|
We knew it. This is the way they operate. It is the way they have always operated. Collectivists (Marxists, communists, socialists, progressives, Democrats, - all virtually the same) have always operated on the basis of "the ends justify the means." The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have shown us they do not care about the United States Constitution. It is a living document and can mean anything they want it to mean including interrupting the impeachment clause as a coup clause.
They have shown us time after time that truth is whatever they say it is. They will even deny something they have said even though it is on tape. They will claim other people have made statements even though documents prove otherwise. Truth is anything that will bring them closer to their end which is as Comrade Obama stated, "to fundamentally transform the United States." Rule of law to them is to apply it in any way that moves the United States closer to the Marxist totalitarian state they desire. We have seen it consistently in the Bork hearing, the Thomas hearing, and the Kavanaugh hearing. Whatever it takes, including the destruction of individuals and families. We are seeing it in these coup hearings. Nothing is to outlandish so long as it moves us down the road of "Hope and Change" to the desired goal of a Marxist totalitarian state. If you think we saw vote manipulation in the 2016 election, wait until 2020. If you live on a road that goes from a cemetery to voting booths, get our of the way. If you live near state lines where states have same day registration, watch the buses coming from the next door state and go right to the voting booths. If you are a lone Republican at a voting place, you will see single voters casting multiple votes. And, a Republican better lead by 10 points plus because they find votes in all kinds of places. The number they find depends on the number they need. We who value freedom and liberty, words now considered as hate terms by the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats), you best be prepared. You must be sure all citizens, yes we Republicans still believe that voting is a privilege for citizens only, you know who will vote properly are registered and make vote. If we who love freedom and liberty will vote, we will win. Even if we win in 2020, our fight is not over. A collectivist has no shame. They will only up their deceit. We who love freedom and liberty must begin today to set brush fires of freedom in the minds of our fellow Americans. Yes, our freedom and liberty depends on it.
0 Comments
The NY Times, like the rest of the legacy media, are fixated on the Senate impeachment trial as they try to explain, rationalize, and support House impeachment managers presentation of their case. The latest attempt at cheerleading involved Adam Schiff’s spinning of the President’s public statements as “proof” of his underlying intentions in his alleged coercion of Ukrainian President Zelensky to investigate the Bidens. This article by Peter Baker attempts to explain Schiff’s strategy in this regard while ignoring some basic truths about our president:
The strategy seeks to capitalize on Mr. Trump’s astonishingly unfiltered approach to politics, which has led him again and again to say openly what other presidents with more of an understanding of the traditional red lines of Washington — or at least more of an instinct for political self-preservation — would never say in front of a camera. In effect, the managers are challenging the president’s own penchant for announcing his motivations without apparent regard for whether it could get him into trouble. At the same time, the managers are challenging the senators to take Mr. Trump at his word about what really drove him to pressure Ukraine to announce investigations into Mr. Biden and other Democrats. Note that first paragraph. Baker recognizes that President Trump uses an “unfiltered approach to politics” but fails to understand the reason and the intent of the President. As a member of the chattering class, Baker has been conditioned to expect politicians – particularly US presidents – to act a certain way within the bounds of what the political class has brainwashed people to believe as proper decorum. That means conveying an air of gentility and courtesy in public, equivocation in public speaking to avoid divulging private thoughts about opponents, making vague promises that are never delivered upon, and turning the other cheek when attacked by Democrats and the media. President Trump has turned all of those expectations on their heads over the past several years, as he speaks in a brusque and direct manner, openly and publicly counterattacks when attacked by opponents, tells us what he is really thinking, makes and keeps his promises, and uses his public statements as part of his political strategy in raising public awareness on matters that the legacy media refuse to cover as they serve the Democrat narratives. Baker and others simply don’t understand that the President’s blunt-speaking manner is the President’s purposeful and highly effective political strategy for communicating to the American