|
|
When people are told one thing one time and exactly the opposite another time, we begin to have serious doubt in those with authority. When a public has doubt in those with authority, the institutions of society begin to crumble.
This is true no matter which side of the political spectrum you reside. Those on the left have great confidence in Barack Obama for instance. Obama was and is very consistent. Obama has always been pro collectivist. Collectivists believe the United States is evil. They believe the United States is the worst of all imperialist nations and that means the United States is the greatest oppressor of all times. Obama never wavered from this belief. Obama also consistently stated and acted upon his belief that government control over the individual for the good of the collective was and is always the best policy. Obama believed in government regulating all aspects of society and that central economic planning is always better than is a market driven economy or socialism over capitalism. Even when Obama claimed he was a capitalist, he qualified that by explaining to Joe the Plumber that he would not be responsible for his success so he would have to share any success he had with the collective. Yes, I disagree with Obama because I believe in Individualism or that less government is always best, and that each individual has the right to make their own decisions and pursue their own happiness. Obama is a collectivist, or he believes that government should control all aspects of society and should make all decisions including how children must be raised and what they must be taught. Simply put, Obama is a communist and I am a Freedom Loving individual. Obama did not create doubt because he was very consistent. I would hope I do not create doubt, but am as consistent in my belief in freedom and liberty for individuals as Obama is in his belief of conformity to the collectivist doctrine of enslavement and allegiance to the state. Today, we are confronted with double standards, misleading statements, and inconsistent policies. The doubts that arise from both sides of the political spectrum are understandable and certainly predictable. Government is no longer believed and correctly so. Recently we heard New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio say that subways are safe and encouraged New Yorkers to use mass transit. But, on the same day he said the city should be ready for a full shutdown after restaurants were ordered to halt indoor dining amid a surge of coronavirus cases. Anybody and everybody would have to simply shake their head and roll their eyes. The only consistently we see from far too many in authority is their consistency at being inconsistent. Is it any wonder why we the people are in the beginning of a revolt against these China Virus warnings. In retrospect, the revolt should have begun in earnest in March of 2020. If it had, hundreds of thousands of lives would have been saved and tremendous hardship and misery would have been averted. Georgia's secretary of state announced an audit of signature matching for ballots in Cobb County after claims of voter fraud. Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger said in a media briefing Monday that he ordered the audit in order to restore Georgians' faith in the election. "As a conservative Constitutional Republican, I believe the best place to land is when judgements are made based on the Constitution. My goal is to make our elections accurate and secure, and believed by the voters," Raffensperger said. He added that his office has alerted counties since January that the election processes have been open to public review, but that neither the Democrats nor the Republicans "availed themselves of this legal viewing of our election processes." Raffensperger said that there had been no evidence of fraud in the signature matching system. "And now that the signature matching has been attacked again and again, with no evidence, I feel we need to take steps to restore confidence in our elections," he continued. Several things are wrong and inconsistent in this self-serving statement. First, it is very questionable as to the claim that he is a conservative or is a Constitutionalist. That he is a Republican is true, but so is Romney and so was McCain and neither of them are or were conservative or believed in the Constitution. Second, that there was no fraud in the Georgia elections is an absurd statement especially since videos and thousands of sworn affidavits to the contrary exist and have been revealed to the whole world. That the Secretary of State refused to do anything to have an honest investigation in a timely manner is the reality. Only the Secretary of State currently knows why he perpetrated this cover up at the present time, but hopefully the world will know soon. Third, these self-serving statements about the election process being opened to review again reveals the inconsistencies and lies so many in government are willing to go for whatever reason. The Secretary of State did all within his power to prevent any review and he was supported by the Republican Governor of Georgia. Now these same charlatans are trying to convince the public that they can and desire to run a fair election for the two Georgia Senate seats. Meanwhile Stacy Abrams is bragging to the same public how she is once again perverting the Georgia election. Of course, there is no response by the charlatans. We who are Freedom Loving Americans must understand we cannot remain free when people like these, regardless of political party claims, will lie, deceive, and cover up. We must purge the filth and hypocrisy from our government. We must begin today “Setting Brushfires of Freedom” in the minds of our fellow Americans. Show examples like these to your friends, families, and acquaintances and simply ask them their thoughts about these types of actions. Your goal is to simply raise awareness and cause enough concern so these friends, family members, and acquaintances will become interested, informed, and involved citizens.
