We are witnessing a coup. This is a communist coup to overthrow the Republic our founders established. This Republic was based on a sovereign people with a government that served this sovereign. In order to accomplish and maintain this ideal, our founders understood it was critical that we always maintain a limited government and maintained a society that adhered to rule of law.
Principles of the Rule of Law Supremacy of the Law: For the laws made to govern the actions of government. The Principles of Equality before the Law: This implies that everybody is equal in the eyes of the law. The Principle of individual Rights: Laws are made in a country to protect the interest of the citizens.
It is so critical we understand that our founders understood the biggest threat to freedom was government, or what Marx called the “dictatorship of the proletariat.” Our Constitution was written with this understanding, but the founders stated that it was not enough to just have the limitations placed on our government defined within the Constitution, but we must specifically state that natural rights granted to us by our Creator could not be infringed upon by government, so they added the Bill of Rights as a part of the Constitution.
What we must understand is that the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) oppose the idea that support the concepts of limited government and rule of law and instead embrace the belief of Marx and Lenin that the people should be under the tyranny of the “dictatorship of the proletariat.”
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are stating this belief, are practicing this belief, and are adhering to this belief in their coup attempt to overthrow a duly elected president, an action which they understand will overthrow, our Constitution, our principle of peaceful transfer of power, and place government as sovereign of the people.
I do not state these facts lightly. However, when I study the beliefs and practices of Lenin, and compare them to the beliefs espoused by Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) candidates for president and when I compare the practices of Lenin to the practices of Pelosi and Schiff in their now stated coup attempt (that is right, this is a coup and not impeachment), a reasonable person can come to no other conclusion.
A special logic governs the Leninist (and Marxist/Progressive or Democrat) approach to morality, legality, and rights. In his famous address to the Youth Leagues, Lenin complains that bourgeois thinkers have slanderously denied that Bolsheviks have any ethics.
We reject any morality based on extra-human and extra-class concepts. We say that this is a deception. We say that morality is entirely subordinated to the interests of the proletariat’s class struggle. That is why we say that to us there is no such thing as a morality that stands outside human society; that is a fraud. To us morality is subordinated to the interests of the proletariat’s class struggle.
When people tell us about morality, we say: to a Communist all morality lies in this united discipline and conscious mass struggle against the exploiters.
In short, Bolshevik morality holds that whatever contributes to Bolshevik success is moral, whatever hinders it is immoral.
Imagine someone saying: “my detractors claim I have no morals, but that is sheer slander. On the contrary, I have a very strict moral code, from which I never deviate look out for number 1.” We might reply: the whole point of a moral code is to restrain you from acting only out of self-interest. Morality begins with number 2. A moral code that says you must do what you regard as your self-interest is no moral code at all. The same is true for a code that says the Communist Party is morally bound to do whatever it regards as in its interest.
Regarding law: If by law one means a code that binds the state as well as the individual, specifies what is and is not permitted, and eliminates arbitrariness, then Lenin entirely rejected law as “bourgeois.” He expressed utter contempt for the principles “no crime without law” and “no punishment without a crime.” Recall that he defined the dictatorship of the proletariat as rule based entirely on force absolutely unrestrained by any law. His more naïve followers imagined that rule by sheer terror would cease when Bolshevik hold on power was secure, or when the New Economic Policy relaxed restrictions on trade, but Lenin made a point of disillusioning them. “It is the biggest mistake to think that nep will put an end to the terror. We shall return to the terror, and to economic terror,” he wrote. When D. I. Kursky, People’s Commissariat of Justice, was formulating the first Soviet legal code, Lenin demanded that terror and arbitrary use of power be written into the code itself! “The law should not abolish terror,” he insisted. “It should be substantiated and legalized in principle, without evasion or embellishment.”
So far as I know, never before had the law prescribed lawlessness. Do as you wish, or else. Lenin had ascribed the fall of the Paris Commune to the failure to eliminate all law, and so the Soviet state was absolutely forbidden from exercising any restraint on arbitrary use of power. Indeed, officials were punished for such restraint, which Lenin called impermissible slackness and Stalin would deem lack of vigilance.
