I hear complaint after complaint about what is happening in our country and frankly around the world. During Q & A after speaking, an all to common consensus is that things have gone to far for those of us who love freedom to turn the ship around and head toward freedom and independence. There were so many times our founders could have quit and said the fight to be free and independent is not worth the sacrifice that must be made. Thank you, Sam Adams, Patrick Henry, George Washington, and so many others who would not acquiesce to the majority of those living in the American colonies.
One of my favorite quotes is by Sam Adams when he said, “It does not take a majority to prevail... but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men.” Very seldom is the majority correct in any fight for freedom and independence. To many people say that this is not my fight, just leave me alone, we should go along to get along, if we give them what they want this time then they will be satisfied, and all the other excuses we hear to not confront those who wish to control our lives.
Freedom is dependent upon individuals being able to live their own lives, have their own thoughts, without government or society dictating how they must live their lives, how they must think, and how they must act. The most important right to maintain freedom is the right to freedom of speech which enables freedom of thought and enhances ideas and discussions. Any tyrant will always curb freedom of speech and thought by outright limiting speech, exercising censorship, insisting upon a unified press or media, and the skillful use of indoctrination and propaganda.
All of this is happening in the Untied States and the world today. The two most destructive forces the world has seen, destructive of freedom and independence or the individual determining their own lives and their own thoughts, are moving forward at breakneck speeds. Those destructive forces are Collectivism (Marxism, communism, socialism, progressive, Democrat – all virtually the same) and Islam. Both movements have as their stated goal to have all in total conformity to the ideology each professes. They both have stated as such and have proven they will use every means available to achieve their goal of world domination or their dictating the lives and thoughts of all.
Both evils are skillful in their use of propaganda and indoctrination. They both are using as their primary means of moving forward their evil, the public-school system, the media, and the entertainment industry. We see overt and covert examples of this every day. They are both very skillful in labeling any of us who oppose their evil ideology as being the evil aggressor simply because it is our goal to protect and promote freedom and independence that allows the individual to determine how they will live their lives, what their thoughts will be.
I am always asked the question, “So Don, then what can we do.”
We must want freedom and independence as much as Sam Adams wanted it. We must have the spirit of Sam Adams who often stood alone while he willed freedom and independence for all the colonists; freedom and independence meaning that each person would have the right to live their own life and to have their own thoughts.
How do we do this if we do love and want freedom and independence:
Many of you will not like it when I say this, but it is true and if we are to be free and independent, we must state the truth especially when it is unpopular. YOU ONLY UNDERSTAND THE EVILS OF COLLECTIVISM AND ISLAM BASED ON BUMPER STICKER SLOGANS. Both of these evils are permeating every aspect of American life, and often times the evil movement is being supported by those who proclaim they are adamant about promoting freedom and independence.
Therefore, you must educate yourselves. You must understand the destructive ideology of both Collectivism and Islam. You must understand their goals and their methods of implementation. Once you understand it, you must DISCUSS it with family, friends, and others. I said discuss; do not argue. Once you start to argue you have lost. Your goal is to plant seeds. One of the best ways of planting a seed is to ask questions. The goal of asking questions is to have the other person start to have enough curiosity so they will begin to do their own research. When they come back and ask you questions, you know the seed has been planted.
The evils of Collectivism and Islam have permeated our public-school system. The best and quickest way to have this corrected would be to have the public-school system collapse along with the Department of Education being eliminated. This can only be done when every single family who claims to be champions of freedom and independence steps forward and moves their children out of the union dominated public-school system and moves their children to charter schools, private schools, or home schools. Control of the schools must be returned to the local districts and teacher unions must be abolished.
These evils also control much of the media. It is very simple to detect which outlets are controlled by the “left”. Stop watching them. Stop supporting them. That does not mean you should stop seeking to learn the evil they are spewing but do it in places that does not financially reward them.
The entertainment industry provided a home for communists at the time Joe McCarthy was exposing it and it is every bit as bad now as it was then. Celebrities, actors, and other so-called entertainers are quoted by the media as if these people had any idea about what they were saying. They do not. They have learned to memorize lines and they use that skill to memorize bumper sticker slogans. Boycott movie theaters, foolish and meaningless celebrity magazines, foolish and meaning less programs like “The View,” or “CNN,” or “MSNBC.” What we learned with the football kneeling nonsense is that when we put meaningful priorities above entertainment, we can get results.
