Joe Biden is very unhappy with Hillary Clinton. Hillary Clinton had the 2016 election won, was the word among the wisest political pundits. That was correct, President Trump had no path to the White House. You could read this in the New York Times and hear it on every news broadcast. Than something happened on the evening of November 8, 2016. As the evening wore on it became apparent that Hillary had no path to victory. All those days and evenings she decided to spend at home as opposed to going to Michigan, Wisconsin, Florida, and so many other states has proven very costly for the Clinton Foundation and for the Biden family finances.
If Hillary had won, pay for play with the Clinton Foundation would still be in vogue and Hunter Biden would never have been exposed. The payments to the Clinton Foundation could have continued for special attention and special decisions would continue to be made. Hunter Biden could still be collecting his monthly payments from Ukraine and receiving his funds for his fund from the Chinese. Just as Obama turned his eye on these questionable practices at best, Hillary would be turning her eye.
But, Hillary lost. Trump won, and ironically, because Trump won and the Marxist/Progressives insisted on running a coup to overthrow President Trump, the corruption of the Biden family has been exposed. This has proven very costly for Joe and Son.
A kangaroo court is a court that ignores recognized standards of law or justice, and often carries little or no official standing in the territory within which it resides. The term may also apply to a court held by a legitimate judicial authority who intentionally disregards the court's legal or ethical obligations.
Where have we seen kangaroo courts used?
The Moscow Trials were a series of trials held in the Soviet Union at the instigation of Joseph Stalin between 1936 and 1938 against Trotskyists and members of Right Opposition of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, including head of the NKVD, Nikolai Yezhov, the perpetrator of the Great Purge, for his large number of purges. There were three Moscow Trials: the Case of the Trotskyite-Zinovievite Terrorist Center (Zinoviev-Kamenev Trial, aka "Trial of the Sixteen," 1936), the Case of the Anti-Soviet Trotskyist Center (Pyatakov-Radek Trial, 1937), and the Case of the Anti-Soviet "Bloc of Rights and Trotskyites" (Bukharin-Rykov Trial, aka "Trial of the Twenty-One," 1938).
The defendants of these were Old Bolshevik party leaders and top officials of the Soviet secret police. Most defendants were charged under Article 58 of the RSFSR Penal Code with conspiring with the western powers to assassinate Stalin and other Soviet leaders, dismember the Soviet Union, and restore capitalism.
The Moscow Trials led to the execution of many of the defendants. They are generally seen as part of Stalin's Great Purge, an attempt to rid the party of current or prior oppositionists, especially but not exclusively Trotskyists, and any leading Bolshevik cadre from the time of the Russian Revolution or earlier, who might even potentially become a figurehead for the growing discontent in the Soviet populace resulting from Stalin's mismanagement of the economy.
The Chinese government's prosecutions of Bo Xilai, deposed Politburo leader, and Gu Kailai, his allegedly murderous wife, have again brought China's criminal justice system to world attention. As a citizen’s most important protection against a government’s arbitrary exercise of power over his person, criminal justice is perhaps the most telling indication of a government’s adherence to human rights standards.
Cuba: Kangaroo Courts
The United States condemns the Cuban regime's initiation of trials against at least 78 members of independent Cuban civil society.
Dozens of Cubans whose only "crimes" were to demand their fundamental rights of assembly now face summary justice in regime kangaroo courts. The Cuban government has denied the international media and members of the diplomatic corps permission even to observe these sham proceedings.
We understand that at least a dozen individuals -- including democracy stalwart Marta Beatriz Roque, poet and independent journalist Raul Rivero, independent labor activist Pedro Pablo Alvarez and civil disobedience advocate Oscar Elias Biscet and "Todos Unidos" leader Oswaldo Alfonso all face life sentences. A number of Project Varela organizers, including Oswaldo Payá's number two, Antonio Diaz, face 15 to 30 years in prison.
The Castro regime's actions are the most despicable act of political repression in the Americas in a decade. While the rest of the hemisphere has moved toward greater freedom, the anachronistic Cuban government appears to be retreating into Stalinism.