The same logic applied to rights. On paper, the Soviet Constitution of 1936 guaranteed more rights than any other state in the world. I recall a Soviet citizen telling me that people in the USSR had absolute freedom of speech—so long as they did not lie. I recalled this curious concept of freedom when a student defended complete freedom of speech except for hate speech—and hate speech included anything he disagreed with. Whatever did not seem hateful was actually a “dog-whistle.”
Lenin’s language, no less than his ethics, served as a model, taught in Soviet schools and recommended in books with titles like Lenin’s Language and On Lenin’s Polemical Art. In Lenin’s view, a true revolutionary did not establish the correctness of his beliefs by appealing to evidence or logic, as if there were some standards of truthfulness above social classes. Rather, one engaged in “blackening an opponent’s mug so well it takes him ages to get it clean again.” Nikolay Valentinov, a Bolshevik who knew Lenin well before becoming disillusioned, reports him saying: “There is only one answer to revisionism: smash its face in!”
And so here we are today, the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) embracing all that Lenin embraced. Lenin brought about a tyrannical government of terror under the rule of the “dictatorship of the proletariat.” The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) under the leadership of Pelosi and Schiff are attempting a coup to bring about this same tyranny under the leadership of the “dictatorship of the proletariat.”
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are telling us that in the interest of compassion and better and more fair health care, we must have a nationalized health care system. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are telling us that any who do not agree with this system are all the typical isms or we are evil people.
Nationalized health care is 0% about compassion and 100% about power. The collectivist (Marxists, communists, socialists, progressives, and Democrats, - all virtually the same) have always been about power and 0% about the good of the people. Collectivists such as Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Castro, Chavez, Wilson, FDR, Obama, Jarrett, Holder and on and on, never considered the people first, but always did what was necessary to put power in the hands of the government, which was power in their hands.
Lenin told us that nationalized health care is the archway to socialism. We have seen this same scenario play out in many European nations, Canada, and the United States. Health care under the control of the government always results in higher cost and less and poorer health care for the people. Always, check out anywhere in the world today where you have nationalized health care including Canada, the UK, Cuba, Venezuela, and the United States.
The VA is government control of health care. The VA has shown us that government health care is not concerned with the patient but is more concerned with bureaucratic procedures and control. It is these controls and procedures that manipulate the system while the patients die.
The collectivists have attempted to bring nationalized health care to the United States for years. In 1965, Johnson was successful, under lies and false pretenses of bringing Medicare. The result of Medicare is much higher health costs, more and more bureaucratic red tape, providers of health care being forced to participate in practices they do not support, and it has been the stepping stone for nationalized health care in the United States, which is serving as an archway to socialism.
Nationalized health care always increases costs, lowers the quality of care, places a large segment of any economy under government control, and gives the government the tool to control the people, just as Lenin said it would.
A National Health Service (NHS) trust in the UK has announced that it will deny treatment to patients it deems are ‘racists’ or ‘sexists’.
The North Bristol NHS Trust said that “threatening and offensive language,” as well as “racist or sexist language, gestures or behavior” and “malicious allegations” would all be punishable offenses.
Patients who commit such an infraction will be subject to a “sports-style disciplinary yellow card and then final red card in which treatment would be withdrawn as soon as is safe.”
“We have staff from many different backgrounds, from all over the world, and we pride ourselves on our commitment to equality which is a fundamental value of the NHS,” said Andrea Young, Chief Executive for North Bristol NHS Trust.
“We’re sending a strong signal that any racism or discrimination is completely unacceptable – we want staff to challenge and report it and we want everyone to know that it will have consequences,” she added.
This is the goal of anybody arguing for nationalized health care. This is the ultimate goal of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats). This is why the $ cost is of no concern to them. The reason they want nationalized health care has nothing to do with the well being of people, but is 100% about power and control. Yes, what is happening in the UK will happen in the US if we foolishly accept the lies of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) that they have any concern for the well being of the people.
