|
|
At the heart of so many movements in the United States today is the call to centralize all power in the federal government. Yes, this is a critical difference between a society based on collectivism (Marxism, communism, socialism, progressivism, the Democrat party – all virtually the same) and a society based on individualism (philosophy on which our nation was founded). Collectivism seeks to control all aspects of society with all people dependent and accountable to the elite of the central government, while individualism stresses the importance of the self-reliant and responsible individual who strives to reach their dreams and aspirations.
A part of the control necessary in a collectivist society is that the state or elite be able to control the daily lives and activities of the individual citizen. This can only be done with federal officials and police who are responsible for smaller or local areas like counties and cities, being totally accountable to the central government and totally responsive to the demands of the central government. The defund the police movement is an extension of the program to nationalize all law enforcement that was begun by Globalist and Communist, Comrade Obama. His unconstitutional and internal efforts to accomplish this goal were interrupted with the election of President Donald Trump, but the collectivist movement is very resourceful and has declared war, literally and figuratively, on our local police. The Obama regime and its “Task Force on 21st Century Policing” unveiled an unconstitutional plot to impose federal “standards” on state and local police forces, with the goal to nationalize and federalize law enforcement. The plan outlined dozens of “recommendations” to be foisted on state and local law-enforcement agencies using federal tax dollars as bribes. The program called for national standards for police a few months after United Nations boss Ban Ki Moon called for American police to obey “international standards.” The efforts to further nationalize and federalize law enforcement, were also in line with Obama’s campaign rhetoric about building a “civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded” as the U.S. military. Such an effort corresponds to a Communist effort to nationalize American police forces that goes back decades. Comrade Obama celebrated the scheme to bring law enforcement further under the control of the central government. He also argued that it must be done quickly. “I’m going to be asking Eric Holder and the Justice Department and his successor to go through all of these recommendations so that we can start implementing them,” Obama explained. “I know one area that’s going to be of great interest is whether we can expand the [DOJ Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS)] program that in the past has been very effective, continues to be effective, but is largely underfunded.” These steps to exercise and take control over police departments should raise a red flag to anyone who understands the history of national police forces. The history behind efforts to nationalize police forces should spark alarm. It is worth recalling that Communist efforts to nationalize local police forces across the United States date back to at least the 1960s. Toward that end, communist agitators, along with their front groups and useful idiots, have long created problems or exploited existing ones to drum up hatred and violence against police. As we have noticed in recent anti-police marches, communist-made signs and slogans were visible everywhere. But it is hardly a new development. It has long been a strategy of all collectivist sponsored movements that a crisis be created so the people will call upon the central government to solve the problem. The collectivist solution is always more power in the hands of the elite running the central government and more controls and restrictions on the people. If only you supporters of these collectivist strategies would understand that once the United States government is under total collectivist (Marxist, communist, socialist, progressive, Democrat, - all virtually the same) control, your rights and liberties will be suspended using the same force, draconian, and demonic methods that you are using to suspend my rights and liberties. You have been warned.
0 Comments
Two of our institutions that have failed the American experiment that was and is unique to the world are our press and our educational system. Ironically, these two elements of our society, along with the entertainment industry, were the three targets set by Lenin to fundamentally transform the United States into a Marxist totalitarian state. The communists have always understood that for them to control the United States they would have to do this through transformation. Marx specifically stated this. Marx also said that the views of all children cannot be the views of the parents or the church, but must be the views of the state. He went on to say that to accomplish this end, all children, from the time they can leave the care of their mother, must be in state institutions.
