|
|
Yes, that is right. The Left is now saying kids can no longer have best friends. It is discriminatory. Perhaps this is a step in the progression of the Left saying monogamous relationships, within marriage or outside of marriage are also discriminatory. I guess there is no end to political correctness and the desire of the elite on the Left to dictate every facet of our lives.
Here is the story. Some American and European educators believe the time has come to eliminate the concept of “best friends” from schools in an effort to encourage kids to be more “inclusive.” The movement gained international attention when Prince William and Kate Middleton enrolled their son Prince George in Thomas’ Battersea prep school in South London last year. News reports on the school indicated that the school encouraged students to “be kind” to all their peers, which included discouraging students from having a “best friend” in favor of being equal friends with everyone at the school. Although Prince George’s school only “discourages” students from having best friends, WCBS-TV in New York reports that some schools are considering banning “best friends,” with the enthusiastic support of education experts. Clinical psychologist Dr. Barbara Greenberg told WCBS that the idea is catching on in schools. According to Greenberg, “There has been a movement in some American schools and European schools to ban the phrase ‘best friend,’ … The idea of banning the phrase ‘best friends’ is a very intriguing social experiment.” Greenberg acknowledged that simply banning the phrase “best friend” won’t stop children from having “close relationships,” but might encourage kids to be more inclusive in their friendships: “I see kids come in all week long who are feeling dreadful because they are excluded and because they are either nobody’s best friend or their best friend has moved on… Let’s face it, you can’t ban somebody from having a close relationship, and you can’t really ban somebody from having a best friend but what the schools are trying to do is foster the idea of kids having more than a single friend.” The British school movement to ban best friends has been gaining momentum for years, and now it appears to be catching on in the United States, according to Greenberg.
0 Comments
We have witnessed the support of demagogue’s time after time by the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) in the United States. FDR favored Stalin over Churchill and aided the Russians, so they could conqueror Eastern Europe after the war through his Second Front fallacy and his Lend-Lease program. Not only did the Lend-Lease program assist the Russians in their industrial endeavors but over gave them the plans and the materials to build their atomic bomb arsenal.
Joseph Kennedy, the American ambassador to the Court of St. James liked to take a short walk from his residence into the most gracious of London’s open spaces, Hyde Park. On Saturdays he took his oldest son, Joe Jr., and his youngest, Teddy, to a large pond in the park where Teddy sailed a toy sailboat, along with other children of the privileged families who lived nearby in the elegant streets of Knightsbridge. In its tranquility the park and its many little rituals of leisure in the fall of 1938 was a refuge from a bigger, ugly reality. At the same time in Germany thousands of shop windows were being shattered, hundreds of synagogues were burning, and Nazi mobs were targeting Jewish communities in the outrage that became known as Kristallnacht. Thirty thousand German Jews were rounded up and shipped to concentration camps in Buchenwald, Dachau, and Sachsenhausen. The isolation of Saturdays in the park from this horror reflected the isolationism pursued by Ambassador Kennedy. Adolf Hitler’s territorial aggression and persecution of the Jews was a European problem, he argued, and the United States should not be involved. Sensible diplomacy, he said, would prove that you could “get along” with dictatorships like those in Germany and Italy and imminent in Spain. Kennedy had supported the “peace” pact made with Hitler in Munich early that fall by the British prime minister, Neville Chamberlain. Even though Hitler was soon ignoring the terms of the deal Britain would be wise to keep humoring him – and not to listen to a “drunk and warmonger” named Winston Churchill. Now we seem this same faction that has this strange propensity to support dictators, evil, and persecutors fawn over the evil that has ruled Korea for three generations. This same faction that supported Lenin, Stalin, and Hitler, would now have us believe that the Kim dynasty is good because a lady has a charming smile with an evil mind. Kim Yo Jung, as director of the Propaganda and Agitation Department of the Workers’ Party of Korea, has been personally sanctioned by the U.S. government for being a leader in the North Korean government responsible for horrid human rights abuses. These are the words of somebody who lived under the hardships caused by the Kim family. “Yo Jong’s grandfather, Kim Il Sung, is a war criminal, and her