The collectivists (Marxists, communists, socialists, progressives, Democrats, all virtually the same) are purposefully destroying our Constitution and thus our nation. The collectivists have always hated liberty and freedom. The collectivist believes that all should worship the state and totally conform to the dictates of the state. The collectivists believe that all should be equally poor and dependent on the state and beholding to those who occupy the seats of power who should live in splendor and opulence because of the sacrifice they are making for the good of the state.
The collectivists advocate for big dominating, dictatorial, bureaucratic government. This is critical to the collectivist movement because through big government the lives of the people can be controlled. It is the belief of the collectivist that all rights come from government including our natural rights and all those rights specifically protected in the Bill of Rights. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are calling for government controls on our liberty to practice our chosen method for worshiping God, what we can and cannot say, and when we can and cannot assemble. These freedoms are critical to a free and independent nation. They are a threat to an aspiring tyrant.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are calling for open borders with unfettered access to any and all who would wish to cross those borders. Once those borders have been illegally crossed, the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are advocating that these illegal aliens have full rights of any citizen. They are also advocating for these illegal immigrants to be free from the consequences of crimes they would commit while in our country.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are in the process of changing our election process for president by demanding that they have the final authority over the results of the election. They are trying to establish this principle by putting forth the proposition that if they disagree with the election results, they can remove the duly elected president by the process of a coup. This will also set aside the idea that power be peacefully transferred.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are stipulating that all facets of our lives be under the purview of government. This includes our health care and the raising of our children. Every tyrant has understood that it is critical the children be indoctrinated by the state so they will understand that it is the state to whom any and all allegiance is given. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have rewritten history, they have determined that children as young as five start to be introduced to the sexual perversions and mores so critical to the breakdown of the family as the core unit of our society.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) understand that in order to bring about their desired collectivist state, they must negate the family unit as the core unit of society and replace the family with a total allegiance to the state. The welfare state, legalized murder of the unborn, demeaning of faith, promiscuity, acceptance of perverted sexual practices, indoctrination of youth, and the destruction of the nations culture are all a part of this effort. It was implemented successfully by Lenin, Mao, and Hitler and is now well on its way to being implemented successfully by the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats).
They are very skilled in their method of implementation. They will always turn the discussion or debate to the details of their target, such as nationalized health care, which turns the discussion to how much is too much, as opposed to the evil and destruction of the implementation of nationalized health care in any form. If you will listen to them, they will always tell you they have been successful if they are able to implement another part of their destructive agenda, even if it was not the total of what they wanted. Freedom Loving Americans must understand this method and not participate in the discussion of how much, but instead demand not at all.
We revolted from the Brits because they were acting as tyrants, telling the American Colonists how they were to live their lives and how they were to think. Today, we have a major political party in the freed colonies advocating that we return to tyranny again and have the government tell we the people how we must live our lives and how we are to think. The last presidential election we held in the freed colonies was in November of 2016. According to the Constitution of the United States, yes Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) we still adhere to parts of that document despite your efforts to totally obliterate it, our next presidential election is scheduled for November of 2020.
November of 2020 is one year or 12 months from now. The campaign for the election began in November of 2016. That is right, we in the United States now have continuous political campaigns. We have been having so called debates since June of 2019. The first caucuses and primaries will begin in about three months with the party nominees to be officially named by Labor Day 2020. In the meantime, we have been having meaningless polls dominating the news cycle. As we learned in 2016, polls are no longer predictors but are used to try to sway public opinion with the only meaningful poll taken where and when it should; on election day.
The United Kingdom has been going through some rocky political times much like we have in the United States. The people of the United Kingdom voted to exit the European Union about three years ago. The deep state in the United Kingdom believes that the United Kingdom should remain a part of the European Union, a globalist organization that believes they supersede the sovereignty of the individual nations, and has thrown every possible roadblock in the way of the public demanded exit.
