From 'the ultimate bureaucrat' Barack Obama to 'it is what it is' Donald Trump, the departing French ambassador, Gérard Araud, reflects on navigating D.C. His advice to the people he leaves behind; calm down, take a deep breath.
“Washington is a bit hysterical,” Araud said in an interview a few days before he was set to retire. “People are so appalled by the behavior of the president that they listen a bit too much to their guts instead of really listening to the brain.” So, what should their brains tell them? That Trump, for all his flaws, is asking legitimate questions, Araud said. That the Republican president saw the world “shifting, in a sense, to a new era” and that his “genius” was understanding the “malaise” in the United States.
It’s a malaise, Araud is quick to add, that is leading people to embrace populism and nationalism in France and other countries, too. “We have to address the concerns of these people,” he said. “It’s a serious crisis of our democracy.”
Barack Obama, Araud said, was the “ultimate bureaucrat.” He was famed for his attention to detail and reliance on meetings, briefings and other processes to help him make decisions. Trump is “totally, totally different,” Araud said. He came to the White House from the world of real estate, pays little attention to bureaucracy or process, Araud said.
Araud applauded Trump for tackling head on tough topics like China’s questionable moves on the global stage and North Korea’s nuclear program. He also argued that although some of the questions Trump asks might seem odd at first glance, they are nonetheless fair game. For instance, Trump has wondered why the United States should go to war to protect the tiny nation of Montenegro if it were attacked. To foreign policy types, the answer is obvious: Montenegro is a NATO member and the military alliance is built on the idea of collective defense. Araud, though, pointed out that many ordinary Americans would pose the same question if the scenario ever arose. By raising the point, Trump is exposing the fact that not everyone is automatically on board with the views of foreign policy elites in places like Washington.
And this is why the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats), media, and self-proclaimed elites hate Donald Trump. He is not one of them. He refuses to obey their demands for political correctness. He asks the hard questions such as why do we think that way; is it just because we always have.
The American public agreed with President Trump as proven that evening in November of 2016 when it became obvious Hillary had no road to victory and the wine and tissues came out in abundance.
This rethinking of the collectivist (Marxist, communist, socialist, progressive, Democrat – all virtually the same) movement is also taking place in Europe with a movement that is questioning the demands and dictates of the Globalist European Union. Again, be sure to watch the elections the end of May.
People throughout the world who have lived in the era where people determined their own lives and their own thoughts are rejecting the self-proclaimed elitists proclamation that all aspiring tyrants make; we know what is best for you so you must follow our demands on how you are to live your lives and what your thoughts are to be. THE INDEPENDENT THINKERS OF THE WORLD ARE RISING IN OPPOSITION TO THIS ELITEST MOVEMENT AND SAYING THAT WE THE PEOPLE WILL DETERMINE OUR OWN LIVES AND OUR OWN THOUGHTS.
The ride to freedom and independence will not be a smooth ride. Their will be bumps in the road. Collectivists (Marxists, communists, socialists, progressives, Democrats – all virtually the same) and Globalists do not understand that we independent people refuse to conform to their evil and tyrannical dictates. They will continue to try to enslave people so they can control. It is their way to power. Freedom lovers, do not give in, do not give up, we have a President who fights for us and does not understand the word quit. Our President is not only leading a freedom movement in the United States, but people throughout the world have reason to hope for a reversal of the evil and tyrannical movement of the collectivist and globalist and a movement toward freedom and independence once again.
This was the headline:
Investigations Are Coming: Trump, Pence and 2020 Campaign Want to Know How Mueller Happened
Every American who loves freedom should be obsessed with this thought and not just Trump, Pence, and the 2020 campaign. This charade was a direct attack on the very essence of our Republic; free and fair elections and an acceptance and peaceful transfer of power once the decision has been made.
What we know now without any question is that the claim of Trump and Russian collusion to rig the 2016 vote outcome was clearly predicated on a known lie. We know that the FBI knowingly and falsely sought FISA permission to entrap anyone that might bear false witness to support their false scenario. This was a misuse of the FBI and our judicial branch of government whose function is to protect against such misuse.
Once the results of the election were known, these rouge elements did not accept that they had failed in their attempt to control the outcome of the election, but they doubled down on their knowingly false accusations and investigations and again used a special prosecutor to try to overrule the will of the American people and set aside a unique gift the United States had given to the world; peaceful transfer of power.