0 Comments
Absurdity – the quality or state of being ridiculous or wildly unreasonable.
Those on the left have believed in some form that somehow mankind will evolve to the point where all on earth will live in peace and harmony and there will be no animosity or antagonisms. Some of the philosophers said this would just naturally happen simply because man will become better and better with each generation. Marx said it would happen because we would become a classless society. The oppressors will be eliminated or changed and because there then is only one class, society will operate in total harmony with no antagonisms. These are absurd and ridiculous theories and philosophies. They both ignore that it is the sin nature of man that causes animosity and antagonisms, and they will only be eliminated when sin is eradicated. The perfect society these people discuss is accurately described as heaven and will happen when Christ reigns as Lord of all. In the meantime, we live with the sin nature of man, the imperfections of man, and the absurdities of man. Here are two examples. Ohio lawmakers are now permitting high school wrestlers to wrestle, but those wrestlers cannot shake hands before or after matches. The Ohio High School Athletic Association states that wrestlers in the full-body contact sport will not be required to wear masks, but will also not be able to congregate or shake hands and will be required to wear facial coverings while off the mat, and more: No congregating before or after practices or games Wear facial coverings off the mat when not actively competing or warming up [T]hose on the team bench shall observe social distancing of 6 feet Do not share equipment, towels, facial coverings, water bottles, other drinks, or food The Fix noted, "Coaches must not share 'clipboards, whiteboards, dry erase boards, or any other equipment used for coaching purposes.'" Next A transgender activist recently called for all children to be put on puberty blockers until they are able to decide which gender they want to be. "If children can't consent to puberty blockers which pause any permanent changes even with the relevant professional evaluation, how can they consent to the permanent and irreversible changes that come with their own puberty with no professional evaluation whatsoever?" My son and daughter-in-law have three-year-old twins. When they were born, based on physical attributes common to children, one was declared to be a boy and one was declared to be a girl. Normal observation of the characteristics of these two as they grow would confirm that declaration. To follow the absurd suggestion of the self-serving transgender activist would do harm to both. Why would any parent consent to such absurdity. This is the absurd world to which political correctness has caused society to descend. You on the left, do you ever listen to yourselves. You declare we must lockdown our society because of the China Virus and if the lockdown saves just one life you claim it is worth it. When I ask you about all the others who are dying because of the lockdown, all of the lives that have been destroyed because of the lockdown, you look at me with your self-righteous look and justify your absurdities by telling me I am a racist and a sexist. Of course, there is no connection what so ever, but this is the absurd world into which the left has brought us. To say that the United States is not at a crossroads, that is will we be free men or will we be slaves, as was asked by Samuel Adams, is to deny reality. Yes, this day of reckoning has been coming for decades as people were no longer taught that our Constitution was written not to protect the government from the people but to protect the people from government. We must never forget that our nation is an incredibly unique nation. We were founded on that very principle that people should always be aware of and thus protect themselves from the tyranny of government. Nothing was more feared than was that reality that government, which is comprised of people, would more and more desire to control the lives and thoughts of the people who elected them to be servants and not sovereigns.