people. And this is the reason for the coup (impeachment) and for the outright hatred of President Trump. President Trump is not of the political class. Some would call this, President Trump is a bull in a china shop. President Trump does not understand, nor does he respect the double talk that is the Washington swamp. It is for this very reason that he was elected to be President of the United States. What this Washington decorum and double talk has enabled the swamp to accomplish is to make themselves wealthy and to believe they are above the law even to where Joe Biden believes he is beyond any type of investigation or even scrutiny. Unfortunately, Biden is not alone, but only one of very many with this same attitude. It is this political swamp talk that has led these swamp dwellers to believe that they should be believed no matter what they say. Comments without context, misleading innuendo, and outright lies are just fine so long as it benefits you and your side has been the normal practice. President Trump does not understand this type of political nonsense and calls out those who use this practice. It has been said by many members of the swamp that President Trump is not presidential. Of course, the term presidential is a very subjective term, but what we now understand presidential to mean is an individual occupying the Oval Office who speaks in politically correct terms and does only what the swamp believes he should do. The swamp is telling us for instance that it is not presidential to attend a “March for Life Rally” even though you strongly support the right to life. We are being told it is not presidential when you fire an ambassador that adamantly opposes you and your policies. The presidential thing to do is to apparently orchestrate an uprising and have the ambassador killed. We are being told that it is not presidential to defend yourself against angry and distorted statements and accusations, even though there is nothing to support them. We are being told it is not presidential to want to investigate actions by members of the political class and swamp whose actions lead any rational person to believe that corruption is taking place such as a kid of a high official who has just been kicked out of the Navy for drug use and then within three months is hired by a known corrupt energy company in a country notorious for corruption, even though this drug user knows nothing about energy. Anybody who believes in freedom and liberty, should strongly support this president who refuses to conform to the demands of the swamp and has the strength and the fortitude to oppose and expose this swamp that has only one goal, and that is to enrich themselves at the expense of the American people. Even if you call yourself a Democrat, it is still for you that President Trump is willing to absorb the lies and abuse of the swamp dwellers and continue to be a non-presidential president that places the good of the American people above the swamp creatures being enriched. THANK YOU PRESIDENT TRUMP We have been told the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have a solid case. They said it was so solid it should take no more than three minutes for the Senate to support their impeachment. We are learning that there is only one problem, the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) need the Senate to produce that evidence. The House Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are not sure where the evidence might be, but they know without any doubt that if the Senate searches, they will find the evidence the House Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) could not.
What we are learning is that not only is there no evidence that President Trump committed a crime, much less an impeachable crime, but the ability to present the case by the House Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) is lacking. Nancy Pelosi named Adam Schiff as the head of this totally inadequate group. Schiff has proven time after time he is totally incapable of being truthful. However, in Nancy’s defense, her options were very limited. She could have named herself, Nadler, Waters, Green, Swalwell, to name a few. You can understand the problem Nancy really had. We are now learning, well we knew it, but it is being presented as new information, that the real reason President Trump must be removed from office is so he cannot be on the 2020 ballot. We were told, once again, that if President Trump is on the ballot he will win and that would be very dangerous and also would show just how stupid the American people are. The House Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are in fact telling the American people that they, the House Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) should have veto power over presidential elections, and they should also have the final say over who appears on a ballot. In the defense of the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) they see this is the way elections are done in all communist countries and so since they are as much of a collectivist as are the other communists, they should have the same authority. A part of me