|
Socialism enslaves people just like we have witnessed throughout the world for years with other forms of slavery. Great Britain was a proponent of slavery and prohibited the Northern colonies from outlawing slavery. After the colonies declared their independence, many of the Northern Colonies did outlaw slavery while those in the South continued the practice that has existed from the beginning time to this very day. Slavery has always been practiced in the Muslim world and is still practiced today. People are bought and sold with many of the young girls and boys being bought and sold for sexual purposes.
Slavery is the condition in which one person is owned as property by another and is under the owner's control, especially in involuntary servitude. A broader definition of slavery would be the demand for the submission of one to the dominating influence of another. The common definition of socialism is any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods. Understand that the most important means of production and distribution in any society is people. Socialism requires the submission of people, the most important means of production and distribution, to the dominating influence of the collective or the state. We must always remember that socialism is collectivism and collectivism is simply an all-encompassing term for Marxism, communism, socialism, progressive, Democrat, which are all virtually the same. The common and essential element for all of these is the requirement that all individuals subjugate their will, desires, and ambitions to the demands and requirements of the state or the collective. Karl Marx stated that his society would be a classless society. He explained that in a classless society all would conform to one doctrine or all would agree on all issues, and all would be equal, primarily economically, but also socially. The fundamental principle of the Socialist classless society was that all would work and produce to the best of their abilities and the productive results would be divided according to the will of the state with each receiving based on their needs. In the example Marx used in the Critique of the Gotha program, the state was included in each, but the state would receive first and what was left would go to the people. In the United States today, the divide is between those who are advocating for socialism and those who are advocating for the principles upon which our nation was founded which is in a single descriptive term, individualism. Individualism is when people are free and encouraged to dream big and then strive for those dreams. Those who are advocating for socialism, which includes groups such as Antifa, BLM, The Democrat Party, and other groups on the left are also saying they oppose slavery and wish to punish those who in any way had anything to do with slavery in early America. Yes, they are saying our laws and ideas should apply on an ex post facto basis. These same socialist are proclaiming their ideas against slavery, not because they oppose slavery, but because they believe they can use the argument to bring about socialism (collectivism) which historically has been the most damaging and brutal form of slavery imposed on people. Under the system of socialism, more people have died and suffered from starvation, from the ravishes of poverty, from the enforcement of conformity and equality by the state, than any other form of governance be it as a state or as an elite privileged ruler under the state. I implore all Freedom Loving Americans to learn and understand the real history of the United States and why our wise and flawed founders instituted such a unique nation. I also implore you to understand the evil that is collectivism and how and why it always destroys. Individualism has always built and advanced society for all while collectivism has always destroyed and brought about poverty and misery for the masses. This is a fact and just as gravity always works so does the truism that individualism always builds, and collectivism always destroys. When you understand this, you can begin to be an effective part of the irate and tireless group that is keen on “Setting Brushfires of Freedom” by asking questions of those who would claim they support socialism and oppose slavery or any form thereof.
0 Comments
We are in the middle of a revolution. The one side is calling for a transformation of the United States. The transformation they seek is to have the United States become a Marxist state. In a Marxist state the people are told how they can live their lives and what they must think. When the Marxist party declares that all must follow their dictates to bring about social justice as they define social justice, any who do not conform will be demonized, shunned, excluded, and yes eliminated. The only law that exists is the law as defined by the Marxist party. The concept of Ex Post Facto is totally discarded. If the Marxist party declares something illegal or immoral today, you are held guilty if you committed the act yesterday, last year, last decade, and now we are learning even last century.
