Call it the GOP or the Republican Party, but do not call it the party led by conservatives. The GOP or the Republican party, has over the years failed the conservative movement. This is primarily why it is viewed by so many as a feckless and meandering party.
Since Ronald Reagan, the GOP has had only one presidential nominee who could be called a conservative and that was Donald Trump. The Bushes, Dole, McCain, and Romney are all in the same category as Rockefeller and Eisenhower, and that is, although they called themselves Republicans, some even called themselves conservatives, that was in name only.
The long-time leader of the Senate, McConnell, and the current leader in the House, McCarthy, are the same as the above. They all have sound bites declaring conservative values, but their actions enhance big government and big spending policies.
During the 20th and 21st centuries, we have had three presidents who have followed American values. They were Coolidge, Reagan, and Trump. American values would be those values that promote limited government. The only limitations in the United States Constitution are those limits placed upon the federal government. The founders followed the principle that government that governs least, governs best. The founders believed that government closest to the people should be the government that regulates, if any regulation is needed.
The GOP or the Republican party, has failed to place people with American values in leadership. Both McConnell and McCarthy support big federal government. Neither McConnell or McCarthy have shown leadership to reduce government regulations and control over the lives of the people. Government that assumes more and more control over the lives of the people, their choices, and their thoughts is a government becoming more and more tyrannical. If you do not oppose government regulation, you support tyrannical government.
Coolidge, Reagan, and Trump all could be identified by the Goldwater conservative or the Goldwater American idea that the power of government must be limited per the United States Constitution. This belief dictated all their choices. Neither McConnell nor McCarthy have exhibited that belief. Yes, they have alluded to that belief, but it is far from their core belief. Their core belief is to do what gives them power and advances their careers and their financial position.
As long as the GOP or the Republican party, refuses to take make the hard choices, such as leadership choices, they will always be a feckless and floundering party. If the GOP or the Republican party, wishes to really restore greatness to our country, they must choose leaders who have the belief that American values are best along with the courage and strength to stand firm in implementing and defending those beliefs. McConnell and McCarthy do not hold American values or conservative values as their core belief, and do not have the courage or strength to defend and implement them if they did have limited government as their core belief.
Do they really believe what they are saying? Sadly, yes. The American Left is easily indoctrinated, believes propaganda, and quickly succumbs to any form of intimidation. The reason the American Left is so easily persuaded is because they believe in conformity and refuse to stand alone. We see this in the way they talk, they dress, and the way they respond to events.
The cries that the removal of any form of censorship on Twitter is dangerous to freedom is a ridiculous argument. Censorship is a necessary tool by any aspiring tyrant to gain control of a society. Censorship is restricting a free flow of ideas. When something is restricted it is less free.
When the Globalists, and the easily persuaded conformists, all sing the same tune that censorship on Twitter must be retained to protect the freedom of women and minorities, they are making an argument of contradiction. This is normal for any who seek to limit the freedoms of the masses and impose their viewpoints on all. This is of course tyranny.
It was restricting freedoms, such as speech and thought, that drove the American colonists to revolt. Living in a censorship free society is an American hallmark. And now an individual from South Africa is proclaiming an American ideal should be restored, and those who would want us to believe that they are Americans, rise up in opposition.
It is the Marxist transformation movement that has brought conformity and compliance to American society. This has been engineered by the uses of indoctrination, propaganda, and intimidation, those same tools used by tyrants, especially collectivist tyrants. When censorship is eliminated, people hear all ideas and the collectivist movement knows that when freedom is freely advocated, the forces of tyranny will fail.
Censorship is always an ally of tyranny. This is why our 1st Amendment states that freedom of speech should not be abridged. That is American.
There are only two things about the left that have been consistent over the years. The left has been consistent in their inconsistencies. This is because of their second consistency; they stay true to their core strategy that the “ends always justify the means.” There are no limitations to how ridiculous an argument from the left will be so long as they believe they are advancing their agenda to transform any society to a Marxist totalitarian state.
There has been a transformation movement in the United States ever since Lenin started the Communist International and set the United States as his primary target. The movement gained momentum during the 1920’s and was well ingrained during the 1930’s. The communist movement dominated the Franklin Roosevelt regime led by Eleanor and Harry Hopkins.