Oct. 9, 2019 at 1:54 p.m. PDT
On my Wednesday radio show, I spoke with Beltway reporters and pundits from across the spectrum of outlets and points-of-view: Jonathan Allen of NBC News, Karen Tumulty of The Post, Chris Cillizza of CNN, Eliana Johnson of the Washington Free Beacon and Jim Geraghty of the National Review. To each, I posed the key question: Do the House Democrats run the risk of turning their impeachment “inquiry” into a kangaroo court by so obviously and repeatedly bending or breaking with the precedents of impeachments past? All agreed it is a risk, though each evaluated the risk differently.
By October 17, 2019, any rational thinker can only conclude that we are seeing the same standards and procedures employed by Stalin, Moa, and Castro employed by their comrades, the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats).
The SA — Sturmabteilung, meaning ‘assault division’ — also known as the Brownshirts or Storm Troopers, was a violent paramilitary group attached to the Nazi Party in pre-World War Two Germany.
The SA was instrumental in the Nazi’s rise to power and played a diminished role during the Second World War. The Brownshirts are infamous for their operation outside of the law and their violent intimidation of Germany’s leftists and Jewish population. It was the SA’s thuggish vigilantism, independence from the regular army.
A documentary about Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson has reportedly been canceled in multiple locations amid complaints and threats of violence from left-wing activists.
“The Rise Of Jordan Peterson” was recently canceled in locations such as Toronto and Brooklyn, according to a piece published Monday by The Stranger. Now, a Portland showing is in jeopardy after a pastor who had been preparing to screen the film at his church received threats of violence.
“Fair warning,” a threat directed at the pastor published Monday reads. “Several community organizations are planning to shut down your showing of the Jordan Peterson propaganda film. While many of us aren’t Christian and some even flat-out condemn the religion, we do not want any harm to come to your place of worship or those within.”
The community organizations are organizations such as ANTIFA. They are organizations, that like the Brownshirts despise freedom and liberty. They support control by the state; control that dictates how each individual is to think and how each individual is to live their lives.
Yes, this is the same philosophy of all collectivists (Marxists, communists, socialists, progressives, Democrats – all virtually the same) who believe a tyrannical government dictating the lives and thoughts of the people is freedom. And it is freedom from the obligation of the making choices for yourself because the only choice a person needs to make is the choice to adhere strictly to the dictates of the state. We saw this in Russia, later to be the Soviet Union, the Soviet Bloc states, Mao’s China, Castro’s Cuba, Chavez’s Venezuela, and now the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are calling for this same freedom for the United States.
Woodrow Wilson called for the United States Constitution to be changed so the United States would be much more like a parliamentary system. He instituted many progressive policies including the steeply progressive income tax Karl Marx said was mandatory for a transformation to a Marxist totalitarian state.
Franklin Delano Roosevelt is often regarded the destroyer of the United States Constitution. He believed in greatly expanding the ability of the government to control the lives of the citizens including confiscating their incomes on what he called a fair and just basis. FDR and his New Dealers wanted a “fair and just” income tax with stiff tax rates on high incomes. FDR proposed a 100 percent top tax rate. Roosevelt told Congress in April 1942, “no American citizen ought to have a net income, after he has paid his taxes, of more than $25,000 a year.”
Comrade and Islamic Jihad sympathizer Barack Obama told American entrepreneurs that they did not build their companies, but the community built it for them. He also told all, that now they must share what the community gave them.
Bernie Sanders is campaigning on the basis that he is a socialist and distancing himself from another socialist, Elizabeth Warren, because he said she is a capitalist. Yes, that is in a campaign to be President of the United States and not President of Cuba or Venezuela.
Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib, said that House Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have talked about arresting and detaining members of President Donald Trump's administration. This is what dictators in banana republics do; places like Cuba and Venezuela. This is what Lenin and Stalin did. This is what Mao did. This is what Hitler did. Yes, this is what collectivists (Marxist, communists, socialists, progressives, Democrats – all virtually the same) have done throughout history and is what the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) advocate as they continue their coup to fundamentally transform the United States into a Marxist totalitarian state.
The history and relentlessness pursuit by the collectivists to transform the Untied States, a transformation called for by Marx and Obama, to a Marxist totalitarian state has been happening for over 100 years. The collectivists believed it would have been completely accomplished if Hillary Clinton was elected. Donald Trump foiled that plan and the collectivists will stop at nothing to destroy President Trump in their determination to fundamentally transform the United States to a Marxist totalitarian state.
