of sex,” A spokesperson for the department said that In the case of bathrooms, regulations providing that separating facilities on the basis of sex is not a form of discrimination prohibited by Title IX.”
The spokesman said that until Title IX is updated or revised by Congress or the courts to include “gender identity,” the department will stick to what the written law says. Transgender activists are displeased with the decision to rely on laws rather than bureaucratic interpretations. “This is an abdication of its job and a betrayal of hundreds of thousands of students who just want an equal chance to learn,” a spokesperson for the National Center for Transgender Equality, said in a statement.
The Constitution said only congress can make law, not bureaucrats or the courts. Thank you, Trump, and DeVos for understanding the constitution and adhering to it. Now if only congress would read the Constitution, understand their role, and then fulfill their role, our country could operate as the Republic it was intended to be.
Once again, the discussion is about which band-aide should be used to stop the leak in the dam. The fact is none of the band-aides will work. We can use the one with super duper adhesive, we can use the extra large one, or we can use the most absorbent one and nothing will change. The dam that is threatening to collapse must be restored, or it will break.
Pundit, politician, and citizen say the AR-15 cannot be sold, the age to buy guns must be raised, better back ground checks must be used, and on and on they go. Meanwhile, the morality, ethics, and respect within our society continues to deteriorate, and that deterioration goes on not only unheeded, but encouraged.
Karl Marx said that in order to transform a society to a classless society that is totally socially just, totally conforming, and totally equal, the transformers must obliterate all morality, all long-standing principles, and all religion from that society. This obliteration has been active and ongoing within the United States and most all Western Society for at least the last 100 year.
When morality, long standing principles, and religion are obliterated, something must fill the void. What has always filled the void are the forces of evil, those who would long to take what is not theirs, legally or illegally, those who would long to kill, legally or illegally, those who would seek to shirk their responsibility, and those who would seek to claim victim hood as opposed to self-responsibility.
A welfare system, be it called a safety net system or compassion will always breed and cause evil. A welfare system creates a segment of the population that becomes government reliant which brings about a lack of self-respect and destroys the family. A society with a strong family unit will always be a society with far fewer people who deem it necessary to kill others. And yes, welfare is nothing more than a system of legal robbery.
We have a system that says it is not only a choice to kill others for any reason including convenience, but this murder is encouraged by a large segment of the population and in many cases funded by the government. This murder is referred to “as a women’s right to choose,” but is in fact telling our population that human life has no value. This widely accepted and encouraged manner of murder is telling our society that if the life of another is an inconvenience to you, you have every right to have that life extinguished. Abortion is telling society that murder is right, and it is legal.
We have a system that tells parents they do not have to, and in many instances the state prohibits them from disciplining or giving their children correction, especially if that discipline or correction is based on the teachings of the Bible. We have a system that says children cannot be disciplined in school because of bad behavior, rudeness, or class disruption because that could harm the self-image of the child. This system is supported by parents who sue the schools when their child is disciplined, and it is supported by school administrators and courts. The Obama regime said that discipline could not be applied based on an individual basis, but discipline must be applied based on race ratios.
We have a system that more and more is requiring that the state be responsible for all aspects of child development including but not limited to morality, religion, and academics. A large number of parents encourage and support the state appropriating this responsibility because the parent can now be friend or just absent, but under any circumstances these parents believe they are freed from this tremendous responsibility.
So, to satisfy our need for believing we are doing something to correct a problem, we argue about the band-aide and allow the dam to continue to crumble. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) once again continues their onslaught against our Constitution and all it represents, and of course they believe they are mitigating the Bible, which can never be accomplished, even by the academic, political elite, or self- adjudicated important individual. The useful idiot joins in this meaningless argument believing they are the defender of freedom. The useful idiot then wins acclaim as opposed to the ridicule they would suffer if they instead insisted on restoring the dam.
CHUCK AND I HAD A GREAT DISCUSSION ABOUT INDIVIDUALISM AND COLLECTIVISM YESTERDAYRead Now
Veteran award-winning Radio Host and author Chuck Morse broadcasts live Mon - Fri Noon ET on YouTube and Facebook.