says this farce should end just as quickly as possible. The Senate has work to do. The Senate needs to get back to confirming constitutional judges. While the Senate allows these House Marxist/Progressives to dominate their time, important work is not being done. On the other hand, a part of me says witnesses should be called, not one for one but any witness that could shed light on the situation should be called. I can name a few I would like to hear; IG Atkinson along with his testimony Schiff said is top secret, the whistle blower, Sean Misko and the individual that overhear the conversation, Adam Schiff and the members of Schiff’s staff that assisted the whistle blower, Joe Biden, Joe Biden’s brothers, sister, and son-in-law, Hunter Biden, Nancy Pelosi’s son, John Kerry's son in law, and Rudy Giuliani to name a few. After all, this coup is claimed to be based on President Trump demanding the Ukrainian government to investigate corruption of the Biden’s and Giuliani is somehow a part of this abuse of power. OK, let’s find out. My rational choice would be to have the sham end quickly and then have the Senate do what they are suppose to do and do thorough insight into what led to this whole charade; the deep state and the corruption in the Obama regime with apparently Joe Biden leading the way. I do believe we have had Democrats in the White House and in Congress that did believe in honesty and truthfulness. I believe John Kennedy was a good person who dealt with people honestly. I believe Tip O’Neil was a Democrat whose word you could trust. The Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party is now dominated by collectivists (Marxists, communists, socialists, progressives, Democrats – all virtually the same) who absolutely believe that “the ends always justify the means.” In the short run that false axiom is applied to destroying Donald Trump so anything can be said and done and is justified if it accomplishes that goal. In the long run the end is to destroy the Republic we call the United States of America and bring about within the United States a Marxist totalitarian state under the tyrannical rule of the “Dictatorship of the Proletariat.” If you only understand what I said based on bumper stickers and 30 second sound bites, you owe it to yourself to thoroughly understand the goals of the current Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party to destroy our Republic. They are following the roadmap drawn by Karl Marx and used by people like Lenin, Hitler, Mao, Castro, and Chavez.
Some of the more infamous lies we have heard recently to bring about the Marxist totalitarian state desired were, “You can keep your plan if you like it,” “You can keep your doctor if you like them,” “Impeachment is a very solemn occurrence,” “I pray for him every day,” “I do not know who the whistle blower is,” and of course the infamous false characterization of the phone call of President Trump by Adam Schiff. Now we have another lie of omission being used by the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) in their illegal and unconstitutional coup attempt to oust a duly elected President of the United States. Schiff, who can absolutely not help himself from deceit and outright lies is trying to put forth the idea that President Trump stated he had complete power under Article II of the Constitution. President Trump did make that statement and President Trump was absolutely correct. Donald Trump, as President of the United States had the full and complete power to fire Special Prosecutor Mueller. Nobody questioned that authority. The clip that Schiff and his fellow deceivers are showing was President Trump stating that fact. The context of the clip was not explained. Nevertheless, Schiff and his fellow Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are using that clip to imply that President Trump stated he had full authority to do anything he wants. If you vote for Marxist/Progressives (Democrats), if you vote for Republican establishment members, if you vote, and if you in anyway condone this type of deceit, you are conforming to the deceitful methods of all collectivists including Marx, Lenin, Hitler, Mao, Castro, and Chavez. You are approving of the anti-American and anti-constitutional methods now being used by the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats), the same methods that have been used by all collectivists (Marxists, communists, socialists, progressives, Democrats, all virtually the same) for centuries. That method is that anything that moves us down the road to a Marxist totalitarian state under the tyrannical rule of the Dictatorship of the Proletariat is not only acceptable but encouraged including deceit and outright lies. We are hearing all kinds of nonsensical cries by those who desire to destroy our Republic and replace it with a Marxist totalitarian state under the tyrannical rule of the “Dictatorship of the Proletariat.” This is exactly what Islamic Jihad sympathizer Comrade Obama meant when he called for the fundamental transformation of the Untied States, the exact same transformation Marx said would take place in the United States.