If the United States is to remain a nation that champions freedom and liberty, it is critical that a thorough, fair, and non-political investigation be made as to how this travesty of justice came about. We have clues that agencies in our government had been politicized. We have clues that people, Seth Rich, were murdered to protect those perpetrating this scheme. We have clues that people, Hillary and Bill Clinton, became wealthy in their collusion with the Russians. We have clues that this scheme went to the highest levels of our government.
We as Freedom Loving Americans must maintain that fundamental element of our Republic; it is the duty of the government to prove guilt and not the duty of the accused to prove innocence, in the course of this investigation. Despite the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) reversal of this fundamental principle of freedom, we must remain true to those principals that are essential to our freedom.
Absolutely, it is mandatory that a fair investigation be made, starting immediately, and that it be completely transparent. It is imperative that the investigation be allowed to proceed based on facts and not conjecture and that it be allowed to reach to whatever level of government played a part in this destructive ruse.
It is critical that once again this be emphasized: THIS SHOULD NOT BE A POLITICAL INVESTIGATION BUT AN INVESTIGATION WHOSE ONLY GOAL IS TO EXPOSE THOSE WHO DECEIVED AND SOUGHT TO UNDERMINE THE VERY ESSENCE OF OUR REPUBLIC.
PELOSI YOUR PARTY IS DOMINATED BY SELF-PROCLAIMED SOCIALISTS – YOU ARE THE MARXIST/PROGRESSIVE PARTYRead Now
Pelosi said she is a Progressive. That makes her a collectivist and in the same family as her self-proclaimed socialists. A Collectivist is a family with siblings named Marxist, Communist, Socialist, Progressive, and Democrat. They were raised by the same parents and all have the same beliefs and principles. One might run faster the other, one might be stronger than the other, or taller or shorter, but they are all Collectivists.
Speaker Nancy Pelosi, miraculously transformed over the past few months into a relatively moderate Democrat elder stateswoman, has understandably been pushing back against the notion that she leads a socialist party defined by a few radicals in the House. On 60 Minutes, she said: “I do reject socialism as a economic system. If people have that view, that’s their view. That is not the view of the Democratic Party.” She dismissed the left-wing members in her caucus as, “like, five people.”
The problem Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have is that the most compelling stars of the party are self-described socialists with a knack for generating controversy and media attention, and with committed mass followings. Pelosi might wish it weren’t true, but poll numbers, fundraising and follower-counts don’t lie.
Sanders is reliably second—sometimes first—in national and state presidential polling of Democratic candidates. He’s out-raised everyone in the field, and with his massive small-donor base, probably can continue to do so for the duration. More than anyone else, he has defined the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party’s current agenda. He can clap back at establishment critics, as he did the other day at the Center for American Progress and make their lives very uncomfortable.
It’ll be much harder to maintain that the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party isn’t a party of socialists if it nominates one as its presidential candidate, which everyone paying attention realizes is a real possibility. If that happens, it won’t be the work of conservatives hoping to negatively brand them, but of the party faithful. The same goes for the prominence of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. It is often said that conservatives are “obsessed” with her; maybe so, but the same is true—and probably more so—of everyone else.
AOC was among the top 10 House Democrats in fundraising the first quarter of the year and had the highest percentage of small donors. Her ally, Rep. Ilhan Omar also excelled. As Senator Elizabeth Warren wrote in a piece about AOC for her in Time’s most influential list, not exaggerating, “millions are taking cues from her.”
It’s obviously vexing to Pelosi to see a House majority built by the careful avoidance of ideological extravagance and won in marginal districts hijacked, at least in terms of public attention, by a few freshmen and a 77-year-old Vermont socialist.
They might not define the center of the party at the moment, and the radical freshmen have lost most of their tussles with Pelosi, but there is a reason that they are so famous, with such fundraising prowess. The crusading purity of Sanders has an inherent appeal. The outrageousness of the freshmen (or their boldness, depending on your point of view), and willingness to respond to any criticism, attracts attention. And, as President Donald Trump will tell you, attention begets attention.