Lenin understood that if the goal of transforming the United States was to be accomplished through the indoctrination of the youth, than the institutions of education must be changed to be institutions of indoctrination, and the only way this could be accomplished would be if the teachers no longer taught but instead indoctrinated. This has been accomplished. You can learn the details in my book “The Road to Tyranny.” The Teachers Unions have become instruments of the Marxist movement, becoming far more consumed with political goals than with educational goals. We have witnessed this blatant call for indoctrination of our children in stated reasons why our schools can not open, in attempts to restrict parents from viewing on line classes, in classroom propaganda for the Marxist movement called BLM, and against our founders, our flag, our Constitution, and our police. Why the Marxist movement opposes any schooling apart from public schools is also now laid bare for all to see, they cannot guarantee that the children will be indoctrinated in the Marxist doctrine unless they are in the public-school system. The way we can minimize this evil is to strongly support school choice with dollars following the student and not the institution. This will enable all parents to have a choice as to whether their child will be educated or indoctrinated. Choices any parent should have would be charter schools, private schools, mini schools, and home schooling. What we know is the public-school system will not be corrected until Teachers Unions are eliminated so that good teachers who wish to educate and not indoctrinate can do so without the threats and demands of the Marxist movement. A free and independent press is essential to a free society. The press must be the informer to the public of what those in government are doing. We know that when those in government know their actions will not be reported to the public, evil will be the result. A totally transparent government is essential. Lenin also recognized that a totally free press is the enemy of the Marxist totalitarian state. The Marxist movement in the United States recognizes the same. Lenin stated, “The press should be not only a collective propagandist and a collective agitator, but also a collective organizer of the masses.” The press in Russia became the propaganda tool for the Bolsheviks and forsook any independence. It only published the party line, and abandoned any sense of fairness or truth. Our mainstream press today has become a tool of the Marxist transformation movement. There is no independence or even attempts to be fair and unbiased. The public must be dedicated to searching if it wants to understand the truth. The headlines are printed with incorrect and corruptible headlines, and then days, weeks, or months later some attempt to tell the facts is printed at times and in areas where the propagandists understand the public will pay no attention. If you value a free press and want the facts of the story and not a slanted story, your only choice is to be diligent and seek many different sources. When you find that a source always gives a slanted and even an incorrect view purposefully, you must totally abandon that source. When enough people have done this, that source will be gone forever or will be forced to change its ways. We the public still have some control. Yes, we can still choose where and how our children will be educated. We can still choose how we get our news. Remember, only a society with a predominant population that chooses to be informed, interested, and involved can remain free. So yes, we have a choice as to whether or not we will remain free. Have you noticed how only the true nectar drinkers like a lady I know in Nevada named Loren are buying into this ridiculousness we are witnessing from the left.
President Trump was prevented by Nevada Governor Sisolak from holding outdoor rallies at airports in Nevada near Reno and Las Vegas, so President Trump went outdoors to Minden and indoors in Henderson. Sisolak allows Casinos to be open at supposedly 50 per cent capacity while keeping much of the state completely closed including draconian limits on church services. Like all closed states, we see inconsistencies, favoritism, and ridiculous orders. These closed states have proven China Virus restrictions have nothing to do with a virus and everything to do with an election. Regarding the Trump Rally held in Henderson, this is the hysteria of the left: Jonathan Reiner, a professor of medicine and surgery at George Washington University and medical analyst for CNN, said on Sunday that President Trump's indoor rally in Nevada is "negligent homicide." "What else could you call an act that because of its negligence results in the death of others?" he said. "If you have a mass gathering now in the United States in a place like Nevada or just about any other place with hundreds of thousands of people, people will get infected and some of those people will die." We heard the same hysteria about the Wisconsin elections, the Sturgis, South Dakota Biker Rally, and different church services to name a few. We never hear this hysteria regarding riots being conducted in different cities that are supposedly for the purpose of promoting “social justice” and hurting the campaign of President Trump and thus supporting the campaign of Biden. The claims made about all the deaths is absolute hysteria. These stories are completely forgotten the day after the story is published and filed with the many other stories in the file of “Claims made that never happened.” What these people seem to not understand or refuse to understand because of their hatred for a President who has kept his promises including his promise to drain the swamp, of which they are a part, is that once in a while they have to publish a story with some truth. After hundreds of stories published that time proves to be totally false, you have lost your relevancy. If you do not believe me, ask Tony Fauci. There is much happening in the United States today that is the direct result of what has been happening in the United States for over a century. The collectivist movement to fundamentally transform the United States as stated by Obama on October 30, 2008, began over a century ago is what is happening. What did I just say and what does it mean?