A fact-based book “Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America's Progressive Elite” is to be released on January 21. Here is the Amazon description Washington insiders operate by a proven credo: when a Peter Schweizer book drops, duck and brace for impact. For over a decade, the work of five-time New York Times bestselling investigative reporter Peter Schweizer has sent shockwaves through the political universe. Clinton Cash revealed the Clintons international money flow, exposed global corruption, and sparked an FBI investigation. Secret Empires exposed bipartisan corruption and launched congressional investigations. And Throw Them All Out and Extortion prompted passage of the STOCK Act. Indeed, Schweizer s follow the money bombshell revelations have been featured on the front pages of the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal, and regularly appear on national news programs, including 60 Minutes. Now Schweizer and his team of seasoned investigators turn their focus to the nation’s top progressives’ politicians who strive to acquire more government power to achieve their political ends. Can they be trusted with more power? In Profiles in Corruption, Schweizer offers a deep-dive investigation into the private finances, and secrets deals of some of America s top political leaders. And, as usual, he doesn’t t disappoint, with never-before-reported revelations that uncover corruption and abuse of power all backed up by a mountain of corporate documents and legal filings from around the globe. Learn about how they are making sweetheart deals, generating side income, bending the law to their own benefits, using legislation to advance their own interests, and much more. Hillary Clinton rips 'career politician' Bernie Sanders with brutal honesty: 'Nobody likes him'. Can you imagine somebody who is as detested and disliked as Hillary Clinton makes this revelation? Hillary Clinton nearly lost the 2016 Democratic nomination to Sen. Bernie Sanders — and now we know she personally does not like the Vermont socialist, either. Ahead of a new documentary about her failed 2016 campaign, Clinton confirmed in an interview with the Hollywood Reporter that she is not a "Bernie Bro," a phrase used to refer to Sanders supporters. In the documentary, Clinton says of Sanders, "He was in Congress for years. He had one senator support him. Nobody likes him, nobody wants to work with him, he got nothing done. He was a career politician. It's all just baloney and I feel so bad that people got sucked into it." When asked if her assessment still holds today, Clinton told the Hollywood Reporter, "Yes, it does." AOC says the Democratic Party is not leftist, calls it 'center or center-conservative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, true leader of the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party said that the Democratic Party is not on the left of the political spectrum, but rather a majority of its members are centrist or right-of-center in their beliefs. To support her position, she pointed to Democrats' inability to even get votes on major progressive issues like single-payer health care. "We don't have a left party in the United States," Ocasio-Cortez said during a Martin Luther King Jr. Day event. "The Democratic Party is not a left party. The Democratic Party is a center or center-conservative party. We can't even get a floor vote on Medicare for All, not even a floor vote that gets voted down. So, this is not a left party. There are left members inside the Democratic Party that are working to try to make that shift happen." Ocasio-Cortez is a collectivist (Marxist, communist, socialist, progressive, Democrat, all virtually the same) who has endorsed fellow collectivist Bernie Sanders in the Democratic presidential primary. She recently said America is the only country in which she and former Vice President Joe Biden would be in the same political party. The Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party is covering their corruption, their division, and their desire to bring about the fundamental transformation called for by Islamic Jihad sympathizer Comrade Obama when he said he would bring about a fundamental transformation of the United States from a Republic to a Marxist totalitarian state under the tyrannical rule of the “Dictatorship of the Proletariat.” Once again, we are in a crisis because the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) hate the United States Constitution, do not understand the United States Constitution, and have no idea upon which values our nation was founded. The definition of oxymoron is when a Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) says we adhere to the Constitution or we must do what our founders wanted. The fact is, the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have no idea about either.