You as a freedom loving American must understand that what is taking place is an outright and vicious coup that believes “the ends always justify the means.” You who call yourselves Americans but support the Democrat party must understand you are supporting a party that has as its only goal the overthrow of a duly elected president which would also be the complete overthrow of the Constitution of the United States. If you want to see what your life would be like in ten years or so and how your children would live, just look at what it is happening in Venezuela. This is the inevitable result of every collectivist movement.
What I am stating is based on fact. If you, like Biden, believe that facts cannot get in the way of truth, welcome to the collectivist world, welcome to the world of the people of Venezuela.
“The actions taken to date by the president have seriously violated the Constitution,” Ms. Pelosi said in a brief speech invoking the nation’s founding principles. Mr. Trump, she added, “must be held accountable — no one is above the law.”
The Constitution of which you speak Ms. Pelosi, would it be the same United States Constitution that was drafted and signed in Philadelphia in 1787 and then ratified by the different states, yes the very Constitution Comrade and Islamist Jihad sympathizer Barack Obama told us was severely flawed, the same document you, Obama, and the other Marxist/Progressives say should be a living document?
This is what great Americans have stated about the United States Constitution that was drafted and signed in 1787, ratified, and then became the absolute law of the new nation, the United States of America.
“The Constitution that I interpret and apply is not living, but dead, or as I prefer to call it, enduring. It means, today, not what current society, much less the court, thinks it ought to mean, but what it meant when it was adopted.” The late great Justice Scalia
The real problem Pelosi and her fellow Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) seem to have with the Constitution of the United States is because as John Adams stated, “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”
The United States Constitution understands the principles mandatory for freedom and independence, those principles that protect us from the tyranny of government, which is the only tyranny that exists. The principles so necessary are: Natural rights are given by the Creator and not government, rule of law must prevail and not arbitrary law as is the very essence of tyranny, the government must be limited in its power and scope, the power of government must be greatly divided, and the people must be the sovereign while government serves only as a servant to the people and protector of the rights of the people. The Constitution cannot be revised to accommodate temporary whims of select factions.
“The Constitution of the United States was made not merely for the generation that then existed, but for posterity- unlimited, undefined, endless, perpetual posterity.” Henry Clay
” This Constitution was not made for a day, nor is it composed of such flexible materials as to be warped to the purposes of a casually ascendant influence.” John Tyler
Others have hated the constraints the Constitution places on the government to invade, reduce, restrict, and eliminate the natural rights of the people and the freedom of the people that would enable the government to become a tyrannical government that controls the lives and thoughts of the people. The goal of collectivists (Marxists, communists, socialists, progressives, Democrats, - all virtually the same) is to be sovereign with the people beholding to the government or slaves to the government. This is why they despise the United States and especially despise the Constitution of the United States.
In the quest of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) to fundamentally transform the United States, they have belittled and attempted to change the Constitution through any means they can. They have put forth the idea that the Constitution is a living document, a concept that contradicts the very essence of the Constitution as stated by the great Americans above.
Living Constitution is a term used to describe the Constitution's ability to change to meet the needs of each generation without the process of amending. This is a concept used in interpreting the Constitution of U.S. It is based on the notion that Constitution of the United States has relevant meaning beyond the original text and is an evolving and dynamic document that changes over time. Therefore, the views of contemporaneous society should be considered when interpreting key constitutional phrases.
Franklin Roosevelt, who was one of the most if not the most destructive individuals of the United States Constitution, stated in direct contrast to the intent of the Constitution, “The United States Constitution has proved itself the most marvelously elastic compilation of rules of government ever written.”
No where do we find that any drafter, signer, or ratifier of the Constitution intended that it be elastic. Elastic means living, or the Constitution can mean anything you want it to mean at any point in time; in other words, the Constitution has no meaning at all.
Dedicated collectivist and Islamist Jihad supporter, Comrade Obama described the U.S. Constitution as having “deep flaws”
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) call for changes to the Constitution on almost a daily basis The means they wish to change the Constitution is in fact UN-constitutional. We hear calls to change the way our President is elected, to redefine due process of law, to redefine the core of “rule of law” or the accuser must prove guilt and not that the accused must prove innocence, to change basic freedoms such as the right to freely practice our worship of God, to freely speak our thoughts even when they are not popular or conforming, and to bear arms to protect us from the tyranny of government. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are demanding these changes be made through legislative, executive, or judicial action. That would be UN-constitutional. The only way the Constitution would allow these changes to be made would be through amendment.