Being at that crossroads, we Freedom Loving Americans must ask ourselves what road we take. We can no longer hide behind the claim that all we have to do is honor our Constitution and all freedom will once again be restored. Those who are telling us that the supremacy of government, or violating the very principle upon which we were founded and the very principle which made us so unique, should and must replace that outdated concept that people can better run their own lives and make their own choices. After all those were the ideas of misguided “white men who were slave owners” and thus must be totally discarded say these enemies of freedom. We are at a time when those who wish to destroy the very society that was built upon individual freedoms and liberties, freedoms and liberties endowed upon all people by the Creator and not man nor government, have become so emboldened that they overtly committed voter fraud and vote manipulation to claim victory despite indisputable evidence and all rational and reasonable facts to the contrary. These who oppose individual liberties and freedoms did so simply because they could. They knew from past experience that many who profess to be Freedom Loving Americans would once again claim that it is best for our country to accept the grave misdeeds of those who wish to destroy the very country these charlatans are claiming to save. If we Freedom Loving Americans are dedicated to the very principle that, “all men are created equally and are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, amongst them the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” we must listen to and then act upon the instructions given to us by those great champions of individual liberty and freedom. We were warned that there would be those who would despise all the unique principles upon which we were founded. These same people would try to tell us that freedom and liberty lies not within individuals but arises through the control and dictates of government and those wise bureaucrats, technocrats, and experts who have our safety as their number one concern. Even though our founders decentralized government and told us government closest to the people was always best, they warned us about the tyranny that arises when the power of government is centralized and governs from the power of a large central government down to that government closest to the people. Through decades we have ignored the warnings of those wise founders. We now find ourselves at a time when the unique founding principles are no longer just ignored but are scorned upon and those of us who still proclaim their wisdom are demonized, ostracized, and are being threatened with elimination if we continue to voice our beliefs that individual liberty and freedom is best. So, what are we Freedom Loving Americans to do? My suggestion is that we follow the example of those who were not willing to settle for allowing tyrants in government dictate their lives and thoughts but said freedom and liberty was the only choice. ““The liberties of our country, the freedom of our civil constitution, are worth defending at all hazards; and it is our duty to defend them against all attacks. We have received them as a fair inheritance from our worthy ancestors: they purchased them for us with toil and danger and expense of treasure and blood, and transmitted them to us with care and diligence. It will bring an everlasting mark of infamy on the present generation, enlightened as it is, if we should suffer them to be wrested from us by violence without a struggle, or be cheated out of them by the artifices of false and designing men.” Samuel Adams ““Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom, must, like men, undergo the fatigues of supporting it.” Thomas Paine “And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, fortunes and sacred honor.” The signors of the Declaration of Independence and should be applicable for all those who are committed Freedom Loving Americans This means, we no longer “go along to get along”, we no longer honor or obey dictatorial declarations of aspiring tyrants, we oppose tyranny in every form, we honor individual freedom and liberty in every form, and we become astute and dedicated Americans who unabashedly go about “Setting Brushfires of Freedom” everyday and all day. We the people have a responsibility to remain informed. Yes, we have a press that is biased. Frankly, there is no law against a biased press. Throughout our history our press has been biased, perhaps never more than today. Remember, our journalist schools are teaching these young aspiring journalists to hate America and hate everything for which it stands. This was initiated when the Frankfurt School was forced out of Germany and brought its collectivist beliefs to America. Lenin added to this movement to turn our journalist schools and subsequently our press into advocates for the collectivist (Marxist, communist, socialist, progressive, Democrat, all virtually the same) movement.
The collectivist advocates have been incredibly open about their intents. We are witnessing the results every day. Today we have the breaking story about the Biden family and how it has been operating as an international criminal family for years by selling the influence of Joe Biden. The MSM and left-wing cable news outlets refused to report on this story prior to November 3rd. People are now saying if they had known about the Biden family was involved in money laundering, selling government secrets, and other criminal activity they would not have voted for Joe Biden. Please people, do not blame the press for you not knowing but blame yourselves. Other Americans knew about this criminal activity. Many Americans actually saw the clip of Joe Biden bragging about how he used United States loans to blackmail Ukraine into dropping an investigation into the criminal activities that included the Biden Family Criminal Enterprise. If Americans did not know this, it was because they refused to accept what was obvious, or they were not interested and did not do any research. Jefferson told us that only an interested, informed, and involved people can remain free. Only governments can impose tyranny on the citizens of a nation and enslave those