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) have for years told us that the Constitution is a living document and can mean anything they want it to mean. Collectivist Franklin Roosevelt said, “The United States Constitution has proved itself the most marvelously elastic compilation of rules of government ever written.” "The words of the Constitution … are so unrestricted by their intrinsic meaning or by their history or by tradition or by prior decisions that they leave the individual Justice free, if indeed they do not compel him, to gather meaning not from reading the Constitution but from reading life." —Felix Frankfurter, Supreme Court Justice Roosevelt, Frankfurter, and so many other collectivists (Marxists, communists, socialists, progressives, Democrats – all virtually the same) were so wrong and are so wrong. Nevertheless, the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) led House is once again destroying our Constitution for political purposes. They have completely ignored the words of the Constitution and the intent of the framers in their coup attempt, and have incorrectly referred to their actions as an impeachment. Their actions in no way adhere to the Constitution or the intent of the framers. Regarding our Constitution being a living document, this was never the intent of the framers. The basis of our political systems is the right of the people to make and to alter their constitutions of government. But the Constitution, which at any time exists, ‘till changed by an explicit and authentic act of the whole people, is sacredly obligatory upon all. … If in the opinion of the people the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates. But let there be no change by usurpation; for though this in one instance may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed. — George Washington On every question of construction carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text or invented against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed. —Thomas Jefferson Can it be of less consequence that the meaning of a Constitution should be fixed and known, than a meaning of a law should be so? — James Madison So far as this coup attempt (impeachment) is concerned: Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz said the Democrats’ impeachment of President Trump is the Founding Fathers’ “greatest nightmare.” Speaking with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos on Sunday, Dershowitz, a Democrat who is on Trump’s legal defense team, made clear that the impeachment articles contain no crimes. “Is it your position that President Trump should not be impeached even if all the evidence and arguments laid out by the House are accepted as fact?” Stephanopoulos asked. “That’s right,” Dershowitz replied. “When you have somebody who, for example, is indicted for a crime -- let's assume you have a lot of evidence -- but the grand jury simply indicts for something that's not a crime, and that's what happened here, you have a lot of evidence, disputed evidence, that could go both ways, but the vote was to impeach on abuse of power, which is not within the constitutional criteria for impeachment, and obstruction of Congress. “Those are both the kinds of things that led Hamilton and Madison -- talk about nightmare -- to regard that as the greatest nightmare, number one, giving Congress too much power to allow the president to serve at the will of Congress,” he continued. “And number two, as Hamilton put it, the greatest danger is turning impeachment into a question of who has the most votes in which House, and rather than having a consensus and a broad view of impeachable conduct.” Dershowitz said his role in the case is to "determine what is a constitutionally authorized criteria for impeachment" and despite Stephanopoulos's pressing, refused to give his personal opinion about whether he believed the president acted improperly. "I'm a liberal Democrat who's been critical of many of the policies of the president. I'm here as a constitutional lawyer, a lawyer who's taught for 50 years constitutional criminal procedure at Harvard, taught a course on impeachment, taught a course on constitutional litigation," he said. "I'm here to lend my expertise on that issue and that issue alone, because that's the primary issue." Again, I repeat, we are in a crisis because the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) hate the United States Constitution, do not understand the United States Constitution, and have no idea upon which values our nation was founded. Anyone who would support this coup attempt (impeachment) is equally as guilty as are the House members who advanced and supported this anti-Constitutional and anti-American coup. That this so-called impeachment is in fact a coup is not disputable. An impeachment proceeding as outlined in the Constitution and discussed in the Federalist Papers is not a procedure that begins prior to a President being nominated, much less inaugurated. This coup did. This coup declared impeachment and then begin looking for a crime. A crime was never found so some nebulous statements were concocted to fulfill the real purpose of the coup, and that was to damage a duly elected president of the United States in an effort to overturn the will of the people.
