Jesus told us what would happen to those who follow him. John 15:19 nkjv “If you were of the world, the world would love its own. Yet because you are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world, therefore the world hates you.”
The hatred of those who Jesus said were of the world toward us that love Jesus because he died on the cross for us and then overcame death so we could live eternally with him, certainly hate Jesus, and yes they hate us. The world does not want its glorification of sin exposed. They want us to believe that the reasons God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah are not only acceptable but are to be celebrated. God told us exactly the opposite. God is the Creator and God is Sovereign. Nevertheless, the world would like to think that evil can and will overcome the righteousness of God. The world also believes that by promoting what God has called an abomination will enable them to destroy the family structure.
A member of Finland's parliament is facing a second prosecution for "hate speech" after she posted Bible verses on social media. The word of God, the Bible, is being called “hate speech” by those Jesus called the “world.”
The verses quoted Romans 1: 24-27 nkjv:
24 Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves, 25 who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.
26 For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their [a]women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. 27 Likewise also the [b]men, leaving the natural use of the [c]woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due.
This is not only considered “hate speech” in Finland, but it is now considered “hate speech” throughout the world including the United States. God has called all that the left and the LGB alphabet promote and insist must be protected as an abomination forever. God has never changed on this, but then God is the same yesterday, today, and forever.
In my latest book, “Fundamental Transformation What did Obama Mean?” I show that it is critical for those wishing to bring about communist tyranny that atheism becomes universal, and the family be destroyed. Jesus told us that the world, which includes the collectivist (communist, Marxist, socialist, progressive, Democrat) movement hates those who follow Christ.
Jesus explained In John 18: 15-25 nkjv why this is so:
18 “If the world hates you, you know that it hated Me before it hated you. 19 If you were of the world, the world would love its own. Yet because you are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world, therefore the world hates you. 20 Remember the word that I said to you, ‘A servant is not greater than his master.’ If they persecuted Me, they will also persecute you. If they kept My word, they will keep yours also. 21 But all these things they will do to you for My name’s sake, because they do not know Him who sent Me. 22 If I had not come and spoken to them, they would have no sin, but now they have no excuse for their sin. 23 He who hates Me hates My Father also. 24 If I had not done among them the works which no one else did, they would have no sin; but now they have seen and also hated both Me and My Father. 25 But this happened that the word might be fulfilled which is written in their law, ‘They hated Me without a cause.’"
This hatred, Jesus explains, is because sin has been exposed. Yes, this was Finland, but the hatred of the Bible is throughout all of the Communist world and is now alive and well in the United States.
Every day the question of who the Democrat nominee will be looms larger and larger. Every day it becomes more and more clear the Democrat nominee will not be Big Guy, Robin Ware, JRB Ware, Robert L. Peters aka Joe Biden. Polls are showing that this person of many names is losing more and more support in his own party. Polls are also showing that he would lose badly to Donald Trump. The left fears Trump because Trump is committed to exposing the deep state. That is bad news for the oligarchs, for the bureaucrats, for the Democrats and RINOS.
The reasons given for people changing their minds about him by many names are not because he has raised the bar for government criminal activity, but because of his age, which is a problem for him, but it is the least of his problems. Biden is certainly older, but there are many older people who are competent. Warren Buffet would seem to fall into that category.
The chief criminal has many other reasons he should be opposed. These other reasons cannot be cited and will not be cited by the captivated press. The number one reason Biden should be opposed is because of his policies. His policies are destructive to our constitutional republic and support the transformation to a communist dictatorship. The number one area of concern should be his support for unfair, non-transparent, fraudulent, and stolen elections. No republic can reman free with Belarus, Russian, and Venezuela type elections.
His open border polices, his destroy the family, his support for damaging wokeness, his support for the murder of the unborn, his spend and borrow, his produce inflation, his anti-American business, and his energy polices are only some of his destructive polices and reasons he should be opposed. The press and the left support these same policies despite their proven failures.
His criminal activities are also a reason he should not only be opposed but should be placed in prison. We know he is the most corrupt vice president and the most disgusting vice president ever, and that list includes Aaron Burr. The proof of his criminal activities is as overwhelming as is the evidence that he did not win the election in 2020.
Age is simply a means by which those on the corrupt left can achieve their ends. Even the most ardent transformation supporter sees the dangers to the transformation movement if this demented narcissist is nominated. They must believe, perhaps rightly so, that if they dump Biden, his failed policies, which are their policies, will not be an issue in the election. They must understand that his and their hate America movement will be mitigated if he is not the nominee. To oppose this failed and frail person based on age is the best way to rid themselves of this failure.