citizens. Only an interested, involved, and informed public can resist the inevitable attempts by government to impose tyranny. To remain free requires effort. To become slaves to a tyrannical government requires no effort, those in government who claim to have the best interest of the people at heart and are the friend of the people, will do all that is necessary to make the citizens slaves to the tyranny of government. Thomas Jefferson warned us about government tyranny when he said, “Experience has shown that even under the best forms of government, those entrusted with power, have in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny.” And Thomas Paine told us that to remain free required an effort when he said, “Those who expect to recap the blessings of freedom, must, undergo the fatigue of supporting it.” Samuel Adams understood the sacredness of the vote and why we must be diligent in understanding the choice we are making when he told us, “Let each citizen remember at the time he is offering his vote, that he is executing one of the most solemn trusts in human society for which he is accountable to God and to his country.” The reality is, and for many different reasons, Americans take the seriousness of our votes for granted. This has led to those desiring to impose tyranny upon the people through the controls of government to use this very tool that was intended to keep us free, to become a tool for certain enslavement by perfecting means of voter fraud and manipulation. Never has it been on greater display than it was in the 2020 elections. If we who are Freedom Loving Americans wish to reap the blessings of freedom, we will have to undergo the fatigue of supporting it. We will have to become totally committed in our efforts of “Setting Brushfires of Freedom.” It becomes our responsibility to be sure that all with whom we have contact are aware of the facts the MSM and other outlets are concealing. We can do this by making those facts known through our many different forms of communication. When doing this incredibly important work of helping our fellow citizens be informed, we do it through reminders, through sharing, and by leading so these people will start to have an appreciation as to why it is critical they also become interested, informed, and involved. A gentle reminder to my Fellow Freedom Loving Americans, in order to be a Samuel Adams who, set the standard for being an effective brushfire setter, you must be fully informed on the principles our founders established so we would be free, and you must be fully informed on who the collectivists are and what their goals are. We can not rely on bumper sticker or 30 second bites, but must develop deeper understandings. We must than learn to lead these people so they can reach the proper conclusion that freedom is superior to enslavement. Remember, not all desire freedom. For instance, the Obama’s, Holder, Jarrett, AOC, Sanders, and others like them strongly place enslavement over freedom. However, many in America are confused for many reasons and are seeking clarification. They are looking for you to answer questions, not to argue or debate, and not to tell them what they must think. They want to decide that for themselves. The Texas AG is simply stating that if we claim to be a nation under the rule of law and not under the arbitrary rule of people, then we must abide by the law. The Texas AG is asking the Supreme Court to apply the law per the United States Constitution. The Democrats are arguing that the United States Constitution is and should be secondary to any real or perceived emergency and can and should be altered to accommodate. The Democrats have been arguing for years that the United States is an outdated document and therefore must be construed to be a living document that accommodates their demands and requirements.
This was taken from the Federalist and was written by Margaret Cleveland. Texas Presents Serious Constitutional Claims Notwithstanding some branding Texas lawsuit, a “Hail Mary” attempt to block the outcome of the 2020 election, the Lone Star State’s complaint presents serious constitutional issues. Those issues, as Texas puts it, far exceed the electoral irregularities of “the hanging-chad saga of the 2000 election.” In its Bill of Complaint, filed along with its Motion for Leave, Texas presents three constitutional challenges. Count 1 alleges the defendant states violated the Electors Clause of the Constitution. The Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution provides “[e]ach state shall appoint, in such manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a number of electors, equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress.” As Texas notes, this clause “makes clear that only the legislatures of the States are permitted to determine the rules for appointing presidential electors.” But, as Texas reveals in its detailed summary of the facts, each of the defendant states, through non-legislative actors, nullified legislatively established election laws in violation of the Electors Clause. For example, several large Wisconsin counties used drop boxes in direct violation of the Wisconsin Election Code that provides detailed procedures by which municipalities may designate sites for the acceptance of absentee ballots. Wisconsin election officials also ignored the statutory certification requirements for absentee ballots, counting votes that the state legislature defined as illegal because they did not include a witness signature and address. Michigan election officials likewise violated the statutory mandates established by the state legislature, with the secretary of state mass mailing absentee ballots in contravention of state law. And in Wayne County, the home of Detroit’s Democratic stronghold, election officials ignored the state’s signature verification requirement. Georgia also violated the legislature’s requirement for signature verifications, according to Texas’s complaint. The most egregious violations alleged came from Pennsylvania, where election officials ignored the statutory bar on inspecting ballots before election day, then illegally provided voter information to third parties, and allowed illegal curing of the ballots. Significantly, in Pennsylvania these