There is an important election taking place toward the end of May and most Americans are not even aware that it is happening. Although the United States is the most influential country in the world, other areas of the world still have an effect on what happens in the world including the United States. The state of affairs in the European Union have had a tremendous impact on the rest of the world especially when it comes to the Globalists calls for open borders. The open border policy has allowed mostly Western Europe to be overrun with Islamists. Facts have shown that the Islamists refuse to become a part of the culture of the different nations. The Islamists refuse to assimilate and instead set up no go zones that repudiate the laws and customs of the host nation and instead establish their own Sharia area.
We are finding in these nations that crime is rampant. The Islamists believe that they maintain their right to kill, rob, rape, and torture even though the law in the land in which they reside prohibits their perverted practices. As you might expect there has been strong backlash to these practices and lawless activities despite the Globalists referring to those who object as Islamophobic. Many countries have elected governments that support all efforts to oppose the European Union mandated immigration policies and acceptance of the lawless and inhumane practices of the Islamists.
This anti-European Union sentiment that has occurred in many individual nations and that is gaining momentum in these countries, is spreading through out the European Union and it is anticipated that this movement will play a major role in the upcoming election.
Here is a summary of the election and its possible aftermath. The writer of this article is pro-European Union or pro-Globalist. Keep in mind when reading this information that when they refer to pro-European they are referring to pro-Globalist policies with the forcing of all members to adhere to the Globalist immigration policy of open borders and the Globalist policy of the individual nations surrendering their sovereign rights to the dictates of the European Union. It was for these reasons the United Kingdom voted to leave the European Union.
“The real challenge will be to find compromises among more than two big mainstream groups,” Florian Hense, a euro zone economist at Berenberg stated.
However, he highlighted that despite the upcoming split in voting intentions, pro-European parties are likely to still have the biggest share in Parliament.
“Opinion polls still suggest a two-thirds majority for the mainstream parties,” he said. ” (And) even if the radicals have big plans for the EU, they lack both democratic support and a common position to deliver them.”
However, not everyone shares this opinion.
A report from the European Council on Foreign Affairs said Tuesday that anti-European parties are on course to win a third of the seats and would “frustrate activity, undermine the security and defense of Europe, and ultimately sow discord that could destroy the EU over time.”
The same think tank said that anti-European parties are likely to work together to undermine European cooperation, such as pushing for an end to sanctions on Russia.
“Overall there will be more political volatility, and this will inevitably affect the quasi-automatic adoption of European Commission proposals,” it was said.
The radicals are those who wish to enforce immigration laws and wish to have their individual countries maintain their individual sovereignty. What happens in this election is important in the United States. We in the United States are fighting the same fight as those in Europe are fighting. We “radicals” are those who oppose the destruction of our societies through such policies as open borders, surrender to a collectivist or globalist state that dictates how we are to live our lives and what our thoughts are to be, and the acceptance of those who openly state they wish to destroy us; the Islamist's and the collectivists.
You will hear very little about this election in our mainstream media and what you do hear will be very slanted to favor the collectivist and globalist movements. Do search and learn the truth. It appears that we “radicals” will gain tremendous ground in the May elections which should give momentum to our 2020 elections.
Ilhan Omar has made many statements that show her disdain for the United States and her support for radical Islamist terrorists. While speaking to a Muslim Brotherhood, the same group enabled by and supported by Obama and Jarrett, friend Omar made the flippant statement that “some people did something.” When President Trump responded with a tweet that showed a video of what some people did, the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) hatred for America was revealed loud and clear as these Marxist/Progressives (Democrats), the same people who wish to destroy our constitution and open our borders, quickly came to her defense. They accused President Trump of inciting violence because he showed the actions of the people Omar meant to defend.
Omar has shown a strong support for those who hate America and wish to see a free and independent people destroyed and converted to the hatred for all who would oppose Sharia law and the caliphate. In 2013 Omar again supported Al Qaeda and legitimized them while agreeing with Obama’s friend and religious mentor “Rev” Wright as he explained that America’s chickens had come home to roost.
In a 2013 Omar interview, the interviewer said, “It’s very interesting that we keep the Arabic name to such violent and negative entities: Al Qaeda, Al Shabaab, Hezbollah.”
Omar agreed, “They don’t mean anything evil,” she said. This was well after September 11, 2001.
