If you are a conservative that is registered as a Republican, you will remember as do I, that we had to hold our noses and turn our heads when we cast a vote, not for McCain or Romney, but against Comrade Obama. Those of us who took the time to review who this person was, this person who could read better than most from a teleprompter, was a collectivist at the far left end. Yes, we knew he was a strong adherent to the ideology his grandfather and Frank Marshall Davis instilled in him in his formative years; the ideology of Marxism or Communism.
Both McCain and Romney reverted to calling themselves conservatives in their quest for the nomination, even though nothing in their record indicated they had any idea what a conservative believed; limited government, low taxation, individualism, and adherence to the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution of the United States, and the Bill of Rights. The Republican establishment, those like John Boehner, Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, and Kevin McCarthy told us that these two imposters should be the nominee because they were the most electable, even though they had no strong belief system about anything but more government and more taxes. What happened was Comrade Obama was elected and became the second most notorious president, second only to FDR, for the destruction and obliteration of the Constitution of the United States and the principles of freedom and independence.
Now the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are being told the same thing. The base of the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party has become a collectivist (Marxist, communist, socialist, progressive, - all virtually the same) party that advocates against the freedom of the individual and for the tyranny by the collective. Joe Biden is the same as McCain and Romney in that the three have never held strong principles except the principle of what would advance their own political career.
These self-promoting positions seem to have appeal. They can say anything they want; they can call themselves anything they want, and they can tell any crowd that they should support them because they hold the same beliefs. Apparently, Jill Biden has a very strong desire to live in the White House as she took a line from John Boehner, Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, and Kevin McCarthy and has stated that principles and beliefs should have no place in politics, only electability counts.
Jill Biden, "I know that not all of you are not committed to my husband, and I respect that," Biden said at a campaign event in Nashua, New Hampshire, to a group of teachers. "But I want you to think about your candidate, his or her electability, and who's going to win this race."
She continued, "So I think if your goal -- I know my goal -- is to beat Donald Trump, we have to have someone who can beat him," the former second lady said.
Biden expanded on her remarks in encouraging voters to look beyond singular issues that draw them to other candidates, surmising that the Democratic Party's collective bottom line "has to be that we have to beat Trump."
"Your candidate might be better on, I don't know, health care, than Joe is, but you've got to look at who's going to win this election," she said. "And maybe you have to swallow a little bit and say, 'OK, I personally like so and so better,' but your bottom line has to be that we have to beat Trump."
Change the names, and we conservatives who are strong advocates of individualism, have had that song sung to us many times. We did not listen to it in 1980 and a conservative was elected. But we bought into it again in 1992, when we learned Daddy Bush really did not have a conservative bone in his body, and every election until 2016. Welcome to the club Marxist/Progressives (Democrats). Will you drink the Kool Aid and nominate a senile has been who never was a been?
That our public schools have become cesspools of collectivist (Marxist, communist, socialist, progressive, Democrat – all virtually the same) indoctrination is no secret. This collectivist indoctrination has been led by Teacher Unions. Remember, the union is to Marxism what a strong family unit is to freedom and independence. Marxism believes the state must indoctrinate the children so they will conform to the Marxist ideology. In a free and independent state, it is critical that parents teach the children their principles, so diversity and free thought prevail. Conformity is critical in a Marxist totalitarian state while diversity is critical for the perpetuation of freedom and independence.
That Teacher Unions support collectivism (Marxism, communism, socialism, progressive, Democrat – all virtually the same) and advocate for all children to be indoctrinated in this evil ideology is no secret. We have numerous examples that support this as fact and not conjecture.
Here is another of those examples. A "delegation" from the Chicago Teachers Union has gained attention after taking a trip to Venezuela and promoting socialist policies and dictator Nicolas Maduro. A CTU organizer and three members took a tour of the economically crippled country, calling themselves a delegation of the union. The trip followed a formal CTU resolution condemning the United States for interfering with Venezuela's disputed regime and calling for America to lift its sanctions against the country.
While on the trip, the group blogged about their experiences on the site Radical Educator Collective, praising the country's "free social programs" which "began under Hugo Chavez, and continue to operate under Nicolas Maduro."
