The United States is a very unique country. This can not be stressed enough. We truly were an experiment. Prior to our founding, nations were always based on the rule of the government. Whatever from the government took, or whatever the head of government was called, it was government that had full and total control over the lives of the people. Now the United States comes along and establishes our government understanding that government is always the biggest and perhaps only threat to the liberty of the people. In order to protect against the tyranny of government, the people drafted and ratified a constitution that had as its only purpose to protect against our government becoming tyrannical. A tyrannical government is a government that determines it is their right to tell the people how they are to live their lives and how the people are to think. This is what the founders intended to avoid. This is why we have a limited government; a government who was granted its powers from the people and was limited to the powers the people granted per the 10th amendment.
In addition, our founders stated and recognized that the natural rights of the people are granted by our Creator and not government. The founders emphasized this belief when the Bill of Rights were adopted. The government was specifically prohibited from infringing on stated rights and then in the 9th amendment, we the people said that our natural rights were not just the ones we stated but extended beyond the stated natural rights and those rights not stated had the same protection as did the stated natural rights.
The founders understood that a natural tendency of bureaucrats is to believe in tyranny of government. They had lived under this tyranny and paid a monumental price to free themselves from it. They also understood that the desire to control others was not unique to those in the British government but was a natural tendency of all collectivists. We were warned that this could happen in the United States and how it must be corrected. Thomas Jefferson told us, “When once a Republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil.”
James Madison defined this tyranny for us when he said, “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.”
And James Monroe told us,” Of the liberty of conscience in matters of religious faith, of speech and of the press; of the trial by jury of the vicinage in civil and criminal cases; of the benefit of the writ of habeas corpus; of the right to keep and bear arms.... If these rights are well defined, and secured against encroachment, it is impossible that government should ever degenerate into tyranny.” Virtually every matter stated by Monroe that must be kept to protect against tyranny is exactly the matters the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are attacking and telling us must be loosely defined and we must encroach on them to protect freedom.
President Trump is a direct threat to the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) movement to have unlimited government, government that tells us that by limiting our natural rights we are enhancing equality and thus it is the role of government to control and limit the natural rights given to we the people by our Creator. Our founders established our Constitution to protect us from this very thing. They warned us what would happen. President Trump is a champion for limited government and natural rights. President Trump opposes a tyrannical government as did our founders.
The intent of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) is to install a tyrannical government, a government who dictates to we the people how we are to live our lives, how we must think. President Trump is a threat to that proposition. The Constitution protects we the people from the intents of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats). Therefore, the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have as their goal to destroy not only the United States Constitution, but also President Trump.
What is on full display is that the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have as their method of operation, the same method employed by their past comrades, Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Castro, and Chavez; “The ends justify the means.”
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have stated openly and often, “The United States Constitution be damned.” Today they are stating openly, “Donald Trump, whose desire is to adhere to the principles of our founding and adhere to the spirit and declarations in the United States Constitution, must be destroyed at any cost and by any means.” This my friends is not hyperbole but supported by facts.
The further we get into this charade of an impeachment hearing, the more proof we have that in fact the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) and the “deep state” are in the middle of a coup attempt and not an impeachment inquiry.
An impeachment inquiry would be held when the sitting individual that is facing an impeachment committed treason, or a high crime or misdemeanor while in office. In the case of Donald Trump, he was threatened with impeachment before he was even a nominee of a political party for president. A coup is a coordinated attempt to overthrow the will of the people.
An impeachment is more like a trial because of the action of the individual. A coup is an event to replace a government or individual because of policy differences. An impeachment proceeding is outlined in our Constitution and because the Constitution guarantees due process to all citizens, the concept of due process or fairness has always been a part of any impeachment proceeding. A coup has no rules other than “the ends justify the means.”
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) and “deep state” have voiced their concerns about the policies of Donald Trump from before he was even nominated to be a presidential nominee of a major political party. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) and “deep state” have now attempted to frame Donald Trump at least twice to camouflage their coup attempt so that many Americans would regard that coup attempt as an impeachment.