illegal practices only occurred in Democratic strongholds, with Republicans following the law. These and other practices, Texas alleges, establish a clear violation of the Electors Clause, because that clause makes clear that it is the state legislature—and not administrative agencies, election officials, or even courts—charged under our constitutional system with selecting electors. (This argument finds support in the three-justice concurrence authored by then-Chief Justice William Rehnquist in Bush v. Gore.) From there, Texas’s Count 1 argues that “electors appointed to Electoral College in violation of the Electors Clause cannot cast constitutionally valid votes for the office of President.” In Count 2, Texas relied on the same facts, then asserted an Equal Protection claim, premised on the reasoning of the majority opinion in Bush v. Gore. In Bush v. Gore, the Supreme Court held that the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution is violated when states apply differing standards for judging the legality of votes cast for president. “The right to vote is protected in more than the initial allocation of the franchise,” the Supreme Court wrote. “Equal protection applies as well to the manner of its exercise. Having once granted the right to vote on equal terms, the State may not, by later arbitrary and disparate treatment, value one person’s vote over that of another.” Then, citing its detailed statement of the facts, which highlighted the defendant states’ disparate treatment of voters, Texas argues in Count 2 that “equal protection violations in one State can and do adversely affect and diminish the weight of votes cast in States that lawfully abide by the election structure set forth in the Constitution.” Finally, in Count 3, Texas asserts a violation of the Due Process Clause of the Constitution. This claim is premised on Texas’s allegation that the election practices of the defendant states in 2020 reached “the point of patent and fundamental unfairness,” thus violating substantive due process. These three counts, and the detailed facts Texas alleges, make clear that Texas’s beef is not with the states’ election laws, but with the states’ violation of their own election laws, in contravention of the U.S. Constitution. Texas Is Not Seeking to Overturn the Election—Or Install Trump These injuries, Texas asserts, demand a remedy. But the remedy sought is not what some may surmise is the goal—a second term for President Trump. No, what Texas seeks is for the Supreme Court to mandate that the defendant states comply with the Constitution, and that means that electors are selected by the states’ legislatures. Texas makes this point clear, stressing: “Plaintiff State does not ask this Court to decide who won the election; they only ask that the Court enjoin the clear violations of the Electors Clause of the Constitution.” And on and on it goes. Yes, the Democrats are Communists. These are specifics Lenin knew must be done to control a society. They worked for Lenin and so Lenin’s comrades in the Communist Party of the United States (Democrats) apparently said it worked for Lenin, it will work for us.
Corrupt the youth and give them absolute sexual freedom. Infiltrate and take control of the mass communication media. Divide the population into antagonist groups; encourage arguments between them over social issues. Destroy the people’s confidence in their leaders. Talk all the time about democracy and republic, but when the opportunity arises, seize power as a dictator. Cooperate with the drainage of public funds; discrediting the image of the country, especially overseas, and create panics within the population through the launching of an inflationary process. Encourage strikes, even if they are illegal, in the country’s key industries. Promote riots while conspiring to prevent intervention by law enforcement. Cooperate actively in destroying the moral foundations of society and honesty and trust in the government’s promises. Infiltrate other parties with your own people, forcing them to vote for what is useful to your own party’s interest. Register everyone who has firearms, in order to confiscate them when the time comes, preventing them from opposing your revolution. If we who are Freedom Loving Americans are serious about remaining free, that means we control our lives and our thoughts and not have government dictate how we live and think, we must take seriously the threat that is communism. The American people have been told for decades that the Democrat party knows what is best for everybody and it is their intent to have government in control of the lives and thoughts of all the people. This is communism. The days of going along to get along, the idea of not making waves, and the idea that what has happened has happened and now we must move on must end. At some point we must take a firm stand. That point is now. We must understand that many of those advocating the Democrat positions do not understand that the Democrat positions are truly communist positions. It is our job to make sure they do. Our freedom will be retained only if we win the hearts and souls of our fellow Americans. We must be about “Setting Brushfires of Freedom”. To do this we must understand what individualism is and what collectivism (Marxism, communism, socialism, progressive, Democrat, - all virtually the same) is. Once we have done this we must converse, not argue, or debate, but ask questions and listen. Always remember, people must change their own minds. We can only help them by asking questions so they can understand what freedom is. Samuel Adams said, “All might be free if they understood freedom and understood it as they should.” That is our job, to help these people understand freedom. I have made the statement that Democrats today are indeed communists. I base this assertion on the basis that if what the Democrats do is follow the directions of communists to achieve the goals of communists, then indeed they are communists. We were told about a number of specific directives communist were given to bring about the fundamental transformation of the United States to a communist nation. These are directives taken from than document which is entitled Communist Goals for Taking Over America.