Opining broadly on the cause of Islamist terrorism, Omar blamed US “involvement in other people’s affairs.”
“Nobody wants to face how the actions of the other people that are involved in the world have contributed to the rise of the radicalization and the rise of terrorist acts,” she said.
It was apparently the lack of “love” we ugly Americans have towards those who chant “death to America” that forced Al Qaeda to board the planes on that clear fall day in 2001 and fly into the World Trade Center towers, the Pentagon, and a downed flight with either the White House or the Capitol building as its target.
Thank you, President Trump, for reminding Americans that we are hated, and "some people" wish to bring “death to America.” SHAME ON YOU MARXIST/PROGRESSIVES (DEMOCRATS) WHO CLAIM TO BE AMERICANS AND YET DEFEND THOSE WHO SUPPORT ATTACKS ON AMERICA AND THOSE WHO WISH TO DESTROY US. THIS SHOULD NOT BE A SURPRISE TO ANYBODY HOWEVER, SINCE YOU, MARXIST/PROGRESSIVES (DEMOCRATS) CONSISTENTLY ATTACK OUR CONSTITUTION, OUR FOUNDING, OUR FREEDOM, AND OUR REPUBLIC WHILE PROPOSING TO FUNDAMENTALLY TRANSFORM THE UNITED STATES TO A MARXIST TOTALITARIAN STATE.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have been demeaning Attorney General Barr ever since he summarized the Mueller Report using direct information from the Mueller report in his summary. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) had been relying on this fictionalized investigation to be the bullet to kill the target of their hatred ever since that fateful evening in November of 2016 when Donald Trump became President-elect Trump and Hillary went off to oblivion with her bottle of wine and box of tissues.
We now know what will be made even more clear that what Donald Trump has been stating for years that there was no collusion between him or his campaign with the Russians. Even the prejudicial group of lawyers and investigators on the Mueller team could not connive any collusion. Of course, if there was not a crime or wrong doing how could you possibly assert any obstruction. The Marxist/Progressives say forget the facts, we have told the lie often enough that it should be considered to be truth by all and not just us.
This could all be a loud clang of cymbals to drown the investigation that should have taken place over the last several years: the collusion between the Clinton campaign and the DNC with the Russians, and the illegal acts that took place in the Obama regime, the DOJ, The FBI, the CIA, and the NSA, to spy on the Trump campaign in an effort to thwart a free election. We saw the overreaction and panic of the members of the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party when Attorney General Barr stated that spying did take place, he just was not sure what predicated the spying. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) and spying participants such as Brennan, Clapper, and Comey quickly began to parse terms and in the famous quotes of one of them who asked just what is is.
The reason this cymbal clanging is so critical to the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) is because another investigation has been taking place. This investigation is by the DOJ Inspector General.
GOP Rep. Mark Meadows told FNC's Maria Bartiromo on this week's "Sunday Morning Futures" that he expects the Justice Department’s inspector general to issue criminal referrals related to the FBI’s possible abuse of the surveillance courts during the Trump-Russia probe.
"Jim Jordan and I met with [DOJ] Inspector General Horowitz -- he and his team have been doing a great job, and I might add an independent job to verify some of the things that we have long assessed as problems."
"We’re fully anticipating that the [DOJ inspector general’s] report will come out as Attorney General Barr said in the next four to six weeks, and I think it’s highly likely that we’ll see criminal referrals coming from them that will correspond with what Chairman [Devin] Nunes has already put forth," Meadows said.
"So what we would find is people within the Department of Justice, primarily the FBI, would actually give information to the media, then those reports would actually come out and they would say ‘wow, we have these reports now,’ and then they would take the actual reports and use those as the probable cause to do a further investigation," Meadows said.
"It was a big circular reasoning… you’ll see all of that come out, I believe, when inspector general’s report comes out."
Meanwhile the media will focus on the futile attempts by the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) to over throw a duly elected president and change the tradition of peaceful transfer of power that has been conducted since March 4 of 1797 when John Adams was inaugurated, and George Washington became our first ex-president by belittling Attorney General Barr.
The Mueller report has exonerated President Trump. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) and the media cannot accept the facts. They will continue to scream and bang. The real fireworks could be released to little or no fanfare and denounced as false and prejudicial regardless of the facts and that is the report of the Inspector General.