So, Ms. Pelosi, your claim that the Constitution is being trampled is incorrect if you are referring to the Constitution that was drafted and signed in 1787 and then ratified. Your claim could be correct if you are referring to the Constitution as desired by the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats). That Constitution can mean anything to anyone at any time so it has no meaning at all. According to that Constitution, if you declare it to be so, than it is so.
Just when you thought they had used every excuse in the world to justify their goal of a Marxist classless society that is totally conforming (all must think and act the same and that is to conform to their collectivist ideology,) and totally equal society, (that is all live in a state of poverty (except the elite who are sacrificing for the good of all)) so they are easily manipulated and controlled, the collectivists (Marxist, communists, socialists, progressives, Democrats, - all virtually the same) come up with even more justifications.
Elizabeth Warren is taking Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) efforts to combat climate change one step further, releasing a plan that would address “environmental racism.” Now it is not just white males that are racists, but the environment. And then we learn the justification for accusing the environment of being racist: The $1.5 trillion plan would more heavily invest in low-income and minority communities in the form of job-training programs and technologies. Yes, another justification for government intrusion and government confiscating from some to reward their power base.
“Our crisis of environmental injustice is the result of decades of discrimination and environmental racism compounding in communities that have been overlooked for too long,” according to the new plan. Was Baltimore overlooked we might ask, and of course the answer is no. Millions of dollars were sent to Baltimore and the community remains the same, but Elijah Cummings has a net worth in the millions as do many of his friends running Baltimore. Billions of dollars have been spent on the homeless situation in California as the homeless numbers continue to increase, as does the net worth of Marxist/Progressive (Democrats) who say only more dollars will solve the homeless situation. Apparently, the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) believe they should be rewarded even more for their sacrifice of speaking for the homeless.
“The same communities that have borne the brunt of industrial pollution are now on the front lines of climate change, often getting hit first and worst,” Warren wrote, arguing that it’s a “result of multiple choices that put corporate profits before people, while our government looked the other way.” We are all to believe that climate change is an isolated happening in specific small areas of cities. Just like the Constitution can mean anything that is appropriate to support the collectivist agenda, climate and change can mean anything that is appropriate to support the collectivist agenda of transforming the United States from a free and independent society to a Marxist totalitarian state as promised by Comrade Obama.
Warren added: “It is unacceptable, and it must change.” What Warren is stating is that people must become more conforming and more equal with Warren and the other Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) gaining even more control over the lives and minds of Americans. What is really sad is that many Americans believe it is this agenda that will free them. This agenda will free them from the burden and responsibility of making their own decisions, living their own lives, having their own thoughts, being responsible for their own decisions, and deciding what they should have for dinner, what car they should purchase, and what house they should purchase, because there will be no food to purchase, cars will not be allowed, and all housing will be government housing and will be shared with several others. If you do not believe these facts, yes Biden I believe in facts, look at Venezuela today, or any other society that believed these lies told by other proponents of the hoax that is known as “Hope and Change.”
A quick review finds that the United States is a unique country. We were the first nation to be founded on the idea that people have natural rights granted by the Creator that are independent of government. These rights include life, liberty, and property, or the right to pursue our own happiness. Our Constitution was a unique document in that no other country had ever had a Constitution that was hailed as the law of the land. In our Constitution the founders did many unique things, but perhaps the two most unique were that they recognized that any form of government is always the biggest threat to the freedom of the people, so they specifically limited the power of government by defining what powers it would have. They recognized that freedom and liberty could only survive if power was divested between different independent branches of government, and they understood that government would try to control the freedom of the people so they specifically stated that the government was prevented from making any laws that limited the natural rights of the people.