father, Kim Jong Il, killed three million people by starvation. Kim Jong Un is responsible for human rights violations and assassination of his own half-brother,” Ji, an individual who escaped the Kim evil, said. “The Kim family is taking hostage of the North Korean people and threatening the world with its nuclear weapons,” he added. “South Korean people hate Kim Yo Jong and her visit.” Ji knows all too well the reality of who Kim is when she’s not on the world stage. He was personally the victim of the Kim regime — losing limbs and being imprisoned. And yet, the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) dominated media and press fawn over this member of the Kim family just as Kennedy fawned over Hitler and Roosevelt fawned over Stalin. Marx told his followers that even evil is good if it moves the “social justice” cause forward. So, once again we are witnessing the Marxist love for evil over good, for domination over freedom, for hell over heaven. Kennedy, Roosevelt, Obama, and all Marxists have always been able to justify their egregious actions because “the ends always justify the means.” These are the results of our grade school and high schools becoming indoctrination centers as opposed to systems of education. The Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) doctrine, that doctrine that advocates the teachings of Karl Marx, is very evident. We see the basic concept of conformity front and center. Marx said their must be one class, that will be a classless society, and all will think the same. Those who would oppose the Marxist doctrine will be ostracized and eliminated.
Young Walker understands that if you tell a lie often enough it will become truth. Walker claimed it is the first responsibility of universities to ensure the safety and well being of students to mean protecting students from hearing anything but the Marxist doctrine. That is the definition and purpose of indoctrination, not education. And then we see the age old axiom of the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) movement; “the ends always justify the means,” when we are told that violence against speech that exposes the fallacies of the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) movement is justified. Colleges should limit “hateful rhetoric” on campus, according to Richard Walker, a University of Central Florida sophomore and member of the Knights for Socialism. “The university’s first responsibility is ensuring the safety and well-being of their students,” Walker, 19, told the Orlando Sentinel. “It might be just words now, but if you let that sort of thing come into the public discourse and become widely accepted, it doesn’t stay words.” Walker said he believes colleges should ban speech viewed as racist or defamatory, a concept that concerns First Amendment advocates, the report said. The problem lies in getting everyone to agree on what is truly “hate speech,” advocates said. Generally, the First Amendment protects free speech except for statements that are slurs or epithets likely to cause a violent reaction, the report noted. “I’m very disconcerted about how very uninformed — frankly dangerously uninformed — many college students are about the First Amendment,” Lawrence Walters, a Longwood, Florida,-based attorney who focuses on First Amendment issues, told the paper. What have other students said? A recent study by the Brookings Institute, a nonprofit that is sometimes referred to as “the think tank for the establishment,” surveyed 1,500 students about free speech and found some troubling results. Almost 20 percent of students said, “using violence is an acceptable means to stop such speech,” the survey found. Additionally, 53 percent of students (they were 61 percent Democrat and 47 percent Republican) said colleges and universities should “prohibit offensive speech.” Some students point out, however, that limiting free speech can be abused or enforced unfairly. “If you’re going to insulate people in college from offensive speech, how are they going to survive the real world?” UCF junior Alexander Zimmerman, 21, of Miami, told the Orlando Sentinel. Zimmerman added that people have spit at him and threatened him simply because he supports President Donald Trump. “Under the leadership of a spurious individualist, recently a budget was finally passed. This budget was passed by a group of collectivists, spurious individualists, and weak individualists with no support from true individualists because the budget completely met all the demands of the collectivists. In typical fashion, the head of the spurious individualists explained that it was in the nation’s best interest to cave to the collectivists, but that they had set the stage to bring about true individualist policies in the future. Once again, the spurious individualists and weak individualists promoted the collectivists agenda of fundamentally transforming the United States from a free and independent nation to a fair and just classless society that is totally conforming and totally equal by making our massive government even more massive.”