To understand what I just said we have to first of all understand the differences between the two forces that have raged since the founding of the United States of America. These two forces are referred to as individualism and collectivism. Collectivism is some sort of group rather than an individual who is at the center of all social, political, and economic concerns, and issues. Those who are proponents of this ideology say that the interests and claims of groups like the state, supersede those of individuals. Individualists believe that society is there, but it is ultimately made up of individuals who choose and act. The foundation of individualism lies in one’s moral right, to pursue one’s own happiness. Marxism, communism, socialism, progressives, and all autocratic states are forms of collectivism. The state has the authority to dictate to all people within the collective who and what they will be. Collectivism dominated the world until the formation of the United States of America. In our Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson stated and the delegates to the Continental Congress accepted the idea of individualism that had been talked about philosophically for centuries but stated so clearly and emphatically by John Locke, that each individual is endowed by the Creator with certain unalienable rights, including but not limited to life, liberty, and property, or as Jefferson said the pursuit of happiness. This concept of each individual having the rights including life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness is the very concept that went on to propel the United States to become the benevolent power it became. It is this very concept that is now at the heart of so many Americans despising our nation and as Obama stated, to fundamentally transform the United States of America. What Obama did not say on October 30, 2008, but stated in his policies and statements prior and after, was that the United States of America would be fundamentally transformed from a nation founded on the principles of individualism to a nation based on the principles of collectivism, or that the United States of America would be transformed into a Marxist totalitarian state. This was happening and supported by the Democrat party and the Republicans In Name Only as they supported more and more government controls over the lives of the individual citizens, over their life, liberty, and the pursuit of their happiness. This group, the Democrat party and the RHINO’s were now saying that it is government who can control the life by allowing the murder of unborn children, by regulating the liberties of speech, religion, assembly, right to bear arms to name a few, and the right to pursue our own happiness, with the caveat that the government has a right to share in our monetary rewards and to control our pursuits so as not to harm the egos of others or exceed declared limits by the state. This is what is happening in the United States today, will we be fundamentally transformed. Will we remain a nation adhering to the liberal and radical concept proclaimed by our founders that we individuals will retain our rights given to us by the Creator, or that we will alienate those rights to government who will alter their role from protector to controller of all rights including those given to us by the Creator. The collectivist movement has become a dominant force in the Untied States by indoctrinating people that their rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are best served when they adhere to the dictates of the collective, subjugating their personal desires and wishes to the control of the state. This has been accomplished primarily through the efforts of those adhering to the demands of Vladimir Lenin when he demanded through the control of the Communist International over the member of the United States Communist party that they concentrate on gaining control of education, news outlets, and entertainment outlets in the Untied States. This was done and enabled by the Democrat party which became a tool for the Communists under Franklin Roosevelt, and became the Communist Party of the United States under Obama despite maintaining the name Democrat Party. The question every American is facing today is do I agree that I am an individual and my rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are God given with the government’s only role as protector, or do I agree that all my rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are under the control of the state, and it is my duty and obligation to live as a loyal and subservient member of the state, understanding I owe my all to the state. On September 11, 2001, the United States was brought to an abrupt stop. The sky was empty, the airports were empty, people were in shock, the Twin Towers were no more, the Pentagon had a hole in it’s side, a field in Pennsylvania had a new hole, and 3,000 people were dead. This took place because a group of terrorists hated the freedom and liberty extended to all United States citizens and they wanted these freedom and liberties extinguished forever.
The method these people chose to begin the process to end what they hated was an act of terrorism. Terrorism is defined as the use of violence or the threat of violence, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political goals. To hijack four airplanes loaded with civilians and fly them into buildings that were filled with people and represented individualism, capitalism, and freedom for the purpose of causing panic that would lead to the citizens demanding collectivism, socialism, and state control of all people, is an accurate description of the terrorist act that took place on that fateful day. The political results the terrorists sought were not achieved by their act of terrorism nineteen years ago. Ironically, those political acts are being achieved today by a major political party in that very country the terrorists desired to destroy by using terrorism. The political goal of the terrorists of 9/11 and the Democrats of today is to destroy the Republic of the United States and abolish the protections extended to all Untied States Citizens of our Natural Rights given to us by God and the liberties protected by the Constitution of the United States as delineated in the first ten amendments. Both the terrorists of 9/11 and the Democrats of today see