Perhaps the most unique aspect of our new nation was that the people would be the sovereign, or the ruler and the government would be in place to serve and not to rule. Many then and now have ridiculed this idea stating that people must be controlled and ruled because they are not capable of ruling their own lives much less a government. These doubters about people being able to rule a country appear to have been proven correct. Polling conducted by the Annenberg Foundation and Xavier University has revealed, for example, that nearly half of adult Americans cannot pass the basic test — the test passed by more than 90 percent of immigrants — given to aspiring citizens. Worse, American citizens seem to demonstrate their greatest ignorance about the basics of the American political system. Eighty-five percent have no idea what the “rule of law” is, which is a fundamental feature of our county.
But it gets worse. Some two-thirds do not know there are three branches of government. And 71 percent of American adult citizens do not know that our Constitution is the source of supreme law in the United States. It is this failure of the American public that has allowed the government to usurp the freedom and sovereignty of the American people, or perhaps more correctly, this is how the American people have abdicated their rights to freedom and sovereignty.
We the people no longer say that we can handle our own affairs and lives and resent any intrusion by the government. That is right, many Americans, especially those who call themselves Democrats, instead say government, please tell me what you will and will not do to support me and my family, government please solve all my problems for me, and government provide all my needs for me and my family so I do not need to be responsible. Government, when I make a choice, understand that I am not responsible for any negative consequences because somehow, I was and am a victim of someone or something. Yes, government please run my life for me and also tell me how to think.
In today’s world, we Americans are rejecting the principles our founders understood were critical to our freedom and our sovereignty. One of these key principles is the idea of fair and equal treatment under the law. This concept was established even before the Declaration of Independence was signed. Some British soldiers shot and killed some unarmed citizens of Boston. The American principle that came from this was that these British soldiers should be given a fair trial and be able to have a lawyer, be able to confront their accusers, were not required to establish their innocence but instead their guilt must be proven, and the proceeds would be conducted in public and be completely transparent. The lawyer that defended these British soldiers was John Adams, the same John Adams who was instrumental in writing the Declaration of Independence, who served as our first vice president and our second president, and who stated that the facts must rule and not sentiment, which is exactly the opposite of what Joe Biden said when he stated that facts cannot get in the way of truth.
The founders also understood that freedom of speech was the cornerstone of freedom and a sovereign people. So definite were they about this irrefutable truth that they stated in the first amendment that congress could make NO law abridging (that means to limit) this fundamental right. Today we are seeing this cornerstone of freedom being attacked by claiming that speech that might hurt the feelings of others is hate speech, and this hate speech can be abridged. It was this speech that expresses different ideas and political thoughts that was the speech the first amendment protects. Today we have mobs and thugs disrupting free expression of speech almost on a weekly basis and a major political party supports, promotes, and defends these mobs and thugs. Today we have in all facets of our society, but perhaps most prevalent in the very facet where free speech should prevail, our educational institutions, being limited, curtailed, and even dictated to conform to only one ideal.
We even have today, in our political process, those who would aspire to become our chief executive, demanding the limitation and curtailment of the speech of our current chief executive because they disagree with that speech or that speech is revealing corruption to which they are a party.
The most frightening aspect for the call for the reversal of the very principles our founders understood where critical for the protection and thus preserving freedom of the people and the sovereignty of the people, is that these calls are being made in the name of preserving freedom and protecting and preserving the Constitution of the United States. As we learned in the poll noted above, the overwhelming number of Americans have no idea that what these left-wing politicians are in fact advocating, is a complete obliteration of fairness, rule of law, limited government, divided government, and sovereignty of the people. Yes, they are calling for a complete repudiation of the unique principles upon which our nation was founded and as Obama stated, to fundamentally transform the United States to a Marxist tyrannical state.
Any citizen who has not taken the time or made the effort to study our founding would be what Alinsky called a “useful idiot.” Any who would call themselves a Democrat and support the modern Democrat party, which is in fact the Marxist/Progressive Party, would be what Alinsky called a “useful Idiot.” Any who would support the likes of RHINO’s such as the now deceased John McCain, and the still living Romney, Ryan, Boehner and the like would be what Alinsky called a “useful idiot.” America will lose its freedom and sovereignty of the people because the American people will and are abdicating their rights to freedom and sovereignty as shown by the above poll and the huge number of what Alinsky called “useful idiots.” If you are in any of the above categories, you can escape from that scourge by taking the time and making the effort to learn the uniqueness of America and how that uniqueness was to be protected and preserved, and by learning what inevitably happens to any nation that follows the course outlined by the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats).