Having failed in their attempts to concoct a crime and frame Donald Trump, they now are resorting to trying to convince the American public that a differing of opinion on policy is in fact treason or a high crime or misdemeanor. Their current key witness, Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, when he wrote, “I realized that if Ukraine pursued an investigation into the Bidens and Burisma, it would likely be interpreted as a partisan play which would undoubtedly result in Ukraine losing the bipartisan support it has thus far maintained,”
“This would all undermine U.S. national security,” Vindman added. “Following the call, I again reported my concerns to NSC’s lead counsel.”
If those were legitimate concerns of Vindman, he should have reported them or voiced them to his superior. Differences of opinion are not only common but healthy. President Trump and John Bolton apparently had differences of opinion. John Bolton was asked to submit his resignation and he did. Vindman could have done the same.
Under any and all circumstances, to proceed with these impeachment proceedings, which are based on policy differences, is openly and clearly stating that in fact, “We, the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party and members of the “deep state,” are conducting a coup attempt to overthrow the will of the American people and subvert the United States Constitution.”
Any person who supports the above movement is what Saul Alinsky referred to as a “useful idiot” and is a participant in a coup attempt to overthrow the republic that is the United States of America.
The Senate rejected an effort by Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) to place an across-the-board spending cut in a domestic funding package being debated by lawmakers. Senators voted 24-67 on the amendment from Paul, which would reduce spending by 2 percent compared to fiscal 2019 levels. This would be two cents for every dollar spent. If all we did was to eliminate duplication of agencies, reduce waste, eliminate pork, and do zero based budgeting, the two cents reduction could probably be doubled. Yes, it would take some effort, not a great deal of effort, but it would also take time from the irrational efforts to overturn the people’s will and to oppose any good ideas because they were initiated by the opposite party.
Marxist/Progressive Leahy of Vermont said, "His amendment will slash spending below the bipartisan budget act that we all negotiated.” Well, Leahy, perhaps that amendment should be reviewed in the name of national security. After all, it has long been recognized that the runaway deficit that the bipartisan budget act greatly enhances threatens our national security.
“National security experts have long warned us that our massive debt is one of our biggest national security threats. With U.S. debt recently surpassing $22 trillion, soon we will spend more paying down interest on our debt than on national defense. I do not accept the standard Washington presumption that nothing in the budget can be cut in order to fund important priorities without increasing the deficit. Hardworking taxpayers make tough spending decisions to stay within their budget and expect their representatives in government will do the same.” – Congressman Daniel Webster (FL-11)
“We introduced this resolution because the United States is racing towards a fiscal cliff. Congress is taking few measures to solve this problem, and it is beyond time for our colleagues in both chambers to become serious about balancing the nation’s budget and recognize this issue as a threat to our national security.