When you objectively study the collectivist (Marxist, communist, socialist, progressive, Democrat- all virtually the same) mentality of the national and international leaders of this evil and often perverse ideology, it becomes abundantly clear that they believe strongly in the idea that, “this is good for everybody else but not for me.” We saw this in the life of Karl Marx. Marx advocated for the proletariat, but yet he deemed himself and his family to be above the proletariat as both he and Jenny, his wife, were cruel and condescending to the companion of Engels, Mary Burns, an Irish lady he met when she was a worker in his factory.
Marx was also notorious for his condescending attitude toward any member of the proletariat. Both Karl Marx and Jenny Marx were raised in the upper economic class of their hometown Trier. They never forsook their bourgeois upbringing and strove to raise their children in that manner despite Marx’s refusal to provide for his family.
Marx stated that there should be a 100% tax on all estates because the assets held by any individual were rightfully the assets of the people and the 100% tax would simply return the assets to their rightful owner. Yet when Jenny received her inheritance and when Marx received his inheritance, they spent every penny on themselves, giving nothing away. Marx was a typical collectivist in that he practiced the collectivist idiom, "do what I say and not what I do."
This has been the standard for all leaders of collectivist nations. We saw it in the Soviet Union, the members of the Soviet bloc, Mao’s China, Castro’s Cuba, and Venezuela. We are now seeing this same practice being employed by the collectivists (Marxists, communists, socialists, progressives, Democrats, - all virtually the same) advocating this ideal in the United States.
Marx said the absolute rule is, “From each according to their ability to each according to their need.” Marx explained that this meant all would strive to produce at their optimal level because they knew all they produced would be shared with all according to the needs of all. So when Bernie Sanders explained his unequal status by saying, "I didn't know that it was a crime to write a good book, which turned out to be a best-seller," he was following both the rules of the individualist and the collectivist, produce at your optimum.
He went on to explain further by stating, "I don’t apologize for writing a book that was No. 3 on The New York Times best-seller," he added but reiterated his belief in a "progressive tax system which demands that the wealthiest people in this country finally start paying their fair share in taxes.”
Sanders followed the same distorted thinking exhibited by Marx and all collectivists. That is that they agree that it is fine to produce at the optimum, but the “to each according to their needs,” must be modified when applied to themselves. If Sanders was a true and dedicated Socialist, and not a good for everybody else socialist, he would have given all of his book proceeds away. In fact, he would give away all of his income and wealth and retain and receive only what is necessary for his immediate needs.
Sanders is the same as all the others. That is this philosophy is great for others and they should strictly adhere, but it is just fine for me to modify my beliefs to allow me to live way above my needs. Marx practiced this same ideal as did Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Castro, Chavez, Obama, Holder, Jarrett, and all other comrades who were in a position of authority and power.
Thank you Bernie Sanders for once again exposing the hypocrisy of the collectivist (Marxist, communist, socialist, progressive, Democrat – all virtually the same.)
President Trump has indicated that he would allow $125 billion in spending cuts to take place for both defense and non defense spending if Congress does not agree to his spending plan, top White House adviser Larry Kudlow said.
“The president has indicated, if the spending caps going all the way back to the 2011 deal are not met, then we will sequester across-the-board, both defense and nondefense, excluding entitlements, but we will run by those rules,” Kudlow said during The Hill’s Newsmaker Series event in Washington. “That’s tough stuff. I think that’s appropriate.”
Kudlow was referring to budget caps set in place in the 2011 Budget Control Act (BCA), a law that was meant to force bipartisan cooperation on budgeting by threatening steep cuts to both defense and nondefense spending. Without legislation to raise the caps, 2020 defense spending would drop $71 billion and nondefense spending would drop $54 billion from current levels — about a 10 percent across-the-board cut.
The United State National Debt exceeds $22.2 billion and is growing. This is greater than our Gross Domestic Product and puts us in the same category as Greece and many third world countries. There is only three ways to solve this problem. We could have spending cuts until the inflow exceeds the outflow and starts to reduce the national debt. It appears that neither the Marxist/Progressives nor the Republican establishment favor this solution.