To try to overcome these roadblocks, Prime Minister Boris Johnson declared that a national election would be held. In many ways this national election is a repeat of the vote taken three years ago on whether or not the United Kingdom should remain a part of the European Union. The outcome of this election will make the final determination, supposedly.
Johnson called for this election the end of October. The election will take place on December 12th of 2020. That is correct, approximately seven weeks from the time the election was called, it will be held. Of course, there are many polls being conducted, perhaps far more meaningful than those in the United States which were first taken four years from the presidential election. But, only seven weeks of campaigning. Only seven weeks of pontificates. Only seven weeks of listening to meaningless promises and rhetoric.
How refreshing is that.
The above number is the current National Debt. It is actually higher because this was the number as of the other day. It is on its way to $24 trillion. Gross National Product for 2018 rose to a level of $20.50 trillion. As of the end of 2018, Greece had a national debt that was 181% of its GNP, Italy was 132%, and Cyprus was 102%. The United States is 117%.
Today we hear cries from the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) to provide universal health care, eliminate all student debt, provide free college tuition for all, and on and on. The congress is in the middle of passing budget bills so the government can keep operating. In the discussion, nobody is mentioning that we are in a bankrupt state.
During the current presidential campaign, we will be hearing from the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) how much the government should give away. They will be telling us that we can pay for their give away programs by taxing the rich. What history proves is that the higher the tax rates the lower are the government receipts and the lower the tax rates the higher are the government receipts.
As has so often been said, the United States, along with Greece, Italy, Cyprus, and so many others, does not have a receipt problem, we have a spending problem. President Trump proposed a zero-based budgeting program with a 5% decrease spending cut as its goal. Rand Paul recently called for an across the board cut of 2%. In both situations, they who called for the make sense and responsible budgeting proposals were roundly demonized by the Marxist/Progressives and Republican establishment.
In the plan to make America great again, President Trump, along with Rand Paul and other Freedom Loving Americans, must make the greatest threat to our national security, our debt, a target and right the ship. This means we will need a large majority in both the house and the senate. Remember, the swamp runs deep and deficit spending is a major part of the swamps ideology.
The argument for or against nationalized health care seems to be what is the cost. We hear cost estimates to be as high as $52 trillion over the next 10 years. What we know is that cost estimates are always lower than the actual cost. The actual cost in this instance goes way beyond dollars. The cost of nationalized health care must be measured in terms of liberty and lives. Nationalized health care has always been supported by collectivists (Marxists, communists, socialists, progressives, Democrats, - all virtually the same). The reason for their support for nationalized health care is that it is mandatory for a Marxist totalitarian state, they do not care about costs, they do not care about liberty, and they do not care about lives.
Would socialized medicine lead to socialization of other phases of life? Lenin thought so. He declared socialized medicine to be the keystone to the arch of the socialist state.
From the Socialists Workers Party--
“When the administration of John F. Kennedy discussed a plan for government health care that would cover people of Social Security age, the American Medical Association (AMA) fought back, along with the insurance and pharmaceutical industries, with a well-funded campaign–complete with a commercial featuring actor Ronald Reagan, who was determined to talk to America about an “imminent threat”:
Now, back in 1927, an American socialist, Norman Thomas, six times candidate for president on the Socialist Party ticket, said the American people would never vote for socialism. But he said under the name of liberalism, the American people would adopt every fragment of the socialist program…
One of the traditional methods of imposing statism or socialism on a people has been by way of medicine. It’s very easy to disguise a medical program as a humanitarian project…Now, the American people, if you put it to them about socialized medicine and gave them a chance to choose, would unhesitatingly vote against it.”
Why do we have a limited government?
“It will not be denied that power is of an encroaching nature and that it ought to be effectually restrained from passing the limits assigned to it.” James Madison
Limited government is important because limiting government preserves individual liberties and protects certain rights and freedoms. It also protects private property and enables citizens to have more control over their own lives.