“America has a spending problem, not a revenue problem. While the United States is producing record federal revenue, Congress has failed to pass balanced budgets. If we do not change our course, we will be responsible for one of the worse catastrophes this nation has ever experienced: the crash of the American economy and the demise of a superpower. I thank Senator Perdue and my colleagues for their leadership on this issue.” – Congressman Andy Biggs (AZ-05)
“The single greatest threat to our national security is our national debt, and it’s time Washington comes to grips with that reality. This month, our national debt topped $22 trillion. This news should have sounded alarms throughout Washington, but bureaucrats and career politicians didn’t even blink an eye. Ultimately, the debt impacts our ability to fund priorities, like providing our men and women in uniform with the resources they need to protect Americans. This debt crisis will only get worse, and if we don’t act now, our country will lose the ability to do the right thing.” – Senator David Perdue (R-Georgia)
“The $22 trillion national debt is crippling our country. In a few short years, interest payments on our debt will outpace all defense spending. That is a stark and sobering statistic which lays bare the real national security threat our debt crisis is creating.” – Congressman Kelly Armstrong (ND-At Large)
“Throughout my time in Congress, I’ve voted for responsible budgets that prioritize necessary spending, eliminate waste and end programs inappropriate for federal government expenditures. Unfortunately, even as our national debt and its threat to future generations have ballooned, too few in Washington are willing to take tough votes necessary to curb spending and protect our solvency. It is important we recognize the threat associated with a $22 trillion – and growing – national debt. While it is doubtful Democrats allow a spending bill addressing this issue to move forward, I will continue advocating for responsible spending of taxpayer funds for as long as I am in Washington.” – Congressman Brian Babin (TX-36)
“At a staggering $22 trillion, the national debt is suffocating Americans. While we can’t undo our past, we can work toward a better future, especially for the millions of young Americans who will bear the burden of this growing debt in their sunset years. It’s time we find responsible solutions that curb government waste of taxpayers’ dollars contributing to the national debt.” – Congressman Troy Balderson (OH-12)
YET NOTHING IS DONE AND RAND PAUL’S EFFORTS ARE REJECTED AND ROUNDLY CRITICIZED.
Former FBI Director James Comey says he will move to New Zealand if President Trump wins reelection. Comey should share his research with his cohorts Brennan, Clapper, McCabe, the Orr’s, and Obama. As Durham begins his process under the legal system of the United States, due process, these people might consider a quick trip to New Zealand to determine on which Island they wish to live and if in a city or out in the countryside. New Zealand is a beautiful place and if you like wine, they have some of the best.
What Comey must be assuming is that the wheels of justice will move slowly, and he will not have been indicted and will still have his passport by November of 2020. He must be thinking he will save himself some expenses and the hassle of listing his home for sale just in case Schiff can manufacture some lie that will not be so easily disproved. If that were to happen, Comey must be thinking that perhaps then a socialist might be able to be elected. If that were to happen, all the charges based on facts would be dropped against the socialist agents who worked so feverishly for the election of such a flawed candidate as Hillary Clinton, ignoring any and all laws. I do not believe even Comey believes that will happen, and since he is preparing to stay out of jail, his apparent research has led him to begin preparations to move to New Zealand.
One of the key factors of Comey choosing a country would have to be the extradition agreement the country has with the United States. Of course, Comey could choose a country like Venezuela, a country who has the same policies he wants for the United States, but who would want to live under the conditions that are a result of the policies he supports. New Zealand would be much better and there is a clause in the extradition agreement that I am sure Comey believes the far-left government of New Zealand would claim when the United States tried to enforce the extradition agreement.
Article VI of the agreement states that Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances. And number 4 of the article states, If the offense for which his extradition is requested is of a political character, or if he proves that the requisition for his surrender has in fact been made with a view to try or punish him for an offense of a political character. If any question arises as to whether a case comes within the provisions of this paragraph, it shall be determined according to the laws of the requested Party.
We have learned that Comey understands how to use the law for nefarious purposes. He has probably already confirmed with the like minded government in New Zealand that they would invoke this provision. As Durham continues his fact-finding mission, expect more of those mentioned above to announce how lovely a place New Zealand is and that they would also love to move there. The cost of living is reasonable and US$.63 buys New Zealand $1. That is also favorable. Great choice Comey. Oh, Lisa Page and Peter Strzok might want to go along with you.
Obamacare is for all practical purposes gone now that the individual mandate has been revoked. The Iran Treaty that Obama and his fellow Jihad favoring members of his regime and lied about it to get it through the senate is gone. Iran is now under sanctions and is on the verge of imploding despite Obama sending his Jihad brothers plane loads of cash. The TPP, remember that agreement that surrendered the sovereignty of the United States, is gone. The Climate treaty, remember the Paris agreement that surrendered the sovereignty of the United States, is gone.