the Republic and the Constitution as the obstacles to bring about the collectivist society they desire. That is a society with a socialist economy and a political system where the citizens are slaves to a Marxist bureaucratic government that dictates every aspect of each individual’s life. The Democrats have now resorted to the same method, terrorism, employed by the 9/11 terrorists. To bring about the fear required, the Democrats of today are orchestrating terror in the streets of different cities of the United States. We are witnessing constant rioting, looting, arson, and assaults nightly. This terror has now extended to daylight intimidation of citizens who are in restaurants, stores, or simply walking down a street. We have even seen this terror move to the homes of law enforcement officials. It was the goal of the 9/11 terrorists to end our Republic and destroy our Constitution. It is the goal of the Democrats of today to end our Republic and destroy our Constitution. The 9/11 terrorists used terrorism to achieve their goal. The Democrats of today are using terrorism to achieve their goals. Just as on the fateful day of 9/11 nineteen years ago when we learned of brave Freedom Loving Americans aboard Flight 93 who overpowered the terrorists and sacrificed everything for their fellow Freedom Loving Americans, we today must recognize and then overcome the terrorist evil of the Democrats of today. We, who oppose terrorism and desire to remain a Republic and retain all of our Natural Rights and liberties protected under our United States Constitution, must become adept at “Setting Brushfires of Freedom” and do it on a daily basis. The outlandish claims from the left reveal a party that is in meltdown. To try to sell the idea that President Trump called those who sacrificed their lives for our freedom as suckers and losers is farfetched and outlandish. This reveals meltdown. To say that President Trump wants to defund the police is farfetched and outlandish. This reveals meltdown. To talk about President Trump not respecting the tradition of peaceful transition, especially after it has been proven time after time that Islamic Jihadist sympathizer Comrade Obama violated every aspect of peaceful transition, is farfetched and outlandish. This reveals meltdown. For Cuomo to blame the pathetic handling of the China Virus in New York is not only scapegoating by Cuomo but it is farfetched and outlandish. This reveals meltdown. To keep states in lockdown over the China Virus is now obviously politically motivated and has nothing to do with science, but continues despite these lockdowns being far more damaging than helpful is farfetched and outlandish. This reveals meltdown. To encourage and enable rioting, looting, arson, assault, and murder while hoping the public will accept the explanation that this is peaceably protesting is farfetched and outlandish. This reveals meltdown.
Why are the Democrats grasping at such farfetched and outlandish straws. It could be because they nominated an even weaker candidate for president in 2020 than they did in 2016. Hillary is almost impossible to like. Hillary is way to the left. Hillary does not inspire. Hillary used the government and her positions to enrich her family. Hillary refused to go on the campaign trail. Biden is more likeable than Hillary, but Biden moved far to the left and has surrounded himself with Marxists. Biden does not inspire. Biden has used the government and his positions to enrich his family. Biden cannot go on the campaign trial due to the escalation of his diminishing mental capacity, which is clearly revealed when he walks and talks. For some unknown reason, the DNC chose Kamala Harris to be the vice-presidential candidate. Kamala Harris is a San Francisco liberal like Nancy Pelosi. Kamala Harris is difficult to like as are Pelosi and Hillary Clinton. Kamala Harris is a divisive person. Kamala Harris has as her only principle the destruction of the Republic of the United States to be replaced by a Marxist totalitarian state and she will do anything to achieve this goal. Yes, Kamala Harris is a firm believer in and practitioner of the Marxist maxim, “The ends always justify the means.” The Democrats have no national figure that generates enthusiasm or gives their base a reason to become excited. Jerry Nadler, Adam Schiff, Andrew Cuomo, Bill De Blasio, Gretchen Whitmer, Gavin Newsom, Ilham Omar, AOC, and you get the idea, have deserved high negatives. The only alternative the Democrats seem to have is the one they showcased at their convention and that is to say and do whatever is necessary to create hatred and distrust of Donald Trump. This is a totally negative approach and has proven in the past to be a losing strategy. What we are seeing since the Democrat Convention is a doubling down of the lies and contortions. In defense of the Democrats, when you have a platform that is totally contrary to the American ideals and candidates with no redeeming values, you are left with farfetched and outlandish approaches as your only strategy. Yes, to the informed, interested, and involved citizen this reveals you are in meltdown. You can only hope that there are enough uninformed, uninterested, and uninvolved voters, or your voter fraud tactics that you have been improving, are adequate and sufficient to win the election by any means necessary to accomplish your ends. Based on the Democrat tactics so far, we can only surmise that the attacks over the next two months will become even more farfetched and outlandish. What has been clearly revealed by the left is that, as their supporters, including BLM and ANTIFA, continue their looting, rioting, and arson, they continue to reveal their true goal is “Death to America.” We who are living in the United States must ask ourselves if we should support the Democrat party, which has become the Communist party, or should we vote for those who believe living under the United States Constitution that protects our freedoms and liberties is the wisest choice. Folks, these are the choices. What do you choose???? What we know about Kamala Harris is that she is a panderer. Pandering is defined as an immoral or distasteful desire to gratify or indulge. Another definition, mine, would be a person who will say anything or do anything to please another person or group of people despite the lunacy or immorality of such a statement.