At the heart of this revolution is the idea of what are Natural Rights and from where do those rights come. When the United States was founded, we adopted the unique idea that Natural Rights come from God and not from government. This idea was not unique because of the truth of the idea, but because no country had ever founded their society on this truth. All nations had accepted that government controlled all rights. Autocrats have demanded that people adhere to the concept they are assuming the role of God and Marxists believe God does not exist and therefore the role of God falls to the Marxist party. Although Natural Rights are commonly referred to as Live, Liberty, and Property or Pursuit of Happiness, our Declaration of Independence correctly recognized that Natural Rights extend beyond these stated when Thomas Jefferson stated that amongst these Natural Rights are......... Under whose control do Natural Rights fall is at the core of the revolution in which we are now engaged. This has been a struggle in the United States for years. The most basic Natural Right is that of life. Who is allowed to have life and who is denied life. Certainly, God is in ultimate control, but the Marxist movement has for years tried to assume some control. They were able to take that control in the United States when they circumvented the United States Constitution and achieved their goal through unconstitutional means. It was through the courts, who have no legislative or lawmaking authority, that the Marxist movement achieved a legal means to commit murder and end the lives of unborn children in the name of choice, because it is deemed that the child is an inconvenience. This same movement is making noises that the concept of choice should extend beyond the time of birth as well as being applied as people age and are deemed to be a liability as they age. The Marxist movement is also attacking the concept of liberties being under the control of government. Today our liberty of speech is being curtailed and completely restricted when it is determined by the Marxist party to be politically incorrect and what they term as hate speech. Our right to assemble is now based on whether or not the purpose of the assembly is to further the Marxist movement or if it is to oppose the Marxist movement. Assembly to oppose is now being outlawed. Our liberty to practice our religion is now prohibited and when it is again allowed, the Biblical command to make a joyful noise to the lord is threatened. The Natural Right of property or the pursuit of happiness is being restricted. Many of the Marxists are defining how we are to use the property, when we can do business from the property, and even demanding we pay rent to the state for the property we supposedly own. Our personal incomes are now considered property of the state and it is the state that tells us how much of our income we can keep. Even the right for us to pursue our dreams is being limited if the state determines the achievement of our dreams would hurt the fragile ego of another. We are in the midst of a revolution. It is critical that we who are Freedom Loving Americans do not accept that the Marxist party can dictate to us how we are to live our lives and how we are to think. When we accept that government in deed has the right to control, limit, or abolish our Natural Rights that do come from our Creator, than we have accepted total conformity to the Marxist dictates and have willingly become a servant to the state. Whether or not the United States will remain a Republic with the principle that our Natural Rights, Life, Liberty, and Property or as Thomas Jefferson stated, pursuit of happiness, is the question before us. Freedom Loving Americans state unequivocally that we do not want to transform our nation into a Marxist totalitarian state under the control of the “Dictatorship of the Proletariat.” The collectivists (Marxists, communists, socialists, progressives, Democrats, - all virtually the same) are telling us that indeed we must transform the United States to what Karl Marx called a classless society where all conform to the same politically correct mantras, and that is under the rule of the “Dictatorship of the Proletariat.”
We have loud and direct demands for this transformation. We have many on the left telling us that we must follow the call by Lenin when he stated, “No Marxist can deny that the interests of socialism are higher than the right of a nation to self-determination. The role of government is to implement socialism.” This is exactly what the left in the United States, camouflaged as the Democrat party, is demanding. We were told by Comrade Michelle Obama on May 14, 2008 that. “We are going to have to change our conversation: we are going to have to change our traditions, our history; we are going to have to move into a different place as a nation.” This is what was happening under the guise of government from 2009 through 2017 and was intended to continue in the same manner with the sure election of Hillary Clinton. That we would change our conversation under the demand for political correctness, change our history by blatantly rewriting it, and to change our place as a nation to a Marxist totalitarian state under the firm control of the “Dictatorship of the Proletariat.” The election of 2016 happened, and the transformation ran into a road bump. The Democrat party and their fellow collectivists immediately implemented the change our traditions part of Comrade Michelle’s declaration and the attack on the tradition of peaceful transfer of power was now the target. This is what has consumed the collectivists. In order for them to move the United States into a different place, they must change the tradition of peaceful transfer of power. They have used the China virus, knowing that their draconian policies would kill people and destroy the lives of many others, to do what they believe is the role of government; and that is to do as Lenin stated, implement socialism. Freedom Loving Americans, the biggest threat the United States has ever faced in our history is the current promise by the Democrats and their fellow collectivists, and that is to do as Comrade Barack Obama Promised on October 30, 2008, “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America. Ivelisse Correa of Hartford said her 4th of July plans do not include fireworks or a celebration of America’s independence.