The attempt by Comrade Obama to politicize the bureaucracy and to bring the security institutions of the executive branch has been revealed. These institutions were intended to be non-political and have as their only interest the good of the country as a whole. Obama intended them to become enforcement arms of the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party, as did his brothers, Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Castro, and Chavez, has been thwarted and revealed. Those who brought about these changes are being investigated today under a criminal investigation.
The choking regulations on American industry, in the name of the hoax of first climate cooling that would destroy the polar bear population that has actually grown considerably, then climate warming that would put both Miami and Los Angeles under water shortly after the turn of the century, and now climate change which is a catch all phrase that actually means a national and international redistribution of wealth as called for by Karl Marx, have been greatly reduced. This, along with the reduction of the choking income taxes on American businesses, has enabled our economy to grown at a rate considerably greater than the growth rate of the population, a rate for which Obama strove because that is a rate Karl Marx had stated would not enable the capitalist to accumulate capital that would help grow the economy, raise the standard of living for all, and free the people from believing the false promise of “hope and change.”
And now we learned Sunday morning that the ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi is dead. This individual, much like the prophet Muhammad, was a rapist, pedophile, robber, torturer, and murderer. He was called “austere religious scholar” by the Washington Post. It would appear that this is the same manner in which Obama and Jarrett viewed this ruthless killer. It would be safe to assume that on Sunday morning, Barack Obama and Valarie Jarrett were in mourning for this individual who mimicked Muhammad not only in the above description, but as a Caliph who had as their goal to bring the total world under the rule of the Caliphate. Those who reused to follow their perverse and cruel teachings would be killed or enslaved.
Islamist Jihad sympathizer, Comrade Obama and his sidekick Valeri Jarett, enabled ISIS to begin, to flourish, and to grow when they vacated the territory and left a complete void. They further enabled these sick people to practice their Islamic beliefs by curtailing and inhibiting the United States armed forces in their quest to stop the growth of this cancer, a cancer supported by Obama and Jarrett.
Today, another of the legacies of Islamist Jihad sympathizer, Comrade Obama, has been dealt a server blow. Another of Islamist Jihad sympathizer, Comrade Obama’s policies to fundamentally transform the Untied States from a free and independent nation to a Marxist totalitarian state, has been thwarted.
Thank you, President Trump, for recognizing all the evil that was done to the United States and your heroic stance, many times under severe personal and political attack with little to no support, to fight against the attempt to fulfill the promise of Comrade Obama to fundamentally transform the United States to a Marxist totalitarian state. We who love freedom and independence salute you. Those who favor a Marxist totalitarian state loathe you and will attack you with greater force as they believe that “the ends always justify the means.” Never forget that all of them, along with Biden, refuse to let facts get in the way of their “truth.”
The United States was founded on the concept of Liberty for all. Today the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) and many of the Republican establishment are telling us that we have liberty when the government provides maximum safety. What in fact they are defining is tyranny and what they are promoting is tyranny. If you call yourself an American and support the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) agenda, you are an enemy of the Liberty on which our nation was founded and the Liberty for which so many have sacrificed. You must decide if you want Liberty, because the opposite is tyranny. There is no middle ground, only a transition period as nations follow “The Road to Tyranny.”
I found this article at Breedshill.org. All should read it and understand it. Then you can decide if you are a supporter of Liberty or a supporter of Tyranny. If you determine you are a supporter of Liberty, you can no longer support the agenda of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) because they are proponents of Tyranny.
Benjamin Franklin once said, “Where Liberty dwells, there is my country.”
Powerful words…and slightly unsettling ones. Would Franklin have us believe that he was not wholly devoted to the United States? Or did he mean to suggest that if America abandoned Liberty it would no longer be his country? America was founded on the ideas of Independence, Justice, and most of all, Liberty. But when the founding generation spoke of Liberty did they mean the same thing we do when we speak the word? We know that the meaning and power of words can change over time. For example, once the word “Gentleman” meant a man who was above the rank of yeoman (laborer), or a person of high birth. Today, a gentleman is anyone who exhibits good manners. How too may the word Liberty have changed with time?
