I wish to bring to your attention that the question is “can we talk” and not “may we talk”. Are we in the United States capable of talking and perhaps even reasoning with each other? I do not think so. Some time ago I wrote about one of the major problems we face in our nation. That major problem is that we have political movements with totally different end goals. Our framers also had different political agendas, but they had one common goal. The founders common goal was to build a unified nation that adhered to rule of law, functioned with a limited government, maintained a divided government, functioned with people as sovereign and government as servant, and protect the natural rights of man given by the Creator of life, liberty, and property. Please note, I said protect and not regulate or control.
A society can never function as a free society where there is open and condoned calls for the breakdown of society, open disrespect and disregard for fair and transparent government, open disrespect and disregard for the maintenance of civil discourse, and open calls for hostility against public law enforcement. This is why we in America have come to the point where we “can not talk.” We have one political arm that has openly called for a complete breakdown in our government and open attacks on our law enforcement. We are witnessing the fallout of a regime that had as its goal to turn the bureaucracy into an arm of a political movement and not to operate as servants to the people, thus replacing the people as sovereign with the political movement replacing the people. This same regime openly called for attacks by militant groups, such as Black Lives Matter and Antifa, against our local and state police departments. This regime and movement now openly support the movements that would abandoned our basic principles as outlined in our founding documents, The Declaration of Independence, the Constitution of the Untied States, and the Bill of Rights, and replace them with total government control of the lives and thoughts of the people.
The other political movement advocates for the continued adherence to our founding principles of rule of law, limited government, divided government, sovereignty of the people, and individualism. These two movements have goals that are polar opposites; one believes government operates as a servant of the people and the other believes government is the sovereign and people are the servants. No longer do we in the Untied States have a common goal with only differences in how to reach that goal.
This difference is clearly shown in our treatment as a community and as a nation, a situation that exhibits the result of the prior regime calling on open hostility toward our local police forces. That this incident did not receive national attention and then be roundly denounced by every political movement and aspiring candidate for state or national office, tells us that certain political movements, the supporting press, and those who are called leaders, support along with the prior regime, a complete and total breakdown of our current society so their socially just, classless, conforming, equal, or communist society can be built.
The incident about which I am speaking took place in the Capital city of what is quickly becoming a communist society, Sacramento, California.
From the public statement by Sacramento PD:
On June 19, 2019, the Sacramento Police Department received a call regarding a disturbance between a male and a female. Officers made contact with the involved female at a residence in the 3700 block of Esperanza Drive. Officers then responded to a residence in the 200 block of Redwood Avenue to standby while the involved female gathered some belongings from a residence. At approximately 6:10 p.m., officers on scene reported shots had been fired, and an officer was struck by gun fire. The officer who was shot, Tara Christina O'Sullivan succumbed to her injuries after being transported to the hospital. The suspect, 45-year old Adel Sambrano Ramos, was booked into the Sacramento County Main Jail on charges relating to the murder of Officer O'Sullivan.
A video shows the attitude of people toward those police officers assisting the lady and then cheering because an officer had been shot. The video shows the residents taunting the cops, praising the shooting of the officer, and even threatening police with more violence.
“Take that gun off. I'll whoop your little butt," one woman's voice can be heard saying. “All y'all cowards."
Keep in mind those cowards were there to protect a female victim of domestic violence as she attempted to leave a bad situation. It is a miracle that the victim was not also wounded or killed by the ambush shooter.
This is the behavior supported and encouraged by the previous regime. This is the behavior supported and encouraged by the political movement calling for a complete breakdown and revamping of our current free society. This the behavior supported and encouraged by current candidates seeking higher office under the banner of that political movement that has openly called for our society to become a society with a sovereign government and the people as servants to that government.
Yes, the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) openly call for and demand a complete breakdown of our society, open attacks on our local and statewide police departments, a total abandoning of our principles of rule of law, limited government, divided government, sovereignty of the people, and individualism. The Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) movement is demanding our nation become a collectivist (Marxist, communist, socialist, progressive - all virtually the same) movement where government dictates how each person lives their lives and what thoughts they have. Yes, the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are demanding we come under the rule of the "Dictatorship of the Proletariat."