Named as one of the “heavy 100” talk show hosts by Talkers Magazine and awarded “Communicator of the Year” by the National Right to Work Committee in 2003, Chuck's column is published weekly by Newsmax.com and his books are available on Amazon.com and elsewhere.
Chuck, who wrote the forward to my book “Goodbye Constitution, Freedom, America” and I discussed my new book, “The Road To Tyranny, Individualism to Collectivism.” Chuck is very knowledgeable about many topics including a unique and deep understanding of Collectivism. Our discussion will give everybody a better idea as to what is happening in the United States today. You can listen to this penetrating and informative discussion here: https://youtu.be/TcgRs0jMKrc
I would recommend that any American who wants to have a better understanding of the current discussion taking place in the Untied States today go to my website and order “The Road To Tyranny, Individualism to Collectivism.”
A reader called me yesterday and thanked me for writing what they called “a great book.” They said they appreciated the straight forward explanation of Individualism and Collectivism without the typical and expected bombastic rhetoric. They also thanked me for relating these concepts to current events, so they had real life meaning. They went on to say they now understood what is meant by the slippery slope so often discussed today without any clear explanation of what the term really meant. They then ordered ten additional books, explaining there were many people they knew they wanted to give a copy and strongly encourage them to read the book.
As I have explained to others, I wrote this book because in Q and A sessions, both on radio and in live settings, it became very clear to me that people did not understand the differences, nor did they relate Individualism and Collectivism to current happenings. The above reader believed they understood these differences but said for the first time they were able to relate these differences to current events. My mission was accomplished with this reader. For the sake of liberty and freedom in the Untied States, I hope you are the next.
MARXIST/PROGRESSIVES (DEMOCRATS) STEP UP FIGHT AGAINST FREEDOM AND LIBERTYRead Now
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) understand the real fight to bring about their desired fundamental transformation of the United States from a free and independent nation to a Marxist totalitarian state that is a classless society that is totally conforming and equal, lies in the courts. The role of the courts today is totally different from what the founders intended. The founders intended that the courts only give rulings. The Constitution does not give the courts the authority to make law.
However, this has become the role of the courts. Yes, the Marshall court, the courts during the FDR reign of terror, and the Warren court determined the role of the court was to make law, engineer social justice, and advance the fundamental transformation so this has become the purpose of the third branch of our government. Consequently, the battle between Senate Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) over the “blue-slip rule” escalated this week, after another one of President Trump’s judicial nominees advanced without the approval of both of their home-state senators
The blue-slip rule — which Democrats describe as a long-running Senate tradition Grassley has taken to ignore — has become a flashpoint for members on the Judiciary Committee. The committee has been tasked with considering the slew of nominees from the Trump administration, many of which have been controversial. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the committee’s top Marxist/Progressive (Democrat), said that Grassley’s decision to hold nomination hearings and approve two nominees who lacked a blue slip from a home-state senator marked a landmark change in committee tradition. Home-state senators have historically been able to block nominees by refusing to return a blue paper of approval to the committee. It’s a courtesy, rather than a formal Senate rule, and whether it’s followed is entirely up to whoever helms the Judiciary Committee — in this case, Grassley.
This is critical because the courts have become the predominant way the Marxist/Progressives are enforcing and advancing their programs. A Marxist/Progressive Judge in Pennsylvania has just taken it upon himself to flaunt the Pennsylvania legislature and redraw the congressional district map that will probably swing four house seats to the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) side. Nothing in the United States Constitution gives any member of the court the right, power, or duty to determine congressional districts. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have never allowed the United States Constitution to prevent them from moving forward their agenda of transforming the United States from a free and independent country into a Marxist totalitarian classes state that is totally conforming and totally equal.
Former Obama regime EPA administrator Gina McCarthy says that regulations struck down by the Trump administration won't carry weight in court. McCarthy, who was the Environmental Protection Agency chief from 2013 to 2017, called the recent political targeting of regulations at the agency a "real problem."
"I think the important thing is none of them should be touched unless the administration has a real reason to touch them, other than it was done under the Obama administration, and that is the real problem that we see," McCarthy said.