Whether or not we pass a nation of freedom and independence on to the next generation depends on whether or not we are willing to adjust our priorities and make the necessary choices. IN OTHER WORDS IT IS UP TO US. ARE WE WILLING TO MAKE THE SACRIFICES NECESSARY TO PASS FREEDOM AND INDEPENDENCE ON TO FUTURE AMERICAN GENERATIONS.
In our politically correct society today we are led to believe that when we say something with which the left does not agree we must apologize and denounce our core beliefs. This is a direct assault on our Constitutional right and more importantly on our God given Natural right to freedom of thought, belief, and speech. Here are some things I believe and for which I will not apologize. Have you made your list?
Socialism is evil and as Lenin said it is the gateway to communism. The Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party is a party that is advancing socialism or the destruction of Untied States as a free capitalist nation.
Barrack Obama is a devote communist adhering to the beliefs of Marx and Lenin as his grandfather and Frank Marshall Davis taught him.
Abortion is murder.
Climate change crisis is a hoax.
There is a crisis on our southern border and the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) support this because they believe it damages Trump and enhances their chances of being elected and gaining power.
Marriage is between a man and a woman.
Islam is not a religion of peace but a religion that teaches hatred, killing and enslaving of non-Muslims. It also teaches rape, pedophilia, and that physical and mental abuse of women is not only okay but desirable.
Omar is a Muslim and as such she hates Jews. That is what she was taught.
The European Union, along with all Globalists are anti-Semites. They are pro destruction of western style governments and capitalism. It is there goal to enshrine a one world government with total domination over all the peoples of the world.
There is as much evidence against Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation as there was against OJ Simpson. Arbitrary justice was then and is now being applied.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) do not believe in the principles of the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution of the United States, and the Bill of Rights and want to destroy freedom and bring about a Marxist totalitarian state.
Anybody who refers to themselves as a Black American, an African American, a Hispanic American, an Asian American, or uses any adjective to describe the kind of American they believe themselves to be, is not an American. An American is only an American and is not distinguished based on any other characteristic than their love for freedom and independence and freedom from a government who believes it is the right of government to control the lives and thoughts of its citizens.
The United States was founded on Judeo/Christian beliefs. We were not founded on Muslim ideology or on secular beliefs. We were told by our founders that our freedom depends on us electing virtuous people to be our representatives. We have failed to do so. Instead we have elected people void of virtue, people like Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters, Elijah Cummings, Paul Ryan, John McCain, Barrack Obama, and on and on. The sad truth is that we were also told that those we elect to be our representative will reflect the virtue or lack thereof of the American people.
Rule of law is distinguished from arbitrary law because it is blind to social, political, or economic position. Under rule of law the eyes of lady justice are covered and does not see an individual but applies the law equally to all. Under arbitrary law, which is the law practiced by collectivists (Marxists, communists, socialists, progressives, and Democrats – all virtually the same) and other tyrants, the law is applied on what would be called an as needed basis. Under arbitrary law, not only is the end result predetermined because of the individual, but it is also predetermined based on whether the result will enhance or detract from the viewpoint of the collectivist.
Our founder’s determined that we would be an individualist nation or a nation that advances the freedoms and natural rights of the individual. An individualist nation or a nation free from the tyranny of government can only exist if the concept of rule of law is practiced. It was determined at the inception of our nation that we would not be a nation with a king, emperor, or czar but we would be a nation that had as our ruler the rule of law. History has proven that as the rule of law is disregarded and arbitrary law is employed, you have a society turning from a free nation (an individualist nation) to a nation ruled by tyranny (a collectivist nation).
Testimony of Lisa Page was released that openly declares arbitrary law was employed in the case of Hillary Clinton and her clearly illegal email practices. This is the explicit testimony of Lisa Page when questioned:
"We, in fact," Page explained, "and, in fact, the Director — because, on its face, it did seem like, well, maybe there's a potential here for this to be the charge.
"And we had multiple conversations, multiple conversations with the Justice Department about charging gross negligence," she added.
Page says that the Department of Justice ended the consideration of charges being brought up against Clinton.
"The Justice Department's assessment was that it was both constitutionally vague, so that they did not actually feel that they could permissibly bring that charge," she testified.
When asked to clarify if it appeared to be a command from the DOJ, Page responded, "That's correct."
Comrade Obama’s Department of Justice (I know that is an oxymoron) ordered that, despite the evidence that said Clinton had broken the law, no charge should be brought and no indictment should be sought because it was Hillary Clinton and because this evidence and other evidence could reveal facts that would damage the Obama regimes efforts to transform the Untied Stated from a free and independent nation to a Marxist Totalitarian State.