The Founders talk about Liberty and Freedom as two separate but connected ideals. Both of these words contain the idea of possessing the ability to exercise one’s will, and a power to choose. However, in many ways the words differ. Liberty comes from the Latin word libertas, which means “unbounded, unrestricted or released from constraint.” Libertas even contains the idea of being separate and independent. The English word Freedom can trace its roots to the Germanic or Norse word Frei, describing someone who belongs to a tribe and has the rights that go with belonging. This is something along the lines of “membership has its privileges.” Besides freedom the root frei becomes the English word friend. These ideas of liberty and freedom came from Western Civilization, and for the most part are absent in other cultures before their contact with the West. In other non-western cultures we find that the opposite of slave is not free but master.
For the Founders, Liberty was not new but, like their symbol the Liberty Tree, deeply rooted and long established among them. By 1776, some families had been in America for 170 years, and American Liberty was something they had always possessed. This is why when Thomas Jefferson writes the words of the Declaration of Independence, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness,” he refers to it as simply “An expression of the American mind.” They did not look at Independence as a quest for new Liberties but a revolt against a government bent on taking their Liberties away. Liberty is who they were.
It was this very potent notion of Liberty that moved patriot militias to assemble at Lexington and Concord in 1775. These people believed that they had always been in charge of themselves, and refused to be subject to the arbitrary rule of others. The quote that is most often attributed to Benjamin Franklin, “Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety” is an excellent picture of the mind of the time. Safety was not Liberty and Liberty was not safe.
Our concept of liberty today is pale and thin compared with that of the Founders. Today we want to believe in liberty (small “l”), but not so much that we could get hurt. As long as we can still say what we want, worship as we please and have a vote, we say we have liberty. We expect that the government will prevent us from making mistakes, rescue us if we do make mistakes and provide for us if we fail. The founding generation wanted no restraints and accepted that they would have no safety net if they failed. This is a concept that is foreign to both of our main political parties today, and to most Americans in general.
Today, the Constitution that was put in place to restrain Government’s ability to infringe on freedom is regularly violated without much protest and sometimes with support from the public. The Government has been allowed to create new departments and administrations that effectively redefine its powers. Undoubtedly, this expansion has made us safer; but it has had a price. To justify it we have had to redefine what we mean by Liberty.
The Founders saw Liberty as the opposite of tyranny; freedom from dependence on another’s will, and the ability to choose one’s own way without interference. My search for the Founder’s definition of Liberty has been one that challenged my own previous thoughts on the subject. The Founders threw down a gauntlet during the Revolutionary War that began a journey towards Liberty. These Founders’ own words reveal that they knew it could not be achieved in their lifetimes, but would be a generational destiny. They mapped out a path and left markers for us to follow. I wonder--in our age, do we have the courage to follow that path? In the end, the question will be this: If our nation is defined by the word Liberty, how will we define the word?
The news sites are filled with stories about the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) using double standards. This is not new, and it is not news. Collectivists have always used double standards. If it were not for double standards, they would have no standards. This is not a silly or trite cliché, but is fact that is proven by empirical evidence. Remember, collectivist is a term that incorporates all who aspire to control the lives and minds of the people and includes Marxists, communists, socialists, progressives, and Democrats. They are all virtually the same.
Constantly we read news stories that the left has a double standard such as when President Trump referred to the current proceedings as a lynching. The left, even though they have used the same term for different situations when it benefited them, was very quick to cry foul and explain that President Trump is a racist because he used the term. Come on, what did you expect?
Through out the ages we must remember that the collectivist has been void of fair play, honesty, principles, and values. Karl Marx explicitly told his followers, of which the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are included, that to complete the transformation to a classless (communist) society that is totally conforming and totally equal, all long-standing principles, all morality, and all religion must be nullified and obliterated. Any who will take an honest look at what the Marxist/Progressives are doing and advocating can come to no other conclusion than that they are following the command of Marx.