The terribly insensitive and misleading statement by AOC about concentration camps is made even worse because her fellow comrades such as Nadler and Pelosi have agreed with her and have not denounced her. This is wrong in every possible way anybody could even imagine. And the saddest part of it is that the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are now allowing their heartfelt anti-Semitic positions to be on full display along with their anti-American prejudices of placing political power above the good of the country is also on full display. These displays of poor judgement and their demand to gain power by enslaving the American citizens to the dependence of government, exhibit how false their pathetic statements are about freedom for the people.
I have been very fortunate, primarily because I have made it a priority, to have been able to travel extensively, especially throughout Europe. This has been very enlightening. I have seen poverty and third world conditions, and yes, the situations in many of our great cities like New York, Los Angeles, and San Francisco resembles third world countries. I have been able to speak with people who suffered under government oppression, the same oppression advocated by the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) for the United States, in places like Albania, Bulgaria, Romania, Serbia, Hungary, and so many more. I have had conversations with youth in many of these same countries as well as Russia, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and more. They long for the freedom and opportunity we in the United States have. It has made me understand just how lucky we who are citizens of this country really are. Do not listen to the lies of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) how we should change just so they can have power and control our lives.
I have been in places where my only response as to what was it like was that it was overwhelming. Two of those overwhelming experiences were being in actual concentration camps. The other was being in Jerusalem. The overwhelming feeling in Jerusalem was completely different from the concentration camps. To have walked the streets where Jesus walked, to be on the Mount of Olives, and to be in the Garden of Gethsemane was wonderfully overwhelming.
To walk the streets of Buchenwald and observe the pictures of mans cruelty to man was very sobering, but to walk the streets of Auschwitz, to go into the buildings and see the piles of human hair, the piles of shoes, the piles of discarded clothes and toys, to be in the yards where people were shot, to go to Birkenau and see the train tracks, walk on the platform where people were separated, to walk to the gas chambers, to be in the barracks, and to hear the stories was indeed life changing. Every American should make this a priority. It is not fun or enjoyable in any manner, but it will change you.
I now realize just how desperate the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) really are. I now realize that the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) will stoop to the very depths of hell to gain an inch to bring about the very social and economic system that brought about the likes of concentration camps. We Freedom Loving Americans were told that Freedom is never assured nor is it free, but it must be won by every generation because there are the likes of Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) who want to take it from us simply because they desire control and power.
So many questions and so few answers. Please, both you on the left and you on the right, help this Freedom Loving American understand.
The first two question are perhaps questions to which only God knows the answer, but if anybody can give me more insight, it would be greatly appreciated.
How does Earth hang in space and always at the proper distance from the sun to bring about the different seasons at the proper time in both hemispheres?
How does the mind of a woman really work and how can a man understand all the nuances? Is it possible?
These are questions to help this Freedom Loving American understand how the minds of those on the left come to their conclusions.
Why do those on the left despise the Jewish people? What have they done to have earned this hatred? Do you on the left really fear the Jewish people? The Jewish people do not commit terrorist attacks. The Jewish people are not aggressors but will react when attacked. The Jewish people are smart and industrious. The Jewish people are good citizens of any country in which they reside. Why do you on the left despise them so?
What do you on the left consider to be a lie? If I say that I believe a certain person is a good person, do you consider that to be lie or an opinion? If a person states something is a fact knowing that it is not, such as if you like your plan you can keep it, is that a lie?
Why is it OK to apply different standards such as who has the burden of proof? You seem to believe the rule of law, or where the burden of proof lies is different in different situations? For instance, in the case of Kavanaugh the women were to be believed and Kavanagh had to prove his innocence, yet in the case of Clinton he was to be believed and the women had to prove their accusations. What am I missing?
When I am paid for performing work, whose earnings are those, mine or the governments?
Am I a racist if I believe individuals of all races are to be treated as equals and to give advantages to certain individuals because they are a member of a certain race is actually racism?
Is it unfair to believe we all should have the freedom to make our decisions and that each individual is responsible for the consequences of those decision, be they good or bad? Is it unfair of me to believe that because a person made bad decisions for whatever reason, and the consequences of those decisions are not favorable, that society as a whole is the responsible party and the individual who made the bad decisions is a victim?
I have so many more questions, but this should be a good start. I am really hoping that some will give me answers to these questions.