Develop the illusion that disarmament is a symbol of moral strength. Develop free trade between Communist nations including free trade of equipment and technology of items that could be used for war. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, and policy making positions. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. Present homosexuality, degeneracy, and promiscuity as "normal, natural, and healthy." Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a "religious crutch." Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state." Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man.” Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat]. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use ["] united force ["] to solve economic, political, or social problems. Yes, these directives to transform the United States into a Communist nation are the policies of the Democrat Party. This list can be found in some form in the Democrat platform. The Democrat party is indeed the Communist Party of the United States and to not say so forcefully with out any apologies or equivocation is to enable this communist movement to complete the transformation. The left has learned how effective it is to bully and intimidate and they are incredibly good at implementing these tactics. An example is how they destroyed Joe McCarthy. In retrospect, Joe McCarthy was absolutely correct. The bureaucracy, the entertainment industry, and the media industry were and still are dominated and controlled by communists. We saw how vicious the left could be in their attacks against Joe McCarthy and how so many who claimed to be advocates for freedom and liberty quickly took what they believed to be the politically correct path and joined the attacks against McCarthy and truth, just like we are seeing today in the attempts to destroy President Trump.
The personalized attacks, those attacks that label people as people who hate, aimed at anybody who would disagree with the ideology that is collectivism, (Marxism, communism, socialism, progressive, Democrat, - all virtually the same) have accomplished the intended purpose. That purpose is to silence, or at the very least to intimidate people into not using accurate terms such as communists when speaking of the Democrats of today. Consequently, very influential people will refrain from using the accurate term of communist or qualify it in some way when referring to communism in connection with the Democrats. So, what really is communism. Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin wrote extensively on what Communists must do in order to bring about the utopia to which they aspire. The first phase to bring about this utopia is destruction. Marx said that all long-standing principles, all morality, and all belief in God must be destroyed and eradicated. Marx also said that all state institutions, including but not limited to law enforcement and the military, must be destroyed and eradicated. The purpose of this destruction and eradication is so the communists can gain total control of the government. The next step, and Lenin wrote about this stage in more detail than did Marx, was to implement control of the people under despotic rule via the “dictatorship of the proletariat”. The purpose of this stage in to destroy or eradicate all who are not communists. Marx and Lenin said this would bring about a classless society. They said all antagonisms or conflicts in society are caused by having different classes who have different ideas and values, such as the worker and the capitalist, the rich and the poor, the minorities and the white people, and on and on. The communist movement encourages rioting, looting, arson, and chaos to create and enhance hatred between classes because this anarchy hastens the destruction of the society the communists then promise to fix by remaking or re-imaging it. Both Marx and Lenin emphasized that during the reign of the “dictatorship of the proletariat”, despotic and violent means must be used. They both emphasized that there could be no limits to what would be done in order to accomplish the goal of having a classless society; that is a society where all people think alike, have the same values and goals, and all people are given equal starts, are equal during their journey, and as Kamala Harris recently reminded us, end equally. When a classless society is achieved, there will be total conformity and equality, because there will no longer be different classes of people, society will then operate in total harmony with no antagonisms or conflicts, so the communists say. The old society will have been destroyed and the new classless society will have been created. Several other actions are mandatory the communists tell us to achieve total harmony for a society. Citizens can not have guns. All education must be changed to indoctrination. The family unit must be destroyed. History has to be rewritten and taught in such a way that all of society believes the state is more proficient in bringing about prosperity and equity than is a free-market system where competition and profit are motivating factors. All productive property and all distribution must be controlled by the state because the state knows what products are best for the people. History must reflect that our long-standing principles are faulty principles because they were promulgated by evil and faulty people. People must understand that the state is the god, and all allegiance must be given to the state. The communist teaches that societies with strong