Lenin said that in a successful transformation to a communist society, anything that moves society down the road to communism is moral and anything that detracts from going down the road to communism is immoral. What we are witnessing the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) do today is follow that idea completely. Never forget that the collectivist, which includes the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats), has only one principle and that is that “the ends always justify the means.” Lie, cheat, destroy, use double standards, and destroy American society so long as it moves us down “The Road to Tyranny.”
What Schiff, Pelosi, and Nadler are doing, what Obama, Clinton, Holder, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, and Jarrett did, is no different from what Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Hitler, Castro, and Chavez did. All of these collectivists have in common that they will do absolutely anything to achieve their goal of bringing about a Marxist tyrannical society ruled by the “Dictatorship of the Proletariat.” Lenin stated specifically and clearly that he did not want any Christian or fair-minded individual working for him because when he needed deceitful and abhorrent deeds done, including murder, he could not count on them to complete their assignment.
This is the exact state of the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party of today. They will cast aside and demonize anybody who will not adhere to their axiom of “the ends always justify the means.” The means includes double standards, lying, cheating, deceiving, ignoring the Constitution, and in the case of Seth Rich murder. Yes, freedom loving Americans, we have in our midst people who will stop at nothing, people who have no boundaries, and people who have as their ends to bring about a Marxist totalitarian state that controls the lives and the thoughts of all.
You are anti-American if you support the process being used by the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) in their impeachment inquiry. Everything they are doing violates the very essence of what was deemed to be American and what was totally different from the rest of the world when our nation was founded.
Let us explore what I just stated. The United States, contrary to what the schools are teaching and what the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are preaching, is a unique nation. We were founded on the principles of our natural rights coming from the Creator and not from government. We were founded on the concept of “rule of law” and not “arbitrary law” which is the difference between freedom and tyranny. It is this principle that is being changed by the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats).
When employing “rule of law,” fairness, total transparency, the investigation of a crime and not an individual, and the burden of proof of guilt is on the accuser and not the proof of innocence by the accused are essential. When employing “arbitrary law,” it is just the opposite. Tyrants pay no attention to fairness, all is done in secret, they accuse an individual and then find a crime, real or imagined, and the accused must prove their innocence.
The Marxist/Progressives are using the tyrannical principle in their impeachment inquiry just as they did in their hearings on Judge Bork, Judge Thomas, Judge Kavanaugh, and now on President Trump. The concept of fairness means that we would use facts and not innuendo. We would not lie about and distort the known statements of the accused for which Schiff is now infamous. Everything the accuser has must be given to the accused for their defense unlike Nadler, Schiff and Mueiller did which is to conceal anything that would exonerate President Trump.
A tyrant holds all proceedings in secrecy as opposed to the requirements of the United States Constitution which calls for due process and total transparency. The accused not only must know who the accuser is, but must be able to confront the accuser in open court. The accused is always given the opportunity to cross examine and to call their own witnesses.
A tyrant will state that the individual is the problem and must be removed so a crime, any crime, even a concocted crime must be produced. In the situation of President Trump, it was determined by the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) that if nominated he must be impeached, if elected he must be impeached. The impeachment was declared and the hunt for a crime began. Having found no crime, other than that he was elected by the American public per the requirements of the United States Constitution, they began their search for a crime. Being able to find none, they have resorted to the champion of all tyrants, a concocted crime. When the Russian hoax failed, they resorted to the Ukraine accusations. The very crime for which they are trying to convict President Trump, we have learned that both Biden and a group of three Marxist/Progressive (Democrats) committed. Biden admitted to the crime on video and the three Senators wrote a letter that is now public knowledge.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have declared President Trump guilty without any proof of a crime, without practicing the Constitutionally protected practice of due process of law, and without even offering him the ability to present a defense. Remember the accuser must prove guilt. The accused is always given the assumption of innocence. In fact, President Trump is not even being afforded the Constitutionally protected requirement of knowing who his accuser is, knowing what the accuser is saying, and being able to cross examine the accuser.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have assumed the role of tyrant and forsaken any resemblance of “rule of law,” which includes fairness and fact finding to arrive at truth. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have in fact stated that truth is what ever they want it to be. This was openly stated by Biden when he said, “we never let facts get in the way of truth.” This is anti-American.