The former administrator who has been an outspoken opponent of changes made under current EPA head Scott Pruitt, specifically mentioned the administration's desire to change the Clean Water Rule, also known as the Waters of the United States (WOTUS) rule.
"We see the Clean Water rule being proposed to be repealed, all that rule really did was do what the Supreme Court and what science told us to do to make sure we are protecting the rivers and streams that are necessary to ensure safe drinking water and fishable and swimmable waters," McCarthy said.
"That is being challenged just because the president told them to do that in an executive order. That’s legally not going to hold up."
McCarthy is probably correct. The courts have taken it upon themselves while overstepping their Constitutional authority, that they can rule, not on the content of the regulation or law, but what they determine to be the motive and thinking of the law. The Supreme Court has done this, as have appellate courts, and now district courts. One court said he ruled against a lawfully written administrative order because of things Trump said during the campaign. Another court recently ruled that the current administration’s position on DCAC is unconstitutional because the administration said DACA is unconstitutional.
No wonder the Senate Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are so adamant that the so called blue-slip rule be treated like a law or even like a part of the Untied States Constitution. That is how much the Marxist movement depends on the courts. Thank you Senator Grassley for acting in the best interest of freedom and independence and actually adhering to “rule of law” to restore the Constitutionally mandated role of the Judicial Branch of government.
MAJOR CASE FOR THE PROTECTION OF FREEDOM AND INDEPENDENCE BEFORE SUPREME COURTRead Now
A case is to be argued Feb. 26 that could affect the financial viability of unions that are major supporters of Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) candidates and causes. The unions represent more than 5 million government workers in 24 states and the District of Columbia who could be affected by the outcome.
The court is being asked to overturn a 41-year-old ruling that allows states to require government employees who don't want to be union members to pay for activities the union undertakes supposedly on behalf of all workers, not just its members. These so-called fair share fees are purported to cover the costs of collective bargaining and grievance procedures to deal with workplace complaints.
Pro freedom interests are backing an Illinois government employee who says that being forced to pay anything at all violates his First Amendment speech rights.
"I'm not against unions," said the employee, 65-year-old Mark Janus, who is represented by American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Council 31. "I don't oppose the right of workers to organize. But the right to say no to unions is just as important as the right to say yes." He said he opposes his union's fight for wage and benefit increases when the state is "in pretty terrible financial condition right now."
William Messenger, the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation lawyer who is representing Janus at the Supreme Court, said everything the union does, including its bargaining with the state, is political and employees should not be forced to pay for it.
Will the Supreme Court rule in favor of the First Amendment which says that no law should be made that would abridge freedom of speech, which includes the right to say yes as well as to say no.
The result of this ruling could have a major impact on the power the Marxist supporting unions have amassed in many states including Illinois, California, New York, and New Jersey; yes, the states who are locks for the Marxist/Progressive Party in statewide and national elections. A ruling in favor of the First Amendment will be good for freedom and liberty.
Those who hate freedom, those who despise independence, and those who hate the Bible and the Constitution; that would be the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) and most of the Republican Establishment, say more and more government (laws) are needed to prevent any future school shootings in particular, and violence in general. Once again, their band-aide solutions will do nothing to solve these problems.
These collectivists, who promote big and powerful government and conformity to their ideas that always promote evil and result in devastation, are taking the easy road and saying if only we had more laws, if only the government had more power, if only the people had less freedom, if only the rights of the individual and their power were reduced and the power of the collective was greatly enhanced, all future violence, including shootings at schools would be eliminated.
Meanwhile these foolish people promote the vary policies and ideas that cause the violence, including school shootings, they claim they wish to stop. These foolish and blind people desire to eliminate God from our society including our schools. When the righteousness of God is eliminated, the void this creates is filled with evil. When the Ten Commandments, the only laws any society needs to live in peace and harmony, are ostracized and demonized, the void is filled with meaningless, complicated, and enslaving man-made law that has never brought about a society that lives in peace and harmony.
These same foolish people promote the murder of the unborn child. In so doing, these foolish people are telling the youth of our nation that life has no value. The very foolish would allow the murder of these children even when the child had survived the murderous act of abortion. Yes, the message is that life has no value so if you kill somebody for your own convenience, our society supports you.
