It sounds so good, as do so many Marxist proposals. Many people would tell us that “from each according to their abilities to each according to their needs” is not only compassionate, but the Marxist atheist will throw in that it is also Christian. Nothing is further from the truth. It is neither compassionate nor is it Christian. To teach that government reliance, reliance on others is right and proper, is to teach victimhood. In Second Thessalonians 3:10 we are told, “For even when we were with you, we commanded you this: If anyone will not work, neither shall he eat.”
This is the way of the isms. They make claims that can be made to sound like they are good for all, but these claims are methods whereby they can and do gain the power the isms grave; that power of controlling the lives, choices, and thoughts of all.
The Marxist, or the isms, understand the necessity of destroying the family in order to gain control. Karl Marx explained that it is critical that public education become a part of all societies. At the time he made the claim, many children were home schooled. This is a threat to the isms. They were unable to indoctrinate the masses. Marx understood that if public education became a reality, the influence of the family would be greatly reduced. As the family influence was reduced, indoctrination could be attained along with the destruction of the core family unit.
This is the case in the United States. Most children attend public schools. The communists have total control of the teacher unions. Indoctrination is the main thrust of our public school system. The core family unit is under constant attack in virtually every classroom in the United States. Karl Marx told us that every child must be taught in a state institution from the time they can leave the care of their mother.
We are now witnessing the teacher unions demanding indoctrination, destruction of the family, and furthering atheism including demonic teachings. The National Education Association (NEA) recommended that teachers include the controversial book "Gender Queer" on their summer reading lists.
This was a review from a National Book Store, “Warning to parents: The rating says 15 years with no warning about the sexual graphic nature of the book. The book include sexually explicit images and links to in appropriate sites. There is also obscene sexually language. This book needs to have the rating changed to 18+.”
Reading other reviews, it would appear that this book is intended to groom children and to encourage all people to promote the queer and transsexual agendas despite the horrible results of the vast numbers who believed these lies.
Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.