This revelation should have been the headline in every newspaper and the lead story of every news organization. It was barely covered and then only by more conservative outlets. What was suspected, that is that the Obama regime clearly disregarded the United States Constitution and the basic but critical principle so necessary for freedom, the principle of rule of law, and instead employed arbitrary law which is fundamental to tyranny, was directly stated by one of the minions in the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) police force, the FBI.
If you support freedom and independence, this should be very disturbing to you and you should join with me and a few others to raise the whisper of concern to a clanging of insistence that all evidence and documentation revealing the anti-freedom practices of the Obama regime be made public. We must also insist that any and all responsible be tried and appropriate punishment be assigned if guilt is proven. This would include but would not be limited to Page, Strzok, McCabe, Comey, Orr, Mueller, Lynch, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, and Comrade Obama.
The Collectivist movement has confused mankind throughout the course of history by not making the proper distinction between a right and entitlement. The collectivist movement within the United States, (and I specifically say the Untied States because that is our primary concern but this is true of the universal collectivist movement) would have us believe that entitlements are rights. Consequently, we are told that health care is a right, that education is a right, that a basic income is a right, and that income and wealth equality are rights and are mandated, within the United States by the Constitution, and universally by the power of any government.
The concept of natural rights was discussed by people such as Thomas Aquinas, Thomas Hobbes, and John Locke. A distinguishing feature of Natural rights or rights is that they are not granted by man or government, they are not enhanced by man or government, and they were always presented as not to be controlled by or limited by man or government. These rights, commonly referred to as Life, Liberty, and Property, existed prior to government and were and continue to be separate from the purview of government. An individual having a natural right is not dependent upon another individual nor does one individual having a natural right take from another individual. My right to liberty is totally independent of your right to liberty.
Common definition of Natural Rights
Natural rights are those that are not dependent on the laws or customs of any particular culture or government, and so are universal and inalienable (they cannot be repealed or restrained by human laws).
An entitlement is based on the laws of man and is totally under the purview of government. The individual who receives an entitlement and the individual who sacrifices so another can receive the entitlement is determined by government. An individual can receive only if another individual is penalized or taxed.
Definition of entitlement by the United States Senate
entitlement - A Federal program or provision of law that requires payments to any person or unit of government that meets the eligibility criteria established by law. Entitlements constitute a binding obligation on the part of the Federal Government, and eligible recipients have legal recourse if the obligation is not fulfilled. Social Security and veterans' compensation and pensions are examples of entitlement programs.
When we are told for example that health care is a right, this is a lie and we are intentionally being deceived by the collectivist. History has shown that collectivists want entitlements to be perceived as rights by the general population so those receiving will become dependent upon the collectivist and those contributing will be shamed into believing their exercise of their natural rights are greedy and taking from another. The collectivist has used this deceit to gain power and control over the masses to enhance their power and life of luxury.
A society that cherishes freedom for all, protects and defends natural rights while limiting or eliminating any government entitlements. This society has a “safety net system” and “welfare system” that is in control of families and the natural goodness and charitable attitudes of the people of a free society. A society that adheres to the concept of limited government will remain a free and prosperous nation with a high standard of living for all and a very low percentage of the population considered to be living in poverty.
A society that strives for a society dominated by government entitlements, must take from the innovator and job creator to redistribute to the general public under the guise that these entitlements are rights. This has very often been referred to as “Hope and Change.” What history has proven is that the promise of “Hope and Change” has ended with an enslaved population that has willing become servants to a tyrannical few who not only control and limit the entitlements of the servants. These tyrannical few also believe natural rights are also under their purview and come to control life, liberty, and property of all. This course always ends with the general population living in an equal status of poverty.
As you listen to the promises being made by the many collectivists in the United States today, remember that an entitlement is not a right but is a means to control and enslavement of all but the tyrannical few. When the tyrannical few have accomplished the enslavement of the masses, they will, based on history, also believe they are the grantor of natural rights, your right to life, liberty, and property.