“It’s pretty generally felt that July 4th is not for us,” said Michael Oretade, the head of Black Lives Matter 860 in Hartford. “In reality, Black independence is never really been fulfilled.” “We’re going to talk about how the system has treated us and ways that we need to fight the system,” said Oretade. Oh yes, we will have a July 4th in 2021, but will we have an Independence Day. Independence Day is celebrated in the United States of America to honor the Declaration of Independence, a document that declared the colonies would be free from the rule of Great Britain because Great Britain was a tyrannical government dictating to the colonists how they must live their lives, even how they must think. Within the document entitled “The Declaration of Independence” the colonists stated that government has no right to control, limit, or abolish our rights bestowed upon us by the Creator including but not limited to those of Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness, or Property. The colonists also state that government has only the power given to it by the people. Today, we have people in the United States that strongly disagree with the basic principles that defined our independence. Many of these groups are using race as the excuse to cause the unrest necessary to return the nation that grew from the original thirteen colonies into what we now know as the United States of America comprised of 50 states. These people who disagree are calling for a transformation of the United States of America from a Republic based on Natural Rights given to us by God into a Marxist totalitarian state under the “Dictatorship of the Proletariat” that is an all demanding government that endorses and demands total conformity to one form of thought. All movements calling for this transformation have followed the dictate of Karl Marx that all current systems must be destroyed and then rebuilt in the image of the Marxist, which is a classless society that is totally equal and conforms to the party line. There is no room for independent thought within the Marxist state. If the leftist movement is successful in the November elections, and they will use every means possible to have the most votes, the likelihood of the United States celebrating Independence Day based on the principles of the Declaration of Independence will be extremely low. Conformity and adherence to the party line will be called justice and that is what will be proclaimed as worthy of celebrating. If the leftist movement fails in the November election to manufacture enough votes to take control, those of us who believe in the principles of the Declaration of Independence will not have won the war, we will only have been given a short four years to make substantial progress to restoring the spirit in the American public critical to us resisting the transformation movement. We should look upon this time, if it happens, as Trenton and not Yorktown. Karl Marx, in the Critique of the Gotha Program, described exactly what our current position is when he said, “Between any Capitalist and Communist society there lies the period of the revolutionary transformation of the one into the other. Corresponding to this is also a political transition period in which the state can be nothing but the revolutionary dictatorship of the proletariat.” Samuel Adams also described the current position of the United States when he declared, “It is now high time for the people of this country to explicitly declare whether they will be free men or slaves.” Are you willing to explicitly declare? Many on the left have explicitly declared they want to be slaves. If you explicitly declare you want to be free, then you have explicitly declared you will immediately become a part of the irate and tireless minority keen on, “Setting Brushfires of Freedom.” Learn what that means and how you can become a warrior for freedom and liberty. July 4th is a day that means fun and games to many people. Some might even wave a flag and wear red, white, and blue, but they have no idea what the significance of the day is. They ooh and ah when the fireworks explode and even join in the cheering at the end of the program. Unfortunately, these are mostly collectivists (Marxists, communists, socialists, progressives, Democrats, all virtually the same) living in the United States. Everything they believe is the opposite of why we celebrate Independence Day.
Independence Day is just that, the day the United States celebrates the adoption of the Declaration of Independence. It was through this document that the American Colonists said we declare we are free from the tyranny of government and the demand that we conform to one way of thought. The Declaration of Independence states that we the people now recognize that our Natural Rights of Live, Liberty, and Property or as Thomas Jefferson stated, the Pursuit of Happiness comes from God. Government has no right to control, limit, or abolish our Life, Liberty, and Property, or Pursuit of Happiness. Please, contemplate that for a minute and then do a count and notice just how many ways the Collectivists now demand that government control our Life, Liberty, and Property or Pursuit of Happiness. Independence Day also celebrates the day we the people declared that we would now be sovereign, and government would be the servant. The Declaration of Independence states that the government, as servant receives its power from we the people. The Declaration of Independence said that the rights of the individual are protected and no longer does the individual have to conform to the dictates of the collective or the state. Collectivists celebrate July 4th. Individualists celebrate Independence Day. Which do you celebrate?? Stupid things are based on the stupid and destructive concept of political correctness.