The complete text of Article I, Section 8 creating the 17 enumerated powers of Congress reads as follows:
Article I - The Legislative Branch
Clause 1: The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts, and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
Clause 2: To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;
Clause 3: To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;
Clause 4: To establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;
Clause 5: To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;
Clause 6: To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;
Clause 7: To establish Post Offices and post Roads;
Clause 8: To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;
Clause 9: To constitute Tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court;
Clause 10: To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;
Clause 11: To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;
Clause 12: To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;
Clause 13: To provide and maintain a Navy;
Clause 14: To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;
Clause 15: To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;
Clause 16: To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
Clause 17: To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;
Only congress can make laws. Congress can only make laws permitted by these 17 powers. I see no place where congress can dictate people receive a shot, or wear a mask, or be limited to 2 beers each week. If Congress cannot do it, clearly the executive branch can not do it. If you adhere to such unconstitutional demands, you are rejecting our republic and consenting to dictatorship.
If you have followed history, and remember history does repeat, you have learned that conservative movements always operate at a distinct short-term disadvantage. The disadvantage comes about because conservatives believe in following truth and following rules. When conservatives make a commitment, they believe they have an obligation to honor that commitment. Liberals, or the left live by and only honor their age-old axiom of the “ends always justify the means”.
The conflicts between conservatives or individualists, and liberals or collectivists have been a part of history. The liberals promote government control over the individual while the conservatives promote individual liberty and freedom. The collectivist has taken this position best expressed by Marx, “In bourgeois society capital is independent and has individuality, while the living person is dependent and has no individuality. And the abolition of this state of things is called by the bourgeois, abolition of individuality and freedom! And rightly so. The abolition of bourgeois individuality, bourgeois independence, and bourgeois freedom is undoubtedly aimed at.”
The collectivist, the communist, the Democrat have as their ends to destroy individuality and will do anything to accomplish this end. They will lie, they will cheat, they will destroy, they will make commitments with the intent of not honoring those commitments.
The conservatives believe we must live by laws we make, that there is right and wrong, and that the word given by an individual has meaning. The liberal, the Democrats believe exactly the opposite. They believe cheating is commendable if it gets you closer to the end of destroying individuality.
Conservatives are at a disadvantage because honor and right are meaningful. Should we change? That is a moot point. We will not, cannot, because that is who we are.
The fallacy many would have us believe is that we become wiser and thus we should not waste time learning from those of the past. Marx said, “But Communism abolishes eternal truths, it abolishes all religion, and all morality, instead of constituting them on a new basis; it therefore acts in contradiction to all past historical experience.”
This is what communists throughout the ages have attempted to accomplish. This is what the Democrats in the United States are trying to accomplish. They would have us believe that mankind becomes wiser and wiser and therefore will be corrupted from prior wisdom. The fallacy of this belief is that as we attempt to remove eternal truths, remove not religion but God, and believe that morality is outdated, we fall under the dictates of evil and we become enslaved to tyranny and despotism. This is exactly what the Democrats and RINOS are advocating for the United States.
We can and must learn from the wisdom of those who came before us. Eternal truths cannot be changed. If something is eternal, how can it be ended? If something is truth, how can it become false? The vary basis of communism, the very basis of what the Democrats want for the United States is based on a false premise. It cannot survive, it cannot last, and much evil will be done in the attempt to recreate society on the communist ideology. We have seen the evil communism brings. Let us take note.
Marcus Cicero (106-43 B.C.) was a Greek philosopher who was considered the greatest orator of the late Roman Republic. He spoke many eternal truths that the American Communists would like us to ignore, because they do not coincide with their ideology.
Cicero said, “The budget should be balanced, the treasury refilled, public debt reduced, the arrogance of officialdom tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands curtailed, lest Rome become bankrupt.”
Cicero said, “As laws multiply, injustice increases.”
Cicero said, “When a government becomes powerful it is destructive, extravagant and violent; it is an usurer which takes bread from innocent mouths and deprives honorable men of their substance, for votes with which to perpetuate itself.”
Cicero said, “Within the character of the citizen, lies the welfare of the nation.”
And this is where we are today. The character of the left in our nation would have us believe we are to reward the slothful and punish the industrious, we should debate when the murder of the unborn should be acceptable even though the individual is created at conception, we should teach that biological sex is a choice, we should force all to honor what God calls an abomination, we should ignore the criminal because they profess our political philosophy, we should encourage those who we believe will support us politically that they are victims and stealing is their right, we should believe that intellectual abilities are determined by skin color and discriminate based on skin color for political purposes.