Department of Agriculture - $3.6 billion or 15-percent decrease
Department of Education - $8.5 billion or 12.0-percent decrease, The Department of Education should be eliminated completely
Department of Energy - $31.7 billion or 11-percent decrease
Department of Health and Human Resources - $87.1 billion or 12-percent decrease, another department that should be phased out of existence with services being determined by each state
Department of Housing and Urban Development - $8.7 billion or 16.4-percent decrease, another department that should be phased out of existence with services being determined by each state
Department of the Interior -$2 billion or 14-percent decrease
Department of Justice - $698 million or 2-percent decrease
Department of Labor -$1.2 billion or 9.7-percent decrease
Department of State and Other International Programs - $12.3 billion or 23-percent decrease
Department of Transportation - $5.9 billion or 22-percent decrease, If the tax code were simplified, this Department could be very minimal
Department of the Treasury - $0.2 billion or 1-percent decrease
Corps of Engineers - $2.2 billion or 31-percent decrease
Environmental Protection Agency -$2.8 billion or 31-percent decrease
This is a step in the right direction. Thank you, President Trump. This is however contrary to the desires of the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party who believes in bigger and bigger government, with higher and higher taxes until they reach the goal set forth by Marx where Individuals receive based on need as determined by the government. All GDP goes to the government and they distribute as they say is just and fair. Many establishment Republicans like the late John McCain and current Mitt Romney concur with the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats).
“The Prophet” (a person regarded as an inspired teacher or proclaimer of the will of God) is incorrectly used when describing Mohammed, the corrupt individual the Muslims refer to as “The Prophet.” Calling Mohammed, a prophet is incorrect because he referred to Allah who is not God the creator. Also, history shows that Mohammed was a corrupt individual. Among other things, he was a murderer, robber, and pedophile. He taught the Muslims to hate the Jews and anybody else who denounced his hatred.
Omar is a Muslim. She has been taught to not only hate the Jewish people, that makes her Anti-Semitic, but to hate all who are not Muslim. Take the time to read this wonderful article that will give you an insight into why Omar and all Muslims are Anti-Semites and haters of all non-Muslims.
Why do Muslims Hate the Jews?
By Dallas M. Roark, Ph.D.
There is a long and complicated history to the Muslim hatred of Jews. Some people seek to trace the issue back to Abraham’s two sons, Isaac and Ishmael, or Isaac’s two sons, Jacob and Esau. Whatever enmity existed between the two offspring, there was not a command of God to kill the Jews. The immense hatred of the Jews began in the time of Mohammed, by Mohammed, and it is alleged that Allah gave the command for it. The Qur’an, the hadiths, and the events in Mohammed’s life will explain the hatred that began with Mohammed and continued in his followers to this day.
1. The Qur’anic data
Q. 5:60 Say (O Muhammad to the people of the Scripture): "Shall I inform you of something worse than that, regarding the recompense from Allah: those (Jews) who incurred the Curse of Allah and His Wrath, those of whom (some) He transformed into monkeys and swines, those who worshipped Taghut (false deities); such are worse in rank (on the Day of Resurrection in the Hellfire), and far more astray from the Right Path."
This quote is in contradiction to the verses quoted below from the Bible about the Jews as God’s chosen people. Did not Allah “remember” what he told Abraham and others? There seems to be a lot of self-serving comments in the Qur’an that reveal Mohammed’s hatred of the Jews in his area rather than the words of Yahweh.
One must understand that the Jewish rejection of the prophethood of Mohammed deeply affected him. Mohammed wanted to be accepted as a prophet and his pride could not stand the rejection.
Q. 2:61 “And when ye said: O Moses! We are weary of one kind of food; so call upon thy Lord for us that He bring forth for us of that which the earth groweth - of its herbs and its cucumbers and its corn and its lentils and its onions. He said: Would ye exchange that which is higher for that which is lower? Go down to settled country, thus ye shall get that which ye demand. And humiliation and wretchedness were stamped upon them and they were visited with wrath from Allah. That was because they disbelieved in Allah's revelations and slew the prophets wrongfully. That was for their disobedience and transgression.”
This story involves Moses and the Exodus from Egypt and the grumbling of the people for food. This happened about 2000 years before the time of Mohammed. Judgment did take place on the unbelievers who were not allowed into the Promised Land and who died in the wandering in the wilderness. Why should this story be resurrected and used to accuse the Jews in Mohammed’s time? That is irrational. The Jews in Medina did not believe Mohammed because he did not fit the demands of a prophet. For them to accept a false prophet would have been to reject their own revelation from Yahweh who did perform great miracles in rescuing the people from slavery in Egypt. Remember, Mohammed did no miracles!
Q. 2:65-66 “And ye know of those of you who broke the Sabbath, how We said unto them: Be ye apes, despised and hated! And We made it an example to their own and to succeeding generations, and an admonition to the God-fearing.”
How can this be accepted by anyone? Yahweh did not make apes out of Jews. If you read the Old Testament you will discover that Yahweh did punish disobedient people in various ways but he never defiled the image of God that he created in humans (cf. Genesis 1:26-27).
