Collectivist (Marxist, communist, socialist, progressive, Democrat, - all the same) Terry McAuliffe stated the other day, “I don’t think parents should be telling schools what they should teach.” This has been the long-held view of collectivists. We have been told by collectivists that in order to bring about their goal of transforming the United States to a Marxist totalitarian state, it is necessary that the views of the children can no longer be the views of the parents or the church, but they must be the views of the state.
Karl Marx said, “the education of all children from the time they can leave the care of their mother, must be in state institutions.” One of his ten planks in the Communist Manifesto is to have all children indoctrinated in public schools run by the state.
It has been the belief of collectivists that children belong to the state and are not the responsibility of the parent. The collectivist movement calls for the destruction of the core family unit.
Collectivist Melissa Harris-Perry put it this way, “We have never invested as much in public education as we should have because we’ve always had kind of a private notion of children. Your kid is yours and totally your responsibility,” Harris-Perry said. “We haven’t had a very collective notion of these are our children.”
“So part of it is, we have to break through our kind of private idea that kids belong to their parents, or kids belong to their families, and recognize that kids belong to whole communities. Once it’s everybody’s responsibility and not just the household’s, then we start making better investments.”
This is what McAuliffe told the parents of Virgina. He directly stated that in the transformed United States what is taught in the state-controlled schools is of no concern to the parents. The children belong to the state and the state will infuse whatever views it deems best into the minds of the state’s children. You made your communist view very clear, Terry McAuliffe. Soon we will learn if the people of Virgina want the transformation of the United States to a Marxist totalitarian state to be completed.
Comrade Obama recently supported that long held collectivist-communist view that a steeply graduated income tax (another of the 10 planks of Marx and Engels in the Communist Manifesto) is proper and good. He said, “tax the rich, including me, to fund Biden spending plan.” He went on to say, “I think anybody who pretends that it’s a hardship for billionaires to pay a little bit more in taxes so that a single mom gets childcare support or so that we can make sure that our communities aren’t inundated by wildfires and floods and that we’re doing something about climate change for the next generation – you know, that’s an argument that is unsustainable.”
This has been the standard line of the Comrades, even before Marx and Engels wrote the Communist Manifesto. They have always believed that property belongs to the collective and it is in the best interest of the community if the Comrades determine what is and what is not enough and how the excess should be shared with all.
Many people read what Obama said, and on the surface would say that it was reasonable. After all those billionaires have plenty. What history has taught us is that this is a totally flawed concept and can never, and subsequently never has been successful. The implementation of the “share the wealth” concept has always resulted in the masses living in poverty and a crime infested environment while the elite few live in isolation and opulence.
The collectivist formula denies the reality of human nature. The Bible tells us, and history has proven that incentive is a critical factor of human nature. The Bible tells us, and history has proven that to minimize or abolish incentive is always destructive to a society. “The Lord God took the man and put him in the garden of Eden to work it and keep it” (Genesis 2:15).
The collectivist-communist (Democrat) understands that for them to have power they must make people dependent on the state. This is the only purpose of welfare. The more capital of any kind that the state removes from the private sector, the slower the economy grows, the fewer jobs there are, the lower is the standard of living, and the higher the poverty rate climbs. This is the ideal scenario for the collectivist – communist (Democrat) because it creates a greater government dependent population which eventually gives total control to the government so the government can dictate to all how they are to live their lives and how they are to think; total control or communism has arrived.
The lower the tax rate goes; more property is left in the hands of the private sector. Innovation and investment grow. Businesses are built. Jobs are created. People become self-reliant. The less and less is the need for government assistance. The less power the government has. The more people make their own choices and live their own lives. Poverty and crime decrease. The American dream flourishes. The transformation to a Marxist totalitarian state is thwarted.
McAuliffe said that kids are the responsibility of the state and not the parent. This is communism. Obama said take from one to give to another. It builds a society dependent on government. This is communism. Obama said on October 30, 2008, “We are about to transform the United States of America.” The transformation is from an Individualist society to a collectivist society; the same type of society called for by Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Castro, and Chavez. Is that what you want? If so go along with McAuliffe and Obama. If not, resist with all your strength and energy, the transformation movement in the United States that is being advanced by the Democrat party.
Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.