Democrat VP candidate Kamala Harris visited Kenosha, Wisconsin to tell Jacob Blake just how proud she was of him. Harris does not state why she was proud of Jacob Blake. She did not say if was because he had fought with the police and refused to follow police directions when they tried to perform their legal duties to arrest Blake because of a warrant for his arrest or if her pride stemmed from his actions to bring about that warrant and attempted arrest. It appears that Harris’s pride in Blake stems from him being a Black individual who was shot by police as he refused to obey the police in their lawful duties, and subsequently his actions enhanced the Democrat and radical left scenario that all police are racists, yes even Black police, and thus the racist institutions in the United States must be destroyed by defunding police and any and all other means necessary. This is the same Jacob Blake who was charged with a gun-related offense in 2015. A review of court records shows he had a confrontation at a Racine County, Wisconsin, bar that led to a combative traffic stop and a total of five criminal charges in September 2015, including resisting an officer, disorderly conduct and three gun-related ones. Then Blake was charged July 6 with felony third-degree sexual assault and misdemeanor trespassing and disorderly conduct. All three offenses carried a penalty enhancer because they were connected to domestic abuse. The charges stem from a May 3 incident in Kenosha County. A woman Blake knew told police he came into her house about 6 a.m., sexually assaulted her and then took a debit card and car keys before fleeing in her vehicle, according to a criminal complaint. Contrary to many social media claims, the woman involved in this case was an adult. A warrant for Blake’s arrest was filed the day after the criminal complaint, online court records show. Police radio traffic explains officers were dispatched for "family trouble," and a dispatcher named Blake as taking the caller’s keys and refusing to give them back. A dispatcher used the police code 10-99 while sending officers, alerting them to Blake's warrant. Kamala Harris, which action is worthy of your pride? Is it the first instance or the second? Is it that Jacob Blake has shown that he is a thug and a sexual assaulter, or is it that he was shot by police as he fled from being arrested and consequently you and your party were able to falsely enhance your only reason for voting for your party; the false and absurd claim that the United States is a racist nation and our racist police run around looking for opportunities to shoot Black people. All freedom loving Americans must ask themselves if they accept this pandering statement by Kamala Harris. In so doing, I would suggest that all Americans ask themselves if they would use Jacob Blake as a role model for their own children or would they teach their children that getting in Bar fights, resisting arrest, sexually assaulting another, stealing their property, and then again fighting with police and assisting arrest is a wrong and harmful lifestyle to all including in this case Jacob Blake. To what level has an individual sunk when they would take pride in the actions of a Jacob Blake. When you are wondering what is happening in our nation today, allow me to suggest a method to you that I have used to gain some clarification. That tactic is to step back and ask myself questions to try to determine why these things are taking place.
Here are some questions I am asking myself currently. The order is of no significance. Why is looting, rioting, arson, assaulting, and yes murder not only condoned in the streets but encouraged by a major political movement? In instances this tactic has been used in the past it has resulted in a tyrannical style takeover. The political movements that were encouraging these tactics have said the reasons for these methods were to correct victimhood and injustices. The tactics are a form of intimidation against the majority of the citizens who are interested in living in peace and harmony. In the last 175 years these tactics have been associated with movements promoting a style of government that followed the doctrines of Karl Marx. Do these facts support the situation in the United States today? Why is a free press, a free press meaning a press that is not controlled by the government even though it could be a propaganda tool for a political movement, so determined to promote false scenarios and abandoned any journalistic integrity or curiosity? Throughout history it is difficult to find a time where members of the press, other than a press controlled by the government, has promoted in unison so many blatantly false stories and continued to promote those stories even after they had been proven to be false. We have learned that members of the press, along with members of academia, have leaned toward a collectivist philosophy as opposed to an individualist philosophy, but in majority numbers, not overwhelming numbers. When looking at the above press question, we must ask ourselves why this has happened, what impact does it have, and is it good for a free society. Why this has happened, I believe can be answered when we realize that academia, in this case the journalism professors are overwhelmingly proponents of the collectivist movement, and as such adhere to the collectivist demand to indoctrinate and not educate. The impact it has is to influence a general population, who unfortunately does not have the interest to educate themselves and thus accepts in too many instances the loudest and most often published stories without taking the time to verify. What we know is an unfair press, a dishonest press, and a press void of curiosity and integrity will always lead an uninterested, uninvolved, and uninformed populace astray. Why are a