The public-school system is no longer a system of education. The public-school system is an indoctrination system. We hear these people make the most foolish and outlandish statements because they have been indoctrinated to believe that freedom is bad and government enslavement is good.
I have made the statement about AOC, somewhat in jest, that I like her because she is cute, she has great energy, and she is the gift that just keeps on giving. Her foolish statements on socialism are no different from the foolish statements made by the likes of Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Barack Obama, and all the other collectivists (Marxists, communists, socialists, progressives, Democrats – all virtually the same), but she states them with so much more energy and in almost incomprehensible manner just as do so many of her fellow products of the public-school system. They cannot complete a thought without using “like” or “you know” at least twice. After they have completed their incomplete sentence and thought, they must explain what they “were trying to say.”
Much of what AOC has said, we can dismiss as nonsense coming from a naive product of the indoctrinating public-school system. Her latest claims are examples of the lies the indoctrinating public-school system is teaching as they attempt to rewrite history.
Her inane comments: Detention centers holding undocumented immigrants on the southern border are "exactly" like concentration camps, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said in an Instagram Live video.
The freshman lawmaker also said President Trump is a fascist, underscoring her argument that what is happening in the United States has parallels to Nazi Germany and other fascist states.
“The U.S. is running concentration camps on our southern border, and that is exactly what they are," the freshman lawmaker said. “If that doesn’t bother you ... I want to talk to the people that are concerned enough with humanity to say that ‘never again’ means something.
“The fact that concentration camps are now an institutionalized practice in the ‘Home of the Free’ is extraordinarily disturbing, and we need to do something about it,” she added.
“I don’t use those words lightly. I don’t use those words to just throw bombs. I use that word because that is what an administration that creates concentration camps is,” she said. “A presidency that creates concentration camps is fascist, and it’s very difficult to say that.”
It is obvious this foolish young indoctrinated individual has no idea what a concentration camp is or what the policies of Hitler and the Nazi’s were. I would strongly suggest that AOC and anybody that would use concentration camps as a comparison, go to Auschwitz and walk those grounds, hear what happened, see the piles of human hair, discarded shoes, bullet holes in walls, destroyed gas chambers, and barracks where people were kept until it was their time to be killed. AOC, you are not only displaying your naivete, but you are inaccurately portraying and minimizing one of the most horrible times of man’s inhumanity to man.
You also have a completely distorted picture of Hitler and his Nazi party. Hitler advocated the same polices you tout, socialist policies. Hitler took all guns from his people, he had complete control of the economic system with a ruthless central planning system, he provided free health care, he provided free education, he had an indoctrinating school system, he outlawed any speech he considered to be hateful or offensive, he declared loyalty to government must be the people’s first loyalty, even superior to God. Yes AOC, Hitler’s government was exactly what you and your other Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) want for the United States.
You do have the freedom in the Untied States to make these foolish, outlandish, and inaccurate claims. In order to protect my freedom of speech, I must protect yours. I cannot demand, but I can suggest however, that you educate yourself since the public-school system did not. Go, travel, see, and learn from those who lived under the tyranny you now want for the United States. Go to Auschwitz and learn what a concentration camp is. Go to Eastern Europe, talk to the people, and learn what it was truly like to live under the type of government you want for the United States. If you will do this, I predict you will no longer make such inane comments in the future.
Elizabeth Warren has proposed a sweeping new program for free college and student loan debt cancellation. Warren proposed canceling up to $50,000 worth of student loan debt for households making less than $100,000, which she estimates would wipe out educational debt entirely for more than 75% of Americans. Canceled debt would be tax-free, and the plan would be accessible for both publicly- and privately held student loan debt.
The plan also would be for the federal government to pick up part of the tab for those carrying student loan debt making over $100,000 in household income, but at a lesser rate — the plan would phase out $1 for every $3 above $100,000 in household income. There would be no debt cancellation for households with more than $250,000 in income.
Get Secure Financial Aid established a guaranteed student loan program that extends loans that are federal or state funded loans for students looking to finance their college education. They are distinct from personal, private or alternative loans in that they are backed by government funds. This act effectively established a government bank for student loans.
If you do not have a good credit score and are looking for loans, the best option would be to apply for federal student loans. These loans are "need-based" and require no credit check. Your income level does not affect your eligibility for a federal education loan. The loan will not be denied.