Not limiting government enables the government to have absolute power over the citizens. In an unlimited government, the government makes decisions on behalf of the citizens, resulting in the loss of individual liberties. Both the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights were designed to limit government. A limited government has legal limits on its power and can only pass laws that do not affect personal liberties.
A limited government prevents the government from employing extensive control over people's lives, freedom of speech and actions. It also prevents the government from interfering with the implementation of civil liberties. Moreover, it gives citizens the opportunity to participate in political and social issues and local government. In addition, it provides a free market economic system that enables citizens to have financial freedom.
Our argument against nationalized health care must center on liberty. Nationalized health care places more power in the hands of government and takes liberty from the people. Again, the collectivist wants all power in the hands of government. They understand liberty is a threat to their power. The cost in terms of dollars and lives is of no concern to them. They are comrades of Lenin, and like Lenin understand that socialized medicine is the keystone to the arch of the socialist state.
If we will listen to what the collectivists (Marxists, communists, socialists, progressives, Democrats – all virtually the same) have to say, rather than thinking what snarky comeback we could make, we would learn what their evil really is. They believe in the principles of collectivism and hate the principles of individualism, therefore they hate the United States and all we were meant to be, They tell us everyday that they must, as Karl Marx said, destroy all long standing principles, (that means the obliteration of the Declaration of Independence, the United States Constitution, and the Bill of Rights) all morality, (that means they promote depravity, murder of children, and any and all lawless acts so long as it promotes their agenda) and all religion (that means they believe our society should be a Godless society with any and all who would profess God and Jesus, to be persecuted and eliminated).
It is the intent of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) to do exactly what Marx told them to do when he said you must tear down current society so the new classless society, that is totally conforming and totally equal, can be established. Marx said that this new society has to be based on an international order and all borders must be eliminated. Yes, this is today referred to as Globalism. This is why Comrade Michele Obama was only proud to be an American after her husband and Comrade, Barack was nominated by the collectivist party in the United States the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party, to be their nominee for president. Comrade Michele saw him as the president of the world and not as president of the United States.
This was recently confirmed when Comrade Michele stated, "Barack's presidential library could have been anywhere in the world because there are so many people who feel like he is their president all over the world.” Comrade Barack always put what he considered to be the good of his real constituency, the world, above the good of the United States.
When Karl Marx talked about having a classless society, he talked about eliminating all who disagreed with him and having a society who conformed to his ideology. This has been the goal of the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party at least since the days of Woodrow Wilson. They have stated throughout that time that the Constitution of the United States in an outdated document and must be changed, ignored, or totally eliminated. The Constitution of the United States protects the freedoms of the individual which protect and promote diversity. Diversity is essential to freedom or individualism but is the enemy of collectivism. Collectivism requires conformity.
Pete Buttigieg told us why the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party will stop at nothing, including conducting an open coup and promoting a revolution, to further their ends of destroying individualism, the very core of the origin and greatness of our nation. Remember, individualism promotes the rights of the individual as opposed to collectivism which states the individual must suppress their ambitions and desires when they do not conform to the “good” of the community.
“This country cannot afford four more years of Donald Trump,” Buttigieg said. “We will not recognize it if he gets reelected.” Buttigieg is exactly correct. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have been promoting rule by the bureaucrat or unelected official, a police state with all security agencies operating as arms of their party and not for the good of the country, dominance of the judicial branch, all natural rights including life, liberty, property, religion, speech, right to bear arms, rule of law, limited government, divided government, sovereignty of the people, and one party rule. President Trump is a strong advocate for exactly the opposite, or President Trump is a strong advocate for freedom and liberty as intended by our founders.
If President Trump is re-elected, our nation will become once again a nation that champions natural rights, individualism, and freedom and liberty. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) will not recognize this nation. This nation is the exact opposite of what their vision for the United Sates, which is the United States called for by Comrade Barack Obama when he promised to fundamentally transform the United States from a free and independent nation to Marxist totalitarian state ruled by the “dictatorship of the proletariat” and all that implies.
Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.