This is taken directly from my recently released book, “The Road to Tyranny, Individualism to Collectivism.” This passage was written about times from the past. History does predict the future. This exact scenario just took place last week. The Republican Establishment led by McConnell and Ryan could not jump on the ideal collectivist budget fast enough. Once again, the collectivists were able to secure everything they wanted in the “budget” deal. The “budget” adds more and more deficit and debt. Rand Paul said the additional debt will be over $1 trillion. History would prove that it will be much greater. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have never misled anybody about spending. They say it is critical to spend more and more on welfare or redistribution plans of any kind. This is their agenda and McConnell apparently told Schumer to give him a wish list and McConnell would see that it was accommodated. This is what Ryan said in 2011. Paul Ryan, chairman of the House Budget Committee, gave a talk and took questions this morning at an event organized by the American Council on Capital Formation. His solution to economic problems; First, get government spending and deficits under control, to restore fiscal certainty and allay fears of higher taxes down the road. As our national debt passed $15 trillion, that is almost $6 trillion ago, Ryan tweeted this; $15 trillion in national debt marks an infamous day in U.S. history. You deserve leaders willing to tackle this problem. McConnell has a well-documented history of fretting about the debt. “We’d like to do something about the nation’s biggest problem, spending and debt, which of course is the reason for this economic malaise,” he said in 2011. He added that Republicans could not address the problem because they did not control the White House or Senate. Ryan and McConnell, you do control the House and the Senate. Yet, you caved to the demands of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) once again. Once again you showed you cannot be trusted or believed. You could care less about the debt or the deficits. Your only concern is you keeping power and accumulating more and more wealth. Freedom Loving Americans have fallen for your lies and deceit time after time because we say well at least they are not the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats). You might have a R behind your names, but that certainly does mean that you are honest and have the long-term health of the United States as your primary goal. Freedom Loving Americans, we have some real soul searching to do. If you have a desire to understand what “The Road To Tyranny” is, what individualism and collectivism are, and what we must do immediately to have any chance of remaining the free people our founders wanted for us, go to Amazon or www.mygrandchildrensamerica.com and get “The Road To Tyranny.” The collectivist would have us believe that by rewriting history, by erasing aspects of what is considered disagreeable today, and by denying the ageless conflicts of mankind (not peoplekind Trudeau), their utopia can and will be achieved. Nothing could be further from the truth. History is a record of people interacting. History reflects what works and what does not work to bring about a better world, if that is possible.
Throughout history we have had the broad classification of conflicting ideas on what supports a more harmonious world. These broad classifications are referred to as individualism and collectivism. Proponents of individualism don’t deny the importance of the common good. Individualists simply believe that the common good of society can be advanced only by the “spontaneous order” that occurs when individuals are free to direct their own lives. When individuals pursue their own ambitions, they find that their own interests are best served by collaborating with and creating value for others. Thus, the combined effects of individual pursuits elevate society as a whole towards greater well-being. This is why social, economic, and cultural progress can best be achieved by liberating and empowering individuals to pursue their own visions for their lives Collectivists, on the other hand, view self-interest as opposed to the common good in an irreconcilable conflict. They believe that individuals cannot be trusted with the responsibility of promoting social or economic well-being. Instead, elite guardians who supposedly possess extraordinary wisdom and intelligence are charged with orchestrating economic and social progress from a position of central authority. All other individuals must conform to group identities so that they can effectively play the part that has been assigned to them. The history of the United States reflects these same conflicts. It began with the early settlements of Jamestown and Plymouth and continues to this very day. Individualism dominated in our early history as is reflected in the fight for independence and the governing documents of our Republic; The Declaration of Independence, The United States Constitution, and the Bill of Rights. The forces of collectivism were relatively silent in our early history but have become more prominent in the last century or so of our history. The collectivist force commonly referred to as Marxism or Communism