RULE OF LAWRead Now
Rule of law is distinguished from arbitrary law because it is blind to social, political, or economic position. Under rule of law the eyes of lady justice are covered and does not see an individual but applies the law equally to all. Under arbitrary law, which is the law practiced by collectivists (Marxists, communists, socialists, progressives, and Democrats – all virtually the same) and other tyrants, the law is applied on what would be called an as needed basis. Under arbitrary law, not only is the end result predetermined because of the individual, but it is also predetermined based on whether the result will enhance or detract from the viewpoint of the collectivist.
Our founder’s determined that we would be an individualist nation or a nation that advances the freedoms and natural rights of the individual. An individualist nation or a nation free from the tyranny of government can only exist if the concept of rule of law is practiced. It was determined at the inception of our nation that we would not be a nation with a king, emperor, or czar but we would be a nation that had as our ruler the rule of law. History has proven that as the rule of law is disregarded and arbitrary law is employed, you have a society turning from a free nation (an individualist nation) to a nation ruled by tyranny (a collectivist nation).
Testimony of Lisa Page was released that openly declares arbitrary law was employed in the case of Hillary Clinton and her clearly illegal email practices. This is the explicit testimony of Lisa Page when questioned:
"We, in fact," Page explained, "and, in fact, the Director — because, on its face, it did seem like, well, maybe there's a potential here for this to be the charge.
"And we had multiple conversations, multiple conversations with the Justice Department about charging gross negligence," she added.
Page says that the Department of Justice ended the consideration of charges being brought up against Clinton.
"The Justice Department's assessment was that it was both constitutionally vague, so that they did not actually feel that they could permissibly bring that charge," she testified.
When asked to clarify if it appeared to be a command from the DOJ, Page responded, "That's correct."
Comrade Obama’s Department of Justice (I know that is an oxymoron) ordered that, despite the evidence that said Clinton had broken the law, no charge should be brought and no indictment should be sought because it was Hillary Clinton and because this evidence and other evidence could reveal facts that would damage the Obama regimes efforts to transform the Untied Stated from a free and independent nation to a Marxist Totalitarian State.
This revelation should have been the headline in every newspaper and the lead story of every news organization. It was barely covered and then only by more conservative outlets. What was suspected, that is that the Obama regime clearly disregarded the United States Constitution and the basic but critical principle so necessary for freedom, the principle of rule of law, and instead employed arbitrary law which is fundamental to tyranny, was directly stated by one of the minions in the Marxist/Progressive (Democrat) police force, the FBI.
If you support freedom and independence, this should be very disturbing to you and you should join with me and a few others to raise the whisper of concern to a clanging of insistence that all evidence and documentation revealing the anti-freedom practices of the Obama regime be made public. We must also insist that any and all responsible be tried and appropriate punishment be assigned if guilt is proven. This would include but would not be limited to Page, Strzok, McCabe, Comey, Orr, Mueller, Lynch, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, and Comrade Obama.
Leave a Reply.
Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.