families are societies that cultivate and then promote conflict. We are told that in order to arrive at the utopia promised, “the views of all children can no longer be the views of the parents or the church, but must now be the views of the state”. Marx said, “the education of all children from the time they can leave the care of their mother must be in state institutions”. Lenin said, “destroy the family, you destroy the nation”. Lenin went about destroying the family by providing easy abortion, promoting pornography, enabling easy divorce, promoting adultery and prostitution, and through assignments of workers he separated married couples. Teaching children manners and values becomes the responsibility of the community via such philosophies as it “takes a village to raise a family”. The communist believes all children are the states property. The axiom, “the ends justify the means” is the only law to which Lenin would adhere. To lie, cheat, steal, and manipulate were not frowned upon or punished but rewarded and applauded. As you read through this brief description of communism per Marx and Lenin, you will become aware that the communist doctrine and communist methods per Marx and Lenin are identical to the doctrine and methods of the Democrat party. Consequently, the only logical or rational conclusion one can reach is that those who adhere to the same doctrine and methods must be the same, or yes, Democrats are Communists. Therefore, do not apologize and do not equivocate when speaking the truth saying that Democrats are Communists. I can not emphasize enough how critical it is that we who are Freedom Loving Americans immediately make it a top priority to begin “Setting Brushfires of Freedom”. An integral part of Setting Brushfires of Freedom is speaking the truth, which would include calling Democrats what they are, Communists. The first step to be an effective brushfire setter is to understand who we are and who they are. The second step is to learn how to go about setting those brushfires. Many people have told me that after they read “The Road to Tyranny”, “Two Visions of America”, and “Setting Brushfires of Freedom” and now understand who we are and who they are. Consequently, they have become far more adept in their quest to make a meaningful difference in preserving and promoting individual freedom and liberty. It worked for Samuel Adams and it will work for us. That the Democrat party in the United States today is in fact the Communist Party of the United States is no longer a question. Anybody who has taken any time to study and understand what communism is will not deny that fact. Even Comrades Barack Obama, Michelle Obama, and Eric Holder do not deny that they are Communists. They will deflect the question, but they do not deny the accuracy. Communists will follow the same rule Muslims follow and that is that it is proper to lie about who you are when it is necessary to further your cause. This practice is called Taqiya or Kitman.
I have written extensively on how the Democrats are collectivists and are demanding that the United States become a collectivist (Marxist, communist, socialist, progressive, Democrat, - all virtually the same) nation. I would strongly suggest that every Freedom Loving American also read “The Road to Tyranny,” “Two Visions of America,” and “Setting Brushfires of Freedom.” They are available on my website, on Amazon, and Barnes & Nobel. The area we Freedom Loving Americans must ask ourselves is whether or not the enabler is as responsible as the perpetrator. After you have taken the time to educate yourselves on collectivism and are aware of its evil and how it is the exact opposite of freedom and liberty, yes the same freedom and liberty promised in the Declaration of Independence, The United States Constitution, and the Bill of Rights, you will stipulate to my statement on Democrats being the enemy of freedom and liberty; yes even you who call yourselves Democrats but deny your party is in fact promoting communism. Democrats or communists are winning the war to end our freedom, not because collectivism is a more fair and liberating system, but because of the mentality of those who claim to be Republicans. We see this time after time where it is beyond question that wrongdoing has occurred, such as voter fraud and voter manipulation, but the Republican mentality is such that they use the fallback that they want to pass laws or take action be sure such wrongdoing never occurs again. This is taking the easy way out of making a hard decision. Oh yes, it sounds good and the pontificating that goes along with it would have one believe the action is proper and decisive. The fact is it is as much of a fraud as is the actual deed of wrongdoing. We heard in the open hearing in Michigan where the courts had just ruled that poll watchers could, for the purpose of performing their duties, get closer than 6 feet of another person. Numerous people told the legislators that when they even showed the supervisor the court order, the supervisor’s response was well we do not care about the court order, that is not our policy and if you violate our policy we will throw you our of the room. The response by the Republicans was to wonder how they could pass another law to stop this from ever happening in the future and pontificated how wrong the action of the supervisor was. There were many similar and identical revelations that were not only told but put into sworn affidavits under penalty of perjury. I have heard these same enabling tactics used by Republicans for