It was during the 1930’s that Stalin was committing horrendous atrocities against the Russian people. Anybody Stalin thought might be a threat to him was a target along with their family members and even acquaintances. Nobody is sure how many people were murdered during this time. Stalin did hold show trials when he knew he had total control of a situation and the defendant would cooperate and confess to the false accusations.
The American left defended this murder. A letter was posted in a communist paper published in the Untied States, called the “Daily Worker.” It was argued that these murders were really brilliant maneuvers for freedom, democracy, and a superior kind of justice. A quote from the defense: “Your voice.....will lend even greater weight to the worldwide defense of the right of the individual to speak, write, create, and otherwise engage in cultural activity in complete freedom.”
The American left, which has the identical ideology today as it had then, is claiming that the change in ownership of Twitter will hinder free speech and hurt democracy. “You could secretly ban one party’s candidate or all of its candidates, all of its nominees. Or you could just secretly turn down the reach of their stuff and turn up the reach of something else, and the rest of us might not even find out until after the election. Elon Musk says this is all to help people because he is just a free speech, philosophically clear, open-minded helper, a world helper, if you will. Is that true? Should you take him at his word? Should you care about this whether you have a Twitter account or not? This is important stuff,” said a host on MSNBC.
What is stated above is the very reason Musk said he wanted to purchase Twitter. That reason was to be sure that the left and the right both had a voice. Previously Twitter only allowed the voice of the left. Musk said he no longer wanted major stories like the Hunter Biden laptop to be censored from the public. Musk said he wanted to stop censorship of any kind. Remember the left demands conformity and complicity. When they deny any who do not conform of comply, it is not censorship, but it is serving the democracy.
The one area the left of the 1930’s and 40’s, and the left of today, get right, is that Stalin’s actions and the censorship on Twitter, do and did promote democracy. The call for promoting democracy is terribly misunderstood. Democracy does not promote freedom. Democracy will always bring dictatorship. Democracy has no limitations or restrictions on what the majority or those in power can do. This is why the founder’s rejected democracy. It was their purpose to limit the powers of government and protect the freedoms and liberties of the people. That is what a republic does.
The conversation was who would Biden choose as a running mate. This question was more important than normal. Biden, who was always a light of 20 watts, was no longer shining at all. He was clearly suffering from cognitive decline due to aging. The talk was that the vice-presidential choice would become president because the 25th amendment would have to be invoked. That the 25th amendment should be invoked is beyond question.
For unknown reasons, Kamala Harris was the Democrats choice. Yes, she is a woman, many men have come to know this for certain, but she is not black. She was hurt badly in the debates as Tulsi Gabbard asked her about her record. Harris dropped out of the race even before the Iowa caucuses. It was evident she would show poorly in the California primary.
Yet she was chosen. After the big steal of the 2020 election, Harris was sworn in as Vice-President. Very quickly it became evident why she had to drop from the primaries so early. Harris rose through the ranks in one party California, not based on any political astuteness, but because she was that woman who was well acquainted with many powerful men. All of America quickly saw how incompetent she is. Perhaps Biden went along with Harris as his running mate because even he knew there would be real reluctance to invoke the 25th amendment. Harris has proven to be even less capable than anybody imagined.
Biden noticeably declines on a monthly if not weekly basis, and yet there is little talk about the 25th amendment. That is due totally to Harris. She has not had a public appearance where she has not embarrassed herself, Biden, and the country. This is the result: “The approval polling tracker at FiveThirtyEight—which takes a weighted average of the polls—is recording a steady downward approval trend for Biden and Harris.
According to FiveThirtyEight, Harris has experienced a sharp decline in her approval ratings, with an updated average on April 21 that showed 58.1 percent disapprove of Harris compared to 32.1 percent who find her to be favorable, a -26 percent net rating.”