The Democrats live under the same axiom as do all communists and that is that the ends justify their means. Their ends are to have total power over the lives, the choices, and the thoughts of all. Any means to accomplish this end are not only acceptable and tolerable but are encouraged. History has proven that what the Democrats are proposing and desiring has always ended in poverty, crime, and misery for the masses while the elite live in luxury despite them living immorally and in decadence.
We should never attempt to abolish eternal truths. Many have done so. The result is always the same. Decay and disaster. We who understand this must ever remain diligent and strong and continuously be about “Setting Brushfires of Freedom”.
These multi-candidate television fiascos have lost any value they might have had. I tried to watch the “debate”, but found it very difficult. I have read reviews on so-called winners and losers, and would you believe those who had favored one candidate prior to the debate thought they won. Those who opposed a candidate prior to the debate thought they lost.
Those who explained their reasons thought the winner had great zingers, and the losers were zinged. A person’s ability to zing has nothing to do with whether that person would be a good or bad president.
So, the conclusion can only be that those who watched the debate were losers because they wasted two hours of time. I was one of these losers. Those who put on the debate were losers for a lot of reasons. Two of those reasons would be they had absolutely no control and their questions were leading questions. MacCallum and Baird proved they are far more comfortable with Ryan’s Fox News than they were with Ailes Fox News.
When we vote for a person for president because they can shout louder than another person like a Christie, or because they are more pompous than are others like Pence, our political system is keeping pace with our crime prevention levels in Democrat run cities or the scores of school children in Democrat run cities.
These multi-candidate debates have outlived any usefulness they might have had. So, you say, and you should, Don what would be a better format. The one on one with Tucker and Trump was excellent. Each candidate should do a one on one with Tucker. Tucker is fair and direct and does not ask leading questions.
Another format would be a town hall meeting with one candidate present at a time. No moderator would be present. People would ask the candidate a question and the candidate would give an answer. Yes, I know, there would be people that would ask very difficult questions. That would be good.
The overwhelming conclusion is that the multi-candidate debate has outlived any usefulness it ever had, if it ever had any. The new formats would remove the rehearsed lines, the zingers, and the shouting. It would be a format where candidates would be able to express their beliefs and agendas. Isn’t that what we really want?
A political cult has been defined as a cult with a primary interest in political action and ideology. Cults do have common characteristics. We find these characteristics consistent with the Democrat party.
A cult demands authoritarian control. Members are discouraged, even prevented from deviating in any way from the demanded ideology of the cult. People in the cult must feel incapable of living an individual life outside the norms of the group. Marx, like the Democrats, said there must be a classless society where all conform to one ideology. Those who do not conform must be ostracized, demonized, and eliminated. This is called community or “the greater good”.
A cult, like the Democrat party, hold extremist beliefs. Cult members hold very dogmatic and extreme beliefs. They also are unable to question these belief systems without fear of reprisal or punishment from the group members. If you do not belief that killing the unborn is a choice or health care and not what it really is, murder of a baby, you can not be a part of the Democrat party. If you do not agree with grooming small children for perverted adults, you can not be a part of the Deomcrat party. If you do not agree that a biological male is incapable of becoming a biological female, you cannot be a part of the Democrat party. If you do not agree that tyranny must replace freedom of any kind including thought, you cannot be a part of the Democrat party. Of course, we could go on and on, but you get the idea.
A cult, like the Democrat party, demands you cannot explore other thought. All Democrats must only watch and read those who are advocates for the cult or Democrat ideology. This helps fulfill the mind control aspirations of the Democrat hierarchy.
The Democrat party, like the isms, communism, Marxism, socialism, progressivism, is built on all the same principles upon which cults are built.
An American can emote nothing but shame, embarrassment, and disgust for the person who now lives in the White House. If you are one of the 50M legal voters who voted for Biden and have no shame and remorse, you are to be pitied.
Demented is defined as unable to think or act clearly.
A Narcissist is defined as an extremely self-centered person who has an exaggerated sense of self-importance. Narcissists are manipulative and learn to cover up their nature, though over time, they will reveal their true self-contentedness.
Imagine a person of authority who is going to a recently devastated area, an area where a fire has destroyed a community burning virtually everything and causing the death of many. The narcissist must talk about themselves, for instance they would say something like,, “I don’t want to compare difficulties, but we have a little sense, Jill, and I, what it’s like to lose a home. To make a long story short, I almost lost my wife, my ‘67 Corvette, and my cat. But all kidding aside, I watched the firefighters, the way they responded…And they ran into flames to save my wife and save my family. Not a joke”.
The description of the fire: the fire was “small” and “contained to the kitchen.” It was under control in 20 minutes.
