|
|
Never before in the history of the Supreme Court has there been a leak of a decision before official release. There has and always will be speculation about this leak.
The Supreme Court staff is small and official information is well controlled. Yet, the preliminary ruling for Mississippi’s Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization was leaked to the press. This occurred in early May. Supposedly the SCOTUS is going to correctly rule that killing of unborn children is a matter for each state to decide. The ruling is supposedly going to rule that the court was wrong originally in declaring that the killing of an unborn baby is a matter on which the court had authority to rule. We also understand that Chief Justice Roberts disagrees with the opinion of 5 other judges and that even with his vote to support keeping Roe v Wade in its unconstitutional form and continue the endorsement of murdering the unborn, he would be in the minority. We have been informed that Roberts has lobbied other justices to change their votes. When the leak occurred, we heard outrage from many, but little from Roberts. He did promise that the leak would be investigated, an investigation that knowledgeable people tell us should have been done in days and not weeks. It is questionable as to whether or not an investigation has been taking place and if one has, it would certainly appear to be for show only with no real intent of identifying the leaker and punishing the leaker appropriately. This brings me to my wild idea or real possibility. It just might be that Roberts was behind the leak. When Roberts became convinced he could not change the mind of one of the 5 justices necessary to keep murdering the unborn as was declared back in 1973, he might have concluded that public pressure was the means to accomplish his goal. Roberts also knew that he would be the driving force behind any investigation. We have learned from the FBI that when you investigate yourself, the outcome is the outcome that does the least damage to your or no damage. Roberts, perhaps, concluded that if a large organization like the FBI could continually coverup their illegalities, he could do the same in a small, controlled group. A logical action to take after the leak, would have been to release the final decision immediately. A cover-up decision, especially if you wanted to still try to change the opinion, would be to delay the release.
0 Comments
The number one destructive fabrication in our nation today is the belief that government solves problems. Government creates problems, always has and always will. Government creates problems because government is comprised of people.
“In every government on earth is some trace of human weakness, some germ of corruption and degeneracy, which cunning will discover, and wickedness insensibly discover, cultivate, and improve.” Thomas Jefferson The founders formed us as a republic because in a republic the law is the supreme ruler and not men. The law however can only rule so long as we adhere to that law. People in government, as we are seeing today, are using their cunning to circumvent the law and enforce the will of the majority, which is a euphemism for those in power. We are being told the rules of nature and biology can evolve and be changed to promote perversions of all kinds. We are being told that those born male can choose to become women and when they do so they somehow become biological women or women can become biological men. No, we cannot control our biological functions. Those born male do not menstruate. Those born male cannot become pregnant. Those born female cannot impregnate. To think and teach differently is a sign of nothing less than insanity. That all must adhere to the insanity that biology is fluid is controlling and damaging. Because somebody tells me I must accept insanity as normal and call refer to as a man as she, should not be attempted to be controlled by government. Any government that would attempt to do so is exceeding its role and is damaging society. We are being told the proper role of the schools is to teach values. Any society that adheres to this fabrication is a society that is determined to indoctrinate and not educate. Indoctrination is a tool employed by those who want to control and enslave people. People must understand that government will use any fabrication it can to take those liberties and freedoms from us that were given to us by our Creator. The only proper role for government is to protect those liberties and freedoms, not to control and regulate them. Unless the American people understand that government is at best a necessary evil, that to trust government is to sacrifice liberty and freedom, that government that governs least governs best, America will become a Marxist totalitarian state. The American left has told us that they will transform the United States to a Marxist totalitarian state and the RINO’s are their useful idiots aiding and advancing this transformation. Central planning, such as is used in collectivist nations, always fails. When government plans an economy, the economy is certain to fail. It always has and always will. When bureaucrats believe they are better at planning what companies should produce, or how companies should run their businesses, the economy is certain to fail. It always has and always will. The American Left is telling us government must plan the economy.