These numbers are even worse than Biden’s numbers. Everything Biden does lowers his numbers, but Harris goes down even faster. No that is not a pun. The choices for the Democrats are very bleak. The midterms are only 6 months away. The numbers keep getting worse. The Democrats only hope is that they have mastered how to steal elections. The vote counters will have to be very good, but then they openly stole the election in 2020, so do not underestimate their resourcefulness. Biden and Harris will not be on the campaign trail. Would you want them to campaign for you?
6 Russian Oligarchs Commit Suicide in Mysterious Outbreak of Epstein Syndrome
The body of Sergey Protosenya, former top manager of Russia’s energy giant Novatek, was found together with those of his wife and daughter on Tuesday in a rented villa in Spain, where the family was reportedly on holiday for Easter.
The 55-year-old millionaire was found hanged in the garden of the villa in Lloret de Mar by Catalonian police, Spanish media reported, while his wife and daughter were found in their beds with stab wounds on their bodies.
Just a day before the body of Protosenya was found in Spain, on April 18, former vice-president of Gazprombank Vladislav Avaev was found dead in his multi-million apartment on Universitetsky Prospekt in Moscow, together with his wife and daughter.
The bodies were reportedly discovered by a relative of the Avaevs after being unable to get in contact with the family for several days.
On March 24, Russian newspaper Kommersant reported the death of billionaire Vasily Melnikov in his luxury apartment in Nizhny Novgorod, the sixth-largest city in the country.
According to police investigations mentioned by Kommersant, Melnikov—who reportedly worked for the medical firm MedStom—was found dead in the apartment together with his wife Galina and two sons. They had all died from stab wounds and the knives used for the murders were found at the crime scene.
Ukrainian-born Russian tycoon Mikhail Watford was found dead in his home in Surrey in the U.K. on February 28.
Watford—who had changed his name from the original Tolstosheya—was born in 1955 in then-Soviet Ukraine and had made a name for himself after becoming an oil and gas magnate.
Watford, 66, was found hanged in the garage of his home by a gardener, according to The Daily Mail. Surrey police said the circumstances around his death were not suspicious, as reported by the BBC.
On February 25, Gazprom’s Deputy General Director of the Unified Settlement Center (UCC) for Corporate Security, Alexander Tyulyakov, was found dead in a cottage near St. Petersburg, as reported by the Russian newspaper Gazeta.
Tyulyakov’s body was reportedly found hanged in the apartment’s garage. Police found a note next to his body that led investigators to believe the oligarch had died by suicide.
The first death linked to Russian energy giant Gazprom dates back to before the Russian invasion of Ukraine had even started, in January.
At that time, 60-year-old Gazprom’s top manager Leonid Shulman was found dead in the bathroom of a cottage in the Leningrad region, next to a note that led police to believe he died by suicide, according to Gazeta and Russian media group RBC.
Speculation is that either we are witnessing a cascade of unlikely events within a 60-day timeframe, or the institutions upon which Putin depends to stay in power–the security services, the military, and the oligarchs–are shaken by Putin’s War in Ukraine.
Is Putin the reincarnation of Stalin??
Will there be a large donation to the Clinton Foundation announcement shorty??
Do the Democrats wish they had as much freedom to rid themselves of those they do not like such as Marjorie Taylor Greene??
Every American who believes in individual liberty and freedom, who understands that the Constitution of the United States has as its purpose to limit the power of government and protect the rights of the people, and who believes that the government must be the servant and the people must be the sovereign is aware how we are purposefully being transformed from a republic to a democracy. A democracy is a dictatorship of the majority, or those in power. In a republic the law is the supreme ruler and in a Constitutional Republic that supreme ruler would be the Constitution.
In a constitutional republic, the majority or those in power are limited and restricted by the constitution. In a democracy the majority or those in power have only the limitations or restrictions they impose on themselves.
These differences become more and more evident in the United States every day. The majority or those in power are attempting to prevent specific individuals from being on the ballot in the 2022 election. Article 1 and Section 2 of the Constitution states: “No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the Age of twenty-five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen.” The above stated individuals meet these qualifications.
The 14th Amendment Section 3 states: “No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.”