Q. 2:96 And thou wilt find them greediest of mankind for life and (greedier) than the idolaters. (Each) one of them would like to be allowed to live a thousand years. And to live (a thousand years) would be no means remove him from the doom. Allah is Seer of what they do.
This is a strange verse since it reflects on Mohammed as a greedy person. He did not work but had his followers raid caravans, plunder villages for gain, and he was to receive 20 percent of the booty. In contrast, many of the Jews were hard working farmers and orchard people who earned a living by the sweat of their brow.
Q. 5:12-13 “Allah made a covenant of old with the Children of Israel… And because of their breaking their covenant, We have cursed them and made hard their hearts. They change words from their context and forget a part of that whereof they were admonished. Thou wilt not cease to discover treachery from all save a few of them.”
Q. 5:7 “We made a covenant of old with the Children of Israel and We sent unto them messengers. As often as a messenger came unto them with that which their souls desired not (they became rebellious). Some (of them) they denied and some they slew.”
There are lots of Jews who were disobedient throughout the history of Israel. Yahweh judged them. Yet, nowhere is there a command for individual non-Jews to hate the Jews. In reality what the Qur’an says about the Jews is seen more widespread in the Muslims’ reactions to Christians. Hundreds of millions of Christians have died because of the brutality of Muslims through the centuries.
2. This hatred is underscored in the hadiths:
"Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: The last hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him; but the tree Gharqad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews." -- Sahih Muslim 6985
And in Sahih Bukhari 4.52.177 we read: "Allah's Apostle said, The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say: 'O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him'."
The intolerance of Mohammed and the Muslim movement toward the Jews and the Christians is seen in the hadith, Sahih Muslim, Book 019, Number 4366, narrated by ‘Umar b. al-Khattib: He heard the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) say, “I will expel the Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula and will not leave any but Muslim.” Other issues may be seen at this site.
3. The Events in Mohammed’s time and his treatment of the Jews.
Mohammed was incensed that the Jew did not accept him as a prophet. There were different tribes of Jews in the area. Mohammed had a truce with the Banu Qaynuqa tribe. He resolved to deal with them for their rejection of him as a prophet. The Muslims laid siege to them and would have killed them had it not been for the intervention of Abdullah bin Ubayy who was a Muslim. They were allowed to leave with their lives but had to turn over all their property to Mohammed. Can you imagine the gain that the Muslims got from this? And Mohammed accused the Jews of being greedy!
A second tribe, Banu Nadir, was expelled when one of their members planned to kill Mohammed but the Muslims learned of the plot and they marched against the tribe and laid siege to it. After a couple of weeks of the siege they agreed to go into exile. They took what they were able to carry themselves, but the rest became Mohammed’s property.
A third tribe, Banu Qurayza, a Jewish tribe was massacred after the battle of the Trench. The Jews did not fight for Mohammed and after the Meccans withdrew the Jewish tribe was laid siege. After 25 days they surrendered and the men were beheaded and the women and children were taken by the Muslims and sold into slavery. Reports on the number of men beheaded range from 600 to 900.
Shortly after this Mohammed attacked Khaybar which was north of Medina in an area where Jews lived. Many of the men were killed and women taken as wives. One person was tortured by building a fire on his chest to force the Jew to tell where a big treasure was hidden. Following the conquest the fruit of the land was to be shared with Mohammed and his wives; i.e., some of the Jews were allowed to stay and farm the land on shares with Mohammed getting 50 percent of the crop; but later the Jews were banished to Syria. (Cf. Sahih Muslim: Book 010, Number 3759)
4. This hatred has continued from the time of Mohammed to the present. A recent story about a Saudi textbook affirms the tradition.
A twelfth-grade Saudi textbook is teaching hatred of Jews and jihad to liberate Palestine, according to MEMRI. The report illustrates that hatred and violence continue to be themes in Saudi educational materials, putting a black mark on the conservative Islamic kingdom's desire to become a "knowledge society."
"Whoever studies the nature of the conflict between the Muslims and the Jews understands an important fact, [namely that] this is a religious conflict, not a dispute about politics or nationality, or a conflict between races or tribes, or a fight over land or country, as some describe it," states Saudi textbook Studies from the Muslim World.