Bureaucrats to often come from academia, where they have taught theory, and seldom to they come from the real world of business where they have run a successful business. The theorists make decisions based on factors other than results. Business executives make decisions based on what the consumer is telling them they want and need. We are seeing this difference in the energy industry for example. The bureaucrats are telling us that, for their own reasons, we must rely on wind and the sun for our energy needs. This sounds good to some, but it has not, can not produce the energy necessary to run our economy today. It might have worked prior to the automobile, electric lights, air conditioning and heating, prior to a modern economy. Those central planners today who are calling for us to abandon fossil fuel energy are doing all that has brought failure because of central planners of the past. When you boil it down, large-scale central planners fail because they believe three things that aren’t true. First, that they know current conditions (wants, desires, hopes, capabilities, resources). In other words, that they know the exact and entire present state of the community they are planning for. Second, that they know where the community ought to go; that is, that they know what the future ought to be. Third, that they are capable of creating the future they want. None of those things is more than an illusion. Together, they constitute what F. A. Hayek called “the fatal conceit that man is able to shape the world around him according to his wishes.” Central planners have lived in an imaginative world in the past and they live in an imaginative world today. The percentage of Americans who say they believe in God has dipped to the lowest number in the past nearly 80 years, according to a new Gallup poll. The Values and Belief poll showed 81% of people answered that they believe in God. That is down six percentage points from the 87% of respondents who said they believed in God in the 2017 poll. This year is the lowest percentage in Gallup’s trend since the public opinion polling company first asked the question in 1944.
The poll found that the belief in God has plummeted the most in recent years among young adults and people on the left of the political spectrum, namely liberals and Democrats. The question asked was about belief in God. Belief in God is not necessarily about belief in the Bible and that the only way to heaven is through Jesus Christ and the cross. It would be interesting to see those numbers on the left of the political spectrum. Even so, the drop in the numbers of belief in God is a direct correlation to the rise in crime of all kinds, to the support for sexual perversions, to the support for sexual immorality, to the support for immorality, for the support for pedophilia, for the support to destroy the family, for support to indoctrinate children, and for the support of all that is evil. A God less society is always a society in decline. The collectivist movement is an anti-God movement. The collectivist movement teaches atheism and the worship of the secular state. The American Left is indoctrinating Americans is the ways of the secular state, using propaganda to reinforce that indoctrination, and enforcing their ideas through all forms of intimidation. It is certain that unless the Church, and by the Church I do no mean the secular meaning of the Church but I mean the Biblical meaning of the Church which would be those redeemed by the blood of Christ which was shed on the cross, will stand against the evils thrust upon society by the secular left, the United States will become a collectivist nation and will be ruled by the despotic Dictatorship of the Proletariat; we will become a Marxist nation. Christ’s church, we must rise and proclaim the name of Jesus. The topic today is gun legislation. We are told to solve the problem of drug addicted kids, kids from single parent or no parent homes, kids who have been taught to shun respect for others and to not take pride in their accomplishments, is to violate the United States Constitution and infringe on the rights of law abiding and good citizens from owning guns. This is an easy argument for any who wish to control the lives, choices, and thoughts of others.