The majority or those in power are saying that these individuals, having never been charged nor convicted, have engaged in insurrection and rebellion. They claim this based on these people putting forth what was in January 2021 thought to be an opinion but since has been shown time and time again to be a fact, that the 2020 election was stolen. The majority or those in power are saying, nevertheless, we with the power will apply this section in any manner we wish. We will extend the definition of insurrection and rebellion to include political differences. A conviction is not required. If we were a republic, this would never be allowed, but in a democracy, the majority or those in power have no restrictions and no limitations.
The 1st Amendment states: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” Concerning the freedom of speech, it states no law abridging the freedom of speech. Abridge means to curtail or to limit.
Comrade Obama said during a recent speech that social media companies should censor what “we don’t think are good for society.”
“I think it is reasonable for us as a society to have a debate and then put in place a combination of regulatory measures and industry norms that leave intact the opportunity for these platforms to make money,” Obama continued. “But say to them that there’s certain practices you engage in that we don’t think are good for society.”
The Comrade took to Twitter recently to suggest that censorship is needed to prevent “real challenges” to the Washington, DC, establishment. “In recent years, we’ve seen how quickly disinformation spreads, especially on social media,” he said. “This has created real challenges for our democracy.”
The Comrade is in total disagreement with our Declaration of Independence that states: “That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government...” The people must continually challenge the Washington D.C. establishment. That is the essence of protecting the rights of the people and limiting the power of government. The Comrade is correct that free speech is a challenge to democracy. In a democracy, it is the majority or those in power, that would be the Washington D.C. establishment, from dictating what can or cannot be said. Democracy is dictatorship of the majority or those in power. In a democracy, speech can be abridged, must be abridged, so that the majority or those in power can demand conformity and compliance to their dictates.
In a republic, the rights of the people are protected, and the Washington D.C. establishment would be limited and restricted. In our republic, the Constitution is supreme. In a republic, when the Constitution says that congress cannot abridge the peoples right to free speech, it means exactly that.
These are the reasons that our founders gave us a Constitutional Republic and not a democracy. It was their intent to have the people challenge the Washington D.C. establishment, the power of government, and to protect the rights of the people. The transformation from a republic to a democracy must be reversed immediately.
Sports, team or individual, are people competing against each other. It is absolutely wonderful to watch gifted athletes as they compete. Their natural abilities, honed by dedicated training, their mental capacities to adjust to the events of the moment, and their ability to draw from an inner reserve is inspiring. Where these gifted individuals were born, their political beliefs if any, have little to do with their natural abilities. If they were born in the United States, they have been exposed to different sports than if they were born in a third world country where succor might have been the sport to which they were mostly exposed.
Most sports are international today. It was not that long ago that tennis was dominated by athletes from the United States and Australia. That is where tennis was mostly played. Today, tennis has become a truly international game. Players from Europe, from Asia, from North America, and from South America rise in the rankings. Players from countries with dictators and players from countries where open elections are held, rise, and fall in the rankings.
I for one, and I hope I am in the majority of tennis fans, have my favorites based on their abilities, their attitudes, and their dedication to the game as I perceive it. For instance, both Serena Williams and I are Americans. She is my least favorite tennis player ever. She is a gifted athlete. She has a remarkable ability to come from behind, but she has a terrible attitude and is a poor sport. On the other hand, Stephie Graph was my favorite player. She is a gifted athlete, was very resourceful, and was a model for other athletes. She was born in Germany. We all have our favorite players based on their individual qualities and not their place of birth.
The most prestigious of all Grand Slam Tennis Tournaments has made a very unfortunate ruling. “Wimbledon bans Russian and Belarusian players — including No. 2 Medvedev.” This ruling has nothing to do with their athletic abilities or any other individual characteristic; it is based only on where they were born, their citizenship.
The political policies of Belarus and Russia have been very consistent over the years. Dictators head their governments. The tennis players have little if any impact on the polices of their government. Many of the players who were born in Belarus and Russia no longer live full time in those countries, yet Wimbledon will not allow gifted and deserving individual athletes to compete in a sporting event based on the abilities of the individual, separated from world political events.
It is the tennis fans who wish to see the best players compete, that are being denied, no that are being cheated. I would hope Wimbledon would become a tennis tournament again and not an arbiter of world events.