The federal student loan program is what collectivists (Marxists, communists, socialists, progressives, Democrats – all virtually the same) have advocated since the days of Karl Marx. In the Communist Manifesto Marx called for the government to have a monopoly on all lending. This is the exact statement:
Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
This is a great way to share wealth as Elizabeth Warren is advocating. Not only is she advocating for sharing the wealth, but she is advocating what all collectivists advocate which is irresponsibility. The collectivists said to students come one come all and get whatever money you want. That is irresponsible on the part of the collectivists. Now the collectivists are claiming, as you would expect, that these students are victims and the debt the collectivists extended irresponsibly, the same debt the students irresponsibly accepted, should be forgiven.
This is the foolishness of the left. This is why socialism, yes Bernie even Democratic Socialism, always fails. So called “sharing the wealth” always brings about a failed society with a collapsed financial system. Practicing and advocating irresponsibility is a road to devastation, it is “The Road To Tyranny.”
This has been a common theme that the left has used to enslave minorities to believe they are incapable of competing in a free economy and can only survive if they have government help. Then the left explains to the minorities that the right believes they are capable of competing and this is discriminatory. The left than explains that because the right believes in them as individuals they must vote as a block to remain enslaved and receive freebies that holds them in this state of enslavement. The so-called leaders of the minorities such as Jackson and Sharpton perpetuate this lie and become rich doing so.
New York City's public-school educators have been instructed to focus on black students over whites as part of "racial equity," it was reported.
"If I had a poor white male student, and I had a middle-class black boy, I would actually put my equitable strategies and interventions into that middle-class black boy because over the course of his lifetime he will have less access and less opportunities than that poor white boy," a consultant hired by the city Department of Education told administrators at a workshop, citing accounts of those in room.
"That's what racial equity is," Darnisa Amante, the consultant in question, added.
How did the president of the NYC Parents Union react?
Mona Davids, president of the NYC Parents Union — and who is black — said she's appalled by the alleged purpose of "racial equity".
"It's completely absurd — they want to treat black students as victims and punish white students," Davids added. "That defeats the purpose of what bias awareness training should be."
Thank you, Mona Davids,
Calling your self one thing when you are really another does not change what you are. Elizabeth Warren is Caucasian despite claiming to be Native America. Rachel Dolezal is Caucasian despite claiming to be black. Bruce Jenner is male despite claiming to be female. Abortion is murder despite claiming to be choice. Mercy killing is murder despite claiming it is for family honor. An entitlement is an entitlement despite claiming it is a right. Socialism is socialism despite claiming it is democratic.
Even though we live in a politically correct world where we are told things are what we call them, it does not change the fact that a bird is a bird, a dog is a dog, a sin is a sin, a man is a man, a women is a women, collectivism is authoritarianism, and individualism is freedom.
Bernie Sanders, modifying socialism by calling it democratic does not change the fact that socialism is socialism. Vladimir Lenin explained that “socialism is the gateway to communism.” It always has been and always will be. Both socialism and communism adhere to the dictates of collectivism with socialism being one state and communism being the inevitable next state of collectivism. Use any adjective you want to fool the people; it does not change the reality.
Here are current examples of others using the word Democratic to try to conceal their authoritarian reality. The people living under these “Democratic” authoritarian regimes are no more free than if they were accurately called for instance the Authoritarian People’s Republic of Korea.
People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria - Authoritarian
Democratic Republic of the Congo – Authoritarian
Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia – Authoritarian
Lao People’s Democratic Republic -Authoritarian
Democratic People’s Republic of Korea – Authoritarian
Bernie, all countries that are Communist are technically "Democratic". All Communist countries have elections whereby the leader is elected by the people. However, the Communist party uses tactics to ensure their victory. They count the votes and claim overwhelming victories. Collectivism (Marxism, communism, socialism, progressives, Democrats – all virtually the same) is authoritarian no matter which politically correct term you use to modify it.
Why Democracy, be it socialist or any other, was rejected by the founders for a Republic.
“It had been observed that a pure democracy if it were practicable would be the most perfect government. Experience had proved that no position is more false than this. The ancient democracies in which the people themselves deliberated never possessed one good feature of government. Their very character was tyranny; their figure deformity.”