It is also far less of a political threat to professional politicians if they shy away from discussing causes of problems, causes of acts of violence, of acts of violating the natural rights of others or the life, liberty, and property of others. These causes are uncomfortable and threatening for not only the politically ambitious but also for those who seek riches and power. Benjamin Rush, Signer of the Declaration of Independence said. "The only foundation for a useful education in a republic is to be aid in religion. Without this there can be no virtue, and without virtue there can be no liberty, and liberty is the object and life of all republican governments. Without religion, I believe that learning does real mischief to the morals and principles of mankind." Having read biographies on Benjamin Rush, I can attest that when Rush said religion, he did not mean religion such as in promoting the religions of Secularism, Communism, or Islam. When Rush said religion he was referring to the Gospel of Jesus Christ as outlined in the Bible from Genesis 1:1 to Revelation 22:21. Noah Webster, author of the first American Speller and the first Dictionary stated, "The moral principles and precepts contained in the scriptures ought to form the basis of all our civil constitutions and laws. . . All the miseries and evils which men suffer from vice, crime, ambition, injustice, oppression, slavery, and war, proceed from their despising or neglecting the precepts contained in the Bible." Ronald Reagan told us, “We must reject the idea that every time a law's broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions.” The politically ambitious and the money and power seekers disagree with Rush, Webster, and Reagan. The politically ambitious and the money and power seekers claim that all evil can be eliminated if we simply address the symptoms of crime and ignore the causes. These people instead seek to increase any and all welfare programs which have destroyed the core family. Since LBJ and his great society was introduced in 1965, out-of-wedlock birth rates have soared. In 1965, 24 percent of black infants and 3.1 percent of white infants were born to single mothers. By 1990, the rates had risen to 64 percent for black infants and 18 percent for white infants. Twenty years later it’s now 72 percent of black infants, 30 percent of white infants and 53 percent of Hispanic infants. 63 percent of youth suicides are from fatherless homes, 85 percent of all children that exhibit behavioral disorders come from fatherless homes, 80 percent of rapists motivated with displaced anger come from fatherless homes, 71 percent of all high school dropouts come from fatherless homes, 70 percent of juveniles in state-operated institutions come from fatherless homes. That the welfare state has been the biggest contributor to these devastating numbers is never discussed. The way these numbers are being discussed in today’s society is to encourage failure by lowering achievement and discipline standards, by creating even greater numbers of essentially homeless children, by making drugs even more accessible, or simply by promoting the programs of the American Left, which are Communists have as their number one goal to destroy the family. They have been successful. Today, our children are not encouraged to be good citizens but are instead rewarded for bad behavior by removing consequences for bad behavior. Today our children are rewarded for failure by punishing those who do seek achievement and lowering the standards so more and more will fail. Today we strive to teach victimhood so the politician and those seeking money and power will have larger and larger bases. The policies promoted by the American Left, the politicians, and those who seek riches and power is a proven way of how to destroy a society. This has been proven time and time again. The teachings we find in the Bible are the antithesis to this. The Bible teaches that nobody has to be a victim, but all can be welcomed into the Kingdom of God. The Bible teaches that any civilized society must impose consequences for bad behavior. Bad behavior is the same today as it was in Genesis through Revelation. The Bible also reveals the devastating destruction and misery brought about by society rewarding bad behavior. The Bible also teaches that the ambitious politician and those seeking riches and power will distort Biblical teachings, they will preach that good is evil and that evil is good, they will promote perversions of all kinds, they will promote reliance on government or themselves, and they will promote victimhood and then dominate and destroy the very people they were claiming to help. Americans, we harm our future when we believe that what is happening in our nation is unique to our nation. It is not. It has been happening since the beginning of time. The ambitious claim they have the answers to all problems. Their answers are answers that will eventually enslave all to them and give them the riches and power they seek. They will dismiss the teachings of the Bible, which in fact has all the answers, and these are the answers that promote a free and prosperous society. The upcoming decision on the Environmental Protection Agency’s climate oversight will render an opinion of the very basics of the United States Constitution. The Constitution gives legislative or law-making ability exclusively to the legislative branch of government. The executive and judicial branches are granted different duties but have no authority to make law.