The book says that the conflict will not end unless one side vanquishes the other, because "throughout Islamic history, the Jews have striven to destroy the [Islamic] religion and spread fitna [chaos] among the Muslims. The book also repeats classic anti-Semitic lies that Jews have taken control of Western media and culture, exploited their home societies, and aligned themselves with Christians to destroy Islam.” (Saudi High School Textbook Preaches Hate, Dec. 8, 2011)
There is a good bit of paranoia in these statements. When did the Jews seek to destroy Islam? The Muslims have persecuted the Jews from the time of Mohammed. They have outnumbered the Jews for centuries. Jews have been forced to depart Muslim countries so that very few are left in those countries.
5. In 2011 a survey was taken of 1010 Palestinians in the West Bank, Gaza on the question who agreed with the hadith in the Hamas Charter “about the need to kill Jews hiding behind stones, trees. Seventy-three (73) percent of the 1010 Palestinians agreed with the hadith (*).
6. Following are excerpts from statements made at a rally of the Palestinian Al-Ahrar movement in Gaza, a pro-Hamas group that split from Fatah, which aired on Al-Aqsa TV on November 3, 2011 (*):
“Praise be to you, our Lord. You have made our killing of the Jews an act of worship, through which we come closer to you.”
From the time of Mohammed to the present there is hatred for the Jews especially and for non-Muslims generally. How does this come about? This amounts to brain-washing on a massive scale. When a young child can appear on a TV show in the Muslim world and professes hate for the Jews this is quite unnatural. Children do not have hate to begin with in their young lives. The only way hate could occur is if the innocent child has been brainwashed. This child probably never saw a Jew or even knew what one was.
The policy of Saul Alinsky so ably employed by Comrade Obama and his fellow collectivists (Marxists, communists, socialists, progressives, Democrats – all virtually the same) is once again placed in full view of those who will take an honest look. As we were directed to do, those who have eyes let them see and those who have ears let them hear, once again goes unheeded.
These are the eight steps Alinsky laid out to topple our nation and create a socialist state, the same state to which Comrade Obama referred when he said he would fundamentally transform The United States:
1) Healthcare — Control healthcare and you control the people
2) Poverty — Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.
3) Debt — Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.
4) Gun Control — Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.
5) Welfare — Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income).
6) Education — Take control of what people read and listen to — take control of what children learn in school.
7) Religion — Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools.
8) Class Warfare — Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.
One of the rules of Alinsky that is so skillfully used by the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party today is “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” Alinsky explained that “you cannot risk being trapped by the enemy in his sudden agreement with your demand and risk saying, “You are right – we do not know what to do about this issue. Now you tell us.” We saw the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) adeptly apply this concept in their class warfare tactic of dividing the people. It was almost as if the prize student of the Alinsky School for Radicals, Comrade Obama was orchestrating the rule. Maybe he was.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have as one of their main attack points, the now politically correct position that anybody not on their side is a racist and anybody on their side cannot be a racist. This has become very divisive and has made the term racist to be more common in today’s vocabulary than butter. Several months ago, Steven King from Iowa gave an almost hour-long interview. In the course of the interview King said, "White nationalist, white supremacist, Western civilization — how did that language become offensive?" This was taken to be offensive and racist by the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats), of course, and by many in the Republican party. King was removed from the committees on which he served and ostracized by the Republican party.
A newly elected Muslim member of congress from the Somalian community in Minneapolis, Ilhan Omar, has made many comments that at the very least would have to be classified as anti-Semitic, like accusing any member of congress who supports Israel as being bought and paid for, and any member of congress who supports the Jewish people as being an agent of Israel. Omar’s past associations with openly anti-Semitic groups and other comments can only lead any rational person to conclude, that she believes, as the Quran teaches, that the only good Jew is a dead Jew. There was a call for a resolution in Congress to reprimand Omar and any anti-Semitic views.
Her fellow Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) who also hate the United States, and some establishment Republicans defended and justified Omar’s comments by saying that she is just a new member of congress and must be given some slack, her comments were taken out of context and not anti-Semitic or hateful, and she is naïve. These same people roundly condemned Steve King.
The resolution that came forth followed the rule set forth by Alinsky that all good students of Alinsky in their efforts to topple our nation should not be caught in a trap. The Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) controlled house voted on a resolution that condemned all hatred including so called Islamophobia and failed to mention Omar. In addition, Omar still sits on the powerful Foreign Relations Committee.