Today, in our communities, our schools, our churches, and elsewhere, the left is proclaiming that evil is good, that good is evil, that perversions are to be protected and promoted, that the criminal is to be protected and law-abiding citizens are national security risks, that sexual immorality is to be celebrated and our youth must be groomed to participate, and any who would voice opposition to this evil is a domestic terrorist. When evil prevails, big tyrannical government is the result. Our founders understood that individual liberty and freedom can only exist when society is virtuous and moral.
The Founders’ counsel to us concerning virtue and morality
Americans are no longer taught and thus cannot appreciate the profound degree of anxiety with which the Founders expressed concern about the quality of virtue and morality in their descendants. They knew that without these qualities, the Constitution they had written and the republican system of government which it provided could not be maintained. As James Madison said:
“Is there no virtue among us? If there be not, we are in a wretched situation. No theoretical checks, no form of government, can render us secure. To suppose that any form of government will secure liberty or happiness without any virtue in the people, is a chimerical idea. If there be sufficient virtue and intelligence in the community, it will be exercised in the selection of these men; so that we do not depend upon their virtue, or put confidence in our rulers, but in the people who are to choose them.”
Thomas Jefferson counseled, "Virtue is not hereditary." Virtue has to be earned and it has to be learned. Neither is virtue a permanent quality in human nature. It has to be cultivated continually and exercised from hour to hour and from day to day. The Founders looked to the home, the school, and the churches to fuel the fires of virtue from generation to generation.
After serving eight years as our first president, George Washington sensed the tendency of the people in a free republic to begin to forget the bedrock of virtue and morality so necessary to the preservation of the republic the Founders gave us. Thus, in his Farewell Address, he declared:
"Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports.”
Is not Washington telling us that without religion and morality, which are the seedbed of virtue, that our free republic would crumble? He then warns us about those who claim to be patriots but reject and even fight against the foundations of morality and religion:
“In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism, who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens....”
The insightful Washington then suggests that without a firm belief in the Creator and our duty to Him, there would be nothing to bind the consciences of men and our oaths would mean nothing:
“Let it simply be asked, where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths which are the instruments of investigation in courts of justice?”
He then warns us of those people who would claim they can be moral and virtuous but need no religion: “And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion.” Most Americans have heard someone say, “I can be a moral person; I need no religion.” When such persons are asked, “What is your morality?” they respond with, “Well, it is whatever I feel is right.” This is clearly what is called today moral relativism. It has no solid basis. Washington knew that religion is necessary in a society to give standards to morality, and hence to give firmness and consistency to laws of the land. But Washington is not through. He then seems to foresee the time when the very learned, with all manner of degrees behind their names, will be wise in their own eyes and therefore reject the need for religion. He says:
“Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education ... reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle."
Today, those who have promised to transform the republic we were given into a democracy and socialism, and then into a Marxist totalitarian state proclaim atheism and secularism as the nation’s religion. They demonize and ostracize virtue as racist and unjust. They promote and protect all evils. They demand the destruction of the family. The American left is well aware that in order to achieve their goals of a Marxist totalitarian state they must destroy the republic our founders gave us along with all the pillars of decency and virtue critical to its survival.
Indoctrination, propaganda, and intimidation are very powerful tools used by collectivists, the American left, the Democrat party. The results of intimidation, propaganda, and intimidation is to have idiots, who are viewed as people with understanding, leading popular opinion and influencing other idiots. Those idiots, Racheal Maddow and others with MSNBC and NBC, those on CNN like Lemon, and the epitome of idiocy, the ladies of the View, are such perfect examples.
Joy Behar left no doubts about her intellectual rigor while discussing the basic system of the American government this week. During an episode of "The View," Behar seemed to believe the Supreme Court passes bills, a duty that is, in fact, entrusted to Congress, not the Supreme Court.
"The Supreme Court is poised to pass a bill contradicting the New York City State laws," Behar began her totally serious explanation to the table. What you'll notice from the clip, is that the others at the table are staring at her wide-eyed, as if she's some treasure trove of valuable information. In the video clip, not one person corrects her; they appear to move on in acceptance of the information presented to them.