Sarah Chambers, one of the travelers wrote, "While staying in #Venezuela, we didn't see a single homeless person. USA is the richest country in the world; yet, there are homeless people everywhere. Over 17k CPS students are homeless...This is why @CTULocal1 is fighting for fair housing #CTUAgainstVezIntervention."
And in California, the State School Board, supported by the Teacher Unions, is demanding that a part of the curriculum in the public schools is to teach the evils of capitalism and the humanity of socialism.
If you live in California, Illinois, or any state with strong and controlling Teacher Unions, and you want your children to be educated and not indoctrinated, remove them from the public school system immediately.
This was reported by Robert Spencer on August 17.
Sharia UK: Police hunting for man who made a rude joke to a Muslim
Note TellMAMA’s headline: they claim that this man made a “racist slur” against a Muslim. What race is Islam again? In reality, there are Muslims, and Islamic jihadis, of all races. But TellMAMA wants to intimidate Britons into believing that anyone who makes a rude quip to a Muslim is a racist, and thus deserving to have the book thrown at him.
Tell MAMA (Measuring Anti-Muslim Attacks) is a national project which records and measures anti-Muslim incidents in the United Kingdom.
But that’s all this was: a quip. Say anything you want: the guy was rude, or his joke was tasteless, or whatever. But an arrestable offense? That’s insane. The Muslim could have laughed it off, or come back with his own counter-quip. Instead, he contacted Tell MAMA, who contacted the police, who, instead of telling them to grow up and stop the endless victimhood posturing, is actually investigating. The cumulative effect of all the many incidents like this one in Britain will be a cowed and submissive populace that doesn’t dare utter the slightest negative word about Muslims or Islam, for fear of prosecution. And that, not coincidentally, is the status Muslims enjoy in Islamic law, which forbids all criticism of Muslims or Islam on pain of death.
A Muslim man was abused by a middle-aged man, who said: “You haven’t come to bomb the place have you?” and then laughed, as they queued to purchase tickets for the Carabao Cup clash between Salford City and Leeds United.
If I was in the UK and made the factual statement that the Prophet Muhammad would have been a close friend of Jeffrey Epstein since both were notorious pedophiles and rapists, would I also be hunted by the police. What about here in the United States? Even though the statement is an accurate statement and verifiable by historical records, does Sharia, in the UK and the US prohibit the protected right of free speech.
Free speech includes speech that some might regard as offensive. If speech is limited based on any definition including such arbitrary definitions as offensive or hate, then speech is no longer free and the very essence of our Constitution and First Amendment would be violated. The slope is slippery and the UK for sure is sliding. The US is not far behind. The speech you advocate should be limited will be lead to your speech being limited next.
What can we discuss the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) continue to cry??????
Now that their absolute guarantee that Trump colluded with Russia to defeat their inept candidate who determined she could not be beaten so did not campaign, has proven to be totally false; they are looking elsewhere. Even with the Mueller investigation that was aligned to prove the false allegation with its investigators being Clinton cronies, but could find no evidence; even with the FBI anti-American and anti-fairness top echelon, who now face serious situations for their deceit and manipulation in their investigation using the Steele novel as though it was factual; and with all aspects of the deep state which is not so deep as it was lead by people such as Lynch, Clapper, Comey, and Brennan could not bring about the downfall of a duly elected president, the Marxist/Progressives are becoming even more desperate.
However, do not sell them short. Never forget that truth, facts, and honor have no place in your opposition when it is your goal to fundamentally transform the United States to a Marxist totalitarian state. When this anti-American, anti-natural rights, pro-government enslavement group believes that the ends always justify the means, there is no limit to what they will do. Remember they are currently trying to overthrow the results of an American election.
What these collectivists (Marxists, communist, socialist, progressive, Democrat – all virtually the same) have come to learn is that even by placing the modifier Democratic in front of Socialism, it has not convinced the American who gets up every morning and goes to work that word tricks alter the evil that is socialism.