became a world force in 1917 when the Bolsheviks instituted the Dictatorship of the Proletariat on a divided and devastated Russia. A pledge the Communists made in their quest for a world revolution was, “First we will take Eastern Europe; then the masses of Asia. Then we will encircle the Untied States of America which will be the last bastion of Capitalism. We will not have to attack it; it will fall like an over-ripe fruit into our hands.” Even though we have seen the rise and fall of collectivism throughout many parts of the world, the quest to make the Untied States of America the last bastion of Capitalism continues and is flourishing. The Communist Party of the United States flourished in the 1930’s and 1940’s with known Party members and known Communist spies occupying critical seats of power in the Franklin Roosevelt regime including Harry Hopkins who is purported to have run the government for Roosevelt. Collectivism or Communism played less of a role within the Untied States after the death of Roosevelt, but it was not vanquished but continued to simmer. Then in 2008, a young Marxist or Communist purported to have been born in Hawaii came onto the National scene because he was a gifted orator much like Trotsky, a deceased Comrade of Obama. Obama promised to complete the transformation of the United States from the bastion of Capitalism to the collectivist state the Bolsheviks promised during the rise of collectivism and the failure of collectivism in many parts of the world. Today we are witnessing just how successful General Secretary Obama and his Comrades were in their fundamental transformation efforts. They were able to infiltrate our highest law enforcement agencies and annihilate all that is sacred in an individualist nation including adherence to the sacred concept of “rule of law.” Comrade Holder was a dedicated and successful soldier in his transformation of the hierarchy of the FBI into a mentality that adheres to the age-old axiom of Communism; “The ends always justify the means.” If the Untied States is not to succumb to this relentless attack by the collectivists against the principles upon which the United States rose to be the shining pinnacle for freedom, goodness, independence, and capitalism, we must become honest historians. History is prophetic. History will reveal to us the ultimate outcome if the collectivist movement, including forming a police state, is permitted to continue. History will reveal to us the methods the collectivist uses to bring about their desired results; deceit, lying, double talk, double standards, attacks against the Bible, attacks against the founding documents which outline our great principles, attacks against morality, and opposition to all that good and decent people embrace. When you witness the incredible and deceitful claims today by collectivists such as Schiff and his fellow comrades, remember your history. Remember that promises, such as "hope and change" that they make and the Communists before them made including the Bolsheviks, people within Roosevelt’s regime, Obama, Holder, Jarrett, and the more recent enemies of the United States. Remember their code, “The ends always justify the means” no matter what those means might be. Remember the ultimate end that always results. 64 Americans went to fight with ISIS. What do we do with them now?
WHAT A FOOLISH QUESTION. That a question like this would even be asked shows how the dangers of political correctness have endangered our freedom and our Constitution. We are a nation that is supposed to adhere to “rule of law.” The correct question that should be asked is, “Did these Americans commit treason based on our law." The Law says that “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.” If there is reasonable cause to believe that Treason was committed, then the 64 should be indicted and tried by a jury of their peers. I believe that is the way a country operating under “rule of law” would proceed. If the jury finds that any or all of the 64 Americans were guilty of Treason, then they should be subject to the applicable penalty which is “Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.” The Court would have the legal authority to show leniency for any special situations. That is the way the law works when you adhere to “rule of law.” Was this question asked about Benedict Arnold? Would this question have been asked of people who would have left the United States to fight with the Germans against the United States in either World War I or World War II? We were at war with the British and with the Germans. We are at war with ISIS. ISIS has openly declared war on the United States. ISIS is our enemy as were the British and the Germans. Yes, the question is truly a foolish question, and just by asking the question, the author is questioning whether we are or are not a nation that adheres to “rule of law.” This is the real danger of political correctness. Reading and listening to the news is extremely frustrating because what is called news is not about facts or what happened, it is about who can spin better, who can tell the biggest lie, who can make the most clever insult, or who can make the most outrageous claim. Everybody seems to be far more interested in castigating then they are interested in reporting.