Saul Alinsky is alive and well. Our nation is being toppled and transformed to the Marxist totalitarian state called for by Marx, Lenin, Alinsky, and Obama. This is so blatant, and yet American citizens who claim to love our country and our constitution and freedoms refuse to learn what this evil really is. They remain ignorant of an evil that is enslaving them. We also have American citizens who naively and foolishly continue to vote for Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) believing they are voting for people who promise to make America better by following the road of “Hope and Change,” the same road followed by Lenin, Mao, Castro, and Chavez; the same road championed by their Comrade, Barrack Obama.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have led us to believe that they are fighting for “people” and would have us believe this fight against oppression of all is a progressive fight. They refute that the fight for opportunity is the fight for all and is the reason capitalism always reduces poverty and raises the living standard for all.
We fully regard civil wars, i.e., wars waged by the oppressed class against the oppressing class, slaves against slave-owners, serfs against land-owners, and wage-workers against the bourgeoisie, as legitimate, progressive and necessary. Lenin, Socialism and War
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have dedicated themselves to, at any cost, convince people that socialism is the road to salvation. Truth and reality are not to be factors in their efforts.
Socialists must explain to the masses that they have no other road of salvation except the revolutionary overthrow of “their” governments, and that advantage must be taken of these governments’ embarrassments in the present war precisely for this purpose. Lenin, Socialism and War
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have continued their war on law enforcement including but not limited to local police, Border Patrol, and ICE.
A standing army and police are the chief instruments of state power. Lenin, State and Revolution
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have taken up the call for universal suffrage in the United States, including non-citizens, children down to age 16, the dead, people voting several times, and the deceased, will bring about “the will of the people.”
Our Socialist-Revolutionaries and Mensheviks themselves share, and instil into the minds of the people, the false notion that universal suffrage “in the present-day state” is really capable of revealing the will of the majority of the working people and of securing its realization. Lenin, State and Revolution
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have professed the real reason, as stated by Lenin, for the expansion of voting rights to all, (non-citizens, children down to age 16, the dead, people voting several times, and the deceased) is to bring about the restriction and elimination of freedoms for others.
The dictatorship of the proletariat, i.e., the organization of the vanguard of the oppressed as the ruling class for the purpose of suppressing the oppressors, cannot result merely in an expansion of democracy. Simultaneously with an immense expansion of democracy, which for the first time becomes democracy for the poor, democracy for the people, and not democracy for the money-bags, the dictatorship of the proletariat imposes a series of restrictions on the freedom of the oppressors, the exploiters, the capitalists. Lenin, State and Revolution
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have learned that the abolition of all civilized and rational discourse, discourse with the intent of reaching a reasonable conclusion, does not move them further down the road of “Hope and Change” to their desired goal of communism.
It is, of course, much easier to shout, abuse, and howl than to attempt to relate, to explain. Lenin, April Theses
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have as their end goal, the same goal as did Marx and Lenin.
Democracy means equality. The great significance of the proletariat's struggle for equality and of equality as a slogan will be clear if we correctly interpret it as meaning the abolition of classes. But democracy means only formal equality. And as soon as equality is achieved for all members of society in relation to ownership of the means of production, that is, equality of labor and wages, humanity will inevitably be confronted with the question of advancing father, from formal equality to actual equality, i.e., to the operation of the rule “from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs”. Lenin, The State and Revolution
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) would have us believe their ideas and goals are new ideas and goals, but just as history always repeats itself and should be used as a foreteller of the future, the Marxist/Progressive (Democrats) are repeating the feats of Lenin. Yes, the results will be the same results that have occurred every time collectivism (Marxism, communism, socialism, progressive – all virtually the same) has been tried and employed; total social decay and financial collapse.
COMRADE OBAMA IS ALIVE AND WELL AND HE IS NOT DONE PROMOTING COLLECTIVISM (MARXISM, COMMUNISM, SOCIALISM, PROGRESSIVE, DEMOCRAT- ALL VIRTUALLY THE SAME)Read Now
Comrade Barack Obama shared his vision for the future with a Canadian crowd, promoting his Obama Foundation and its mission to "train a million Baracks and Michelles" to impact the international stage.
Speaking to 13,500 people in Winnipeg, Obama explained his mission to create a "university for social change.” Obama said, “If we could form a network of those young leaders, not just in the United States, but around the world, then we got something, if we can train a million Baracks and Michelles who are running around thinking they can change the world, hope is achievable."
Obama received a comprehensive course in Saul Alinsky during his years as a community organizer in Chicago, an experience Obama recalled as "the best education he ever had." Years later in 2007, an interviewer found him still "at home talking Alinskian jargon about 'agitation,'" and fondly recalling organizing workshops where he had learned Alinsky-esque concepts like "being predisposed to other people's power."