What these collectivists have learned is that the American people were led to believe that Obamacare would be good for them but then saw it fail. The American people quickly learned that Obama was a typical Marxist and would say anything, yes lie, to bring about his desired fundamental transformation. When Comrade Obama said “you can keep your plan if you like it;” “you can keep your doctor if you like them;” was nothing more than a ploy to nationalize health coverage and health care. The American people said perhaps this is not a good idea as their premiums, deductibles, and co-pays skyrocketed and access to care was greatly reduced. Consequently, these false promises, no lies, that universal health care is good, are falling on deaf ears.
What these collectivists have learned is that their call for open borders and freebies for all illegal aliens, just so the collectivist party can gain power and eventually bring about the fundamental transformation that will enslave all people to the collectivist government, is not selling anyplace except in the core areas of the collectivist movement. Even in these core areas the people are seeing the horror of socialism as their streets are littered with homeless people who in turn litter the streets with garbage. The reality of socialism is no longer just in Venezuela and Cuba, but it is in major cities in the United States in places like Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Seattle. The open border argument is proving to be a loser as well.
Now these collectivists have decided they will tout the argument of racism. The bad news for the collectivist is that this argument is also proving to be a loser as the people in those very groups that are supposed to be victims of this false claim of racism are now getting up each morning and going to work and receiving a paycheck, so they no longer have to be regarded as slaves to a collectivist party or government. These so-called victims are learning that they are valuable producers in a free marketplace and that yes, despite what the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have been telling them, they can compete and are valuable. These groups who are refusing to any longer accept their rightful place, according to the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) as victims, are more and more feeling pride in themselves and thus they are rejecting the enslaving mentality that has held them in poverty and dependency for years.
There seems to be no place for the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) to turn. Their collectivist (Marxist, communist, socialist, progressive, Democrat – all virtually the same) arguments are all losers. Never forget, that when a collectivist is backed into a corner is when they are the most dangerous. People with no honor or no sense of fairness, will use any tactic to gain their goal of total power over the lives and thought of others. Remember Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Castro, Cuba, FDR, and Obama. They are shameless opportunists who firmly believe that the “ends always justify the means.” We will see this same shamelessness used again by those who adhere to the ends proclaimed by the above; the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party.
That Obama and Holder are collectivists (Marxist, communist, socialist, progressive, Democrat – all virtually the same) is beyond question. They are. Comrade Obama was schooled by documented communist, Frank Marshall Davis and his communist grandfather. He went on to become the prized student of the Saul Alinsky School for Community Organizers and continued to practice the disruption taught in the school during his political career. Holder was his Tonto, his Sundance, or in today’s world his Bonnie.
Disruption of a civil society is a critical element of the collectivist movement in their strategy of destroying a society so they can rebuild their totalitarian Marxist state under the control of the Dictatorship of the Proletariat. In a free society, the kind of society Comrade Obama told us he would fundamentally transform, it is critical that the population respect the authority of law enforcement. If it is your goal to destroy the society, you will, as Comrades Obama and Holder did, encourage disrespect that will become an outright revolt against law enforcement.
We are now witnessing this revolt against law enforcement by an organization sanctioned by Comrades Obama and Holder, Black Lives Matter, and an organization supported by and encouraged by the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party; ANTIFA. However, the revolt has spread into the inner-city communities as they are being told all law enforcement is racist and thus is their enemy. This is a tactic Comrade Obama learned from the Alinsky school and one he has put to work many times.
We have witnessed the results of this legacy of Comrades Obama and Holder on an ever increasing and unabashedly manner within the last couple of weeks when hoodlums and thugs poured water on law enforcement officers in New York. These hoodlums and thugs became even more obtuse in their behavior when they obstructed police in Philadelphia who were confronting a long-time criminal who was attacking them with deadly force.
A reporter at the scene of an attack on police officers said that bystanders were mocking and taunting police even as bullets rained down upon them. A video shows a crowd of residents shoving and confronting the police even as they were dealing with a tense hostage situation. It was circulated online among many supporters of law enforcement who expressed outrage at their treatment. Even as six police officers were being treated for injuries by a man barricaded inside a home, the neighborhood residents expressed hostility and antagonism against the police.