YOU ARE ANTI-AMERICAN IF YOU IN ANY WAY SUPPORT THE PROCESS BEING USED BY THE MARXIST/PROGRESSIVES (DEMOCRATS) IN THEIR COUP TO OVERTURN A FAIR ELECTION. YOU ARE ANTI-AMERICAN IF YOU IN ANY WAY DEFEND PELOSI AND SCHIFF AS THEY LIE AND MAKE A MOCKERY OF THE CONSTITUTIONALLY MANDATED DUE PROCESS OF LAW. YOU ARE IN FACT A “USEFUL IDIOT” (as stated by Saul Alinsky) TO THE OPEN ATTEMPT TO PERVERT THE VERY UNIQUENESS OF THE UNITED STATES BY THE MARXIST/PROGRESSIVES (DEMOCRATS) IN THEIR OPEN AND DECLARED QUEST TO FUNDAMENTALLY TRANSFORM THE UNITED STATES FROM A FREE NATION TO A MARXIST TOTALITARIAN STATE UNDER THE DICTATORSHIP OF THE PROLETARIAT.
If you identify with the above, you are helping to pave "The Road to Tyranny." You are an accessory to the overthrow of the Constitution of the United States.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) and some Republican establishment have fought Donald Trump even before he was nominated to be the Republican candidate for president in a way we have not witnessed in presidential politics for decades if ever. The attacks on Trump as a candidate for the nomination, as a candidate for president, and now as president go back to the worst times, we have witnessed in the United States including the campaign between Thomas Jefferson and John Adams and the campaign between Andrew Jackson and John Quincy Adams. Both of those campaigns, like the campaigns against candidate Trump, nominee Trump, and President Trump, have been personal and not policy oriented, filled with innuendo and void of fact and logic.
Why the enemies of President Trump fear him so greatly is exposed by their very own.
The prospect of four more years has already captured the fevered imaginations of Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) and never-Trump Republicans. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi predicted, “The reelection of Donald Trump would do irreparable damage to the United States.” Even the president’s own supporters envision an emboldened incumbent who pulverizes political norms with a vigor, to borrow the president’s go-to line, the likes of which the world has never seen.
And there it is. Pelosi states that the president would do irreparable damage to the United States. Pelosi and her comrades have already told us how much they hate our Constitution and the principles upon which our nation was founded; individualism and capitalism, rule of law, limited government, divided government, and sovereignty of the people. The United States of which Pelosi speaks is the United States envisioned by the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) promised by Comrade Obama and the United States proclaimed by the current candidates to be the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) candidate.
The United States of which Pelosi speaks is a United States that is a collectivist (Marxist, communist, socialist, progressive, Democrat – all virtually the same) nation. This United States would be a nation with arbitrary law as we are witnessing with the impeachment fiasco, it would be big bureaucratic dictatorial government, concentrated power in the hands of the judicial branch and not divided power, and government as sovereign with the people as the servants. This movement has been in a full-frontal assault since at least the days of Woodrow Wilson. The movement has only had serious challenges and setbacks during the administrations of Coolidge and Reagan, until now. President Trump is as skilled at fighting the enemies of freedom as Napoleon was at bringing all of Europe under his control.