What has happened to Chubby Nadler? He used to dominate the headlines. Apparently, Pelosi also recognized how incompetent he is.
What has happened to Crooked Cummings? Apparently, Pelosi does not want the corruption in Baltimore and the corruption of Crooked Cummings wife’s non-profits to be exposed and dominate the headlines.
Pelosi is left with Shifty Schiff, but his inability to veil his lies is clouding his usefulness, even in a party, The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) and their allies the Mainstream Media who live and die by the collectivist axiom, “The ends always justify the means.” The collectivists who came before the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party, those who set the standards for veiling lies and deceit such as Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Castro, and Chavez to name a few would be appalled at the likes of Shifty Schiff. It looks like Pelosi will have to say good-bye to him soon.
But, with Pelosi determined to dominate the headlines with manufactured stories in the quest to impede and derail President Trump’s accomplishment of exposing the swamp and draining the swamp, the very swamp that Obama so successfully filled with dedicated collectivists who hate America, through threatening impeachment, has really hurt the incompetent field of Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) candidates for president.
When was the last time we saw any of these candidates in the headlines? The heart attack of Sanders, the continuing lies of Warren (Is Shifty Schiff like Warren or is Warren like Shifty Schiff), the corruption of Biden with his son and his brother, the inconsistencies of Harris and Booker, the self-righteousness of Buttigieg, and on and on we could go, have all been relegated to the 14th page of papers or 10 second news stories.
Perhaps this is the real plan of Pelosi in continuing this charade. Perhaps Pelosi recognizes the clown show that is the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) primary and she is trying to hide these clowns in Old Mother Hubbard’s cupboard. The cupboard is no longer bare, it is filled with clowns and hidden from the American public.
Pelosi must think that self-proclaimed victim Hillary is their best 2020 chance. If Pelosi can continue her effort to convince some Americans that it was the Trump campaign and not the Clinton campaign that colluded with the Russians, and now we are learning with Ukraine, she can avoid the embarrassment of Biden, Sanders, or Warren (The rest are out of the race and just have to make the announcement) and bring in Hillary who might be able to hold enough votes to maintain the house and ensure that more charades can be played to keep the basics of the swamp intact and maintain a way to continue to enrich her family and the families of those cronies who adhere to the collectivist (Marxist, communist, socialist, progressive, Democrat, - all virtually the same) line.
Make no mistake, President Trump is a definite threat to the collectivists (Marxists, communists, socialists, progressives, Democrats – all virtually the same) and their staunch allies the Mainstream Press. President Trump is not a RINO like McCain, Romney, Ryan, and Boehner, that is I will talk the conservative talk but will cave and refuse to walk the walk. The reason for these RHINO’s to cave so quickly to the collectivists, is because they did not and do not believe what they were saying to get elected but were and are in fact big government and central planning people. We could say they are and were Mensheviks as opposed to Bolsheviks; that is they had and have the same goal as did Lenin, just a different way of getting there.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) and Mainstream Media used these people. They knew they would talk about opposing the collectivist movement, but when it came time for action, the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) could always count on their support. We saw that time after time when it came to big spending and budget breaking continuing resolutions. Perhaps the epitome of caving was John McCain who rose from his death bed to march down the halls of the Senate to cast his collectivist vote against ending Obamacare. McCain wanted to erase any doubt that might have been in anybody’s mind that he was a fraud and was a true Bolshevik just as Trotsky had to prove.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) and Mainstream Media learned that if Trump was elected, they would be dealing with an individual who said what he meant and meant what he said and was not afraid to fight for his beliefs. This was of course a danger to the collectivist movement. Trump was not McCain or Romney. Trump was a fighter and was neither a Menshevik or a Bolshevik but an American who believed in Individualism, The Declaration of Independence, The Constitution of the United States, and the Bill of Rights. Oh, how the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) wished they could have Romney or Ryan.
President Trump has been a great example to other true conservatives that if we are to remain a free and independent people we must fight for it just as our founders had to fight for the same freedom against great odds and against those who wanted to control the lives and their thoughts of others.
