CAN WE TALK

​I wish to bring to your attention that the question is “can we talk” and not “may we talk”.  Are we in the United States capable of talking and perhaps even reasoning with each other?  I do not think so.  Some time ago I wrote about one of the major problems we face in our nation.  That major problem is that we have political movements with totally different end goals.  Our framers also had different political agendas, but they had one common goal.  The founders common goal was to build a unified nation that adhered to rule of law, functioned with a limited government, maintained a divided government, functioned with people as sovereign and government as servant, and protect the natural rights of man given by the Creator of life, liberty, and property.  Please note, I said protect and not regulate or control.
 
A society can never function as a free society where there is open and condoned calls for the breakdown of society, open disrespect and disregard for fair and transparent government, open disrespect and disregard for the maintenance of civil discourse, and open calls for hostility against public law enforcement.  This is why we in America have come to the point where we “can not talk.”  We have one political arm that has openly called for a complete breakdown in our government and open attacks on our law enforcement.  We are witnessing the fallout of a regime that had as its goal to turn the bureaucracy into an arm of a political movement and not to operate as servants to the people, thus replacing the people as sovereign with the political movement replacing the people.  This same regime openly called for attacks by militant groups, such as Black Lives Matter and Antifa, against our local and state police departments.  This regime and movement now openly support the movements that would abandoned our basic principles as outlined in our founding documents, The Declaration of Independence, the Constitution of the Untied States, and the Bill of Rights, and replace them with total government control of the lives and thoughts of the people.
 
The other political movement advocates for the continued adherence to our founding principles of rule of law, limited government, divided government, sovereignty of the people, and individualism.  These two movements have goals that are polar opposites; one believes government operates as a servant of the people and the other believes government is the sovereign and people are the servants.  No longer do we in the Untied States have a common goal with only differences in how to reach that goal. 
 
This difference is clearly shown in our treatment as a community and as a nation, a situation that exhibits the result of the prior regime calling on open hostility toward our local police forces.  That this incident did not receive national attention and then be roundly denounced by every political movement and aspiring candidate for state or national office, tells us that certain political movements, the supporting press, and those who are called leaders, support along with the prior regime, a complete and total breakdown of our current society so their socially just, classless, conforming, equal, or communist society can be built. 
 
The incident about which I am speaking took place in the Capital city of what is quickly becoming a communist society, Sacramento, California.
 
From the public statement by Sacramento PD:
 
On June 19, 2019, the Sacramento Police Department received a call regarding a disturbance between a male and a female. Officers made contact with the involved female at a residence in the 3700 block of Esperanza Drive. Officers then responded to a residence in the 200 block of Redwood Avenue to standby while the involved female gathered some belongings from a residence. At approximately 6:10 p.m., officers on scene reported shots had been fired, and an officer was struck by gun fire. The officer who was shot, Tara Christina O'Sullivan succumbed to her injuries after being transported to the hospital. The suspect, 45-year old Adel Sambrano Ramos, was booked into the Sacramento County Main Jail on charges relating to the murder of Officer O'Sullivan.
 
A video shows the attitude of people toward those police officers assisting the lady and then cheering because an officer had been shot.  The video shows the residents taunting the cops, praising the shooting of the officer, and even threatening police with more violence.
 
“Take that gun off. I'll whoop your little butt," one woman's voice can be heard saying. “All y'all cowards."
 
Keep in mind those cowards were there to protect a female victim of domestic violence as she attempted to leave a bad situation. It is a miracle that the victim was not also wounded or killed by the ambush shooter.
 
This is the behavior supported and encouraged by the previous regime.  This is the behavior supported and encouraged by the political movement calling for a complete breakdown and revamping of our current free society.  This the behavior supported and encouraged by current candidates seeking higher office under the banner of that political movement that has openly called for our society to become a society with a sovereign government and the people as servants to that government.

Yes, the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) openly call for and demand a complete breakdown of our society, open attacks on our local and statewide police departments, a total abandoning of our principles of rule of law, limited government, divided government, sovereignty of the people, and individualism.   The Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) movement is demanding our nation become a collectivist (Marxist, communist, socialist, progressive - all virtually the same) movement where government dictates how each person lives their lives and what thoughts they have.  Yes, the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are demanding we come under the rule of the "Dictatorship of the Proletariat."