“A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine.” Attributed to Thomas Jefferson
Democracy always leads to tyranny with the rights of a minority being denied until the rights of all have been denied. Socialism always leads to a society with a failed financial system, a failed social system, a society of despair, a society of devastation, a society where all hope is lost. This is the inevitable end of socialism, no matter how it is modified for political purposes, because socialism by its very nature is destructive to ingenuity, advancement, and achievement because it mandates underachievement, dependence, and mediocrity.
This is a broken record that always has the same ending; some huge spending bill that nobody reads. It is as Pelosi says, “We have to pass the bill to learn what is in it.” And like Obamacare, we learn that everything in the bill is more spending, more government control, and less freedom.
The lack of a spending deal with fewer than 20 legislative days remaining until the August recess is prompting some GOP senators to discuss the possibility of cutting short the Senate’s August break. Sen. David Perdue (R-Ga.), who is up for reelection next year, said he will ask Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) to consider trimming the annual recess in order to tackle government spending bills.
The effort to shorten the recess was successful in 2018 after Perdue and other lawmakers sounded the alarm on a pileup of spending measures. This year, the Senate is even further behind schedule on its to-do list. Senators have done little legislating this year and still have on their agenda a border supplemental spending bill, defense authorization, a highway reauthorization and the annual appropriations bills.
“We only have 19 working days between now and the end of July. If we don’t stay here in August at least some of the time, it’s hard for me to believe we’re going to get all of this appropriated by Sept. 30,” Perdue said Tuesday, citing the end of the fiscal year.
“We have got to get defense and HHS done,” he added, referring to the two biggest spending bills funding the Pentagon and the departments of Labor and Health and Human Services.
“If we don’t get it done, I’m still of the mind that we need to be here in August. I don’t know how it would be any other way. It’s just a reality, we’re not doing our jobs and we got to get it done,” Perdue said.
What do they do? The budget is their primary function. We know they do nothing about the border. We know they do nothing about the deficit except pass last minute bills to increase it. We know they have time to pontificate. We know they have time to pass bills naming post offices and giving wonderful citations. But they never have time to preform their most important function. Perhaps this year, and we can only hope it happens, President Trump will veto this last-minute spending bill, a bill that contains lots of surprises, and utilize the sequestration rule. Let us hope so.
We can only hope the eventual nominee has not yet declared. Yes, I am a freedom loving American and I do believe in fair and transparent elections in which only United States citizens vote. This is not what any of the current Marxist/Progressives support. They believe come one come all.
We can only hope the eventual nominee has not yet declared. Yes, I am a freedom loving American and I do believe in a market-based economy and not central planning by the government. This is not what any of the current Marxist/Progressives support. They believe in government-controlled markets.
We can only hope the eventual nominee has not yet declared. Yes, I am a freedom loving American and I do believe in all Americans being encouraged to “pursue their happiness” even when their goals and achievements exceed what the collective would deem detrimental to the under achievers. This is not what any of the current Marxist/Progressives support. They believe the achiever is to be punished and not to receive reward or acclaim but should be demeaned and punished for exceeding the limits set by the collectivist.
We can only hope the eventual nominee has not yet declared. Yes, I am a freedom loving American and I do believe all Americans should have the unimpeded right to freedom of speech and thought. This is not what any of the current Marxist/Progressives support. They believe all Americans must conform to their beliefs and the only speech to be allowed is that speech which conforms to their beliefs.
We can only hope the eventual nominee has not yet declared. Yes, I am a freedom loving American and I do believe all Americans should be treated equally under the law. This is not what any of the current Marxist/Progressives support. They believe that justice is to be applied in an arbitrary manner depending on your political beliefs and does what you did detract from or add to their goal of bringing about a Marxist totalitarian state.
We can only hope the eventual nominee has not yet declared. Yes, I am a freedom loving American and I do believe that a primary role of government is to protect the natural rights given to us by our Creator, including but not limited to the right to life, liberty, and property. This is not what any of the current Marxist/Progressives support. They believe that all rights are under the purview of government and therefore can be limited or eliminated by government as it chooses.
We can only hope the eventual nominee has not yet declared. Yes, I am a freedom loving American and I o believe that a free people can only remain free if the country adheres to the principles of rule of law, limited government, divided government, sovereignty of the people, and individualism. This is not what the current Marxist/Progressives support. They support arbitrary law, big bureaucratic dictatorial government, consolidated government with all power in the judicial branch, sovereignty of government, and collectivism.