This case deals with the executive branch issuing primarily regulations, but it will also apply to executive orders, that are deemed to be law. The legislative branch has contributed to this problem as they have in the past passed a law in concept and then told the executive branch to fill in the blanks. That is unconstitutional. SCOTUS, if it agrees with those bringing the case, will be declaring it unlawful for federal agencies to make “major” decisions without clear authorization from Congress. SCOTUS will be declaring that Congress must fulfill its constitutional duties of making law as it declares that the executive branch cannot make law. “Congress did not — and, under our Constitution, cannot — grant unelected administrative officials at EPA legislative power to creatively reimagine energy policy for the entire country,” states a legal brief by the Americans for Prosperity Foundation. SCOTUS has the opportunity to state that indeed we are a Constitutional Republic and not a democracy. That means that we must live by what the Supreme Ruler of the land says, that is the United States Constitution, and not concoct new rules that make democracy or dictatorship easier. If the court rules in favor of the Constitution and freedom, this ruling will apply to all aspects of the executive branch including the NIH, HUD, DOJ, Department of Education, the Department of Agriculture, that is the entire executive branch. It should also be extended to the judicial branch. The judicial branch has no legal authority to make law. SCOTUS did make law when it ruled on Roe vs Wade. A court that not only gives opinions on the Constitution, but adheres to the Constitution, would have declared that Roe v Wade was an issue for the states or for Congress and would have refused to issue the inane ruling it did. Let us hope this ruling comes down on the side of the Constitution and freedom, and not on the side of democracy and dictatorship. First of all, when I say that I am an Individualist that means that I believe each individual must have the right and the responsibility to live their own life, make their own choices, and have their own thoughts. I believe in the John Locke ideas of natural law and individual liberties. Simply put, it means that each of us have the right to life, liberty, and property, but my right ends when I deprive others of that same right. In today’s world that would mean for instance that my right to life ends when I deprive an unborn child of their right to life, my right to free speech and thought ends when I deprive that right to others, and my right to property ends when I infringe on your right to your property.
In a collectivist society, everything for which I stand as an individualist is negated. The collectivist believes that we as individual persons are simply a clog in a greater machine and our purpose is to contribute to what the collectivist would call the “greater good.” If it is for the “greater good” that I kill my unborn child, than I must. If it is for the “greater good” that I think only as I am told, than I must. If it is for the “greater good” that I own nothing that I can call my own, but all is shared as I am directed, than I must own nothing. America was founded on the principle of individualism. We are the first country that was founded on that principle. We are unique because America meant that our individual liberties such as life, liberty, and property, came for our Creator and not from government. We were also founded as a Republic and not a Democracy. That means that the powers of our government were specifically limited, and the liberties of the people were unlimited but subject to the rules of “natural law”. Now for the random thoughts. Dictators arise because of the propensity of people to need a hero they place on a pedestal. It is the true stateman that understands this weakness in people and refutes this dangerous adoration. We saw this with George Washington. What a statesman. He could have declared himself King, Emperor, or Czar. Any meaningful opposition would have been that his monarchy could not be hereditary. Washington took the position that America was not his, but it was a nation where the people must be the sovereign and the government must be the servant. Washington chose to serve as a servant and not a sovereign. We hear comments from both the right and the left that this is Trump’s America. Those on the right applaud and those on the left sneer. Trump has stated many times that America is not his, but his purpose is to return America to the people. This is what the right applauds, and this is what the left fears. We are given reports on Trump’s endorsements in the primaries. It is my belief that, like the media always does, the meaning of these endorsements is exaggerated. I am sure in a few races and in limited circumstances they have been the direct difference, but Laxalt would have won the race in Nevada without endorsements from anybody. The real news should be, is the candidate a dedicated individualist or a dedicated collectivist. The news always wants to take one isolated race and declare that it is a harbinger of the future. In most situations, the outcome of any individual race can only be measured as an isolated incident in a specific time and at a specific place. However, the Mayra Flores victory is telling. The seat was vacated by a Democrat. I assume because the Biden regime and Pelosi believed it to be very safe for the collectivists. It had been since 1872 and is heavily populated by what Biden and Pelosi considered strong supporters. Flores, an individualist won the race and will now be in the