These same foolish people promote the protection of those who would break our laws. In the United States, we have laws against violence and the harming of or destruction of or absconding with others property. Yet, these foolish promoters of collectivism protect those very people who have broken our current laws, just because those people are in our country unlawfully or illegally. The ideas of sanctuary principalities to protect these people who have broken laws, is telling people that adherence to law is conditional.
These same foolish people protect those who flaunt our law because they are of the same political persuasion are once again telling our youth that so long as the ends justify the means, your unlawful actions are justified so long as your ends conform to the collectivist movement. The collectivist supports the unlawful activities of Antifa and Black Lives Matter because their unlawful activities, including the killing of law enforcement personnel, supports the collectivist movement. The foolish collectivist does not understand that the example they are setting transcends politics.
These same foolish people promote the very policies that have destroyed the family unit and promoted hate between classes of people. The so called “compassionate” safety net and welfare systems are the very systems that have brought about the destruction of the family unit and destroyed self-reliance, replacing it with government reliance. Programs like “The War on Poverty” and “quota” systems and requirements, are the same programs that have helped bring about hate between different classes of people. These programs have promoted a society of classes and not a society of individuals.
The foolish collectivist wants to eliminate and nullify that which can reduce crime and violence. The foolish collectivist wants to remove from our society any influence of the Bible and the United States Constitution. The foolish collectivist cannot live with the righteousness of God and his teachings in the Bible, such as sin and evil are not relative to what is our wish or convenient to us.
The foolish collectivist wants to eliminate and nullify the principles of the United States Constitution. The Constitution teaches rule of law and not arbitrary law, The Constitution teaches that freedom and independence are dependent upon having a limited government, a divided government, and that sovereignty must reside with the people. The collectivist believes that government and conformity is the answer. Once again, they are wrong.
Karl Marx said that society must be torn down before it can be rebuilt into the fair and just classless society that is totally conforming and totally equal he desired. The policies of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) and the Republican Establishment are those very policies Marx said were necessary to bring about his transformation. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) understand exactly what they are doing. It is the useful idiot we hear clamoring for more gun laws to solve this problem whose heart and mind must be changed. It is this useful idiot that must understand his support for the nullification and elimination of the Bible and The United States Constitution, as advocated by the collectivist, is the real reason for the violence we have in our society. The Bible and the United States Constitution are our only hope.
Our country is doing exactly what we were told not to do by those who understood what it means to be free and how to remain free. The current mentality of our country is exactly the opposite what is needed for freedom. A free nation cannot rely on government or laws to maintain their freedom. in fact, exactly the opposite is needed. A free people cannot rely on government enforcement to maintain civility within a society. This is what our founders told us time after time.
Patrick Henry was very succinct in verbalizing this doctrine when he said, “The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government — lest it come to dominate our lives and interests.”
Henry understood the evil of government. Henry and the founders understood that the more control the government has the less free and civilized society becomes. Government is the instrument of Collectivists to control and enslave people. Collectivists believe it is laws enforced by government that create the utopia they desire; their classless society that is totally conforming, socially just, and totally equal. This is the definition of a totally enslaved and lawless population.
Henry and the founders understood that it is an Individualist society that brings about freedom and civility. Henry and the founders understood that freedom and civility depend on individual responsibility; individuals who are self-reliant, individuals who understood they are personally responsible for their behavior, individuals who will not assume the mantra of victim hood, and individuals who will assume role of responsible parenthood and not pass that responsibility to the all-consuming government as is desired by the Collectivist.
Today the Collectivist chooses to pursue the course of indoctrination with the emphasis on victim hood and class hatred one for the other. The outcome has always been and can only be an enslaved and lawless society. Passing more laws has never solved the problems of immorality, hatred, and revenge. History has proven the only solution to these problems is individualism; self-respect, self-responsibility, and acceptance of all individuals as just that, individuals.
The more the Untied States passes laws which contradict the Bible and the founding documents and principles, the more enslaved and uncivilized will our society become. The more the Untied States embraces the Bible and the founding documents and principles, the more free and civilized will our society become. This is not conjecture or philosophy. This is fact based on the prophecy of history.
Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.