Perhaps this is the reason real problems go unresolved. The world is in chaos. The United States has very real problems. I learn far more about the chaos and the problems when I am outside the country than when I am in the country. In the present state within the borders of the United States it is impossible to have conversations without making outrageous accusations with no regard for the truth. Yes, we Freedom Loving Americans would like to say this only happens on MSNBC and CNN. Make no mistake it does. Morning Joe and his girlfriend, along with Chris Mathews seem to lead the pack. However, let us just get real for a minute. I watched some of Hannity the other night and was quickly reminded why I no longer watch his program. He had some excellent guests who seemed to be interested in having an honest and newsworthy discussion. When they appeared to want to discuss provable facts, Hannity reverted to the Morning Joe and Chris Mathews innuendo and demagoguery. Meanwhile Europe is being threatened by a radical Islamic takeover. Some Eastern European countries such as Hungary, Poland, The Czech Republic, and Austria are resisting. France, Germany, Sweden, Belgium, and the United Kingdom are allowing no-go zones and pockets of cities and other areas to be ruled by Sharia law enforced by Islamic courts. This is totally being ignored in the Untied States as are the no-go zones and Sharia law havens being established in some of the larger cities in the United States including Detroit and Minneapolis. The Untied States faces very real problems that are not directly addressed by any element of the media or the press. Our national debt continues to grow and will soon exceed $21 trillion. Our borders remain open to anybody who wishes to enter for any reason. We continue to operate as a banana republic and refuse to have any budgetary controls, only continuing resolutions. Our federal government is totally out of control. We now learned that the Pentagon has “misplaced” $800 million and that is minuscule compared to the estimated $5 billion the State Department lost. Our biggest crisis is that a major political party has and is promoting this chaos while at the same time trying to undermine our Republic and our election process through the creation of a secret police force within the DOJ and the FBI. This major political party is purposefully leading us down “The Road To Tyranny” while changing us from an Individualist nation to a Collectivist nation. Many people will say that the above statement I just made is inflammatory. It would be if the facts did not support the statement. We must have honest discussions based on facts and not innuendo. One side promotes economic growth through the private sector while the other side believes in a government dominated and controlled economy. Let us discuss which is best, which will promote growth, employment, and reduce government reliance and reduce the debt. In the discussion we must be willing to discuss why we support the side we support. We must discuss the advantages and disadvantages of open borders and uncontrolled immigration. We must be willing to discuss openly and honestly why we favor one over the other; for instance, Marx openly proclaimed his call for open borders because it allowed free movement for all workers and mitigated what he called the damaging forces of nationalism. We must discuss the advantages of and disadvantages of confronting those who would challenge our right to free and open access of international waters. During the Obama regime the Iranians, for instance enjoyed playing chicken with our navy because the Iranians went unchallenged. Today, the game of chicken is not longer played by the Iranians because the Trump Navy did not enjoy the game and said no more. We must discuss the advantages and disadvantages of defending ourselves. We must discuss the advantages and disadvantages of having our DOJ and FBI being a political arm of one of the political parties. Both sides must be open and honest as to what affect this has on freedom and the continuation of our Republic. Those who are Freedom Loving Americans must know and understand why they want to live in a free and independent nation that favors individualism. Bumper sticker defenses are not good enough. Freedom Loving Americans must understand why they support rule of law, limited government, divided government, and sovereignty of the people. Those who favor collectivism (Marxism, Communism, Socialism, Progressivism, Fascism) must be able to defend the actions they profess and what the ultimate outcomes will be. They must forego bombastic and demonizing rhetoric. They must be willing to state their real goals. Our media today is unwilling to discuss honestly. The United States is in the middle of a crisis. We are witnessing the holdovers of the Obama regime willingly manipulate and bring about the downfall of a duly elected President. If they are successful, we will have lost the Republic. Now is the time for all Freedom Loving Americans to openly, honestly, and intelligently deal with not only the threat from outside our borders but also the threats from within. I beg Freedom Loving Americans to get out of their comfort zones and understand the threat of collectivism (Marxism, Communism, Socialism, Progressivism, Fascism). We have seen examples of the differences before and paid no attention. In order for a nation to remain free it is imperative that elected officials first and foremost act as statesmen and not political hacks. George Washington said this was the reason he hoped political parties would never become a major part of the American political system. George Washington’s warnings went unheeded.