Now that conservatives have seen President Trump rise every day with determination and energy to fight the threat of tyranny by the collectivists, they have realized they can and must do the same. The results are that the hoaxes of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have been and continue to be exposed. The corruption within the deep state and the use of high positions of power to enrich families is being exposed. When the Mainstream Media tries to protect and do their cover up, conservatives are speaking the truth and not being the timid and accommodating group they had previously been.
What we are witnessing is blatant lying without even a thinly veiled attempt to conceal the lie. We are seeing TV hosts and newspaper reporters resorting to outrage. Marxist/Progressives (Democrat) candidates are calling for suppression of speech, censorship by not allowing specific people on talk shows, and yes candidates trying to control and suppress speech by dictating the questions they can or can not be asked. Unlike past times, conservatives are actually fighting back against these collectivist tactics so successfully employed by the likes of collectivists from the past; Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Castro, and Chavez, to name a few.
Thank you, President Trump, for being a leader. You did not come from the swamp, you do not like or support the swamp, you understand the threat the swamp poses to our freedom, and most importantly you are willing to fight the swamp even if you must stand alone, as you did for a while. You are no longer standing alone, and more and more every day, others who love freedom are willing to stand by you and fight with you. Of all your great accomplishments, exposing and then draining the swamp will be your greatest accomplishment, because it is the swamp that is the greatest threat to freedom.
Joe Biden will once again be a loser in another quest for a run to be president. I can only imagine that Joe and Hunter are not discussing how Joe can end his candidacy in the best face-saving way that will protect Hunter and allow both of them to keep the money they amassed during Joe’s years as Vice President. Hunter should have himself in a good enough financial position that he should not have to worry about going to work in the morning but rest and get ready for another evening of drugging and whoring. Imagine how disappointed he is with his father after his father made it all possible for him to be paid lots of money by using his office to strong arm people into giving his unqualified son positions and funds.
When Joe declared he would be a candidate, he became the front runner on the basis that he was the only Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) who could be elected. The claim was that Joe was likeable and he was a moderate, or he was not declared socialist as are Sanders and Warren. Joe quickly started to slip in the polls as he began to speak in public and it became clear once again that not only is Joe getting much older, but he is even more intellectually challenged than he was acclaimed to be. He was now a gaffe every hour as opposed to a gaffe every day. His handlers greatly limited his appearances. He is now back to gaffe a day Joe.
Now the very actions, those of helping his family become rich by using his office, that kept Joe out of the 2016 race, because Hillary promised to make them a campaign issue, have come back to haunt him once again. That Joe used his office to enrich his druggie and whoremongering son can not be disputed. If it had been Hillary that made it an issue, the press would have reported on the facts and not the fiction of the offenses. Joe, understanding that lies will be exposed, has now declared that questions about Ukraine and China are off limits for him and he refuses to answer them.
Not only is Joe losing in the polls, but his fundraising has tanked as well. Joe is not even in a position to go to Ukraine and China and blackmail them into picking up the slack. Joe is now running another failed campaign to be president. The winners are the American people. Considering what Joe was able to give away China while he was Vice President, imagine what he would have given as President. Hunter is the winner. He still has his money and he can do what he likes most to do and what he does best, drugging and whoring.
Joe had the best possibility he has ever had to win the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) nomination. Bernie had a heart attack, but he was slipping anyway. Warren cannot tell the truth about anything, and she is alienating even hard-core Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) by trying to out Marx, Marx and Lenin. Harris and Booker are showing they are even more inept as candidates than they are as members of the Judiciary Committee. There is just not another candidate that has any traction. The only candidate that has shown any common sense is Tulsi Gabbard, and because she has tried to be somewhat reasonable, she is totally ostracized by the press and the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party machinery.
Yes, Joe once again you have blown your chances. The other times were because of your intellectual limitations and not being capable of thinking before you speak, just blurting out the truths your fellow comrades wanted to remain a secret such as; “we never allow facts to get in the way of our truth.” This time the story about your self-dealing was exposed, and the evidence is so overwhelming even the press does not believe your denials.
Joe is once again a loser, but the good news is that means the American people are the winners. However, it does raise the question of whether or not Hillary will be “forced” into the race to save her fellow collectivists (Marxists, communists, socialists, progressives, Democrats – all virtually the same). One would have to wonder if her entering would also rejuvenate contributions to the Clinton Foundation now that the possibility of pay to play was revived.
Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.