We can only hope the eventual nominee has not yet declared. Yes, I am a freedom loving American and I do believe in the principles and wisdom of our founding documents, the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution of the United States, the Bill of Rights, and all the freedoms granted to the people and the protections of those freedoms. This is not what the current Marxist/Progressives support. They believe in the regressive policies that would take us back to the days of demagogues and totalitarian governments that control the lives and the thoughts of the people insisting on total conformity and equality in poverty for all except the ruling elite.
We can only hope the eventual nominee has not yet declared. We can only hope there is at least one Democrat who would be bold enough to identify as a freedom loving American who supports the freedoms and protections upon which our nation was founded and enabled the Untied States to be the standard of freedom and prosperity to which every other nation aspires. If that Democrat did emerge, it is doubtful they would be nominated since the Democrat party has become the Marxist/Progressive Party that believes in collectivism (Marxism, communism, socialism) and despises all our founding documents proclaim.
Even though our national debt has risen by more than 120% over the last decade or so, it now must be considered the #2 threat to the security and sovereignty of the United States. The race to be the #1 threat to the security and sovereignty of the United States is now claimed by the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) political party. The Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party has been the primary force behind raising the national debt of the United States to be substantially greater than the Gross Domestic Product of the United States and place us in the same position as are most third world countries. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have had help in this endeavor from such RHINO’s or members of the Republican establishment like John Boehner, Paul Ryan, Kevin McCarthy, Mitch McConnell and several others.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) claim their #1 spot because of their hatred for our long-established protectors of freedom that are outlined in our national documents; the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution of the United States, and the Bill of Rights. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have told us these protectors of our freedom and sovereignty are now outdated and must be replaced with the regressive policies of demagogues prior to our Revolution and advocates for tyranny such as Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Castro, Chavez and other collectivists since our Revolution.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) like all demagogues and collectivists want the Untied States to regress to the times when government controlled the Natural Rights given by the Creator directly to the people. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) claim that government has the right to deny life to certain classes of human beings such as those who are still in the womb and masquerade this act of murder with the euphemism “choice.” The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have also determined they can determine the extent to which the individual has the right to liberties such as speech, our worship of God, our right to assemble, our right to be fairly treated under the law, and so many others.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have adopted the philosophy of Karl Marx that all borders should be eliminated, and the worker should be free to roam with no limitations. This policy has always resulted in a break down in a society that nullifies any attempts to provide security as well as eliminating national sovereignty. Open borders bring about the result intended by Marx; chaos and lawlessness.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have adopted the practice of all demagogues and collectivists by stating that all property is the property of the collective and it will be the collective or government that determines how much property any individual can use. Thus, we have adopted the steeply progressive income tax that Marx said was absolutely necessary when employing the practice of sharing the wealth. Elizabeth Warren is now advocating for direct confiscation of property accumulated after applying the steeply progressive income tax.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are now claiming that all elections should be based on the same standards of fairness that is used by demagogues and collectivists; the only fair result and the only acceptable result is the result that favors the demagogue and the collectivist. This is the reason the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are still contesting the presidential election of 2016 and the Georgia governor election of 2018. To correct the result of what they consider to be an unfair result of the presidential election of 2016, the Marxist/Progressives are ignoring the safeguards of freedom in the Constitution and conducting a coup to overthrow a duly elected president. This should be no surprise to anybody since the Marxist/Progressives have stated and demonstrated they have no respect for or regard for the Constitution of the United States or any of its principles that exist for the sole purpose of providing security to our freedoms and protecting the sovereignty of the United States, both of which the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) oppose.
If you believe in the principles of the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution of the United States, and the Bill of Rights, but call yourself a Democrat and vote that way, you are playing a hoax on yourself. Either you really do not understand the requirements for freedom, liberty, and independence, you really do not believe that freedom, liberty, and independence are the proper way for society, or you want to state your public belief for some purpose while you knowingly do everything to oppose it, such as do demagogues and collectivists. The people you support, the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) openly state by their words and their actions every day that they detest every principle of freedom, liberty, and independence our forward viewing founders instituted. You would be a part of what is now the #1 threat to the security and sovereignty of the Untied States of America, the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats).
Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.