Today, we have a major political party who believes in the Marxist concept of “social justice,” total equality, and total conformity. All three of these concepts defy human nature as do so many other of the Marxist beliefs. For instance, Friedrich Engels explained how competition is a negative force and very harmful to society. We have seen the Marxist/Progressive Party (Democrats) try to show the harmful effects of competition by demonizing any who strive to accomplish and achieve. We also know that the Marxist philosophy teaches that all that is important is if the Marxist philosophy is advanced. The Marxist has always operated by their core belief, “the ends always justify the means.” This was made so clear when we witnessed how the Marxist/Progressives have demonized Supreme Court nominees, especially Justices Bork and Thomas. The American public has just been made privy to how the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) were in the process of turning the FBI and DOJ into secret police to control the civilian population understanding that the “ends justify the means.” Rule of law, right and wrong, good and bad, or decency have no place in the Marxist/Progressive (Democrats) playbook. Here is an excellent example of the contrasts between good and bad, right and wrong, and decency. Rep. Trey Gowdy revealed last week in a surprise announcement that he would not run for re-election this year and has decided to retire from politics. Speaking on CBS “Face the Nation,” the longtime South Carolina congressman said he decided to retire for several reasons, but mostly because he enjoys fairness and justice, two attributes that have made him a “lousy” politician. “My wife hates it when I say this, but I was a pretty good prosecutor, I think. I’ve been a pretty lousy politician. I’ve done it for seven years, I’m really grateful for the opportunity to do it, but it’s time for me to — whatever time I’ve got left — I want to spend it in the justice system because that’s where my heart is,” Gowdy said. “I enjoy the justice system, I enjoy being fair. I enjoy the pursuit of fairness as a virtue. And I’m just more comfortable in that system,” he explained. Gowdy went on to reiterate his feelings that just because he disagrees with someone politically, that doesn’t mean they don’t love America. But that virtue isn’t popular in modern American politics, he said. “I see multiple sides of a single issue. And the fact that someone disagrees with me, does not make me challenge their love of the country. It doesn’t make me believe that they’re corrupt. I’ve got a lot of friends on the other side of the aisle,” he said. “I don’t think the end justifies the means. I think the manner in which we get places matters, and in politics too often winning is the only thing that matters,” the GOP congressman explained. When asked if he believes he served justice during his time in Congress, Gowdy said: “I tried. It’s about winning in politics, and that is not what — the courtroom — there’s a reason we throw out search warrants even though we find the murder weapon. There’s a reason we throw out confessions even though we think the person did it. The process matters. The end does not justify the means. And in politics, it’s just about winning.” The direct contrast to Gowdy is Adam Schiff, Marxist/Progressive and ranking member on the House Intelligence Committee who leak classified information in an effort to discredit committee chairman Rep. Devin Nunes and the “FISA memo?” After saying the memo’s release would trigger a “constitutional crisis” because of the sensitive information contained in the memo, Schiff leaked classified information to reporters when discrediting the memo. Schiff told reporters that the memo’s central claim — that the Department of Justice and FBI didn’t disclose the political biases of a source when seeking a FISA warrant on Carter Page — is “unfounded.” Schiff told the media the memo’s claims were “not accurate” and the FISA court was made aware of the “likely political motivation” behind the Steele dossier. The Wall Street Journal, Washington Post and New York Times all reported this, citing anonymous sources. It is now clear that Schiff lied. The DOJ and the FBE did not disclose the required information to the FISA courts. Schiff is a political hack unlike Gowdy. Schiff and his comrades do not care about truth and never have. The only thing that maters to Schiff and his comrades is that in the end the United States is transformed into a Marxist totalitarian state. Schiff and his comrades operate by the same rules Lenin and Trotsky did, “the ends justify the means.” It is sad that upstanding and fair-minded people like Gowdy leave political leadership roles and people like Schiff remain. It is also sad that so many voters in the United States continue to play the role of “useful idiots” to those whose goal is to enslave them in the Marxist totalitarian state under the demagoguery of the Dictatorship of the Proletariat. If Hillary had won the election we would have moved much closer to becoming a police state and perhaps would have been one by the end of her first term. A police state is a totalitarian state controlled by a political police force that secretly supervises the citizens' activities. This is clearly what the FBI and the DOJ were becoming. The IRS had been exposed, but there is every reason to believe that the IRS would have again become a tool to be used against what the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) refer to as their enemies.
