The further we get into this charade of an impeachment hearing, the more proof we have that in fact the Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) and the “deep state” are in the middle of a coup attempt and not an impeachment inquiry.
An impeachment inquiry would be held when the sitting individual that is facing an impeachment committed treason, or a high crime or misdemeanor while in office. In the case of Donald Trump, he was threatened with impeachment before he was even a nominee of a political party for president. A coup is a coordinated attempt to overthrow the will of the people.
An impeachment is more like a trial because of the action of the individual. A coup is an event to replace a government or individual because of policy differences. An impeachment proceeding is outlined in our Constitution and because the Constitution guarantees due process to all citizens, the concept of due process or fairness has always been a part of any impeachment proceeding. A coup has no rules other than “the ends justify the means.”
The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) and “deep state” have voiced their concerns about the policies of Donald Trump from before he was even nominated to be a presidential nominee of a major political party. The Marxist/Progressives (Democrats) and “deep state” have now attempted to frame Donald Trump at least twice to camouflage their coup attempt so that many Americans would regard that coup attempt as an impeachment.
Having failed in their attempts to concoct a crime and frame Donald Trump, they now are resorting to trying to convince the American public that a differing of opinion on policy is in fact treason or a high crime or misdemeanor. Their current key witness, Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, when he wrote, “I realized that if Ukraine pursued an investigation into the Bidens and Burisma, it would likely be interpreted as a partisan play which would undoubtedly result in Ukraine losing the bipartisan support it has thus far maintained,”
“This would all undermine U.S. national security,” Vindman added. “Following the call, I again reported my concerns to NSC’s lead counsel.”
If those were legitimate concerns of Vindman, he should have reported them or voiced them to his superior. Differences of opinion are not only common but healthy. President Trump and John Bolton apparently had differences of opinion. John Bolton was asked to submit his resignation and he did. Vindman could have done the same.
Under any and all circumstances, to proceed with these impeachment proceedings, which are based on policy differences, is openly and clearly stating that in fact, “We, the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) Party and members of the “deep state,” are conducting a coup attempt to overthrow the will of the American people and subvert the United States Constitution.”
Any person who supports the above movement is what Saul Alinsky referred to as a “useful idiot” and is a participant in a coup attempt to overthrow the republic that is the United States of America.
Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.