"I mentioned this at 10 and since I was harassed during that live shot, I'll mention it here too," Hoff tweeted. "A major moment of disappointment this evening was watching a crowd of people taunt police officers, laughing and yelling at them in the midst of the gunfire," she added.
One officer was shot in the head, while another was shot in the hand. All injured officers have been released from the hospital. There were reports that the suspect was broadcasting part of the attack on Facebook. Two police officers were trapped inside the home as he fired on the officers outside, and they were saved by the SWAT team along with two other hostages.
Any who would support the actions of these misguided people are as responsible as are they for perpetuating the legacy of Comrades Obama and Holder in an outright revolt on law enforcement to bring about the breakdown of our society. Elizabeth Warren also has blood on her hands as she openly denies the facts of the Michael Brown saga when this young thug, and yes the facts show he was a thug, was killed in self defense by a police officer as thug Brown was attacking him.
A free society that values and demands liberty can only exist where the citizens voluntarily respect the life, liberty, and property of their fellow citizens and at the same time show support and respect for law enforcement. Any who advocate for the policies put forth by Comrades Obama and Holder; that of total disrespect and outright revolt against law enforcement, are as guilty as are they for the breakdown in our civil society.
The facts, and yes Joe Biden this is also the truth, are that when a free society disrespects and revolts against their law enforcement, the result is a national police force that becomes a police force under the control of a totalitarian despot as we saw happen in Russia, later to be the Soviet Union, members of the Soviet Bloc, Mao’s China, Castro’s Cuba, and Venezuela. This is the desired ends to the means begun by Comrades Obama and Holder. If you support or participate in any way with this disrespect and revolt, you are a part of the destruction of our free civil society.
In fact, the #1 enemy of liberty could be you. Anyone who supports and or votes for a Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) is a sworn enemy of liberty. Liberty is the state of being free within society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one's way of life, behavior, or political views.
Liberty, along with life, and property or the pursuit of happiness are the stated freedoms given by the Creator and not government. This is the basic principle upon which the Untied States was founded and was the reason the Revolutionary War was declared and fought. The British government was dictating to the colonists what their liberties would be and had assumed the role of the grantor and thus the controller of these freedoms. The American colonists declared the British government an enemy of the people or an enemy of liberty.
The Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party of today has assumed the role of the British government of the latter half of the 18th century. They, like the British government, have asserted themselves to be the grantor and thus controller of our Natural Rights of life, liberty, and property or pursuit of happiness. The Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party has also declared our founding documents to be living documents so the principles within our founding documents can be rendered to be null and void. The Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party must do this because the principles of life, liberty, and property or pursuit of happiness as granted by the Creator are in opposition to the goals of the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party of fundamentally transforming the United States into a collectivist (Marxist, communist, socialist, progressive, Democrat – all virtually the same) nation.
A collectivist nation as desired by the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) can only exist when all people conform to the same ideology. A nation that adheres to the principles of our founding documents can only exist when non-conformity, or a population with widely different viewpoints, exists. Liberty is at the heart of a free and independent people while it is the enemy of the collectivist.
Liberty includes having the freedom to think and voice different ideas, including what the collectivist would deem to be a radical view. The collectivist has been taught to combat these differing ideas by first ridiculing, then demonizing, then ostracizing, and then eliminating any who would disagree with their dictates. In the United States today, the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have placed us in the ostracizing to eliminating stage. Any who do not agree with them are racists, homophobes, Islamaphoebes, and all the other terms used to demonize. They have also presented the ideas of punishing those who, according to them, use hate speech. This is entering the elimination stage.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have turned our public schools into centers of indoctrination. Again, indoctrination is teaching what to think and not how to think. Throughout our country, but with California taking the lead, our students are not asked to research and develop ideas on situations such as capitalism vs socialism, the teachings of the Bible vs socialism, the Jewish people being the oppressed or being the oppressor, what is choice and what is murder, and we could continue. What is the solution is defined by the curriculum and the student is told to believe it and prove it or they will fail the class.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have told us that anybody who has exercised their liberty to excel and become financially successful is selfish and greedy and has done so at the expense of others, just as Karl Marx stated. This is an incorrect position in that in a capitalist society wealth and success are infinite with all having the freedom to achieve. It is in a socialist society where one gains at the expense of another because the very essence of socialism is that wealth is finite.