house. This could be a harbinger. We who are individualists must understand however, that the collectivists will and have done anything to keep power including stealing the 2020 election. This has to be a warning to them that they must up their game in stealing elections. I hear people constantly say they only get their news from certain outlets. How foolish. If you do that you are missing some news. Also, you are receiving the news from a slanted perspective, yes from your perspective, but anybody who is searching for knowledge, must search from all perspectives. By getting different perspectives, you learn if your perspective is correct and if so, it strengthens your beliefs. The collectivist movement believes in total conformity to the beliefs of the elites, and total equality for the masses. It has been the strategy of the collectivist to employ indoctrination and propaganda, and then use intimidation to enforce their ideology. For equality of the masses, the collectivists have argued that the producers, those who accomplish, the innovators, and the ambitious are dangerous to collectivism. They have stated that this group, or the rich, must pay their “fair share” in taxes so the collectivist elites can spread it to the others. Biden has recently claimed that the cause of inflation is that “the rich are not paying their fair share”. When asked what a fair share is, we receive the standard answer that they do not have a specific amount but what the rich are now paying is not a fair share. The collectivist movement did define “fair share”. They want us to forget that definition. I can not nor will I. Franklin Roosevelt defined “fair share’ in April of 1942 when he asked congress to pass a law to make the rich pay their “fair share”. FDR said that “fair share” would be 100% of all taxable income over $25,000. That would be about $450,000 today. The collectivist mind set would ask why anybody but them needs more than $450,000. That they say, would be a “fair share” for all but the collectivist elite, who should not be taxed at all because of the great contribution they are making to the “greater good”. I am an individualist. I read and have read many books advocating for collectivism. I have read much about the results of collectivism. I have read much history. I have read a few novels like “Atlas Shrugged” and “War and Peace”. Tolstoy was a remarkable author. The more I read, the more convinced I am that individualism brings freedom and prosperity, and collectivism brings conformity and poverty for the masses. Individualism requires a moral society organized as a republic, and collectivism requires a democracy, which is as Lenin said, “indispensable to socialism, which is the gateway to communism”. Yes, our nation is divided. Our nation was divided during the First and Second Continental Congress. Our nation was divided during the Constitutional Convention. Our nation has been divided all of its existence. But never has our nation been as divided as it is today.
The divisions we saw in our earlier history were different from the divisions we see today. The divisions we saw in our earlier history were differences of process and not of ends. In our earlier history Americans overwhelmingly understood that the power of government must be limited, and the liberties of the individual must be protected. The argument about powers of government was how do we give government the appropriate power to protect our borders and our liberties, but not have the power to tell the individual how they must live their lives, choices they must make, thoughts they could have, or how could we give government power to perform only the proper functions of government and not be able to become tyrannical. Americans were overwhelmingly individualists. The Constitution of the United States is all about limiting the power of government and protecting the liberties of the people. This is the reason we have three not co-equal, but three independent branches of government. The Judicial Branch of government was always intended to be the weakest branch and the Legislative Branch was intended to be the most powerful. The reasoning was that the Judicial Branch was the farthest removed from the people and the Legislative Branch was the closest to the people. Our Constitution specifically states what powers the federal government would have. This is not a suggestive list of powers, but it is a definitive and limiting list of powers. The list is in Article 1. Section 8 of the Constitution. The 10th amendment reinforces that the powers of government are limited to only those powers as it states that any powers not listed are given to the states and the people. The Constitution also specifically states that the federal government cannot infringe or abridge liberties of the people. Congress, the executive, and the courts do not have the power to take from the people our liberties. Many of these liberties are listed in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The framers stated however, in the 9th amendment, that all liberties are protected from government, not just those specifically listed. This was the intent and goal of the different factions in our early history. This has changed. In our nation today we still have a large number of people who believe the power of government should be limited and the liberties of the people should be protected. But since the beginning of the 20th century, a faction has emerged that has as its end goal to have unlimited government power and infringed, abridged, and even abolished liberties. This is the core belief of the collectivist (Marxist, communist, socialist, progressive, Democrat, -all the same) movement. Our country is divided today not on process as to what will keep us the most free, but on will we be free, or slaves to government. The American left or collectivists are telling us that our future lies in having the government as sovereign and the people as slaves. The individualists understand that freedom and prosperity are the direct result of individualist policies and that our history is proof. Each American must ask themselves if they want to be free or be a slave. To be free requires that each individual be responsible, be self-reliant, understand that good or bad consequences are the result of their choices, each individual must think for themselves seeking knowledge and not be a willing conformist to indoctrination, propaganda, and intimidation. The choice to be a slave is simple. There is no required responsibility, government reliance is mandatory, and conforming to the dictates and demands of what is known as the woke culture is to be accepted and considered wise. The requirement of the slave is that they simply be compliant and conform to whatever they are told including things such as God does not exist and if God does exist it does not matter because God is irrelevant, that perversions of any kind are good, that gender is a matter of choice, that any evil in the name of conformity is admirable, that violence in the name of conformity is admirable, that all who hold to the truths of the Bible are vile and evil and must be eliminated, and you know the others. Will you take the easy road and submit to the evil of collectivism, or will you take the difficult road and say and mean as did Patrick Henry, “Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!”? I have made my choice as did Joshua, Stephan, and Patrick Henry, and that is to follow Christ and demand freedom. There is no middle ground. What is your choice? Sanders is listed as an Independent and he calls himself a Democratic Socialist. The policies Sanders has always promoted have been collectivist polices. Remember, collectivism is an ideology that embraces all of the evils of Marxism, communism, socialism, and progressives. It is the essence of, it is the heart of the Democrat Party. Sanders has always caucused with like minded collectivists which means he has always caucused with the Democrats.
Sanders had some words for his fellow collectivists this weekend that prove Sanders is more dedicated to collectivism than he is to the United States or to any political party. Sanders said that without a course correction, he sees the Democratic Party, or the collectivists, on track to get shellacked this fall. Sanders said in an interview last week: “You really can’t win an election with a bumper sticker that says: ‘Well, we can’t do much, but the other side is worse.’” Sanders gave a solution when he stated, “Say to the American people: ‘Look, we don’t have the votes to do it right now. We have two corporate Democrats who are not going to be with us.’” “The leadership has got to go out and say we don’t have the votes to pass anything significant right now. Sorry. You got 48 votes. And we need more to pass it. That should be the message of this campaign.” Sanders was referring to Manchin and Sienna. He was saying to the collectivists that they must follow the way of all collectivists and remove any, in any way, that do not adhere to the collectivist movement. Other tyrannical collectivists also understood this concept. In truth, those in the Republican Party who disagree with the America First movement, which is a movement to return to a Constitutional Republic and restore the limits on the power of government and return all liberties to the people, is determined to punish, and remove any who disagree with those like Cheney and Kinzinger. If Sanders is correct, and the Democrats lose the majority in both houses, the American First movement will not have necessarily been victorious. The America First movement is a movement that places the best interest of the American people and our nation before a political party, before their own power, and way before the deep state entrenched in our bureaucracy. Sanders said that those who do not agree with the ends of their movement, that is control by the government over the lives, choices, and thoughts of the people, must be removed. For the America First movement to be victorious they must remove from their leadership any who place the party’s interest and their own interest above the good of the American people and the nation. That means that the Republicans must replace both McConnell and McCarthy who put the interests of the deep state and their own interests before the American people. They are both skillful politicians but are not statesmen nor dedicated adherents to the America First movement. If the members of the newly elected house and senate, will become dedicated to the ideals upon which our nation was founded and flourished, they will select America First leaders. That would not be McConnell or McCarthy. How dd Samuel Adams bring about the American Revolution? Remember, many in the colonies were indifferent to freedom just as are many Americans today. Remember, many in the colonies supported the tyranny of the King just as many Americans support government tyranny today. Remember, many in the colonies feared independence because it required responsibility and accountability just as do many in America today. Remember, many in the colonies believed the lies of the tyrannical King that his control brought security and safety just as do many in America today believe the lies of government.