The chances of the Senate to uphold the actions of a truly rogue and anti American group of people in the House of Representatives is negligible. The reason the odds are so minimal is because more members of the Senate are willing to put party politics aside and in so doing will become statesmen placing the Constitution and the country before party than there are in the House. Our founders understood this would probably be the situation and that is why they placed the final outcome in the hands of the Senate. Do your research and you will know what I just stated is fact. If you do the research, you will become far more equipped to become a freedom loving American who is not only keen but equipped to set brushfires of freedom. We should bring good from evil by exposing the deep state or swamp and how they manipulate to bring about their desired results, illegally or legally. When the Russian Hoax went up in flames with the Mueller report and then the disastrous testimony of Mueller, the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) were desperate to find another means to continue the coup they had begun perhaps as early as 2015. Out of nowhere we learned from Schiff that a “whistle blower” had accused the duly elected President of wrongdoing. Even though the wrongdoing has been proven to be incorrect, the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) still used it as a springboard to bring about the Articles. During the Senate trial, those involved with the accusations by the “whistle blower” should be called before the Senate and the nation. This would include the “whistle blower”, Schiff, and the members of Schiff’s staff that assisted the “whistle blower” in concocting his accusations and drafting the complaint. The Senate should place no limits as to the scope of the questioning. The exposure of this small part of the “deep state” and “swamp” could and should lead to many different parts, including the parts within the FBI and DOJ. We should bring good from evil by exposing the corruption that runs throughout the government as it manipulates foreign aid to different countries and then corrupt officials have some of the foreign aid returned to them much as then Vice President Biden had foreign aid given to Ukraine returned to him through his son. By the way, where is Hinter? It would appear that Senator Mitt Romney would object to this line of questioning as would Pelosi and Schiff who all apparently have money in their hands from Ukraine just as does Biden. There are solid reasons to belief that this foreign aid game has been played from many years and through many different countries. The depth to which it runs is anybody’s guess, but we the people should know and those who have played this game like the Biden’s should be discovered and punished accordingly. It would be interesting to see who else would object, along with Romney, Pelosi, and Schiff. Good can come from evil. People with good intent must be seeking the good and must be willing to expose the evil completely, even if it exposes people they have called friends. “A republic if you can keep it,” is a quote attributed to Benjamin Franklin when he was asked by a lady what type of government we had. It is critical that we note that Franklin did not say, a democracy if you can keep it. The founders understood the difference between a republic and a democracy. They chose a republic because they envisioned that what they had created would last for a long time. Our republic is under attack today like never before and it is being attacked by a political party, the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party, for the very reasons the founders rejected a democracy and favored a republic.
A democracy is rule by the majority. Our founders, who were students of history, governments, and philosophy, understood that democracies quickly become tyrannies. The reason this is so is because rule by the majority is always used to eliminate the rights of the minority. As rights of the minority are eliminated, those members of the minority are no longer considered a part of the political group eligible to vote. As the number considered to be a party of the political group eligible to vote becomes smaller and smaller. A tyranny is created because the demands of a very few, perhaps even one, become the rules of all. A republic is established with the intent to always protect the liberty of the individual and to always protect the rights of the minority. This is why we have the Bill of Rights. The opposition to adopte the Bill of Rights was not because those people opposed the liberties protected, but because they said the Bill of Rights would be redundant since the rights of the individual and the minority were already protected in the Constitution. Those who favored adopting the Bill of Rights stated that any redundancy to protect the liberty of the individual and the rights of the minority could not be overdone. Nancy Pelosi, her understanding of the founding and the Constitution are terribly perverted so as to ask if she has any concept as to why we revolted, what the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution of the United States, or the Bill of Rights really mean and why we have them, stated in her incorrect interpretation, that the founders were against having a king. This is true in the most rudimentary form. The founders feared more than anything, the tyranny of the majority and big government that would, as Patrick Henry stated, “dominate the lives and thoughts of the people.” Today we have the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party advocating for everything the founders feared; they are advocating for a democracy and a big government that “dominates the lives and thoughts of the people.” We have seen the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party dismantle our Republic during the coup attempt against a Constitutionally elected president by totally dismissing and abolishing the rights of the minority. We have consistently heard the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party advocate for a democracy by dismantling our Republic and the rights of the minority through the obliteration of the electoral college. We are seeing the Republic being dismantled through the court