group of people so easily lead down an incorrect and misleading path as the one that is currently being touted by the Marxist BLM movement? History has proven that organizations like this have used emotional statements based on a scenario they do not believe themselves, to promote an agenda that many who have bought into the false narrative would not support. The BLM has convinced a large number of people that they are concerned about the well being of the black population. This is blatantly false. The BLM movement has no concern for black lives unless the life of a specific black person will help promote the real agenda of the BLM movement which is to transform the United States into a Marxist totalitarian state. What organizations like BLM understand is that many people are not discerning. They know that many people, especially those who lean to the collectivist side politically, are always eager to blame others for situations they identify as injustices. These collectivists refuse to look at individuals because they would then have to take personal responsibility for their actions. Other questions that must be asked and answered by those of us seeking solutions and reality and not trying to find a simple solution by using scapegoats would be: Why would a population be willing to accept demonic and senseless restriction on their social and work lives for a virus that is clearly documented to have health affects no more serious than the flu virus? Why does the bureaucracy and Washington elite hate President Trump so vehemently, a person who is not one of them and has never been a part of them, and has promised to expose them? Why would the press try to run with a story that President Trump spoke so disrespectfully about the fallen soldiers with absolutely no collaboration, knowing that the odds of this story being true are even less than the odds would be of a story that Obama spoke favorably about the military? I will continue to ask myself questions and would strongly encourage others to do the same. It is important to step back from the hype and the emotion and have an honest discussion with yourself. “I am the wisest man alive, for I know one thing, and that is that I know nothing.” Socrates Be a wise person. Look for reason which most often leads to truth. Dare to question your long-held beliefs. Remember, people do not do what we would do, but they do what they would do to accomplish their goals, not ours. Priorities, ours, and others, are revealed by what we or they do and not what we or they say. Do we have free speech when speech is checked to verify if it is politically correct or if it is hate speech?
Does peaceably include actions such as rioting, looting, arson, assault, and now murder? Are the Dems of today not naming the obvious instigators of the violence in the street today, BLM and ANTIFA, for the same reason Obama would not name Islamic Radical Terrorists, and that is because they support the actions of the respective groups? We know the reason mail in voting is being championed by the left is because it is a simple means to commit voter fraud and the Dems have been perfecting the art of voter fraud since at least 1960. Why has Fauci worked so hard to promote the China virus while denouncing methods of curing the virus that have been used successfully in so many instances? Why are the Teachers Unions so insistent that schools cannot be opened? Why would the Dems nominate an individual with no accomplishments, suffers from serious dementia, is under criminal indictment in a foreign country, and has been known for changing positions on major issues within days and even hours? Why would a gay person from San Francisco push so hard to decriminalize having sex with minors if the minor is within 10 years of their age? Why are the Dems so determined to not only disrupt, but to prevent church services from being held? Why are the NBA and NFL players so determined to honor a known rapist, women beater, and thug, Jacob Blake? Is it because they are rapists, women beaters, and thugs, and closely identify with all that Jacob Blake was and represents, which is exactly the opposite of what real men are. A Washington D.C. city committee said we must “remove, relocate or contextualize” historical statues and memorials, including some of the city's best-known tourist attractions.
Contextualize means to place (a word, event, etc.) into a particular or appropriate context for the purpose of interpretation or analysis. The appropriate context would mean in the context that best fits the desired narrative. This is the rationale for rewriting history. “The most effective way to destroy people is to deny and obliterate their own understanding of their history.” George Orwell Multiculturalism is a campaign to lower America's moral status by defining the American experience is terms of myriad expressions and their victims. By rewriting history, and by using name calling ("Racist! Sexist! Homophobe!") to inhibit debate, multiculturalists cultivate grievances, self-pity and claims to entitlements arising from victimization. George Will "Barack knows that we are going to have to make sacrifices; we are going to have to change our conversation; we're going to have to change our traditions, our history; we're going to have to move into a different place as a nation." Michele Obama when calling for the United States to be transformed. A working group tasked by Washington DC Mayor Muriel Bowser identified dozens of schools, parks, monuments, statues, and buildings named after historical figures that they believe represent an oppressive or racist history. Consequently they want to “contextualize” these different representations to for the purposes as stated by Orwell, Will, and Obama. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
October 2023
Categories |
RSS Feed