Undocumented immigrant is stupid. Legal or not legal is not based on how we phrase a concept, but did you or did you not break the law. Saying something is hate speech is stupid. If I call you a moron, it is perhaps hate speech to you but it is truth to me. Black lives matter is stupid. When we start to designate that skin color determines if you matter or not we have reached the point of extreme racism and frankly stupidity. Save lives, wear a mask is stupid. Never have I seen anything so stupid as a person sitting on the beach with all the wonderful fresh air, but they, the stupid person is wearing a mask. Lock downs saved lives is stupid. Facts and numbers prove that lockdowns have caused not only much hardship but caused the loss of life. If the lockdown saves just one life, it is worth it, is one of the most stupid statements perhaps ever uttered. Reparation payments must be paid is stupid. Those making this stupid statement are doing it because they want to gain politically, or they want to drive home victim hood. Both are selfish motivations, stupid and destructive. If we follow this inane logic, everybody will have to pay reparations for something and receive reparations for something else. Grow up. Statues must be destroyed because the individual was imperfect is stupid. First of all, there are no perfect people. Second, if you do not like the statue, do not look, but stop the stupidity. Nominating a person with Dementia that becomes visibly more severe daily is not only stupid, but it is cruel and the highest form of disrespect. We can go on and on, but perhaps the most stupid thing I have seen is this: England’s historic St. Albans Cathedral has said that in light of the Black Lives Matter movement, it will install a painting that reimagines Jesus Christ as a black man above its altarpiece. And this in a church that by implication would believe the Bible which teaches that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. The Bible also clearly states that Jesus, when he was on earth in human form, was born to a Jewish mother. Jesus was Jewish, if you believe the Bible, historic St. Albans Cathedral. We have no indication in the Bible if his skin tone was darker or lighter, only that he was a Jew. Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the second deity in the trinity, is God. The Bible never refers to those in the family of God as American family members, white family members, black family members, European family members, but as members of the family of God who have all become members in exactly the same manner; they have confessed with their mouth and believed in their heart that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, and that this same Jesus was crucified as a sacrifice for our sins and rose from the dead in victory over death. Only because our sins have been paid for by the blood of Christ are we members of the family. It is stupid and blasphemy to use Christ in any way for political purposes and gain. Christ tells us, his purpose was to be the sacrificial lamb for us, and he did it because only he could. Every individual who believes in the concept that each individual has the right to life, liberty, and property, is facing a vicious assault on the fundamental principle that made the Untied States a unique nation. Our Declaration of Independence correctly tells us that these natural rights are endowed or given to us by God. That means government has no right to control, limit, or abolish those rights of life, liberty, and property, or as Thomas Jefferson stated, the pursuit of happiness.
In the United States there is a transformation movement that claims the United States must transform from a nation that professes all are entitled to life, liberty, and property, and become a nation that transforms the role of government from merely being a protector of those rights for the individual, but that the government has complete and total control to limit or abolish those rights as it believes is best. This is saying that the United States must transform from an Individualist nation where the rights of the individual are protected, to a collectivist nation where the rights of the individual are subjugated to the demands of the collective or the state. The transformation movement, a key plank in the Democrat Party platform, is proudly declaring that the United States must transform from a nation where people have freedoms and liberties protected by a constitution to a totalitarian state where the reigning sovereign dictates what if any rights or liberties an individual might have. This movement has been in place for many decades, but has gained strong momentum as our school system has been transformed from an education system to an indoctrination system, and our families are systematically being destroyed as the state insists that values taught to children are values proclaimed by the state and not the parents or the church. When you ask yourself if the struggle is worth the effort, I would propose you are asking the wrong question. I would propose the question we must ask ourselves as Individualists and Freedom Loving Americans is can we do anything but give an unfaltering effort to retain natural rights as outlined in the Declaration of Independence and freedoms and liberties as defined in the Constitution and especially the Bill of Rights. The opinion is not only my opinion, but more importantly is the same as that held by the Father of the Revolution, Samuel Adams. Samuel Adams told us: “The truth is, all might be free if they valued freedom, and defended it as they ought.” The Democrat party is telling people there is no value in freedom. It is our job to be about “Setting Brushfires of Freedom.” “The liberties of our country, the freedom of our civil constitution, are worth defending at all hazards; and it is our duty to defend them against all attacks. We have received them as a fair inheritance from our worthy ancestors: they purchased them for us with toil and danger and expense of treasure and blood, and transmitted them to us with care and diligence. It will bring an everlasting mark of infamy on the present generation, enlightened as it is, if we should suffer them to be wrested from us by violence without a struggle, or be cheated out of them by the artifices of false and designing men.” The Democrat Party is the "false and designing men wresting from us our freedoms and liberties." We were charged that we must always be about “Setting Brushfires of Freedom.” Please declare openly and proudly that you will, along with Samuel Adams and me, be about always “Setting Brushfires of Freedom.” Do it unceasingly. Article III. Section. 1.
The judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office. Judicial power has been defined as the authority to interpret and apply the law, adjudicate legal disputes, and otherwise administer justice. Judicial power is not the power to legislate or to administer. In fact, those powers were designated to the legislative and executive branches of government. Article III the shortest of the first three branches of government because it was always intended that the judicial branch be the weakest of the three independent branches of government. That is correct, the three branches of government were never intended to be equal, only independent. "This member of the Government (the judicial member) was at first considered as the most harmless and helpless of all its organs. But it has proved that the power of declaring what the law is, ad libitum, by sapping and mining slyly and without alarm the foundations of the Constitution, can do what open force would not dare to attempt." —Thomas Jefferson to Edward Livingston, 1825. ME 16:114 After the Marbury v Madison decision, which has been perhaps the most damaging decision ever in regard to the continuation of our Republic where the people elect representatives to perform their sovereign act of legislating, Jefferson said this: "In denying the right [the Supreme Court usurps] of exclusively explaining the Constitution, I go further than [others] do, if I understand rightly [this] quotation from the Federalist of an opinion that 'the judiciary is the last resort in relation to the other departments of the government, but not in relation to the rights of the parties to the compact under which the judiciary is derived.' If this opinion be sound, then indeed is our Constitution a complete felo de se [act of suicide]. For intending to establish three departments, coordinate and independent, that they might check and balance one another, it has given, according to this opinion, to one of them alone the right to prescribe rules for the government of the others, and to that one, too, which is unelected by and independent of the nation. For experience has already shown that the impeachment it has provided is not even a scare-crow . . . The Constitution on this hypothesis is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, which they may twist and shape into any form they please." —Thomas Jefferson to Spencer Roane, 1819. ME 15:212 And now these predictions of judicial despotism are becoming reality. "To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions [is] a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men and not more so. They have with others the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps. Their maxim is boni judicis est ampliare jurisdictionem [good justice is broad jurisdiction], and their power the more dangerous as they are in office for life and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such single tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruptions of time and party, its members would become despots. It has more wisely made all the departments co-equal and co-sovereign within themselves." —Thomas Jefferson to William C. Jarvis, 1820. ME 15:277 "The Constitution . . . meant that its coordinate branches should be checks on each other. But the opinion which gives to the judges the right to decide what laws are constitutional and what not, not only for themselves in their own sphere of action but for the Legislature and Executive also in their spheres, would make the Judiciary a despotic branch." —Thomas Jefferson to Abigail Adams, 1804. ME 11:51 "The question whether the judges are invested with exclusive authority to decide on the constitutionality of a law has been heretofore a subject of consideration with me in the exercise of official duties. Certainly, there is not a word in the Constitution which has given that power to them more than to the Executive or Legislative branches." —Thomas Jefferson to W. H. Torrance, 1815. ME 14:303 And now John Roberts has assumed the role of the all-powerful dictator ruling from the bench in the same assumptive role of Supreme Authority that consumed others such as Marshall, McReynolds, and Warren. Roberts played the role of Chief Justice and God when he claimed that congress meant tax and not penalty, and state and not State when he said that Obamacare was constitutional. He than ruled that paperwork must be more accurate in an executive order whose purpose was to negate an executive order that assumed that the executive had legislative authority, which it does not. Now he is ruling that a law duly passed by a legislative branch can be overturned because of a Supreme Court ruling that, according to the United States Constitution would only have the authority of an opinion and not law. The Supreme Court was given no authority to pass law, legislate, and so precedence would be no basis to override a duly passed law. THE SUPREME COURT, THE ENTIRE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT, IS A THREAT TO OUR REPUBLIC AND OUR FREEDOM BECAUSE IT IS ACTING IN A WAY THAT IS TOTALLY CONTRARY TO ITS CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY. YES, THE SUPREME COURT AND JUDICIARY ARE ACTING IN AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL MANNER. More than 10 million people across the globe have now been infected with the novel coronavirus, according to a Johns Hopkins University database. The global tally surpassed the 10 million mark on Sunday as countries such as the U.S. experience another surge in confirmed cases. COVID-19, the disease caused by the novel coronavirus, has also caused more than 499,000 deaths worldwide. The world population in 2020 is counted to be 7.8 billion people. 