Based on the little bit of information that has been made public, the Lynch DOJ and Comey FBI believed it was their function to further the agenda of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) and not to obey the Constitution and enforce the laws of the land. We also know, that none of this activity could have taken place without the full cooperation, perhaps even the orchestration of the Obama Regime. When Obama said he would fundamentally transform the Untied States, we knew he meant to transform the United States into a Marxist totalitarian state. That he would politicize the DOJ and the FBI, in hindsight, should be no surprise. It is critical that congress continue its investigation. There are strong indications that the police state mentality is also deeply embedded in the State Department, the EPA, the Bureau of Land Management, and perhaps even within the Pentagon. What the first official public revelation has taught us, is that the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) members of congress will do anything and everything they can to protect the gains they have made in the effort of transformation, or at least to minimize any loss of these gains. It has also taught us that the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) dominated media will follow the same path as their counterparts in congress. The real question is, will those who claim to be independent voters realize the danger in which Obama and his Comrades have placed our freedom, or will they believe the lies of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) and the Marxist/Progressive media. The actions of the independent voter will determine if the United States remains a free and independent nation or if we continue the fundamental transformation and become a Marxist totalitarian state with the FBI fulfilling the transformation to becoming the secret police force in the new police state. Our future is hanging in the balance. We just came through another government shutdown, simply because congress now believes, apparently, that our Constitution gives them the mandate and the authority to run our nation with continuing resolutions. Anyway, this is how we have operated for the last decade or so. Clearly the Constitution mandates that congress is to pass budgets.
Now we have resorted to continuing resolutions for three-week periods at a time. Schumer, Pelosi, McConnell, and Ryan have proven under their leadership that the United States government would be operated better if the Keystone Cops were in charge. Hopefully the Keystone Cops could fund the government for at least a month at a time. February 8 is doomsday. Another shutdown is looming with all of the posturing and pontificating that goes along with it. All the posturing and pontificating proves is that the American people have failed. The easy answer to fix our problem, according to many people would be to have term limits. Term limits already exist. The term of a senator is 6 years and the term of a representative is 2 years. To limit the number of terms an individual can serve is not the answer either. We tried it in California, and if anything, our legislature has become even more incompetent. The only answer is the voter. The voters are uninformed and uninterested. This has become more and more the case as our school system has become an indoctrination system. Our students are taught multi-culturalism, sex education, two mommies and two daddies, social justice, and all else that goes along with the mandated Marxist indoctrination programs, but they are not taught accurate American history. Until that happens, nothing will change. Freedom Loving Americans, we must begin to change the indoctrination system back to an education system, that is teach kids how to think and not what to think, or we will no longer be the land of the free and the home of the brave. It is our choice. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
October 2023
Categories |
RSS Feed