The other great fear is that President Trump “will pulverize political norms with vigor.” Yes, that he is doing. President Trump is not only draining the swam of collectivists who despise everything about the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution of the United States, and the Bill of Right, but he is exposing this deep hatred for all the principles upon which the United States was founded. Today we know for instance that many agencies within the executive branch of government had and have organized efforts to undermine the elected officials when those elected officials do not conform to the collectivist agenda. Today we know, for instance, that many who are leaders of the collectivist movement were and still are using the political norms to enrich their families, friends, and themselves, both unlawfully and unethically. Today we know, for instance, that the political norms include illegal and unethical domestic political norms of enriching themselves in the manner the late Elijah Cummings and his wife did by diverting funds designated for the people in Baltimore to themselves and by receiving security deposits from those who had matters before the committees headed by the late Elijah Cummings.
Yes, these collectivists fear another four years of irreparable damage and pulverizing political norms that have benefited them and brought about horrible conditions for the “people.” This is the normal and standard means in any and all collectivist nations and the mind of the collectivist.
The real question is, which freedom do you want? The left, from way before Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Castro, Chavez, Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Comrades Obama, Sanders, Warren, AOC, and on and on have always promised a freedom. Marx said everybody should be free from the obligations of life so they can pursue their dreams. Pelosi told us that now that we had Obamacare, people were free to pursue their dreams because they were free from the obligation of worrying about their health coverage. She did not mention that the quality of care would greatly diminish.
Now we have the darling, AOC, tell us: “We Must Have the Government Control Things, So We Can Be More Free.” Thank you, AOC. You absorbed your indoctrination and just keep on giving and giving. This is exactly the same song and dance all collectivists (Marxists, communists, socialists, progressives, Democrats, - all virtually the same) have sung since the beginning of time.
The collectivist has always said that the people are oppressed and are slaves to everybody except government. Therefore, government is the way they can be free. They claim that if government is responsible for making all economic and social decisions for the individual, the individual is free, not only from free the drudgery of making choices in these arenas, but they are also free from the consequences of the decisions. All the individual has to do is to totally conform to the dictates of the government, accept the rewards the government grants to them to supply the necessities for happiness the government determines are sufficient for such necessities, and accept the state as their god, discarding any other.
This model has been tried again and again. Many societies have accepted this concept, and once the people said such things as you cannot fight them so we might just as well accept the inevitable, the inevitable happened. People were free from the drudgery of making choices, because there were no choices to be made. All people were in the same economic position, which was poverty, except for the elite who claimed they were entitled because they had assumed the responsibility of making the choices from which they had freed the people from making. This was the freedom promised and it was the freedom delivered.
The freedom promised by the conservative is exactly the opposite. This freedom places the "drudgery" of making choices, both social and economic, directly on the individual. It also places the responsibility for the consequences of those choices squarely at the feet of the individual. The freedom is that you can live as an individual. You are free to pursue your dreams. You are free to not only aspire, but to also achieve and accomplish. You are not only free to think for yourself, but you are encouraged to think outside the box and challenge not only yourself, but also society as a whole. You are free to raise your children with your principles and not the conforming dictates of the government.
The differences between these freedoms are immense. History has proven that to have freedom from choice, you have a society with a collapsed society, both socially and economically. You have a society that is in a state of despair and destitution. You have a society with no hope or optimism. There is no example where AOC’s ideas have brought about societies where both failures and success existed, where the living standards of the whole population significantly rose, where competition spurred new and sometime miraculous advancements in all areas, where the population in general were vibrant and optimistic believing the only limits they had were those they placed on themselves.
The AOC,’s believe freedom is free from responsibility and the challenge of being the individual you are. The Conservatives believe freedom is being free from accepting the results for ourselves that others dictate for us. The AOC’s believe that freedom and happiness are complete conformity to one ideal which is known as collectivism. The Conservative believes all should strive to be the individual they are.
The American society is at a crossroads. The choices before us are the freedom from choice and responsibility which requires acceptance to the dictates of the state, or we accept the freedom to make our own choices which requires the acceptance that we are responsible for the consequences of our choices, both positive and negative.
IT IS MY PRAYER AND DESIRE THAT WE CHOOSE WISELY. WE KNOW THE RESULTS OF BOTH PATHS.
Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.