system championed by the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party as they campaign for the obliteration of individual liberties by restricting the right to life of the unborn, restricting the right to worship God without state sponsored religion as they establish secularism as the state sponsored religion, we witness the curtailment of freedom of speech by the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) enforcing a limitation on what they call hate speech or phrases and words they consider to be politically incorrect, and we are witnessing the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) eliminating the right of citizens to peaceably assemble by their encouragement of such hate groups as ANTIFA and BLM to disrupt assembly of groups with whom they disagree. In the next coming days or weeks, we will witness the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) attack our Constitution by their perversion of the concept of impeachment. The impeachment clause was not just some clause carelessly thrown into the Constitution, but was carefully considered and discussed. The founders feared the very thing that has just happened and that is that a rogue and irresponsible group would impeach a duly elected President because they disliked the individual and/or disagreed with the political agenda of the individual. The standard for impeachment was set very high. The current rogue and irresponsible House has just lowered that standard to dislike and disagreement, just as the founders feared. When our founders formed our nation, they understood they would also have to form a government. Make no mistake, the founders understood that any government they would form, it would be that government that would be the single biggest threat to the freedoms they had just won. To try to protect those freedoms, the founder created a republic. The Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party is proving the founders to be correct; the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) are destroying the republic for a democracy, so they can bring about the tyranny of government from which we originally revolted. If you are a Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) and disagree with anything I have stated, please, not with emotion with such inane comments as Trump is a liar and racist, but with facts and rational arguments, show me where you believe me to be wrong. If you agree with what I said, I challenge you to thoroughly understand what I said. Please no bumper sticker phrases or 30 second sound bites but cogent reasons. Once you understand, you can become a freedom fighter by beginning to be an irate tireless minority that is keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of others. If you have not already done so, I would strongly suggest you get “The Road to Tyranny” and “Two Visions of America” that will clearly outline why it is critical that you join this cause and how you can effectively set brushfires of freedom. Some quick observations:
Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Castro, and Chavez are alive and well, just different bodies but the same minds and philosophies. They were on the stage alive and well. On a lighter side: Bernie’s hair was combed. Steyer needs a better whitener Biden said he and Islamic Jihad sympathizer, Comrade Obama defeated ISIS. That must have been in the same world where Hunter is. Buttigieg is the best; he is the best talker without saying anything. Give him a high mark for his attempt to be compassionate and emotional. Warner evaded the question of whether she stated that Sanders told her a woman could not win. She is becoming adept at deflecting her lies but then she has had a lot of practice. More serious if we can find any truly serious parts: When you read this, you better say something to yourself, pinch yourself, jump once or twice to make sure you still exist. Climate cooling, warming, change or whatever will kill you more likely today as opposed to in a week unless we immediately redistribute American wealth, which we gained, you understand, because we are the worst of the imperialist nations, to any deemed to be oppressed. Are you still there? If you are, do you know where Hunter is? The conclusion on health care is to adopt the health care systems of Cuba and Venezuela. Everybody has a “right” to government funded health care in those countries. Not one of the people on the stage, but then very few people who identify with the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) party, would have supported the American Revolution, the Declaration of Independence, The Constitution of the United States, and certainly not the Bill of Rights. The Revolution and our Documents came about because of the American dream of individual liberty or individualism which includes capitalism, rule of law, limited government, divided government, and sovereignty of the people. The solution for every single solution was government. The solution for a collectivist is always government. Our founders feared government and that is why they drafted and ratified a Constitution, and then insisted on the Bill of Rights, that protected the people from the government. This is how the founders viewed government, which they knew and has proven to be correct. The very definition of tyranny is when all powers are gathered under one place. James Madison Experience hath shown that even under the best forms of government, those entrusted with power have in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny. Thomas Jefferson What the differences we heard on the stage were that all wanted to gather all power in the government to pervert power into tyranny, just at a different pace. This is the song and dance of the climate warming, cooling, change, oh who knows what claimers. Australia is burning because some of you decided they would start fires and then claim “the world is ending" unless we immediately take everything from the imperialists, mostly the United States, and give to the oppressed. Just like Elizabeth Warren’s claim about Bernie Sanders saying a woman could not win will gain no traction because Warren is infamous for her tall tales, so claims about the disaster caused by climate whatever gain less and less traction.