Unfortunately, the indoctrination, propaganda, and intimidation of the American collectivist runs deeper than just the left idiots. Many people in the United States today have no understanding as to what the intended role of the Supreme Court was. It was first of all designed to be the weakest branch of the three branches of government. The reason for this was because it was the farthest removed from the people.
The only power the United States Constitution gives to the Supreme Court is to render opinions. It has absolutely no Constitutional power to pass bills and make law. For that matter, neither does the Executive Branch. The only Branch of government that has the power to pass bills and make laws is the Legislative Branch. That is the Branch of government the founders said was closest to the people and the branch of government that was deemed to be most responsive to the wishes of the people, the people who were deemed to be the Sovereign.
The indoctrination, propaganda, and intimidation of the left has many Americans believing that Executive Orders, Regulations, and Court Opinions are in fact laws. This was intentional and serves the purposes of the left very well. The collectivists understood that their agenda to transform the United States from a republic to a democracy to socialism and finally to communism would be very difficult to pass if they adhered to the Supreme Law of the Land, the United States Constitution. Over a century ago they begin to use the Executive Branch and the Judicial Branch as their means of passing their agenda.
Their indoctrination, propaganda, and intimidation methods have convinced idiots, like those mentioned above, other idiots of the left, along with many other Americans who refuse to take the time to understand the pillars upon which our government was formed. Most law schools today no longer teach the United States Constitution, but concentrate on teaching Supreme Court opinions.
If we the Freedom Loving People of the United States truly desire to reverse this transformation of the collectivist movement to transform the United States into a Marxist totalitarian state, we must take the time, make the effort, to understand those pillars upon which our nation was formed, to understand the differences between republic and democracy, to understand why government that governs least governs best. This will require not only time but effort. We can choose to invest in that time and effort, or we can continue to allow the evils of Hell and the forces of Tyranny to transform us into a Marxist totalitarian state.
Governor Ron DeSantis is again correct. There are few if any issues on which DeSantis has been wrong. The left despises him, so we know he is doing a lot, if not all thinks correctly. We also see floods of people moving to Florida from all the states the left would have us believe are doing things correctly. That would be states like New York, California, New Jersey, and Illinois, the darlings of the left.
Governor DeSantis said that the Draconian and Despotic China virus mandates were wrong. They would not be adhered to in his state. No lockdowns, no mask mandates, and no shot (they are not vaccines) mandates. The result is that In Florida, there were 0 newly reported COVID-19 cases and 0 newly reported COVID-19 deaths on Apr 14, 2022. In California there are on average, 2400 new cases and 24 deaths daily. With more lockdowns and vaccine mandates, Newsom could drive those numbers even higher so he could declare even more Draconian and Despotic mandates. It is also commonly accepted that Florida’s economic recovery was 2X faster than the left’s darling states. The press and the left have demonized DeSantis and Florida while they flocked to Florida to enjoy the sun, freedom, and a strong economy.
Governor DeSantis signed into law a historic bill to Protect Parental Rights in Education. The left called this all kinds of other things. What the law does it to mandate that parents be kept informed as to what the schools are teaching the kids. This bill said that schools must educate kids and not indoctrinate them. This bill said that parents have the right to know if their kids are being educated or groomed. The bill only covered K-3, but should have covered k-12. The perverted and demented left hated being called out for their grooming practices and made it sound like this bill was discriminatory. This new law promotes education.
Governor DeSantis just recently signed into law an anti-crime and pro-family bill. The legislation will provide $70 million in funding for family and youth support through the Department of Children and Families and the Department of Juvenile Justice. The left really hates this law. The left understands that it is critical that the core family unit be destroyed to bring about their end goal of destroying the family, which destroys society, so they can bring about their Marxist totalitarian state. A critical part of destroying families and society is to promote father- less families. The left has been doing this in earnest since the Great Society days of LBJ.
Governor DeSantis is hated and despised by the left. Governor DeSantis is an individualist, he is an American, and he believes that government that governs least governs best. The American left are collectivists, they hate America, and they believe that tyrannical and despotic government is always superior to individual rights and liberties. Governor DeSantis and the American left are polar opposites. With whom do you stand?
Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.