In those years, Obama was schooled by disciples of Alinsky himself, including Mike Kruglik, who remembered Obama as "the best student he ever had," a "natural ... undisputed master of agitation." Kruglik should know because he studied at the Industrial Areas Foundation, the community organizing school founded by Alinsky. Obama completed the national training course taught by the IAF in Los Angeles. He then went on to teach Alinsky concepts and methods at community organizing workshops and seminars in Southside Chicago. Obama also served on boards in Chicago, including the Woods Fund and Joyce Foundation, which dispensed grants to groups specializing in Alinsky-style agitation. Between 1995 and 1999, Obama led the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (CAC), which was founded by Obama's close friend Bill Ayers, and remained on the board until 2001.
A young Comrade Barack Obama gave a quite good definition of the core ideas behind community organizing:
Organizing begins with the premise that (1) the problems facing inner-city communities do not result from a lack of effective solutions, but from a lack of power to implement these solutions; (2) that the only way for communities to build long-term power is by organizing people and the money [they raise] around a common vision; and (3) that a viable organization can only be achieved if a broadly based indigenous leadership—and not one or two charismatic leaders—can knit together the diverse interests of their local institutions [and "grassroots" people.
The key to community organizing is that it's not about winning on any one issue. It's about creating broad coalitions, and training community members to conduct hardball campaigns that let them win on lots of issues. "Professional organizers focus on building community and power," it is stated. "Issues are simply tools for the building process."
One of Alinsky's insights was to realize how many stakeholders there were to organize. He saw that the same grievances connected ordinary citizens, labor unions, churches, small businesses, and more — and if you could somehow get all those groups together, they were almost unstoppable. And he did get them together.
Alinsky didn't just theorize about organizing. He was, himself, an organizer. A criminologist by training, Alinsky lived in Chicago, and began his work in the Back of the Yards neighborhood in the 1930s. He created the Back of the Yards Neighborhood Council, a group bringing together unions, religious leaders, and other stakeholders in that area. At its first meeting, Alinsky biographer Sanford Horwitt writes, the council passed resolutions calling for a new recreation facility, for child nutrition and disease prevention programs, and to ask the Armour meatpacking company to compromise with the nascent meatpackers' union. The council took on a permanent role in the community, and still exists.
Alinsky then scaled up his model: he formed the Industrial Areas Foundation, a still-extant group that helps local groups like the Back of the Yards council organize and conducts trainings for organizers-to-be. IAF helped spread Alinsky's tactics far beyond Chicago. The Community Service Organization, an IAF offshoot organizing Mexican-Americans in Los Angeles, launched the careers of Cesar Chavez and Dolores Huerta.
And now we are learning Comrade Obama, will take the best education he ever had, and put it to work to train a million Baracks and Michelles to continue the Comrades efforts to fundamentally transform the United States, and the world, to a totally conforming and equal classless society, or a Marxist totalitarian state under the Dictatorship of the Proletariat.
We have differences over what you call “abortion,” “choice,” and “women’s right to choose.” We call it murder of an unborn child. You call it “women’s health care” while we think of it as correcting a mistake or avoiding what you would see as an inconvenience as opposed to a blessing. These differences and arguments have raged for years, even to the point of justifying this act up to the point of birth. It is not about these differences for which I am asking your help to understand. We know your justifications and as we learn more and more about the life of the unborn child, more and more people are rejecting your justifications.
It is about your new position I and many others are seeking understanding. The new position about which I speak is that position justifying the taking of the life of a child after that child has been separated from their mother; born. The description given by one of your own goes like thus; the child is born and is apart from their mother but still in the same room. The describer went on to state that the child should be kept warm and comfortable while the abortionist and mother discuss the fate of the child. If the abortionist and mother determine for whatever reason that the life of the child should be taken, your positions would support this act, an act which can only be described as murder. I believe you would agree with that assessment.
Please, help us understand how you justify that position. Please help us understand how you sleep at night knowing your position ends the life of a living newly born child. Please help us understand at what age, if any, you would deem the ending of the life of a child as being beyond your justifications.
There are many of us, with more and more becoming a part of the many every day, who do not understand your line of reasoning. You understand and we understand that hearing your line of reasoning will not necessarily change anybody’s mind, but it could certainly help bridge ravines and perhaps began some sort of rationale dialogue.
Thank you to any who would be a part of this dialogue. Please, no name calling or uncivilized discussion from either side. The question is very serious. My purpose for encouraging this discussion is because it is not only my belief, and the belief of many, that the action denies life and is detrimental to society. History shows that these actions, and yes they have been a part of past societies, have been regarded as a contributing factor to the downfall of those societies.
Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.