Another solution would be to declare a national bankruptcy and default on our national debt declaring nonpayment of principle and interest. This would bring about an international financial collapse. The third solution would be to bring about hyper inflation so the national debt would be paid with a dollar worth far less than it was worth when the money was borrowed. This solution would also bring about an international financial collapse.
The only responsible solution would be the reduction of spending. Some will say another solution would be to increase inflow by raising taxes. The problem with this solution is that an increase in taxes always decreases the inflow of dollars because of the negative impact the increase in taxes has on the economy. The solution is obvious. The obvious solution would be responsible but would be in direct opposition to the political agenda of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) and many of the Republican establishment
If we the American public are serious about averting an international financial collapse, we will, starting in 2020, elect people to congress who are willing to take the tough political stance of being responsible stewards. Again, it is the American public who have the responsibility to be the adults in the room. Will the American public accept the responsible course or will we continue to believe the false promise of “Hope and Change,” the false mantra of the collectivists (Marxists, communists, socialists, Nazi’s, progressives, Democrats – all virtually the same).
We keep hearing that Americans are not paying their fair share in taxes. Marxist/Progressive 2020 presidential candidate Robert O'Rourke proposed in Iowa that the U.S. "allow" farmers to give up their "fair share" of crops to fight climate change. Of course, he never defined “fair share.” He also claimed that “we” allow farmers to make a profit. In our system, the farmer owns the land and has the “natural right” to property as given by the Creator. We or the government has the duty to protect the “natural right” but “we” have no say in the farmers right to make a profit. What O’Rourke is saying comes directly from the teachings of Karl Marx.
So back to “fair share.” Next time you hear this fall back bumper sticker of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats), simply ask them what they mean by “fair share.” To the best of my knowledge “fair share” has been defined only twice. Karl Marx defined fair share as everything going to the government and then the government would redistribute based on some formula of “need.”
The other definition of “fair share” was stated by the hero of the Marxist/Progressives, Franklin Roosevelt. FDR proposed a 100 percent top tax rate. Roosevelt told Congress in April 1942, “no American citizen ought to have a net income, after he has paid his taxes, of more than $25,000 a year.” Roosevelt went on to say that this was “fair and just.”
In fairness to Roosevelt, the $25,000 was in 1942 dollars. That would be about $350,000 today. Never the less, Roosevelt’s confiscation rate was 100%. Please do not let the Sanders and AOCs see this confiscation proposal.
Comrades Obama and Holder, in their quest to fundamentally transform the United States to a Marxist Totalitarian State, started a war on the independent police forces within the United States. Marx had stated that to bring about the desire of Marx, Obama, and Holder, the current society must be destroyed so the Marxist state could be built anew. A complete and total breakdown of law and order greatly assists in this quest. A disrespect and open hostility on police forces is a part of this endeavor and was encouraged and enabled by Comrades Obama and Holder.
Obama and Holder openly disparaged the local police forces in many incidents including the college instructor in Boston and the continual stating of misleading happenings in the Brown situation in Missouri. Obama and Holder encouraged and gave force to the organization, Black Lives Matter, that openly called for and exercised the murder of individual police. This war on the local police forces has brought about open rebellion in inner cities and hostile city officials as exhibited in the Baltimore situation.
Now we are seeing even more open and dangerous demonetization of local police departments. Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Rep. Bobby Rush blasted the Chicago police union as “the sworn enemy of black people.” Interestingly, Rush represents a district in Chicago which has an open black on black gang war with incredible violence and murders taking place daily. The Chicago police force has shown incredible bravery in continuing to try to protect innocent people being caught in the middle of these lawless happenings.
Rush went on to say, “The FOP (Fraternal Order of Police) is the sworn enemy of black people,” Rush said. “The FOP has always taken the position that black people can be shot down in the street by members of the Chicago Police Department and suffer no consequences.”
The union, though, said that Rush’s comments were “ignorant, offensive, malicious and false.” This comment is correct. Rush’s comment also justifies the “war on police” in Chicago and elsewhere; the very war called for by Comrades Obama and Holder. The very war encouraged and openly supported by Comrades Obama and Holder. The Black community in particular, and the collectivist (Marxist, communist, socialist, progressive, Democrat – all virtually the same) movement in general understand how critical it is for their now overt efforts to destroy the American society so their collectivist society can be built anew is greatly enhanced with more and more open hatred and hostility toward our police forces.