years in the House of Representatives, the Senate, the Executive branch, and from other government regulators. New laws and orders only are adhered to by honest people. The Democrat supervisor who ignored the court order is not an honest person. People who live by the axiom, “The ends justify the means,” are not honest people and do not adhere to laws and courts orders. This is the axiom adhered to by collectivists (Democrats). The only rule a collectivist or criminal understands is enforcement. These supervisors have been identified and now they must be prosecuted. In addition, this foolish statement that not enough fraud was committed to overturn the election is simply another enabling technique. Is any voter fraud and voter manipulation acceptable? Every time voter fraud and voter manipulation are coordinated and orchestrated by a political party, that election must be overturned. This is the only means of stopping voter fraud and voter manipulation. No new law or rule will do. Wrongdoing will only be curtailed when serious consequences are imposed on the perpetrator. Serious consequences used to enforce the law and not means of making sure this never happens again is the only way to stop evil or those who live by the axiom, “The ends always justify the means”. Wise people, a wise society, will always take the time to reflect. A wise people, a wise society must take the time to ask themselves what brought them to this point and where do they want to go. A true reflection cannot be based on wishes and imagination but must be based on reality and honesty. We must ask if we are pleased with the results the policies of the past produced, what has history shown different policies will produce, and which do we prefer.
Carl Sandburg told us, “When a nation goes down, or a society perishes, one condition may always be found; they forgot where they came from. They lost sight of what had brought them along. We the people of the United States must remember we were founded as a Republic and not a democracy. This was a specific choice because in a Republic the government cannot take the rights and liberties from any citizen simply because the majority deems it should be done. Our founders recognize that rights and liberties are endowed upon all by God and not by man or government. Government’s only role would be to protect rights and liberties and would have no power to limit or to abolish any right or liberty. That is from where we came. The left or the Democrat party is telling Americans that from where we came failed and we must change our course, or as they say, “the United States must be transformed”. Upon reflection, not so much as to what they say but based on what they do, it is apparent that the left or the Democrats want us to go down the same path that Karl Marx outlined. This is a path that is in direct contrast to the path upon which our founders set us. As Marx stated, when the human society in its historical development reaches the capitalistic stage of production it gets divided into only two classes namely capitalist class [or the Bourgeoisie] and the working class [or the proletariats]. The former one is the “exploiting class” while the latter is the “exploited” one. Their interests always clash, and conflict arises. It is this class conflict which is always responsible for social movements and revolutions. When the class conflict reaches its final stage, the workers gain upper hand in it. They become victorious in this struggle and establish their regime. In the initial stages “the dictatorship of the proletariat” will be established and thereafter it prepares the way for the transformation of the society. This transformation finally culminates in the establishment of the classless society. The role of the “dictatorship of the proletariat” is to bring about transformation in any and all ways necessary. Marx explains that this is done by totaling destroying all present institutions and to use whatever means is necessary including violence, deceit, indoctrination, and manipulation. Marx explains that the end result will be a classless society that operates in total harmony because there will be no differences. All in society will conform to the same belief system and all will be equal. Marx would have us believe in his ideal society all will produce for the good of the collective even though all receive, not on production, but on some basis of need. In our time of reflection, it is essential that we ask ourselves if we would want to live in such a society where individuals are ostracized and eliminated because they do not totally conform to the directives of the collective, if we would produce to our fullest capabilities if we were to receive the same as those who did not, if we would be content to believe only what we are told to believe and be ostracized or eliminated if we questioned or sought to do our own research, and if we were told to pay homage to the state as our god and denounce even the existence of the God who created all. We must also reflect upon what societies quickly became when they traveled down the road outlined by Marx and proclaimed by the Democrats, and is that what we want for our society and for the United States. After we have reflected we must decide if we favor the society envisioned by our founders or the society outlined by Marx and proclaimed by the Democrats. Always remember that our actions and not our words reveal our true priorities and our real choices. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
January 2023
Categories |
RSS Feed