10,000,000 divided by 7,800,000,000 = .13% 500,000 divided by 7,800,000,000 = .007% What we know about the number of deaths is that they are counted on the basis of with China virus and not because of China virus. We also know that serious underlying health issues are prevalent in an overwhelming number of deaths attributed to the China virus. Yet, not just the American population, but the world population has closed the economic engine, and that closing has caused untold hardships with an increase in suicides, beatings, starvation's, and death due to delayed or ignored health care. The exact number will never be totaled. We are told the economic lockdowns have saved numerous lives, but that appears to be more of a statement to support the lockdowns than based on numbers of fact. We can make the statement that the policies in states like New York, Michigan, and others increased the number of deaths when they forced nursing homes to accept elderly known to have the virus. What we do know is the world population number, and that the number of deaths is an inflated number. We also know that the number of deaths caused by or with the virus were people 70 or above. We heard the inane statement, “If the lockdowns save just one life, they are worth it.” We have no reason to believe they did, but we know the lockdowns caused deaths along with untold hardships, and they are not done. Take a look at the facts, Be objective in your analysis. My conclusion is that once the collectivist movement understood the damage they could cause with an all out campaign of frightening the masses, they set about doing as much political damage as they could to those they consider a political threat without any concern for the masses. What is your objective conclusion? Individual freedom and liberty are under attack in the United States like never before. The communist movement made it a goal to gain control of at least one of the political parties in the United States. They gained control of the Democrat party many years ago and have moved it more and more to the Marxist ideology so that today it is openly declaring everything proclaimed by the Marxist movement throughout the years.
What is it that the Marxist movement desires. Karl Marx said that a society must become a one class system, and because it is a one class system it will be a classless society. In order to achieve that goal, all who did not conform to the classless ideology must be eliminated or converted. One might think he took this from the Islamic doctrine. A classless society requires total conformity and equality as defined by those in power. The Marxist has always claimed that they must have total and complete power so they can eventually establish a totally free society. Lenin said, “No Marxist can deny the interests of Socialism are higher than the rights of a nation to self-determination. The role of government is to implement socialism.” This is what is taking place today. Congress has been infiltrated by socialists whose purpose is to stall, interfere, disrupt, and create discord and gridlock in Congress. Their mission is to interfere with government and bring the system down so the Marxists behind them can gain more power. The socialists in Congress are assisted by the Marxist media, whose job is to promote false and misleading communist propaganda, like the Russian Delusion scam, and to divert our attention away from the crimes of Marxists and their useful idiots in government. Furthermore, Marxists within our government and the media have made a mockery of our Constitution and our rights under it. They turned sexual preference into gay rights and abortion into women’s rights. Everything they do is designed to undermine the Constitution, divide the population, and promote godlessness. They pit men against women, homosexuals against heterosexuals, and blacks and Latinos against whites. Divide and conquer is their preferred tactic. But make no mistake, Marxists want to control the lives of the masses, regardless of race, sex, or sexual preference. To put it into perspective, Marxists want to create a police state where they have total control over everyone and everything, including what we are allowed to say. Once Marxists gain total power, they will have the power to exterminate or imprison anyone who speaks out against them. They now use the politically correct movement to stifle free speech. What we are witnessing today is the anger and disgust of the Marxist movement against Donald Trump, who they are trying to establish as an illegitimate president, primarily because he has exposed and is disrupting the Marxist deep state solidified by Marxist and Islamic Jihadist sympathizer, Barack Obama. There is no limit to what means they will use to achieve their end goal of complete control under the “Dictatorship of the Proletariat.” Is all lost for those of us who are Americans and desire the preservation of individual freedom and liberty. The only time all is lost is when those who oppose evil accept that all is lost. This is something Samuel Adams taught us to never do. The determination to fight the tyranny of government burned to the very core of Samuel Adams. We must have the same determination. All of us must become dedicated servants to the movement that Samuel Adams labeled as “Setting Brushfires of Freedom>’ Please join me in my dedication and determination to fight that evil spectre of Marxism that is haunting the United States today by learning how and then unceasingly being one who is “Setting Brushfires of Freedom.” |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
July 2020
Categories |
RSS Feed