Samuel Adams faced the same obstacles that Freedom Loving Americans face today, and that is the indifference and ignorance of an indoctrinated group. Many in this group truly believe that collectivism, or government control over the lives, choices, and thoughts of the people is superior to each individual being responsible and accountable for their own lives, choices, and thoughts. Samuel Adams, a true believer in the benefits of individualism, did not let the intimidation of the collectivists deter him from his proper mission. Samuel Adams, the champion of “Setting Brushfires of Freedom” told us that we must be a part of that irate and tireless group fighting for liberty, and we must be about “Setting Brushfires of Freedom.” People who oppose a society where the powers of government are limited and the liberties of the people are not infringed or abridged, do so because of one or two reasons. The first reason is because they have been indoctrinated, believe the propaganda, and fear the intimidation of the collectivist movement. The second reason is because they are true collectivists who believe absolute control over all will result in a society of total harmony. True collectivists include Marx, Lenin, Hitler, Castro, Mao, Wilson, Obama, and Soros. Those who are members of the first reason, would include most if not all Democrats, and many RINO’s in the United States today. It is to this group that we must target our efforts as “Setting Brushfires of Freedom.” It is the responsibility of each Freedom Loving American to understand the evils of collectivism and why individualism enabled the United States to become the free and prosperous nation it was. We are not being transformed and consequently are less free and less prosperous as a nation because of that transformation. The collectivist believes that all institutions of an individualist nation must be destroyed. This is the final paragraph of the “Communist Manifesto”. “The Communists disdain to conceal their views and aims. They openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions. Let the ruling classes tremble at a Communistic revolution. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win.” The forcible overthrow means the use of violence. Marx also stated that despotic means would be necessary and must be used. You now can understand why the Democrat Party supports and promotes riots, looting, arson and even assassination. Marx said that to bring about the harmonious society that collectivists would have us believe is the product of total conformity and equality, it is necessary to eliminate private property. He also said that there are other individualist institutions that must be destroyed. Included in this group are the Family, Individuality, Eternal Truths, Nations, and History. This will help you understand many of the desired ends of the policies of the Democrat Party. Lenin told the Democrat Party how to implement these policies and how to seize control of a society in “Manuel to Seize Control of a Society.” “Corrupt the youth and give them absolute sexual freedom. Infiltrate and take control of the mass communication media. Divide the population into antagonist groups; encourage arguments between them over social issues. Destroy the people’s confidence in their leaders. Talk all the time bout democracy and republic, but when the opportunity arises, seize power as a dictator. Cooperate with the drainage of public funds; discrediting the image of the country, especially overseas, and create panics within the population through the launching of an inflationary process. Encourage strikes, even if they are illegal, in the country’s key industries. Promote riots while conspire to prevent intervention by law enforcement. Cooperate actively in destroying the moral foundations of society and honesty and trust in the government’s promises. Infiltrate other parties with your own people, forcing them to vote for what is useful to your own party’s interest. Register everyone who has firearms, in order to confiscate them when the time comes, preventing them from opposing your revolution.” You now know the actual platform of the Democrat Party. Never has the movement promoted by the Democrat Party, the collectivist or communist movement, brought harmony. It has always resulted in government tyranny and abolishing individual liberty and opportunity. Oppression, poverty, and misery has always been the result. If you are an American who believes the power of government must be limited and the liberties of the people are not to be infringed or abridged, you must understand the above and use them to ask questions when “Setting Brushfires of Freedom.” Ask your family, friends, and acquaintances for instance if the believe the powers of government should have restrictions and limitations and if so to explain. Ask your family, friends, and acquaintances if violence and despotism should be supported and promoted, and if so when and to what extent. Ask your family, friends, and acquaintances if they believe private property should be eliminated and the family should be destroyed, and if so what would be the result. You can move on from here, but remember, nobody likes to be told that they are wrong. Do not tell these people they are wrong, ask the questions, plant the seed, be about “Setting Brushfires of Freedom.” Samuel Adams brought about an historic revolution “Setting Brushfires of Freedom,” and we can restore our Constitutional Republic if we will become as irate, and tireless as was Samuel Adams. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
June 2022
Categories |
RSS Feed