Here is a history of claims made by the climate whatever people, who really are collectivists following the direction of Marx to take from the imperialists and give to the oppressed. Remember the criteria for imperialist and oppressor is flexible and can mean whoever or whatever you want. Written by Sam Dorman on Sep 18, 2019. Posted in Latest news Doomsdays That Didn’t Happen: 50 Years Of Failed Climate Predictions The Competitive Enterprise Institute has put together a lengthy compilation of apocalyptic predictions dating back decades that did not come to pass, timed as Democratic presidential candidates and climate activists refocus attention on the issue. The dire predictions, often repeated in the media, warned of a variety of impending disasters – famine, drought, an ice age, and even disappearing nations – if the world failed to act on climate change. An Associated Press headline from 1989 read “Rising seas could obliterate nations: U.N. officials.” The article detailed a U.N. environmental official warning that entire nations would be eliminated if the world failed to reverse warming by 2000. Then there were the fears that the world would experience a never-ending “cooling trend in the Northern Hemisphere.” That claim came from an “international team of specialists” cited by The New York Times in 1978. Just years prior, Time magazine echoed other media outlets in suggesting that “another ice age” was imminent. “Telltale signs are everywhere — from the unexpected persistence and thickness of pack ice in the waters around Iceland to the southward migration of a warmth-loving creature like the armadillo from the Midwest,” the magazine warned in 1974. The Guardian similarly warned in 1974 that “Space satellites show new Ice Age coming fast.” In 1970, The Boston Globe ran the headline, “Scientist predicts a new ice age by 21st century.” The Washington Post, for its part, published a Columbia University scientist’s claim that the world could be “as little as 50 or 60 years away from a disastrous new ice age.” Some of the more dire predictions came from Paul Ehrlich, a biologist who famously urged population control to mitigate the impacts of humans on the environment. Ehrlich, in 1969, warned that “everybody” would “disappear in a cloud of blue steam in 20 years,” The New York Times reported. According to The Salt Lake Tribune, Ehrlich, warning of a “disastrous” famine,” urged placing “sterilizing agents into staple foods and drinking water.” Those predictions were made around the time former President Richard Nixon created the Environmental Protection Agency. Since then, the U.S. has adopted a series of environmental reforms aimed at limiting emissions. Years after those initial predictions, media outlets and politicians continue to teem with claims of apocalyptic scenarios resulting from climate change. Earlier this month, leading Democratic presidential candidates held a town hall on the issue and warned about the “existential” threat posed by a changing climate. Before the end of the month, 2020 candidates are expected to have another climate forum at Georgetown University. CEI’s report came just before the U.N. Climate Action Summit on Sept. 23, an event that promises to “spark the transformation that is urgently needed and propel action that will benefit everyone.” It also came a week after Rep. Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., warned that Miami would be gone in a “few years” because of climate change. She was responding to critics of her ambitious “Green New Deal,” which seeks to reach net-zero emissions within just decades. Ocasio-Cortez, whose plan has been endorsed by leading presidential candidates, previously joked that the world would end in 12 years if it didn’t address climate change. But short-term predictions weren’t a laughing matter in the years following “An Inconvenient Truth,” a documentary produced by former Vice President Al Gore. In 2008, ABC released an ominous video about what the world would look like in 2015. As the video warned about rising sea levels, a graphic showed significant portions of New York City engulfed by water. Gore himself famously predicted in the early 2000s that Arctic ice could be gone within seven years. At the end of seven years, Arctic ice had undergone a period of expansion. So, on and on we go, “the sky is falling, you must redistribute immediately.” And yet those who cry the loudest continue to get rich like Gore, and fly on private jets to conferences to decry climate whatever. Come on, give me a break. We have real problems like Islamic Terrorism that you climate hoaxers protect and champion, like creating poverty, homelessness, and horrible conditions that dominate collectivist nations and U. S. states that you collectivists control. Any rationale person can only conclude that the real problem is you the collectivist. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
January 2020
Categories |
RSS Feed