If you support the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party, you are an enemy of liberty and thus an enemy of the United States; the United States that was founded on the principle of liberty for all. If a member of your family, a neighbor of yours, a friend of yours, or an acquaintance of yours supports the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party, they are an enemy of the United States; the United States that was founded on the principle of liberty for all.
When you listen to the current group of imposters, those Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) who are aspiring to be the President of the United States, they are exposing their plans to destroy the United States; the United States that was founded on the principle of liberty for all.
The real enemy of liberty is entrenched within our national borders, our states, our counties, our communities, our neighborhoods, and yes perhaps even our homes. Understand this enemy. An enemy cannot be defeated by appeasement or by ignoring. An enemy, such as this, can only be defeated by understanding the core of its evil, and then by setting brushfires of liberty in the minds and hearts of that enemy and their useful idiots.
It seems like the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are trying to see who can be even more stupid and outlandish than Mica and Joe, Don Lemon, Chris Cuomo, Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, Jerry Nadler, Bill De Blasio, and of course Joe Biden and on and on. The competition is fierce as these people exhibit their outlandish divineness while denouncing all they are promoting with their ridiculousness.
But believe it or not, we have now even more contestants for the top award of divisive and stupid remarks.
On a recent broadcast of CNN’s (or course) “Situation Room,” Denny Heck, a Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) from Washington reacted to the Trump administration’s new immigration rule by stating that “the president hates all immigrants, except his mother- and father-in-law and his wife, evidently.”
Heck said, “Look, the president hates all immigrants, except his mother- and father-in-law and his wife, evidently. He hates them whether they’re here without documents, they’re here with a green card, they’re here seeking asylum. He hates them all.”
Then on MSNBC’s “MTP Daily,” network political analyst Zerlina Maxwell declared those who support President Donald Trump “caging brown babies” were “supporting racist policies.”
When asked if there is a distinction between Trump’s “clearly racist language” and his supporters, Maxwell said, “Well, they need to speak truth to power, and I do not see a distinction. If you are supporting a president that is caging brown babies and you are okay with that, then I’m sorry, that is supporting racist policies, and that is not distinct from supporting a racist president. I think that often we try to get into this semantic game because people take the label of racist so personally as if I’m saying that you’re a terrible human and that you’re evil.”
What this “brilliant” scholar forgets to say is that Obama started the policy, so logically, (I understand that is a word that cannot be used with statements made by Marxist/Progressives (Democrats)), Obama and all his supporters are racist. That means perhaps over 90% of Americans are racist.
As ridiculous, illogical, and stupid as these statements are, they do not win the top weekly award for stupid. That would again go to Joe, the tongue, Biden when he explained that facts should never get in the way of truth. As stupid as this is, that is the reality of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats).
Saul Alinsky is alive and well and on the debate stage. We have still not seen the real candidate “stand-up” yet, but have just witnessed imposters. The imposter who seems to have garnered the most votes from the American hating crowd that adheres to the collectivist (Marxist, communist, socialist, progressive, Democrat – all virtually the same) crowd, Joe the tongue Biden, has never been a clear thinker but has now gone senile. The other imposters continue to quote Marx and Alinsky, advocating their ideals, but with constant contradictions trying to gain support such as Kamala Harris who is not sure what day of the week it is, or Elizabeth Warren who still claims to be Indian despite the facts, but they never let facts get in the way of "truth," or Corey Booker who aspires to be the gladiator who becomes emperor. Imposters all.
So, let us look at the real candidate, Saul Alinsky, and his clear position. The difference between the real candidate and the imposters is that the real candidate is consistent in his ends of achieving a communist state and that to arrive at the ideal of total government control the ends always justify the means. He does not equivocate with double talk like we hear on the debate stage from the imposters.
Saul Alinsky says:
The Prince was written by Machiavelli for the Haves on how to hold power. Rules for Radicals is written for the Have-Nots on how to take it away. In this book we are concerned with how to create mass organizations to seize power and give it to the people; to realize the democratic dream of equality, justice, peace, cooperation, equal and full opportunities for education, full and useful employment, health, and the creation of those circumstances in which man can have the chance to live by values that give meaning to life.