But the demented narcissist compared this small kitchen fire, that he claimed almost killed his cat and destroyed his corvette to a fire that killed members of families and destroyed everything. We can only add the descriptive term “sick” to our title.
This same “sick” demented, narcissist has also told families who are awaiting the caskets of their sons, their husbands, their fathers, that he understands their pain because he had a son that also died fighting for his country. A total lie. His son died of a brain tumor in a domestic hospital. “Sick”, demented, narcissists lie to grab attention and sympathy and place themselves as to where the attention must be focused.
Yes, you who might be one of the 50 million people who legally voted for this “sick”, demented, narcissist, and feel no remorse, are to be pitied.
From the Nation Center for Constitutional Studies
Please read carefully and then determine if you are willing to fight for our Constitutional freedom.
In 1830 a young judge from France arrived in America. His name was Alexis de Tocqueville. He came to study the American system. He and his friend soaked up more information about the great American experiment in ten months than most scholars absorb in a lifetime. Returning to France, Alexis de Tocqueville wrote a two-volume work entitled, Democracy in America. De Tocqueville saw the people of the United States passing through several distinct stages. First of all, he saw the strength of character and moral integrity that would make them prosperous. But as they became self-sufficient he saw that they would be less concerned about each other and much less concerned about the principles that made them a great people. This would leave them vulnerable to the manipulation of clever politicians who would begin to promise them perpetual security if they accepted certain schemes contrived by some of their leaders. He then described what modern students have been led to identify as "democratic socialism.": "That power is absolute, minute, regular, provident, and mild. It would be like the authority of a parent, if, like that authority, its object was to prepare men for manhood; but it seeks on the contrary to keep them in perpetual childhood; it is well content that the people should rejoice, provided they think of nothing but rejoicing. "For their happiness such a government willingly labors, but it chooses to be the sole agent and the only arbiter of that happiness; it provides for their security, foresees and supplies their necessities, facilitates their pleasures, manages their principal concerns, directs their industry, regulates the descent of property, and subdivides their inheritances -- what remains, to spare them all the care of thinking and the trouble of living." "After having thus successively taken each member of the community in its powerful grasp, and fashioned them at will, the supreme power then extends its arm over the whole community. It covers the surface of society with a network of small complicated rules, minute and uniform, through which the most original minds and the most energetic characters cannot penetrate, to rise above the crowd. "The will of man is not shattered, but softened, bent, and guided -- men are seldom forced by it to act, but they are constantly restrained from acting. Such a power does not destroy, but it prevents existence; it does not tyrannize, but it compresses, enervates, extinguishes, and stupefies a people, till [the] nation is reduced to be nothing better than a flock of timid and industrious animals, of which the government is the shepherd." Are not these warnings sobering? Can we not see every one of them in fulfillment today? Yet in spite of all these dire predictions, the Founders assured us there is a manifest destiny for America that would cause her to rise from the ashes. It is this prophecy that keeps us going. Is each of us doing all we can to help?
Will you commit to become a part of the tireless minority that is "Setting Brushfires of Freedom."
The C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group, which Mike Bloomberg serves as president of the board, is a network of 97 of the world’s largest cities, representing more than 650 million people, to share knowledge and collaborate on efforts to fight climate warming, no cooling, oh let’s just say change. In reality, their policies have little or nothing to do with climate, but everything to do with bringing about the fundamental transformation to communism called for by Obama. It is a means of ultimately placing all means of production under the control of the state and controlling the lives, choices, and thoughts of all people.
If you live in one of the C40 cities in the United States, you would be wise to sell any property in that city and move to a city that still believes private property is mandatory for individual liberty and freedom. Remember, the United States was founded upon and thrived under the solid reality that all right and liberties come from God. All are endowed by their creator with the right to life, liberty, and private property. Jefferson used the phrase the right to pursue happiness. This is the antithesis of what the C40 position or the communist position is.
The 14 cities in the United States are the same cities where crime is accelerating at an exponential rate, where the rights of criminals are placed before the rights of law-abiding citizens, and where woke polices are treated to be truth. These cities include Austin, Boston, Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles, Miami, New Orleans, New York City, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Portland, San Francisco, Washington, D.C., and Seattle.
The goal for C40 cities is to eliminate meat, dairy, and private vehicles by 2030. In addition, they would enforce things such as “3 new clothing items per person per year,” “0 private vehicles” owned, and “1 short haul return flight (less than 1500 km) every 3 years per person.”
Does that sound like freedom? Does that sound like a place you want to live? If you enable the climate hoax purveyors, you will.
Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.