Control healthcare and you control the people
A Marxist begins with his prime truth that all evils are caused by the exploitation of the proletariat by the capitalists. From this he logically proceeds to the revolution to end capitalism, then into the third stage of reorganization into a new social order of the dictatorship of the proletariat, and finally the last stage -- the political paradise of communism.
If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.
The first step in community organization is community disorganization. The disruption of the present organization is the first step toward community organization. Present arrangements must be disorganized if they are to be displace by new patterns.... All change means disorganization of the old and organization of the new.
The most effective means are whatever will achieve the desired results.
AND THE MAXIM BY WHICH THE MARXIST/PROGRESSIVE (DEMOCRAT) OPERATES IS PER SAUL ALINSKY:
An organizer working in and for an open society is in an ideological dilemma to begin with, he does not have a fixed truth - truth to him is relative and changing; everything to him is relative and changing.... To the extent that he is free from the shackles of dogma, he can respond to the realities of the widely different situations.
AOC, sometimes it might be healthiest for you if you took the same stance that Sargent Schultz took, “I know nothing.”
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez demanded answers Saturday after disgraced billionaire Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in a Manhattan jail cell from suspected suicide. This was obviously a knee jerk reaction by a young girl who has not paid any attention to recent history.
Jim and Susan McDougal learned that silence is always the best road to choose when people ask you questions about any dealings with the Clinton’s. Jim of course learned that doctors and doctors’ assistants do not respond to certain medical conditions in prison, especially if you were in prison because of illegal activities in connection with the Clintons. People were curious why nobody would go to the aid of Jim. They learned, I guess, that curiosity killed the cat.
AOC seems to have never known who Vince Foster was. Questions were never answered in this investigation like did Vince Foster shoot himself in the White House and then drive himself to the park and walk into the park. People who wanted answers to the killing of Vince Foster somehow quickly decided whatever story was told was fine with them. They learned, I guess, that curiosity killed the cat.
Seth Rich, you must remember him AOC, was murdered by a robber late one night in Washington DC, but the robber seemed not to be interested in the watch or the wallet Seth Rich had. Nobody seems to know what the robber took, but what is known is that Seth Rich is dead, and nobody still knows how WikiLeaks attained all those emails. Many people wanted to learn why the robber did not rob Seth Rich, but the Washington DC police quickly said the investigation was over. Even the parents of Seth Rich said to let their son lie in peace. They learned, I guess, that curiosity killed the cat.
Even though Hillary broke the law by using a private email, her own server, and transmitted highly secretive government information that was classified, even though Hillary was not sure what the “C” meant, and destroyed evidence, both before and after a subpoena, people quickly said Hillary did not intend to do these things so the investigation should end. Those who said perhaps we should learn more did learn that curiosity killed the cat.
You must understand, AOC, that there are certain questions you ask and certain questions you do not ask. For instance, never ask for protection in Benghazi when illegal weapons are being trafficked through the consulate. Chris Stevens did. Never ask or have information about who really conspired with foreign countries to produce false information in an effort to win an election. Seth Rich did.
You must understand AOC, that curiosity has killed, and it has not always been the cat that was killed.
,Saul Alinsky is alive and well and controlling the progressive movement as they fall in lock step with his dictates.
How to create a social state by Saul Alinsky:
There are 8 levels of control that must be obtained before you are able to create a social state.
The first is the most important.
1) Healthcare — Control healthcare and you control the people
2) Poverty — Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.
3) Debt — Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.
4) Gun Control — Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.
5) Welfare — Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income).
6) Education — Take control of what people read and listen to — take control of what children learn in school.
7) Religion — Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools.
8) Class Warfare — Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.
And the useful idiots fall right in line. Are you a Marxist helping to create the social state or you an useful idiot enabling the the creation of the social state. Regardless, the social state always ends in financial and social collapse.
Are you against the creation of the social state openly proclaimed by the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats)? If so, you must understand what the social state is and then join the few of us who are defining its evil and openly opposing this evil by setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men just as Sam Adams did.
Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.